User talk:Sjmkahn

This is Sjmkahn's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaroslav Muzika (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaroslav Muzika and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sjmkahn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jaroslav Muzika has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jaroslav Muzika. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 07:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaroslav Muzika (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

Please read the comments. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaroslav Muzika and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaroslav Muzika (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Despite the heavy REFBOMBING, the draft actually cites only three sources. (Please consider using NAMEDREFS to combine the references. Thanks.) The first, only provides basic military data. The second gives significant coverage, but is less than WP:RS. And the third covers an indirectly related topic. As such, the sources fall far short of WP:GNG notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaroslav Muzika and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaroslav Muzika (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO) but presently it is not clear that it does. As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that many of the references are not formatted correctly (see Wikipedia’s Manual of Style for help). Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a CV, which Wikipedia is not. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements (it would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject) then resubmit the page and leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaroslav Muzika and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 02:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jaroslav Muzika has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jaroslav Muzika. Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 00:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaroslav Muzika (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This still read like an essay, and the references aren't formatted properly; see WP:CITEHOW. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 00:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaroslav Muzika and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 00:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: reading like an essay is a good thing, not a bad thing. And the references are formatted correctly, in accordance with academic style. Unfortunately, the wikisite you point me to does not give specific instructions on how to format references. So, if there is a correction you would like me to make, you will have to give some specific instructions. Sjmkahn (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaroslav Muzika (November 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Asparagusus was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm going to be WP:BOLD and reject this. There has been no change since the last submission. None of the citations have been formatted correctly, and there are no inline citations. Nobody has fixed this in a year so I doubt anyone will. Five declines is more than enough time to fix an article, but there are still massive problems. I believe that the only way to fix this is to WP:TNT it. Also, a lot of the sources don't have WP:SIGCOV and the prose is still somewhat like an essay.

—asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 20:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and has content guidelines

Hello Sjmkahn. Based on your reply here 1, you appear to not understand Wikipedia's goals. However, you have not been welcomed properly, so that's what this is for. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not a place to publish your essays. The most important content policy is that editors have to write in a neutral tone. Editors also need to provide reliable sources to establish notability of their subjects. You also seem to not know how to correctly format Wikipedia sources. Please read WP:HOWTOCITE, which you have been directed to before. Wikipedia doesn't have the same citation formatting as "academic sources". You need to put inline links to citations in your articles so readers can tell what citations support which content. Many editors have given you instructions on how to improve the article, but there has not been significant change since you first submitted it. Have a good day/night! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 20:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, but these comments are, like most of the comments I've received, garbage. You claim that the article has not undergone significant revisions. That is false. You claim that the article is not written in a neutral tone. That is false. You've rejected the article now on the grounds that the subject isn't sufficiently notable, whereas previous editors already had accepted it as sufficiently notable--and they were right to do so: a WWII vet decorated by not one but two heads of state (the Queen of England and the President of Czechoslovakia) is, indeed, sufficiently notable. Stop being obstructionist; provide some halfway decent feedback that actually tells me what you want me to fix, in concrete terms, not some vague obstructionist nonsense about writing essays (a previous comment told me that the article was written like a CV; I changed that--and now I'm told it reads like an essay. Apparently you don't know what an essay is if you think that Wikipedia doesn't include essays on significant subjects as entries. Every encyclopedia does so). 191.81.167.26 (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jaroslav Muzika

Hello, Sjmkahn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jaroslav Muzika, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jaroslav Muzika

Hello, Sjmkahn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jaroslav Muzika".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]