User talk:Skizzik

Hello, Skizzik. You have new messages at Zodiac's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{umbox}} template.

Welcome

Welcome! Hello, Skizzik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Garion96 (talk) 22:11, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks, from freezing - but probably not as freezing as Sweden - western Scotland! Nach0king 00:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Photo Matching Service

Hi there,

I'm contacting you because you listed yourself at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Photographers. You might be interested in a new wikiproject page that lists photographers and articles that need photos by location. The page is located at Wikipedia:Photo Matching Service or WP:PMS GabrielF 00:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Vandalism

Vandal tags

Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia!

Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as {{subst:test}}, {{subst:test2}}, {{subst:test3}}, {{subst:test4}}). Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism. Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked. If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the {{subst:test4}} tag, request administrator assistance at Request for Intervention. Again, thank you for helping to make Wikipedia better. StoptheDatabaseState 21:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

E number

Thanks for repairing the article, I found it broken but you replaced it even before I could get the last version back from the history. Ace Frahm 19:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

Hi there. I saw that you had warned 206.130.208.126 about vandalism. I just had to revert more gibberish from this IP address, but I'm not an administrator, so I can't do anything more. I just thought I'd bring it to your attention! -- JediLofty ^{User | Talk} 16:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of Apollo 11

Thanks for catching the additional vandalism that I missed on Apollo 11. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 18:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Coordinates

It is very good that you are following up my separation of towns from the municipalities and that you give the actual localities their coordinates. I don't know how to do that. Thanks! --Muniswede 14:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry about that, I have removed the category from all 10 books. --Law Lord 18:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas White

Why did you remove my extremely witty comment from domain of lighting's page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.223.81.88 (talk) 09:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC) :Thank you for reverting the above user. Keep up the good work! 81.149.250.228 09:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Will Whitehorn

A tag has been placed on Will Whitehorn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Is this thing working? (talk) 22:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Inducks character

Template:Inducks character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 22:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reinhold Messner

Would you mind reviewing this edit of Reinhold Messner? It seems spammy to me, but since I just rolled back a lot of user:Natekarle's work, a second set of eyes would be good. —EncMstr 01:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP addresses

I'm sure you are aware that issuing warnings to IP addresses (like you have done to mine) is pointless. The IP belongs to Comcast, and therefore issuing a warning to this IP can be seen by several others besides the person(s) who made the (vandalism) edit. If you are going to issue warnings, please do so in accordance with the proper procedure so that it does not happen again (bothering non-vandal wiki users)98.193.121.227 (talk) 01:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC) I agree. You are neither a moderator nor a user who understands policy. Please refrain from harassing individuals with warnings if you are not familiar with how to issue them71.239.147.154 (talk) 18:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Strauss article

Thanks, someone clearly doesn't like having a critical review there. I suspect yet another IP will be back to delete it.--Doug Weller (talk) 15:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rutvik

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rutvik, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Kallax. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bergnäset

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bergnäset, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Kallax. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ulleråker Hundred, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Gabriel Kielland (talk) 20:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anundsjö

Do you mind if we keep Anundsjö as its own article, since it links to the Swedish version that page and a french version from that page and contains photos of the church. Category:Diocese of Härnösand is intended to have articles on all the parishes in this diocese, just like the articles on USA parishes and diocese. See Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Newark for example. I am not an expert on Sweden, like you are. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 16:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbai casualty toll

Hey man you totally messed up my updates on the number of killed. Please, watch it.89.216.236.45 (talk) 12:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsdal

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lindsdal, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Läckeby. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hundreds

Hello, as I was going through assessments for WPSweden, I noticed several "Hundreds" being tagged despite being redirects. It seems that several months ago (Sep 2008), you were changing all these articles into redirects to List of hundreds of Sweden. At the same time, you essentially erased a lot of information (primarily abou location), which I find a worrying approach to writing an encyclopedia. Combining stubs into an article is something different than just erasing! I have made a general comment here. Regards, Tomas e (talk) 15:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Fridegård article

Hi, regarding this edit - I was wondering - why is the title of the article different than the name, and do you know where I could source an explanation? Thanks --JaGa^talk 22:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to 2009 satellite collision‎. Thank you. --Ericdn (talk) 11:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your recent edit revisions

Dates of birth and death etc should be linked. See wp:persondata. I'd noticed your edit history, and it seems that you're on a crusade against convention here. --Hapsala (talk) 12:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Hapsala (talk) 13:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring: warning

If you're going to go around reverting to delink dates [1], you are obliged to discuss it on the article talk page, or risk being blocked William M. Connolley (talk) 22:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting that attack on my talk page

I've been editing Wikipedia for a long time, and have got involved in a LOT of nasty arguments, but that article is the only one people attack me personally over. I have no idea what the deal is, but thanks for stopping it. Serendi ^pod ous 11:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This was I suppose User:GabrielVelasquez. Ruslik (talk) 15:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish towns and villages

hi I'm glad you are devleoping Sweden. One thing though is there any reaosn why you are naming the categories Localities in .. County. The convention on here is to use Category:Cities, towns and villages. WOuld you have any objection if we renamed the categories Cities, towns and villages in .... County. You see I'm trying to order world cities town and villages from top down by country and the more consistent we can make it the better. Other countries are named this way by province/district etc. Could we rename the categories? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 18:43, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK Great. By remaing it can include any settlement within the given country, just makes the ordering more consistent by country and province/county. I'll request the cat change using AWB. Keep up the good work. This is the sort of work I do on here myself but mostly municipal level areas in developing world countries. My main aim is to have every country covered with municipal/third level units covered by country. so your contributions help. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 18:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OK I've created Category:Cities, towns and villages in Blekinge County . A lot of existing articles are not categorised correctly too so this also makes the move towards more consistency. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats great. We will also need to empty Category:Villages in Sweden and organize by county into our new categories but that can come later. It merges and ties up a lot and makes it completely organised. Regards. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent consistency is what we need on here and your infobox maps, nav templates and order will make it come on leaps and bounds. So by renaming it merges two stray categories into one! Best of luck with Sweden Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One thing though. It is custom in the infobox to list higher order first. So it should be:

Country
Province
County
Municipality

The smallest denomination e.g municpality should came last. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 20:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it will have to be changed. Don't worry about what you've done so far, if you can change the order from those you create from now on we'll have the others sorted another time. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 20:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah you have the data in order like that to read. I see. OK continue as you are, we will need a bot to sort it afterwards. Once you've done the urban areas I would recommend branching the municipality templates out to include rural villages (providing they have more than 50 people!) and any notable landmarks and topics too, so eventually we have a sound coverage of each area. It will take time but definately something to consider but at present you've got your work cut out with the urban areas.You certainly don't have to worry about notability as some people moan about as the people who matter on here consider these places important. Best Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 20:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Horndal and other Swedish localities

Why is the subject matter important? I am not saying that it isn't, but maybe just adding a little more context will make it clear. Btw I decided against littering the talk page and decided just to make the point here instead, because I am sure you know why it is important, but just havn't made it clear yet. Wikiphile1603 (talk) 18:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, this goes for many similar articles that you have created today too. Wikiphile1603 (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you are right: Wikipedia:Inherent notability. It is not official policy (it's an essay) but seems standard practice. I guess they would have to not be tiny, but 1000+ people I am guessing would be enough. You learn something new on Wikipedia every day! I reverted the tag. Wikiphile1603 (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't know if these smaller ones should be inherently notable or not, but I am not involved in this area so wouldn't dispute borderline issues anyway. Also, existance in other languages is a good sign anyway I guess. Wikiphile1603 (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even villages are notable.

Aucasaurus problem / fix

Thanks for your fix of the problem with Aucasaurus. What was causing that? (So that next time I can fix it myself.) -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 22:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish towns

		The Geography Barnstar
		Skizzik, I award you this barnstar for all the Swedish town articles you've been creating lately! Rosiestep (talk) 22:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well deserved. I don't know if this will complicate things for you but I've created a new pushpin map for Skane County showing municipal and county location. See Arild. However given that wikipedia s a global website I think it is essential we keep the main Sweden national locator map. Having two map one for county location and one for national is a good I think. All you have to do is add the extra pushpinmap like I've done with Arild. I'll make some more county pushpin maps now, as long as you don't replace the main Sweden maps though! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can keep a track at Category:Sweden location map templates. I've made Kalmar as well. I tried to do Stockholm yesterday but an error somehow occurred. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:55, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK I've made pin maps for every county. it would be best to have the county map on top I think. We don't want the infoboxes to get any longer now but we can't help it with long countries like Sweden. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should be able to use any county map now see Ekeby, Södertälje Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I thought Halland was a historical province. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:33, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. There shouldn't be any reason why you can't add them to your infoboxes as it doesn't infere with your statistics. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If the county map was a little too big like it was with Ekeby-Almby you can adjust the size of the map to smaller if necessary by adding pushpin_mapsize=200 etc. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see. OK we'll see if somebody can add them using AWB afterwards. I've already asked ALbert to project tag your articles. Maybe he can add the maps using awb at a later date. I'll leave you to it now, I have a lot of work with Turkish towns to tackle now. Regards. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're creating new articles now with the wrong categories. OK its one one or two. Sorted.. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 13:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maps in articles on localities

Regarding Romakloster and its maps:

Despite the already overwhelming hugeness of the Sweden map in the articles on Swedish places, the "pinhead" becomes large enough to cover the area of a metropolitan city, even when a place has barely over 200 inhabitants all living on less than a km². Together with the room it takes, I think this makes the country map less useful. People can click through to Gotland/Gotland County and Sweden if they want more information.

The best solution would be pushpin maps of the county/län, with a small insert of the map of Sweden in a corner, but I don't know how to draw maps. To do this rationally, one probably needs a good GIS program that can generate them automatically from a database. --Hegvald (talk) 07:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see. I'm going to ask the German user who made these maps if he can make a modified version. --Hegvald (talk) 09:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jäderfors

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jäderfors, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Hammarby. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnet och Skälsmara

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lugnet och Skälsmara, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Djurö. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skeppsdalsström

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Skeppsdalsström, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Djurö. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Håbo-Tibble kyrkby

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Håbo-Tibble kyrkby, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Brunna. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CorenSearchBot

If you ask Coren, I'm sure he'd whitelist you from getting all these warning on your talk page - which you're allowed to remove by the way. Anyhow, keep up all the good work. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 12:21, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Modified Gotland map

I asked User:Erik Frohne about this, and he modified his original Gotland map and uploaded it under a different title. I haven't figured out how to get the template to use it, though, or even how to make a modified template for this. I also uploaded a version with a different name on Commons just to test, but it does not appear to work. --Hegvald (talk) 12:23, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) about the new template, as I can't get it to work for some reason. I modified the image in Inkscape to make the inserted map of Sweden somewhat larger. I also coloured Gotland red, which stands out more against the rest of the map. I'm not sure this will work equally well with all the other maps without changing the actual proportions of the "base map" to include some "coverable" territory from adjacent counties, but I see no reason why that couldn't be done. All one would need to do, presumably, would be to change the coordinates to fit the new map. --Hegvald (talk) 06:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the technical quirks appear to have been ironed out, although I'm not sure why things started working after my first failed trials (could be something in the complex nesting of templates within templates within templates that seem to be going on with these things).

Gotland is done. The easiness with which the rest of the counties can be handled will now depend on the shape of each county... --Hegvald (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Default spacing in and around headings

I notice that you are reformatting the spacing around headings. If you will make a test edit for a new section on your talk page, you will discover what Wikipedia's default settings are for such headings. There is spacing between the heading text and the equals signs, and between the heading and the first line of text. This makes it easier to find headings when editing. Please don't change the defaults. I'm sure there is something more significant to do here than make such edits which make it more difficult to edit articles. I suspect this might apply especially to editors whose eyesight may not be what it once was. -- Brangifer (talk) 14:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ty

Thank you for creating Ytterhogdal. Keep up the fine work, Kingturtle (talk) 14:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kosterhavet

Shouldn't the article be moved to Kosterhavet National Park? TheLeft orium 13:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Blå Jungfrun doesn't have that name because the article isn't just about the national park, it is about the island as well. TheLeft orium 14:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Söderåsen National Park borde fortfarande heta Söderåsen National Park eftersom den till största delen handlar om nationalparken, men Gotska Sandön National Park borde flyttas till Gotska Sandön (vilket jag precis gjorde). :) Jag ska kolla igenom de andra också. TheLeft orium 14:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resten verkar stämma, förutom Tiveden National Park som jag flyttade till Tiveden eftersom artikeln handlar om skogen. TheLeft orium 14:55, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Last of the Clan McDuck.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:The Last of the Clan McDuck.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:King of the Klondike.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:King of the Klondike.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blank lines in bulleted lists

Howdy. Just a quick note/pointer towards my reversion at Great libraries of the ancient world. Explanation in editsummary. Hope that helps :) -- Quiddity (talk) 17:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Martin Beck. Thank you. Law Lord (talk) 21:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish municipalities

Hi. How is your work going on these? Have you finished starting them all? Himalayan 16:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of billionaires

I have a genuine concern that repeating Forbes research is a copyvio, especially given that they explain that even linking to their subpages they consider an infringement of their rights. I am raising these concerns on Wikipedia:Copyright problems so they can be investigated by someone who knows more about these matters than I do. SilkTork *^YES! 09:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I added a note to Talk:List of billionaires if you were interested. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 15:33, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

svsrc

I have deleted your user page and your user talk at Swedish Wikisource as you wished! -- Lavallen (talk) 07:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced Swedish BLPs - good work!

Just stopped by to say that I've noticed that you have been referencing quite a number of articles in Wikipedia:WikiProject Sweden/Unreferenced BLPs. Good work - the remaining number of them is really decreasing! Tomas e (talk) 14:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 21:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Tack för att du lägger till infoboxar på mina artiklar. Jag är för lat för att göra det själv. :P Theleftorium ^(talk) 21:31, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tack! Jag kommer definitivt att fortsätta skriva artiklar. Det är en skön avkoppling när jag blir trött på admin-arbete. :) Theleftorium ^(talk) 18:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Populated places in Karlskrona Municipality

Hi . I noticed your name a lot in Swedish place articles. I have start stubs on villages from sv wikipedia. PLease add new articles to nav box on "Localities in Karlskrona" or rename it "Settlements in Karlskrona" and change category of the ones alreayd started form Blekinge County to Karlskrona Municipality. If you have interest I need help to create starter stubs. I have need your help to add red links of villages from sv wikipedia into the locality templates by municpality so ii can start them. Also the parishes need start. See example on sv wiki for layout. I think nav box must contain "Localities", "Parishes" and towns and villages. Starzynka (talk) 13:04, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sanning eller konsekvens.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sanning eller konsekvens.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Södertuna Castle

The article Södertuna Castle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I do not believe that the subject of this article is notable. It has been tagged with a notability template since July 2009. Since then, in my opinion, nothing has been done to establish that the subject is notable. I did check Google scholar, and only three hits showed up. Nothing showed up in Google News, and the plain Google hits did not seem promising.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rockfang (talk) 20:20, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Skizzik. You have new messages at OlYeller21's talk page.
Message added 18:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thanks

Thanks so much for filling out all my citations properly. Gregcaletta (talk) 09:51, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Lulebo"

A page you created, Lulebo, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Pol430 talk to me 01:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tunavallen

Apologies for my error. I now realise that Tunavallen is the name of a football ground that may appear in more than one town.

Finnish Gas (Finnish Gas 11:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Skizzik. You have new messages at Pol430's talk page.
Message added 11:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Skizzik! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For reverting vandalism/nonsense edits quickly, you deserve this Reliable Forever ^talk 18:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism help

I appreciate your help in reverting vandalism. Have you looked at Twinkle yet? It would probably make things a lot easier for you. Calabe 1992 19:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi Skizzik,

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is because after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly: for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Acalamari 14:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome!

User:Skizzik has been awarded an Awesomebox because he/she always reverts vandalism.

ULTRASTAR123|KABOOM! 18:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of urban areas in Sweden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Drag, Kurland, Mora Municipality, Ätran, Avan and Böle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts

Hej Skizzik. First & foremost thanks for your contributions. "Tack tack". Then some thoughts to share:

You do a great job reverting vandalism, but I haven't noticed you wp:warning the editors concerned. Tools like Twinkle make this easy, and of course the earlier a vandal gets warned, the quicker they get blocked, the less havoc they cause & the less work needs doing to undo their bad work. If each vandalising edit gets a warning, then the vandal will be blocked after 4 edits, but if we all just revert, there's nothing to prevent the vandal continuing unpunished for some time. This means you & I and all of us would have many reverts to do, before action were taken.
I notice you supply edit summaries. Very good - except that you always seem to put (update). That's all very well, but doesn't give any clue as to the nature of the update. There is a list of abbreviations, which you could use to be more helpful in ES's - for an explanation of some commonly used abbreviations, see this edit summary legend.
Your talk page is getting quite long, so it's harder for people to find a section they've added. Had you thought about wp:archiving some of it? I could tell you how if you want.

Anyway, good luck with the Sweden edits. Regards, Trafford09 (talk) 21:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Rusksele, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lappland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Nice work removing vandalism on Charles I. I have to admit though, the vandalism was pretty lame. (as vandalism goes haha). OKelly (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. M D Potter. Any comments? 19:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

A smile for you

You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.0.48 (talk) 13:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you

Give me to say apple that she is crazy with 4S

I touched a dog innapropriately

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.0.128.206 (talk) 10:14, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts without warnings

Hi Skizzik, I notice you're doing some serious vandalism fighting, but you never issue warnings on the vandals' talk pages. Have you ever considered using wp:Huggle? It allows you to automatically revert and warn and even report with one single button. Very handy and efficient tool. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 18:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you seem not interested and you have have left this message unresponded for almost two weeks, I have removed your talk page from my watchlist. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 14:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in article 'A26 submarine'

Hi. The article 'A26 submarine' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://blt.se/jobbet_o_pengarna/kockums-kan-fa-bygga-svensknorska-ubatar%28998264%29.gm

You added this in September 2010.
The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots|deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 02:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages

Dear Author/Skizzik

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at the University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Staphylococcal infections. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article and or other health-related articles. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please reply via my talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 19:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to History of computing: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thanks, and keep up the good anti-vandalism work! Amp71 (talk) 18:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Listed buildings in Dalarna County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mora Municipality

Listed buildings in Västmanland County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sala Municipality

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 phenomenon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish localities

Hi, I was wondering if you could provide me the most comprehensive up to date source for population data of Swedish villages?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:56, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks for that. Hope you are well.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I started with Template:Localities in Botkyrka Municipality. The 2010 data isn't actually as comprehensive as the 2005 source. most of the entries were missing I looked for. Anyway, I have a feeling that some of the settlements I added into this to increase comprehensive coverage are not officially "localities". I'm basically looking to cover both localities and settlements by municipality. Maybe rename to Settlements in ...?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll use those terms from now on then. Not sure how far I'll get as its a staggering amount to get through!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 10:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warnings

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Opera: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 07:35, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Swedish Barnstar of National Merit
		Thank you for creating the article on Haverdal.
		_{this WikiAward was given to Skizzik by Miningpyropony (talk) on 07:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)}[reply]

An award for you!

	Swedish National Barnstar of Merit
	Please accept this as a sign of gratitude for your excellent and important work on the Lists of Listed Buildings in Sweden and all of the work you've done in the past on settlements. Keep up the great work and may we have good articles on each of the listed buildings eventually! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:45, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Got there before me

Just as I was about to do it, edit conflict detected. Well done Luxure (talk) 10:32, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to History of Ethiopia: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Peter Sam Fan 15:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Skizzik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Skizzik. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AkuAnkka1951.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AkuAnkka1951.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Skizzik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Swedavia logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Swedavia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beck 19 - Gamen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beck 19 - Gamen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beck 21 - Den japanska shungamålningen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beck 21 - Den japanska shungamålningen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beck 22 - Den svaga länken.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beck 22 - Den svaga länken.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beck 23 - Det tysta skriket.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beck 23 - Det tysta skriket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beck 24 - I Guds namn.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beck 24 - I Guds namn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beck 18 - Flickan i jordkällaren.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beck 18 - Flickan i jordkällaren.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beck 20 - Advokaten.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beck 20 - Advokaten.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Localities in Grästorp Municipality

Template:Localities in Grästorp Municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Localities in Dals-Ed Municipality

Template:Localities in Dals-Ed Municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Localities in Oxelösund Municipality

Template:Localities in Oxelösund Municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Localities in Sundbyberg Municipality

Template:Localities in Sundbyberg Municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Localities in Fagersta Municipality

Template:Localities in Fagersta Municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Localities in Norberg Municipality

Template:Localities in Norberg Municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Localities in Stockholm Municipality

Template:Localities in Stockholm Municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of Template:Localities in Bjurholm Municipality at templates for discussion

Template:Localities in Bjurholm Municipality has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of Template:Localities in Dorotea Municipality at templates for discussion

Template:Localities in Dorotea Municipality has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of Template:Localities in Malå Municipality at templates for discussion

Template:Localities in Malå Municipality has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of Template:Localities in Sorsele Municipality at templates for discussion

Template:Localities in Sorsele Municipality has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of Template:Localities in Vilhelmina Municipality at templates for discussion

Template:Localities in Vilhelmina Municipality has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of Template:Localities in Arjeplog Municipality at templates for discussion

Template:Localities in Arjeplog Municipality has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sweden Solar System

Template:Sweden Solar System has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kopparberg and Aspeboda Court District

The article Kopparberg and Aspeboda Court District has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redircet is wrong. (Nya) Kopparberg is nowhere near Aspeboda. Read the article redirected to. The meaning is Stora Kopparberg and Aspeboda court district, but there are no suitable articles to redirect to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Creuzbourg (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Infobox comic

Template:Infobox comic has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox comic book title. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. MClay1 (talk) 13:10, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]