User talk:Skippo10

A tag has been placed on Stewart Jones, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company or website, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Stewart Jones is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Stewart Jones. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. -- Malpertuis 19:18, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Will stannage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Will stannage.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Paul hathaway.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Paul hathaway.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Adding flags

I'm not sure about this new thing with flags in infoboxes. Although the flags just denote the birthplace, it does tend to stick out and appear as a claim of nationality. WP footballer articles already see a large amount of nationalism-related vandalism - nationalities being changed by partisans of one side or another - so I'm not sure about this. Bill Oaf 00:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Neill

Just so you know, Lucas Neill hasn't completed his move to West Ham United yet. Please wait till it is confirmed he is. -- Mattythewhite 19:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you ever get tired of being wrong? Stew jones 21:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know this was a long time ago, but excuse me? Mattythewhite 15:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More on adding flags to infoboxes

Hi, I've reverted the edits you made to Mark Cooper as the flags by the clubs put's the box totally out of sync (on explorer anyway). Can I suggest that you don't add these flags? WikiGull 12:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well does it really matter what you suggest your going to go ahead and remove them anyway so who gives a fuck what i think me old sausageStew jones 21:10, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't really think there was any need for that. Fair enough if you didn't know that it was screwing up the infoboxes, I thought I'd point it out and corrected them for you. No need to get all insulting about it. WikiGull 13:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. You may share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.

Etienne Barbara

I will not discuss if the article was fairly or not under deletion, I will assume that you have the right that it is notable article. However your action to remove it from deletion was considered vandalism. The note was writing Please improve the article if possible, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the guide to deletion. So you should have respect as rules and since you are not an administrator and 5 days deadline didn't pass, your action was considered vandalism and I have already said that to administrator. KRBN 13:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove AFD notices

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Etienne Barbara. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — ERcheck (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing the afd discussion, it is likely that this article will be kept. However, the discussion has not yet been officially closed. Please do not delete the afd notice until that time; also, do not add the deletion closed notice to the talk page until that time. As a matter of process, I restored that afd tag; and since I was approached by the nominator concerning the process, I'm recusing myself from speedy closing the nomination. — ERcheck (talk) 11:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Regarding notability of Football (soccer) players

Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous Afd debates on the subject I invite you to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 20:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Lawrence (footballer)

May be deleted. `'юзырь:mikka 05:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What a joke, this player has played league football all his career and some clown has now deleted it off, what kind of rules has this been deleted under then? "May be deleted" seems a bit of a poor excuse to me personally, fancy giving me some information as to why this has been deleted then guys? Stew jones 17:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you click the redlink, you should be able to view the deletion log, which shows the admin who deleted the page and the deletion summary, in this case "A7"--which is explained at WP:CSD#A7. Hope that helps. NickelShoe (Talk) 00:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor Templeman

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Trevor Templeman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 00:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted

The article in question was deleted by consensus and recreated by you, breaking WP:CSD#G4. The content of the article is not in question, but the policy involved is. ck lostsword•T•C 01:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:JamiePace.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:JamiePace.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Anthony Robinson (footballer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

non-notable, has never made the requisite appearances in the Football League under notability guidelines for football players

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ref ^(chew)(do) 23:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons format

Please could you stop changing the correct format of football seasons to the incorrect format. The standard for English football articles is to include the endash (as per WP:DASH), and to link it to the article for that season (e.g. 2007–08). Cheers. --Jameboy 21:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. robwingfield ^«T•C» 20:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ludovic Quistin

Whoever deleted him before was wrong to do so, but hiding him won't help - the thing to do is be vigilant; if a speedy tag is added, contested it, if he is prodded, remove it, and if it goes to AfD, WP:FOOTY should see him survive. If he does get deleted, WP:DRV can get him back. ArtVandelay13 21:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok cheers if I do see anyone put a deletion tag on this I will let you know so we can contest it Stew jones 21:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having looked into it, I see he was deleted a few months ago, before he was an international, and at that time he won't have passed WP:BIO. Now he does, so there should be no danger of him being deleted. ArtVandelay13 21:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well in all honesty, we did make his profile before he was an international and fair enough it was deleted fairly quickly, but after he did get his call up and his first cap we made him again, but again he was deleted, but like you say we will need to see what happens and wait to see if anyone does fancy disagreeing again Stew jones 21:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding flags back into the infobox for this article. It's bad practise to do so as the images distort the infobox for many users. See WP:FLAGCRUFT. If you check Template talk:Infobox Football biography#Flags you'll see that there is no consensus for the introduction of flags to this infobox, so discuss there first before continuing. robwingfield ^«T•C» 21:39, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick question, who are you? Me and my collague made this article, took time getting all the information etc and have done it the same as every other profile we have made and I believe that you have no place to come here giving me the 3rd degree on how to make these articles, many have flags included and the no free image picture, so leave the article to me and my collague Stew jones 17:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Ludovic Quistin. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. robwingfield ^«T•C» 22:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oi what right have you got to delete a perfectly good article??? this is a disgrace!!! Stew jones 23:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've not deleted anything. I don't have that ability. robwingfield ^«T•C» 11:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added this article to Deletion Review: Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_October_2#Ludovic_Quistin. You might want to add your thoughts. ArtVandelay13 15:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop altering the formatting of this article away from the Manual of Style. If you disagree with the MoS, then discuss there, but unilaterally changing articles is not the way to go about it. robwingfield ^«T•C» 23:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry I will continue to undo your useless changes, I have looked at the Manual of Style, and then I have looked at many other articles of footballers profiles and I will continue to make them as this one has made. Stew jones 23:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Belford

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Cameron Belford, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. robwingfield ^«T•C» 01:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Cameron Belford

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cameron Belford, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Belford. Thank you. robwingfield ^«T•C» 23:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ludovic Quistin. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. robwingfield ^«T•C» 18:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 6 hours

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 21:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Lawrence (footballer)

You may care to note that I have re-created the article that you originally created and was for some obscure reason speedily deleted. At present the article is at User:Daemonic Kangaroo:George Lawrence (footballer) but I will re-name it when I have filled in his biography. Happy editing. --Daemonic Kangaroo 06:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attitude

You need to work on your attitude, pal. Your smug, snide remarks will earn you no favours around here. - PeeJay 23:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Listen son I don't have any problem with my attitude, but I lose my cool when people turn up changing my work and deleting perfectly good articles that I have taken the time to put together Stew jones 11:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please to not threaten Dancarney, or any user, about what articles they can and can not edit. Mattythewhite 13:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add them back if you want. My revert was mostly due to the removal of the 'as of..' and reference. Mattythewhite 13:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not threatening anyone but why when I do something does everyone turn up and start taking things off that I have done, I really can't understand it Stew jones 13:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well in all honesty I don't see what problem they pose, thats why it winds me up Stew jones 13:14, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question totally off the subject, there is an article on Bury goalkeeper Cameron Belford who to date hasn't played a league game, but plays for a league team, they also have another player called Ben Leonard who is in exactly the same situation, but his article was deleted, how can we get it to be reinstated? Stew jones 13:17, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really, Belford should be deleted as he hasn't played a game in a professional league, going by WP:BIO. Mattythewhite 13:24, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but the talk went on for ages and then it was decided that the article should remain, which if this is the case so should Ben Leonard. Stew jones 13:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style

Please do not use styles that are unusual in articles, as you did to Ludovic Quistin. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. robwingfield ^«T•C» 21:19, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Breath a sigh of Relief

You'll be glad to hear Mattythewhite has finally finished ripping up your hard work, and has now moved on to ripping up my hard work and trying to delete my articles on the Hinckley United page. Honestly, I swear some of the people that appoint themselves Wikiheroes have never been out of a Premiership ground. It's like talking to a Little Britain character and every reply is Wiki says No! Can you believe he's even trying to rip up the Matt Gadsby section of the article? I know it's not really your problem, but I thought I'd just rant to someone who knows what it feels like to be patronised by the Wikielect and their decisions over what is and isn't allowed on a website created and designed to provide never ending resource of information. Apparently it does have an end, it is ended by the word notability... Rant over DJhinckley (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with you, I have noticed how much hard work you have spent updating the Hinckley United page, it really pisses me off too, I swear some of these people really have nothing better to do. Stew jones (talk) 20:41, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I don't do hard work here two? Four GA's, one FA and four FL's, and you have the nerve to say I don't "have anything better to do"? Good grief. Thank god I don't do all of this work for you people. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Put it like this, you do the same as everyone else you add valuable information but I really can't understand the concept of you prowling wikipedia and looking for work to delete off, if anything I would believe that the more information the better, surely. Stew jones (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit of a bitch, isn't it, articles being deleted and stuff. Quite a depressing side of Wikipedia really. There needs to be a cut-off point somewhere with footballers, and it's horrible really where it is and the reasoning behind it. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I really think that players who score important goals in FA Cup ties that knock out or draw with League teams deserve a mention Neil Cartwright, Kyle Storer who scored the winning goal for Tamworth against Bournemouth and scored in a live 3rd round FA Cup tie against Norwich City which was live on BBC 1 and Matt Tubbs at Salisbury City scored in both ties against Nottingham Forest and that was also seen live across the country on BBC, but then they say these players ain't notable? Stew jones (talk) 21:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, you shouldn't really think of people as "they". We're all in this together, as a whole project, even though at times everyone gets that feeling they're on their own. Anyway, you should probably have a look at this, where new criteria is being proposed. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

I have reverted your comment to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maltese Third Division. As the text clearly states, please do not add comment once the discussion has been archived. Also, try to be civil please. Any problems, just ask. Thanks. Woodym555 (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MqabbaFC.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MqabbaFC.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what you mean with this as I don't understand what I have to do Stew jones (talk) 19:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the bits the unthinking robot wants. You don't really expect them to explain to you what they want? They'll just delete it until you guess the right format! ;) Anyway, what I've added is what they're after. DJhinckley (talk) 00:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to Nick Wright (footballer born 1987), makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. robwingfield ^«T•C» 07:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Cameron Belford

I have nominated Cameron Belford, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Belford (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. robwingfield ^«T•C» 17:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Malta.png

Thank you for uploading Image:Malta.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Image:Said, Brian.jpg

I've reverted your edits on this picture, since removing the whole tag (as explained on the tag itself) is not the correct way to deal with it, but merely an action which is against our policy. If you think the picture can be accepted as fair use please explain us why. Keep in mind non-free pictures of living people fail the first non-free content criteria (as a free equivalent can be reasonably found). Thank you. --Angelo (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bolehall swifts.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bolehall swifts.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==

What the fuck do you think you know about Maltese football.You know nothing.So please stop fuckin changing the Template:Maltese First Division.In our country if a team is called Red Devils United,we just find them as Red Devils.The United must not be included.So Pieta Hotspurs F.C. must be written as Pieta.Hope that you fuckin learn.If you keep on persisting to edit that template I will report you.

Your revert on Tamworth F.C.

As it states in the manual of style, textual information should be entered as text rather than as an image, for reasons of accessibility and clarity. In this case, text portrays the same information in a more than adequate manner. Oldelpaso (talk) 21:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Qormi FC.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Qormi FC.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For snapping all those "football stars in cars", particularly for Ronnie Wallwork, an article I've done a lot of work on and really wanted an image for. Jameboy (talk) 22:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem, glad to be able to help Stew jones (talk) 22:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your image uploads

As I already told you earlier, you should not upload pictures of living people under claim of fair use per WP:FAIRUSE, it is against Wikipedia policy. Now it's time to give you an official warning. I hope you're willing to understand and accept Wikipedia policy and avoid such uploads in the future. Thank you.

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Image:Agius, Gilbert.jpg. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. --Angelo (talk) 15:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain who it is inappropriate exactly, and I would appreciate you not threatening me Stew jones (talk) 17:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is inappropriate to upload copyrighted pictures of living people under claim of fair use, per WP:NFCC #1 (see also Wikipedia:Non-free_content#UULP). I am not threatening anyone: I just know this is not the first time you upload such pictures, so I am letting you know about the possible consequences of your actions of breaking Wikipedia policy. Thank you. --Angelo (talk) 17:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So how would you suggest that I upload a screenshot from a TV Program then? Stew jones (talk) 17:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You just cannot upload TV program screenshots, they are simply copyrighted. --Angelo (talk) 19:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Zammit (footballer)

This article has been listed on Articles for Deletion. I've done a bit of work on it to expand and source it, and I notice nobody told you the article was up for deletion. Regards, Reyk _YO! 09:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tarxien Rainbows FC.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Tarxien Rainbows FC.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Mile Oak Rovers F.C.

Template:Mile Oak Rovers F.C. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Walsall FC.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Walsall FC.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles proposed for deletion

Hiya. I've seen that you've opposed deletion of a couple of articles. Unfortunately they weren't in the right place, as the articles were only proposed for deletion as a WP:PROD. To oppose this, all you need to do is remove the prod templates (but it helps if you say why it shouldn't be deleted at least in the edit summary). I've gone ahead and removed the prod templates from those articles you appear to object to at the bottom of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 June 8. However, jimbo online appears to have prodded other articles as well, that you may not want lost. I recommend that you review the ones he has listed to see if that is the case. Thanks. Quantpole (talk) 11:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 June 8

Hi there. I've undone the edit that you made to this, as it broke the page somewhat. What were you trying to do, perhaps I can help? Ged UK 11:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sorry about that, I had a number of articles up for deletion, which I believe don't deserve to be, and I was hoping to list them all, in order to stop them from been deleted Stew jones (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PRODs

Please stop adding the PRODed articles to the AfD, they were not part of the original AfD of the nominated articles. They are only PRODs. If you want to nominate them for a new AfD use the AfD guidelines provided. --Jimbo^[online] 21:45, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright big man chill out, I am trying in vain to get these things taken off my articles I have worked extremely hard on Stew jones (talk) 21:52, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can remove them yourself as they're only PRODs. See WP:PROD. Although the non-notable ones will probably get listed for AfD later on if contested. --Jimbo^[online] 21:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's too complicated about the above you don't understand? --Jimbo^[online] 22:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well they probably will, if you have got anything to do with it, but I am trying in vain to get people on side in order to keep a website (know for it's information) full of useful information for the people to view, I have no idea why you are one of these types desperate to kill off other peoples hard work, but generally the majority of people on here want to improve coverage not get rid of useful articles, so hopefully they will side with me, and will me on to continue working hard to help the website get even more useful articles, for the public to view. Stew jones (talk) 22:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Skippo10. You have new messages at Quantpole's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Maltese footballers

The articles on Michael Galea and Jean Pierre Mifsud Triganza have been restored by the deleting admins on my request. Do you have any sources saying that they have played in full internationals, rather than in under-21s? The links that you provided at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Buttigieg are unclear about this, and I can't find any other confirmation that they have played for the senior team. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TamworthFC.png)

Thanks for uploading File:TamworthFC.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		Great headshots of the Leicester City players, especially Bruno Berner (been trying to find a free picture of him for months). Thanks alot dude. Wolcott (talk) 02:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note

We don't link dates anymore, per WP:MOSNUM. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maksims Daņilovs

A tag has been placed on Maksims Daņilovs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JL 09 ^_q?_{_c} 17:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maksims Daņilovs

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Maksims Daņilovs. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Floriana.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Floriana.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 03:25, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article restorations

Hi, just a quick note - it's probably best to either ask an admin directly (deleting admin) or ask at WP:FOOTY to restore an article, rather than on an old AfD. Also it'd be helpful to cite a reliable source providing proof. I've posted a message at WT:FOOTY asking for Edward Herrera to be restored. Thanks, --Jimbo^[online] 21:47, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, here is the source [1] Stew jones (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Cluett

A tag has been placed on David Cluett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Raziman T V (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Stew jones! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 88 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Jason St Juste - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Cesar Paiber - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rumen Galabov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph John Aquilina

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Joseph John Aquilina. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Briffa

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jimmy Briffa. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Muscat

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Charles Muscat. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Falzon

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Joe Falzon. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gianluca De Ponti

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Gianluca De Ponti. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Livio Pin

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Livio Pin. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:15, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Farrugia

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Mario Farrugia. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Micallef

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Charles Micallef. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Mizzi

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Dennis Mizzi. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Scicluna

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Martin Scicluna. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Schembri

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Eric Schembri. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Eric Schembri

I have nominated Eric Schembri, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Schembri. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. NW (Talk) 00:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Stew jones. I've noticed that you are creating several new footballer articles that have no sources. Please add at least one (see how I added an RSSSF reference to Mario Farrugia) or the article may be deleted. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 00:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iro Curmi (footballer born 1963)

Hi Stew jones, just to let you know I've moved this page to Iro Curmi per Wikipedia's policy on article titles as no disambiguation is needed here. Thanks, Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 15:00, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But there is a younger player with the same name who plays for Msida Saint-Joseph. Stew jones (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I do apologise as I thought the articles were referring to the same person, seeing as how this is the case I've tagged the redirect "Iro Curmi" for deletion to prevent confusion. Regards, Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 15:14, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok cheers, unless it is changed so if you click on Iro Curmi it gives you the option of either? Stew jones (talk) 15:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It really depends, is there an article for the other Iro Curmi? If there isn't it would be fairly redundant having a dab page in which one of the 2 articles listed is a red link. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 15:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Currently not it would be redlinked Stew jones (talk) 15:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Atherstone Town F.C. managers

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Atherstone Town F.C. managers. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Atherstone Town F.C. managers. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

I note that you have previously been warned about creating unreferenced BLPs; you have continued to do so. Referencing is key to what we're trying to achieve here, and the BLP policy is quite possibly our strongest one, since it covers the potential we have to harm living people. Please reference your articles, or you may well be blocked. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 17:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay god almighty!! Stew jones (talk) 20:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Things like this are a great improvement; thanks for taking my concerns to heart. Feel free to drop a note on my talkpage if you have any queries or need help with anything. Ironholds (talk) 17:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Bolehall Swifts F.C.

I have nominated Category:Bolehall Swifts F.C. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Big Dom 16:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bolehall swifts.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bolehall swifts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Atherstone Town F.C. Squad

Template:Atherstone Town F.C. Squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Big Dom 08:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for Template:Halesowen Town F.C. squad.--Echetus Xe 20:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Power Surge!!! Stew jones (talk) 21:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chasetown F.C. squad

Template:Chasetown F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Echetus Xe 13:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Please keep the dates for non-North American related articles in the format of 21 August 2010, rather than August 21, 2010. See MOS:DATE. Thanks, --Jimbo^[online] 12:37, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes right away sir, please forgive me I am so so sorry, what was I thinking Stew jones (talk) 12:48, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lotfi Saïdi

The article Lotfi Saïdi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article about a footballer who has not played in a fully pro league and who fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Deyanov

The article Martin Deyanov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who has not played in a fully pro league and who fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emil Yanchev

The article Emil Yanchev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who has never played in a fully pro league and who fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maksims Daņilovs

The article Maksims Daņilovs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:16, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sunday Eboh

The article Sunday Eboh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:31, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When contesting the proposed deletion of an article, please explain your reason for doing so in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thanks. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mosta F.C. squad

Template:Mosta F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 14:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Malta.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malta.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Njongo Priso

The article Njongo Priso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 06:12, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So the Cypriot League is not a fully professional league? I think you may have been smoking something? --Stew jones (talk) 14:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PROD protocols

When contesting the proposed deletion of an article, please explain your reason for doing so in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jason Bradley

The article Jason Bradley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per discussion at WT:FOOTY, no records can be found to prove that Jason Bradley played for Sheffield Wednesday in the League Cup, thus failing notability at WP:NFOOTY. Also a lack of any significant media coverage means he fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Jimbo^[online] 11:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jason Bradley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jason Bradley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:25, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Stuart Hendrie. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 16:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How can you prove he was born in 1989 then, there isn't a reference to prove this neither, I know for a fact this is his date of birth as I know him personally, so I know the information is correct!! Your best bet is to concentrate on things that are more important than this Stew jones (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a reference which confirms he was born in 1989 - but not which date. Saying "I know this guy" isn't a valid reference, not even nearly - sorry. Please stop adding unreferenced information to this article or I'll be forced to ask an admin to intervene. Giant Snowman 17:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh big man, check the reference now, unlucky, go and try and ruin somebody elses hard work instead!!! Stew jones (talk) 17:57, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please remain civil; many thanks for adding a reference, even if it was at the third time of asking! Giant Snowman 20:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Smith

Hi, I'm in the process of expdanding the Chris Smith (footballer born 1981) article and wondered if you'd be able to re-upload this image you took of him? Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I don't think I have got this picture anymore, can't you use the one you have listed though? Stew jones (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a go at trying it using the preview function on the Smith article but it won't seem to come up with anything. Although, I think it would be okay if you right click on the image, save it and use it that way. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Tellus

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Tellus, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Tellus and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Tellus during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adi Yussuf

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Adi Yussuf. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Hi. The article Marsaxlokk F.C. season 2008–09 which you started has been proposed for deletion, basically for failing WP:GNG through lack of sources. (The similar article Senglea Athletic F.C. season 2009-10 was deleted after a discussion at WikiProject Football.) If you can find sources to support its notability, feel free to add them and remove the tag.

On a somewhat related issue, why exactly does Marsaxlokk F.C. seasons start at 1997 and miss out their earlier history? It's not like you don't know about it (nice article by the way). Alzarian16 (talk) 15:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No I couldn't care less, you go on and delete it son, seems like that little power trip might get you through the day, after all I only spent hours of my life making the page! Stew jones (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph Farrugia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Farrugia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Farrugia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 00:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gavin Hurren

The article Gavin Hurren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG as having not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and WP:NFOOTBALL as having not appeared in a fully professional league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dylon Sciberras

The article Dylon Sciberras has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patrick Curmi

The article Patrick Curmi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clive Mizzi

The article Clive Mizzi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Marlow

The article Mark Marlow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anton Cremona

The article Anton Cremona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Winston Muscat

The article Winston Muscat has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miguel De Pina (born 1983)

The article Miguel De Pina (born 1983) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iro Curmi (footballer born 1963)

The article Iro Curmi (footballer born 1963) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Winston Muscat

The article Winston Muscat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a football manager who fails WP:GNG and who has not managed a club in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Domenico Di Carlo

About a 2 year old edit. [2] Please provide a source for his Sliema Wanderers career. Please follow Wikipedia policy and not a playground. Matthew_hk t c 09:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pedro dos Santos Calçado

The article Pedro dos Santos Calçado has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pedro dos Santos Calçado for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro dos Santos Calçado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro dos Santos Calçado until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Kettering Town F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Beck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RabatAjaxFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RabatAjaxFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Stuart Hendrie, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 18:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done now dick Stew jones (talk) 19:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Hendrie

Hello. Please could you add a source for the Atherstone and Daventry stats that you added to the above? thanks, Struway2 (talk) 20:49, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No Stew jones (talk) 13:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pity. In which case, I've removed them until someone does come up with a source. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 23:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for your hard work there ya clown Stew jones (talk) 23:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nick Heath (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Creambadge.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Creambadge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Keith Russell (footballer)

The article Keith Russell (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails WP:ATHLETE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Deadbeef (talk) 23:07, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you on drugs, he played a Football League Division 2 game for Blackpool on Saturday 05 April 1997, as per the details given on soccerbase, which is given as an External link on article, go and catch some real criminals Stew jones (talk) 23:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Thanks for contributing the new article Hamza Barry. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Giant Snowman 13:09, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of History of Marsaxlokk F.C.

The article History of Marsaxlokk F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Complete duplication of the history section in the Marsaxlokk F.C. article. unnecessary fork.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 08:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corby Town F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Semple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:FlorianaFC.png)

Thanks for uploading File:FlorianaFC.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:47, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Tamworth F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Larkin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roy Chipolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Chipolina

Thanks for contributing the new article Roy Chipolina. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Giant Snowman 19:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Liam Walker, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:06, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What are you waffling on about? Stew jones (talk) 18:26, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years you've been here, you really should understand policies like WP:V and WP:OR by now. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Liam Walker. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah your right I have been on here for seven years, working hard to keep things up to date, I changed this persons full name to Liam Walker, are you now telling me his name isn't Liam Walker? Stew jones (talk) 19:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But without a source how do we know he doesn't have a middle name? Unless we know for certain his full name isn't just 'Liam Walker' it is best left blank. Mattythewhite (talk) 08:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't know if he has a middle name, but can guarantee that his name is Liam Walker, so I don't see the problem, but obviously you are some kind of extremely important figurehead on here as you overrule things that others do Stew jones (talk) 22:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely no doubt his name is Liam Walker, but unless we know his full name we would be potentially giving readers misinformation by having Liam Walker in the full name section of the infobox, as really it might not be his full name, and most importantly it isn't verified. Shame you feel that way, but all I can do is try and explain why I undid your edit. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Willie McStay (footballer born 1961), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:26, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who the hell do you think you are talking to, I will make edits on here to make this website more informative for the readers as and when I like and guess what you won't stop me, you speak to me with some god dam respect you keyboard worrier Stew jones (talk) 19:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Like I've already said, content needs to be supported by reliable sources for verification. But if you've not bothered doing this consistently in seven years, I guess you're not likely to start now, are you? Mattythewhite (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, but you can follow me round and keep checking on me like you seem to do, and you can add them can't you, as you obviously have nothing better to do Stew jones (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no, because if you keep adding unsourced content you'll be getting a block. And the cheap shots won't get you anywhere, that's another thing you ought to have learned by now. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You ain't nobody, with your words, your a keyboard warrior Stew jones (talk) 21:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of foreign football players in Malta

The article List of foreign football players in Malta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Playing in this league does not make you notable per WP:NFOOTBALL, and the subject of foreign players in the league is itself not notable as it has not been the subject of significant, third-party coverage. As per similar arguments here. Additionally, this list refers to foreign players who have played at any level, not just the top league, so could refer to anyone who popped over for an amateur kickabout.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 11:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sliema Wanderers F.C.

Template:Sliema Wanderers F.C. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Żurrieq F.C. seasons

The article List of Żurrieq F.C. seasons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary fork for a minor club in Malta. Content merged with the main club article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 17:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Żurrieq F.C.

Template:Żurrieq F.C. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tamworth F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Thornton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References and spaces

Hi, there is no need for spaces between punctuation and referneces; they should go immediately after the punctuation. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Or you could say there is no need not for the space, I personally think it looks better, and I guess that is all that matters. Stew jones (talk) 09:06, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason that you have basically reverted all the hard work and effort I did yesterday on the article Dan Preston? Stew jones (talk) 09:33, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From looking at the article edit history, I reverted you by amending the infobox layout (so it follows layout at Template:Infobox football biography#Usage), by readding his nickname, by removing the POB from the opening brackets (per WP:OPENPARA) and reinstating the content you removed from the lead. Mattythewhite (talk) 10:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Or you could just talk to me in English. Stew jones (talk) 10:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was only trying to explain my edits, but hey ho. Mattythewhite (talk) 10:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danny Sleath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matlock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Polesworth F.C.

The article Polesworth F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:FOOTYN as the team has not played at level 10 or in the FA Vase or FA Cup.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 18:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can delete my hard work if it makes you feel better, makes all the hard work worthwhile doesn't it, exactly what constitutes an article, as I can name millions of semi-professional/amateur teams that have an article, so please explain!! Stew jones (talk) 18:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Polesworth F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polesworth F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polesworth F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lotfi Saïdi

The article Lotfi Saïdi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Polesworth FC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Polesworth FC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Basford United F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francis Green. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BalzanYouthsFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BalzanYouthsFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MostaFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MostaFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NaxxarLionsFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NaxxarLionsFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:QormiFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:QormiFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TarxienRainbowsFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TarxienRainbowsFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rabat Ajax F.C. managers

Template:Rabat Ajax F.C. managers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 13:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bolehall Swifts F.C.

Template:Bolehall Swifts F.C. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bolehall Swifts F.C.

Template:Bolehall Swifts F.C. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lets get rid of it ay geeza, powerful moment in your life ay Stew jones (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stuart Hendrie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 07:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Stuart Hendrie. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 20:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I have added a reference to the article now, so you can stop whinging Stew jones (talk) 20:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Stew jones. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Maltese records

Hi, IMHO Category:Maltese football club statistics does not contain national or world records, so I removed it from Category:Maltese records. You did not appear to add anything else when you created the latter.[3] It is now empty and eligible to be deleted. – Fayenatic London 09:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GziraUnitedFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GziraUnitedFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NaxxarLionsFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NaxxarLionsFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Graham Bencini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graham Bencini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Bencini until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 15:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Stew jones. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Stuart Hendrie. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 08:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Stuart Hendrie. Giant Snowman 12:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got nothing better to do than pick holes in my edits? why don't you add the reference if it is bothering you so much? Stew jones (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Donohue. Giant Snowman 12:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Morris (footballer, born 2000)

The article James Morris (footballer, born 2000) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY, yet to appear in a fully professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hitro talk 14:29, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep why would you delete the article of a player who has played in the Football League Trophy, very bizarre Stew jones (talk) 22:00, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tamworth F.C., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. groig (talk) 13:12, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Regan Upton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dexter Walters. Giant Snowman 12:02, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shane Blaney. Giant Snowman 09:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got nothing better to do, you referenced the place of birth anyway Stew jones (talk) 13:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does the source say he was born there? Nope. It says he is "from" there - there is a difference. You also do not have a source for his full name. Stop. Giant Snowman 08:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elliott Durrell

The article Elliott Durrell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 13:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anthony Breslin

The article Anthony Breslin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 13:32, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article creations

You have a long history of creating non-notable articles. Today, you have created a further two - Elliott Durrell and Anthony Breslin. Neither player is notable per GNG (no significant coverage) or NFOOTBALL, as Durrell has only played for Macclesfield in the FA Cup against a non-league team/in FLT against youth team, and Breslin has only played in the FLT for a youth team. Neither is sufficient. If you continue to create articles about non-notable footballers then I will seek a topic ban. Giant Snowman 13:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

‘’’Keep’’’ I’d love to meet you in person, you just literally track all my work on here and try and delete it, have you got anything better to do? all three articles have played games in a professional competition, the EFL Trophy Stew jones (talk) 14:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not sufficient. If you don't understand that then I'll seek a topic ban as soon as these AFDs are over. PS we still know it was you editing from an IP... Giant Snowman 14:59, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS Can you prove it tough guy? Stew jones (talk) 15:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DUCK, and your quasi-admission above. Thanks! Giant Snowman 16:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’m telling you now if these articles get deleted I’m deleting my own login and not bothering with wikipedia again, I have been doing edits on here for a number of years, and just try to go about my business quietly, I’m not one of these big shots, trying to prove how worthy I am, with my administration tag. Your argument basically contradicts itself, in the example of Elliott Durrell, he played for Macclesfield Town, who last time I checked are a professional Football League Two side, and the appearance was made in the EFL Trophy, the clue is in the name English Football League, but your saying because West Bromwich Albion listed themselves as U21, that means they are not professional, although that particular U21 team fielded 37 year old Gareth Barry and 36 year old Boaz Myhill, it’s incredibly petty the argument you are raising, as there are other articles on here where players have literally only made an EFL Trophy appearance, yet they are not up for deletion Stew jones (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If there are other players in a similar position - ie only played in FLT for or against U21 team - then let me know and I'll seek deletion. Bear in mind WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Giant Snowman 11:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Regan Upton

The article Regan Upton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 13:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elliott Durrell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elliott Durrell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliott Durrell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 14:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anthony Breslin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Breslin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Breslin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 14:54, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Regan Upton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regan Upton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regan Upton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 14:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Elliott Durrell. Praxidicae (talk) 15:55, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It would also behoove you to rescind your personal attack in your last edit summary as you have now edit warred and removed an AFD against policy - repeatedly and you've been around long enough to know better. Praxidicae (talk) 15:56, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:00, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So I have been blocked for editing, because I amended an article where the player in question made his his Football League Two debut, what a joke, typical bulling on here Stew jones (talk) 20:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Stew jones. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Giant Snowman 09:17, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Green (footballer, born 1987). Giant Snowman 11:00, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kyle Perry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Barrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Squad lists

Hi Stew. Please could you stop adding squad lists to non-League club articles. They are rarely updated, and so end up out-of-date very quickly. I've come across some that hadn't been updated for four or five years. Thanks, Number 5 7 22:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well I am trying to update them in particular in the Southern League Premier Central, which is the league I watch regularly. Stew jones (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's really not a good idea; squads at this level change almost on a weekly basis and it's unrealistic to think that a single editor can keep them all updated (as no-one else is likely to). Number 5 7 22:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate what you are saying, that is why I have put a date on each recent one I have done, and regularly look at the official website of the league and am checking what transfers have gone though, I have also been updating the article of the players for the clubs in this league. I am just trying to improve things. Stew jones (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think there are far better ways to improve the articles than adding a squad list that is going to need (and almost certainly not get) constant attention. For instance, you could hugely expand the history section of Alvechurch F.C. and add some more references so that the tag can be removed. Most of the articles you're adding them to are a bit of a mess. Number 5 7 23:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay that's fair enough, so basically you disagree, so you will just delete all my contributions, its so frustrating on here, I reference everything, I try my best, and someone just has an opinion, and that's it, your work is deleted, simple as that. Stew jones (talk) 23:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to your repeated attempts to change the Barwell F.C. squad list layout, please have some respect for WP:BRD and discuss on talk if you wish to change the established format rather than reinstating your changes again and again. Cheers, Number 5 7 11:35, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent categories

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:Peterborough Sports F.C. players, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. You may find it helpful to use the gadget HotCat, which tests whether a category exists before saving a change. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You have been here long enough to know that Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. If you have such a source to verify the information you added to the Shane Blaney article then please let me know and we can take a look at changing the article. Please let me know if you have any questions or queries. Thanks, Giant Snowman 08:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:St.PatrickFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:St.PatrickFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Your addition to Dennis Greene (footballer) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Elliott Chamberlain. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 09:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Per our previous discussion on the matter, I do not believe adding squadlists to the articles is useful as they are likely to become out of date quickly and are unlikely to be properly maintained.

Regarding your comments in the edit summaries, "hard work" is not a rationale for retaining things on Wikipedia – if it was, then nothing would ever be deleted at WP:AfD.

Contrary to your claims, I have zero problem with you improving articles if you were doing it by expanding history sections, adding references etc. However, I do not believe you adding squadlists is an improvement.

Finally, when an edit you make is reverted, you are expected to gain consensus for redoing it – see WP:BRD. Blindly reverting and reinstating unsourced information as you did at Peterborough Sports F.C. is extremely unhelpful. Number 5 7 12:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be the only person that has an issue with this, if I add a squad list, why do you think it is purely down to you to delete it off as you believe it will become outdated quickly, what have you got to back that up? Other than theory, I got Peterborough Sports stadium capacity off the page 2019–20 Southern Football League, which is also unreferenced, so why don’t you delete all that information too? You are basically just looking at all my edits, and just deleting what doesn’t sit right with you. Skippo10 (talk) 12:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of what I've got to back it up: Years of watching/editing non-league articles – I've come across squadlists that were 3, 4 and even 5 years out of date. Thanks for highlighting the unsourced capacity though, I've deleted it from there too – it's one of the perennial problems with non-league club articles.

And just to be clear, this is nothing personally against you. I regularly remove squadlists from other articles – see this, this or this when they appeared on my watchlist. Number 5 7 12:58, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can clearly see I obviously take a big interest in the Southern League Premier Division Central, I always reference the squad lists I add and also add a date that it was updated. So I don’t get why this is a problem to you personally? Skippo10 (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because I am bothered about the long-term maintenance of these articles, hundreds of which are on my watchlist. I've seen numerous cases of editors adding squads in good faith, but failing to maintain them. In practice, it's highly unlikely that you'll be able to maintain numerous squads at this level given the frequency of transfers, dual registrations etc. There is also a serious issue that many clubs do not keep the squad lists on their website up-to-date (it seems to be especially a problem with clubs that use Pitchero sites), meaning that in many cases there are not really any reliable sources for these squads. Finally, given how few players at this level even have articles, I really don't see any significant benefit to the squadlists being present.

There are many ways in which non-league articles could be improved – hundreds have tags of some kind on them – removing them would be a far more productive use of your time on here IMO. Number 5 7 20:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Number 57, why do you continue to try and find ways to stop me improving the articles relating to the Southern League Premier Central, taking away the Coalville Town, was ridiculous, you can clearly see their squad page is regularly updated, so your original argument is floored, but instead you just like to take away my hard work as some kind of power trip, if you want to go round taking away out of date work, why not concentrate on squad pages from the National League North, like A.F.C. Telford United, which hasn’t been updated for nearly two years, however you wouldn’t know that because for some bizarre reason you know nothing more than my edits because for some reason you follow me round bullying me for trying to improve articles Skippo10 (talk) 09:32, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ZurrieqFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ZurrieqFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Danny Edwards (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Edwards (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Edwards (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Echetus Xe 11:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation

Hello, FYI the rules on red links are different for categories as opposed to articles. Per WP:REDNOT you should never leave a page with red links to a category - either delete the link or create the category. Different areas have different views on eponymous categories - the music people are quite anti them, sports editors tend to be more relaxed, but in general amateur teams tend not to get them (a good guide is whether their ground has its own article or not). So with something like Category:Coalville Town F.C. players, don't add a club category if it doesn't already exist, just add a {sports)people from (town) category instead.Le Deluge (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CoalvilleTownFC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CoalvilleTownFC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zayn Hakeem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiguan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style for External links

Hi, please refer to the Manual of Style for External links which states: "These hyperlinks should not appear in the article's body text, nor should links used as references normally be duplicated in this section." I notice you continue to add Soccerbase and Soccerway to the External links section at Lathaniel Rowe-Turner after each time they are removed, despite the hyperlinks being used as in-line citations. Please keep this in mind and ensure your future edits do not go against the Manual of Style. Thank you. LTFC 95 (talk) 21:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kyron Stabana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Reeves (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:F.B.C. Unione Venezia.png

Thank you for uploading File:F.B.C. Unione Venezia.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updating club badges

Hello Skippo. When you upload a new club badge, can you do it over the top of the old file (using the "Upload a new version of this file" function)? If you create a brand new file, this leaves the old one orphaned and technically in violation of copyright. Also, non-free images need to be a maximum of 100,000 pixels in size. The Coleshill Town one you uploaded is 930,600 pixels in size, so is also a copyright violation.

I've uploaded the new Coleshill badge (below 100,000 pixels in size) over the top of the old one and reinstated that to the article. Are you ok for me to delete the one you just uploaded? Cheers, Number 5 7 15:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its nice of you to ask, you don't normally ask when you delete my work, but if that is the correct way then I'm fine with that, just trying to improve the Southern League as I have said previously. Skippo10 (talk) 17:17, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Josh Ezewele

The article Josh Ezewele has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 18:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Except, of course, the match he played was against Reading U23s, and was therefore NOT a game between two teams from fully-professional leagues, and he therefore fails NFOOTBALL as I said... Giant Snowman 08:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-League squads without numbering

I am not sure if this is a new feature, but I just discovered it and thought it would be useful for your non-league squad updates. For leagues that don't use squad numbers, you can add nonumber=y to fs start, fs player and fs mid, and it removes the numbers column. See e.g. here. Cheers, Number 5 7 12:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that is useful to know, I will bear in mind for future edits. I'm sure you can see and appreciate how much time I'm taking to keep these squads up to date, are we still in a position where if I add others at the same level with up to date squads, you will still remove? as with what happened on the Coalville Town page previously. I clearly think if I can add these squads and maintain them, as you can see I have been doing, it will improve the coverage of these clubs at the level. Skippo10 (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I still think it's a bad idea to have these squadlists for clubs below the Conference North/South due to the player turnover. I can't remember which club it was, but one used over 70 players last season; keeping more than a handful updated is a full-time job, as you'd have to monitor all their Twitter feeds (and even then, some don't really say when players leave); squadlists on club websites are not always kept up-to-date either.

Separately, the 'out of contract' sections you've left in some of these articles are also a concern, as they suggest the players are still at the club and are completely unsourced. Where are you getting this info from? Number 5 7 14:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are 22 teams in the Southern League Premier Central, which is the league I follow and support a team in, so for me it wouldn't be a full time job, I follow all the twitter accounts, so am very confident that I would be accurate with the updates, or certainly accurate officially, I appreciate some clubs aren't very quick to update their squads, but then others are Coalville Town being one of these. I can guarantee I wont let these squad lists get out of hand. In regards to the out of contract players, as a rule I leave them on there as some sign straight away and others do eventually, but again following twitter tells me on occasion when a player has confirmed they have said they are leaving and I move them from those lists, or if they are announced by another club. Skippo10 (talk) 14:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair enough. Number 5 7 20:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But the 'out of contract' section is still problematic. Without being sourced, it seems to be your own original research. Please only include it if you can source the section. Number 5 7 08:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its impossible to source really, I'll just delete them off instead, and just add players as they are announced. Skippo10 (talk) 21:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bromsgrove Sporting F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Cowley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dexter Walters

Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy#Infobox and lead images (which says 300px as a MAX) and stop increasing the image size. Giant Snowman 16:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jack Snelus

The article Jack Snelus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. A footballer who has never played in a competitive match between two clubs from fully professional leagues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LTFC 95 (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Heath (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Heath (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Heath (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 17:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coton Green FC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coton Green FC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ashley Edkins

The article Ashley Edkins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG (which superseeds WP:NFOOTY). A player who happens to have played one game for a Football League team isn't inherently notable and there is no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 14:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashley Edkins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashley Edkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Edkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 12:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TarxienRainbowsFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TarxienRainbowsFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ben Stephens (footballer). Giant Snowman 09:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tamworth FC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tamworth FC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:11, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have been here long enough to know that adding unsourced content - especially about living people - is simply not acceptable. I have reverted your edits at Stuart Hendrie accordingly. Giant Snowman 15:43, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one Skippo10 (talk) 20:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hugo Jinkinson

Hello, Skippo10,

Thank you for creating Hugo Jinkinson.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Insufficient references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aaron Xuereb

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aaron Xuereb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _Signed,Pichemist ^(Talk) 03:36, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adrian Pulis

The article Adrian Pulis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. _Signed,Pichemist ^(Talk) 03:41, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aaron Xuereb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Xuereb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Xuereb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Shirt58 (talk) 10:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hugo Jinkinson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hugo Jinkinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Jinkinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:36, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

You've removed the lead on Alex Jones (footballer, born 1994) and Scott Burgess (footballer) and reverted me when I restored it. Explain yourself. How can someone spend so long editing Wikipedia and not know very basic means of style rules and conventions? How is "Alexander Richard Jones (born 28 September 1994) is an English footballer who most recently played for EFL League Two side Northampton Town, where he played as a forward" a summary of the article's important contents? "the lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic". Everyone makes mistakes in editing but please think before you revert edits.--Echetus Xe 17:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am more than happy to explain myself all the information in the lead is basically repeated in more detail later on in the article, what's the point, and if that is your only grievance, then why revert the whole article? What are you doing??? Skippo10 (talk) 23:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Qormi F.C. squad

Template:Qormi F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pelmeen10 (talk) 06:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Qormi F.C.

Template:Qormi F.C. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Marsaxlokk F.C. seasons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Marsaxlokk F.C. seasons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Marsaxlokk F.C. seasons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pelmeen10 (talk) 01:52, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mosta F.C.

Template:Mosta F.C. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Marsaxlokk F.C.

Template:Marsaxlokk F.C. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:20, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Stephens (footballer)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ben Stephens (footballer). Giant Snowman 21:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand when I did that, I am updating the article, I'm not sure why you think its necessary to threaten me??? Skippo10 (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been around for more than 15+ years and still cannot grasp basic policies like WP:NPOV. For that reason:

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Giant Snowman 21:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

oh and please also see WP:OVERLINK. Giant Snowman 21:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance, I will just get on with updating articles, I have never looked into all this, that's why I am just someone who updates things and not some kind of admin. Skippo10 (talk) 21:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you do not need to be an admin - this policy applies to everybody. Giant Snowman 06:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research / changing squad template format

Your split of squads into "current" and "unregistered" appears to be OR. Please provide sources for this, or restore squads that match the sources used.

Also, please don't change to football squad 2 template – this is deprecated and supposed to be merged into the original template at some point. Could you please revert this change where you have made it too. Thanks, Number 5 7 16:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no worries, I'll just leave you to update these squad lists then, I have this every year with you, the football squad 2 template wouldn't exist if it wasn't to be used, I really don't get what your problem is to be honest. Skippo10 (talk) 20:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Providing an edit summary

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 00:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OVERLINK

As previously advised in may 2022, please read and comply with WP:OVERLINK - multiple links to the same article in the same section of another article is disruptive. Giant Snowman 08:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you are talking about. Skippo10 (talk) 21:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly adding links to e.g. Southern Football League or Tamworth F.C. in the same section of a player bio. Giant Snowman 10:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an example of what GS is referring to. With this edit, you added content to the Tamworth section of Eoin McKeown's article, which is fine, but you wikilinked Tamworth F.C. and Southern Football League three times each in the text you added, even though both were already wikilinked in that section of the player's article. There is no need to wikilink something every single time it is mentioned in the article. Only the first mention of something in an article should be wikilinked and any and all subsequent mentions should not be...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jason Cowley (footballer). Giant Snowman 10:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Giant Snowman 15:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern on this, and thanks for trying to get me blocked, I feel I add a lot to Wikipedia, really nice of you to essentially find ways to bully people who work hard editing and bringing articles up to date, but some admins like to flex their muscles don't they. Skippo10 (talk) 20:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Jones (footballer, born 1994)

Sorry about the irate comment in my edit. Good work with keeping the article up to date, just that Jones could potentially scored 30 goals this season at that level and the article would be out of control if every appearance and goal was described within. Echetus Xe 15:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for WP:CIR isssues, discussed at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=1106796301#Skippo10 - This is a community ban, and must be appealed only to the community as a whole, or to the Arbitration Committee.

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lutel James for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lutel James is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lutel James until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carlo Mamo

The article Carlo Mamo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citations

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 15:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vidal Hendrickson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vidal Hendrickson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidal Hendrickson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ian Lake (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Lake (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Lake (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:07, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dean Walling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dean Walling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Walling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emil Yanchev (footballer, born 1974) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emil Yanchev (footballer, born 1974) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Yanchev (footballer, born 1974) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KalkaraFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KalkaraFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tré Mitford for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tré Mitford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tré Mitford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah you are talking to a blocked user, all I can say, which won't make a blind bit of difference is that Tre Mitford has played international football for Guyana, which at one time meant an article has the necessary coverage to remain, but I don't even know anymore. Skippo10 (talk) 21:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Depression

I'm sure nobody will care, but behind every user, is a human being, since been blocked recently after editing Wikipedia for over 15 years, I have suffered deep depression, I'm bitterly disappointed that the decision was made by a number of admins who didn't really give me any guidance and just decided that blocking a user who whichever way you want to look at it has contributed massively to my chosen interests for a number of years, whilst fighting ultimately an uphill battle. Wikipedia must face a number of users trying to deface work on a daily basis, yet the best that could be done with me after having a few disagreements with users was to ban me indefinitely. I'm really struggling to come to terms with this as coming on here and editing my interests, mainly non league football and football in general really helped with my mental health, and to be honest bought an element of joy to my life. So thanks to ultimately the bullies who have ended that. In any other walk of life if someone needed guidance, people would generally help and gave them the guidance they needed. Thanks to you all for bringing me into a further depression and stopping me doing what I enjoyed :( Skippo10 (talk) 21:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry that you are feeling depressed about this. You could file an unban request that promises to scrupulously avoid all of the problematic behaviors that led to your ban, and taking full responsibility for your past errors. But continuing the accusations of bullying and blaming others is the wrong approach and will not be successful. Because yours is a community ban, your ban appeal would need to be copied over to WP:AN, or to the Arbitration Committee. Please be well. Cullen328 (talk) 21:28, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words, much appreciated, I can only say how I feel, I don't have the first clue how to challenge the block and wholeheartedly expect a proportion of the blame, as I didn't always conduct myself the best as I felt victimised at times, I am only saying how I felt, when the block came in not one person looked at it in the sense that my work on here was good and maybe just needed some guidance, it was a case of how many users could request for me to be blocked. You don't edit for as long as I did, or the number of edits I have carried out if you aren't doing things properly. Skippo10 (talk) 21:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my view, the most serious problem by far was repeatedly adding unreferenced content to biographies of living people. Violations of WP:OVERLINK was also a concern shared by several editors. You have previously been blocked for edit warring and disruptively removing AfD templates. So, if you could bring yourself to promise to refrain from all that misbehavior, and promise to take on board criticism by other editors, then possibly your ban could be lifted. Cullen328 (talk) 21:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I feel that I have understood where I went wrong, and sometimes my passion can get the better of things, which is a detriment to the long term ability to edit articles on Wikipedia, I do appreciate your understanding of my position, and it is nice to speak to someone who understands me a bit. Skippo10 (talk) 07:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please ping me if you decide to appeal your ban. Have you considered editing Simple English Wikipedia? Some constructive editing there would be helpful and you might enjoy it. Cullen328 (talk) 16:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LuqaSt.Andrew'sFC.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LuqaSt.Andrew'sFC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

v t e Maltese football clubs
Premier League	Balzan Birkirkara Floriana Gżira United Ħamrun Spartans Hibernians Marsaxlokk Melita Mosta Naxxar Lions Sliema Wanderers Żabbar St. Patrick
Challenge League	Fgura United Gudja United Lija Athletic Marsa Mgarr United Mtarfa Pietà Hotspurs Senglea Athletic Santa Lucia Sirens St. Andrews Swieqi United Tarxien Rainbows Valletta Żebbuġ Rangers Żurrieq
Amateur League I	Attard Birzebbuga St. Peter's Għargħur Kirkop United Luqa St. Andrew's Marsaskala Mellieħa Msida St. Joseph Pembroke Athleta Qormi Qrendi Rabat Ajax San Ġwann Vittoriosa Stars Xgħajra Tornados Żejtun Corinthians
Amateur League II	Dingli Swallows Għaxaq Kalkara United Mdina Knights Mqabba St. Venera Siggiewi St. George's Ta' Xbiex Victoria Hotspurs
2024–25 Premier League 2024–25 Challenge League 2024–25 Amateur League I 2024–25 Amateur League II

v t e Maltese First Division/Maltese Challenge League seasons
First Division	2000–01 2001–02 2002–03 2003–04 2004–05 2005–06 2006–07 2007–08 2008–09 2009–10 2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20
Challenge League	2020–21 2021–22 2022–23 2023–24 2024–25
Clubs	Fgura United Lija Athletic Luqa St. Andrew's Marsa Marsaxlokk Melita Mġarr United Mqabba Naxxar Lions Pembroke Athleta Pietà Hotspurs Qrendi Rabat Ajax Senglea Athletic San Ġwann St. Andrews St. George's Swieqi United Tarxien Rainbows Vittoriosa Stars Żebbuġ Rangers Żejtun Corinthians