User talk:SirBartleMerryworth

I Killed the Prom Queen

Hi, can you please explain why you insist on changing "unclean vocals" to "lead vocals" in this band's article? You can use edit summaries to explain your edits, which helps avoid confusion.--MASHAUNIX 11:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

NBL Canada WikiProject Invitation

Please accept this invite to join the WikiProject National Basketball League of Canada, a WikiProject dedicated to improving National Basketball League of Canada related articles. Simply click here to accept!

TempleM (talk) 18:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capture the Crown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reign of Terror (album). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Denver Broncos starting quarterbacks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Miller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Miss May I page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Lead/unclean vocals

Hi again, can we please discuss this dispute? My argument is that since the terms "clean vocals" and "unclean vocals" aren't widely understood among readers with no background in metal/punk music, they should not be used alone, as they will not make sense to those readers without being contrasted and linked to their relevant articles. If you disagree, can you please explain why? Thanks.--MASHAUNIX 19:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

It makes fine sense, "unclean" isn't even a Word. Its hardly a term. Lead Vocals are what they are. Lead Vocals. CombatMarshmallow (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

My problem isn't with the term "lead vocals", but with the fact SirBartleMerryworth insists on leaving "clean vocals" next to "lead vocals" even though "clean vocals" makes no sense to many readers when presented alone.--MASHAUNIX 06:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

In your POV it doesn't make sense. I see the "clean" vocals as a contrast to what the lead vocals are doing. Very Clearly. Watch out. if you haven't noticed "mashaunix" makes stuff up, thats nicer... and pushes his point of view Its the Only reason he has Multiple accounts I mean Multiple accounts that never edit usually do the same type of edits and just happen to "appear" and contribute to the deceptive editing. You should look at his talk page and see beaming Examples of this. CombatMarshmallow (talk) 12:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

What other accounts? Can you show me an edit I have made from a different account?--MASHAUNIX 08:56, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Ultimate Disc League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philadelphia Phoenix. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Artery Recordings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crystal Lake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Russell Wilson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. aqwfyj ^Talk/_Contribs 21:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Long Live (Atreyu album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atreyu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

List of Cleveland Browns Starting Quarterbacks

Your interest is appreciated, but could you refrain from updating the number of games started per player until the player actually starts a game? In other words, this is meant to be a "History" page, and not a page for future speculation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.179.161.22 (talk) 20:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Architects (British band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nightmares (album). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Boban Marjanović has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. --Dcirovic (talk) 05:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Hello, I'm Guthix no more. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joe Thornton has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Guthix no more (talk) 02:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shaunae Miller. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. So you know, re-inserting an iffy word that got removed so many times I had to get the page locked looks bad. Your edit summary, where you lied through your teeth by calling an accurate description of what happened a "typo," looks worse. It's really weird putting a template like this on a veteran user's page, but I gotta do it since you're supposed to know better. RunnyAmiga (talk) 01:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

With the edit summary "typo," you chose to lie in your effort to get this contentious edit reinserted. With the edit summaries "I saw the race and she clearly dove. Anybody with eyes can see it" and "Everybody can tell she dove," you're admitting that you're violating WP:NPOV by using original research to get this contentious edit reinserted. With your categorical refusal to actually discuss before reverting, you're edit warring and disregarding at least four other editors. You've been here over a year and you're still up to this kind of nonsense? I'd actually consider letting it go if I got a truly decent answer as to why you're doing this. But since you've ignored several requests to stop reverting and discuss this, I doubt I'll get an answer. Consider this your final warning. RunnyAmiga (talk) 16:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Actually, SirBartle, your edits are nothing approaching vandalism. They're edit warring, yes, as are @RunnyAmiga:'s (who has been warned), and both sets of editors' edits are disruptive, but that does not constitute vandalism. if you continue to disagree on the use of the widely reported word "dove", you both have the obligation to discuss on the appropriate talk page to reach consensus. --Drmargi (talk) 16:53, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Shaunae Miller shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 17:13, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mike Alstott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fullback. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Javier Báez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three days for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ian.thomson (talk) 05:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Edits like this or this are absolutely unacceptable and you should know better by now. If it wasn't for your other (apparently good faith) edits, your block would be longer -- do not expect that to happen if you are blocked for vandalism again. Ian.thomson (talk) 05:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SirBartleMerryworth. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Brock Osweiler. Thank you. Lizard (talk) 04:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

And do not just put the "source" in the edit summary. Provide a whole link to the specific page that has the information you are citing, and put it in a citation tag after the information. See WP:CITE for more information. This applies even if you are adding something positive -- no source, no addition. This applies especially to reasons given in articles (Wikipedia does not use original research, so editor conclusions are not allowed). Ian.thomson (talk) 05:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

April 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Darren Sproles, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 20:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Robbed

Aka he robbed them. Ozyyk (talk) 02:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

• Do not engage in personal attacks, as you did here. This goes against our policies on civility and personal attacks. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:51, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SirBartleMerryworth. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SirBartleMerryworth. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)