User talk:Slindsell15

Slindsell15, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Slindsell15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

March 2018

Your edits at Love Island (2015 TV series) have been reverted. Honestly can't tell whether it's deliberately disruptive or whether you're just being naive. First of all that's NOT how you reference something, as you can clearly see - where are the other 36 references if you've numbered that 37? Secondly - and I really can't believe I'm saying this - but the Celebrity Juice episode you're referring to is a quite clearly an old episode. ITV2 are currently airing Series 15 again, and last week's episode was originally aired on 31 March 2016, where yes Caroline would have said Love Island was returning in May because it in fact did return in May 2016 for the SECOND series. ThisIsDanny (talk) 07:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hi ThisIsDanny, After recently reading your comments on my edit I can explain this for you. I am pretty new to Wikipedia and have not been using it that long. I was watching ITV2's Celebrity Juice and I could see Caroline Flack was on there. Most programs on TV now are assumed to be live unless it is very clear that it isn't. In this case it was not clear. When Caroline said 'it's back in May' you can see why I made the edit I did. Love Island has aired before in May so thought it must be true. In regards to referencing I can say that because It was not in righting I didn't know how to reference this. Thank You

Ibiza Weekender

You removed some of the viewing figures for Series 7 stating that they were not taken from BARB. Perhaps you have made a mistake with your searching, however, the first episode of the series gained 802,000 viewers, including ITV2 and ITV2 +1. The figures were taken from BARB, so I'm going to remove your new figures as they do not correspond with the figures displayed on BARB's website. BigBrotherUKFan (talk) 21:56, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, we can settle with the 28 day ratings. BigBrotherUKFan (talk) 23:34, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Celebrity Big Brother 22 (UK), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning: next time you a. revert without any kind of explanation and b. to insert unverified information, I will block you. Drmies (talk) 01:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, you left a comment here below. Next time, try leaving it as a response, pinging the editor you are trying to talk to. Also, no, the production company is not a reliable source for this kind of information. I don't know why you would think it would be; foxes aren't allowed to guard the hen house. Drmies (talk) 01:07, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

cbb 22 2018

Endemol is reliable as they are the production company.

August 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 Revert Rule broken

Your recent editing history at Celebrity Big Brother (UK TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Today alone three different users have each made edits on that page, some including reliable sources, yet you've reverted them all - breaking the 3 revert rule. ThisIsDanny (talk) 23:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Celebs Go Dating (series 5)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Celebs Go Dating (series 5), Slindsell15!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please recreate this when it has reliable sources and is finished. You can work on it in draftspace or your sandbox.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:45, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Slindsell15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Your recent editing history at Doctor Who (series 11) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. regentspark (comment) 16:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The Voice UK (Series8)

Hello, Slindsell15,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Voice UK (Series8) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Voice UK (Series8) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:44, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ibiza Weekender Table

Hey, I fixed the season 8 table on Ibiza Weekender! Hope it’s what you meant. If you need anything else, don’t hesitate to ask. Joesimnett (talk) 13:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks

Signing off

Just an extra tip: if you’re ever unsure how to sign off on a talk post, just insert 4 ~ symbols at the end of your comment.

– Joesimnett (talk) 15:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing on Ice Series 11

Can you sort out the whole page please, someone’s been hacking the page! Annamargarita0 (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bristol Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. For the second time, you are quoting a out of date reference for British Airways at BRS. Please either stop, or supply a valid reference. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 14:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Love Island Australia (series 2) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Love Island Australia (series 2), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 94rain ^Talk 02:49, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Celebrity Gogglebox (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Celebrity Gogglebox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Celebrity Gogglebox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 13:57, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gogglebox

I have Done the Gogglebox table. – DarkGlow (talk) 16:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I Just like to see wiki pages nice and tidy and I didn't know how to make one of those tables.--Slindsell15 (talk) 16:13, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I totally get it, I love to see a neat article. Come to me any time you need anything like that doing. Didn't I once do Ex on the Beach tables for you? – DarkGlow (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I've never edited Ex on the Beach before so must have been someone else. I will be sure to contact you In future when it comes to tables. --Slindsell15 (talk) 16:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just remembered – it was Ibiza Weekender! – DarkGlow (talk) 23:54, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you know how to change the episode number on Gogglebox from TBA to 15 as there will be 15 episodes in series 14?--Slindsell15 (talk) 12:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Love Island Australia (series 2) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Love Island Australia (series 2), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Celebrity Gogglebox concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Celebrity Gogglebox, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Love Island Australia (series 2)

Hello, Slindsell15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Love Island Australia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Celebrity Gogglebox

Hello, Slindsell15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Celebrity Gogglebox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]