User talk:Shoreranger

Welcome!

Hello, Shoreranger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! DVD+ R/W 21:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lenape

I'm reasonably sure of this edit I made, at History of New York City (prehistory-1664), but given your previous edit, I'd appreciate if you check it and tell me if I misunderstood. - Jmabel | Talk 17:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This seems very good, though I had not noticed before there is no explanation of "Munsee" and, as used here, should be noted as the "Munsee dialect", as opposed to the Unami dialect also spoken by the Lenape. Nice work.--Shoreranger 00:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fordham question?

Hi, no offense meant, but do you work for Fordham? It seems that most of your edits are Fordham-related. Thanks, --AW 11:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

None taken. I do not work for Fordham. Just seems to be a lot to do on that article before I want to move on to too much else. Limited time and energy and all that.... Shoreranger 20:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah OK, thanks --AW 15:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop tagging Fordham University on articles. For alumni, the appropriate category is "Fordham University alumni" and many of the pages you have edited already listed this so your edits on those pages were redundant and unnecessary. Gdo01 23:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that you do good work on the Fordham page. I always watch the page (among others) and it's good to see that someone is maintaining it well. Scskowron 02:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evacuation Day

Hi Shoreranger,
I am fairly new to Wikipedia, but am fairly knowledgeable about New York's history wherever it has something to do with this particular branch of the Riker family. I have made some changes to the Evacuation Day (New York) topic which I hope clarifies any problem you might have with John Van Arsdale's rank or age. The real myth regarding the raising of the flag over the battery (I have never come across the "Bowling Green" reference before but will asume that you have access to material which I do not - I believed at the time the pole was at the battery and that in 1883 that was the structure at that place), seems to be that it was raised by a boy. I strongly recommend that you read Clifton Hood's essay (which is easy to get online) and James Riker's work if you can find it (out of print, expensive to purchase and not online). Clifton Hood's social history essay is a great analysis of class relations in New York throughout the 19th century as well as being an excellent account of the events surrounding the Evacuation itself.
I'm not sure whether my changes are properly Wikified but I am sure that that will get sorted out in time
Regards
John Tierney 00:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Floyd Bennett Field

		The Epic Barnstar
		For helping highlight the role in aviation history of Floyd Bennett Field to New York City, the United States, and the world. Petercorless 23:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fordham article

Okay thanks for the message. I have posted my opinion on the Fordham talk article. Scskowron 19:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. I would also consider Fordham to be the first Catholic college in the region, but I just included that word to be more specific. Scskowron 01:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fordham Student Publications

Thanks for catching my error on the Fordham page. I didn't read the title - I thought the section was for all Fordham publications, not just student ones. Scskowron 22:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hessians

Hey there. I see you replaced the Hessian component in the belligerents section of the infobox on Battle of Harlem Heights. I think that while it is technically true that the Hessians were involved, there's not much reason to separate them out from the British. There were lots of militias involved on the American side, but for this battle, we can lump them all together into the Continental Army. Perhaps if we can figure out the numbers, we can put them in the strength section (see Battle of Long Island. However, to argue your side, if you look at Battle of Fort Washington, there is Hessians in the belligerents section. Perhaps we should bring something up on the project space to standardize this? What do you think? (I'm going to post this same speech on the article talk page) Tan | 39 01:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Hamilton/PMA

Thanks for the kind words. I really appreciate them. Unfortunately, his tactics have worked. I am exhausted. I will not however, go away. I think you're right. I just wish he would stick to the facts and above all, just be civil. I tried to flood him with kindness at first, but that only seemed to make things worse somehow. I'm afraid I lost my cool over time, so I am going to spend some time regaining it. I wish he would set aside his POV, answer direct questions, spend a little more time on his own edits, and drastically less nit-picking those of others, etc. However, sadly, none of those things seem even remotely likely. Responding to things PMA accuses you of in his passive-aggressive way is an exponential time-wasting problem--every accusation I refute brings up three more, and on, and on, and on it goes. I don't have as much time as he does. I hope the article gets new blood. If you know anyone who might be willing to make it a project, please let them know. The article needs all the help, all the new editors it can get. Anyway, thanks again. AdRem (talk) 00:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Thanks for the Barnstar! I hadn't even noticed it! I hope you will still do some work on the article, it needs a lot of help. In any case, have a great weekend! AdRem (talk) 22:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYC meetup

If you're in the city, you may be interested in the NYC meetups. The next one will probably b a picnic in august. Watchlist that page for information. DGG (talk) 22:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the picnic

Unfortunately, we never had enough time to register for a permit. I am just hoping there is less than twenty people. Yes, I hate having to handle it like this. --harej 20:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The King's College (New York)

I've commented at Template_talk:NYC_Colleges#King's restored, Cardozo deleted. --Aepoutre (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

You may wish to note that state is a disambiguation page. The article described these states as self-governing and independent, so I piped the link to sovereign state as this is kind of the definition of what sovereign states are. — Blue-Haired Lawyer 18:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ANPR live the adventure cover08-09.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:ANPR live the adventure cover08-09.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to United Kingdom. Thank you. --Jza84 | Talk 18:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American Revolution Lead

hiya Shoreranger,

Would it be possible to collaborate on rewriting the lead to the American Revolution article? I'm willing to help, but I'm not completely confident about simply doing it myself...

Ω (talk) 14:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We should probably talk about this at Talk:American_Revolution#Lead Section Rewrite, please...

For starters, can we agree to fix the redundant sentences in the first paragraph? Ω (talk) 14:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Deletion Discussion of an Irish Catholic Category

is being discussed at [1]--Epeefleche (talk) 07:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image Deletion by NFCC

I noticed how you recently got FordhamRams.png to comply with NFCC. The same editor who deleted that image also deleted HartfordHawks.png in the Hartford Hawks article. Would you be able to get HartfordHawks.png to comply with these regulations? I would try myself but I am clueless when it comes to images on wikipedia. Any help would be appreciated. The links to the revision when it was deleted and to the image itself are below.

Thanks, Kithira (talk) 12:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irish people

The Irish people article is being vandalized again. I'm still new to wiki editing and I don't know the proper way to revert pages to previous edits, but noticed that you made the last revert after vandalism. Just letting you know, if you want to revert it again. Thanks. 69.171.162.245 (talk) 21:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the vote of support. Yes, editors don't always need to agree, but as long as we agree that there are certain standards to civility and fair play, then Wikipedia is a nice place to live. Chime in on Irish American when you can. Your presence alone is good support. Eastcote (talk) 23:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shoreranger, agree with the tags on Irish American. Thanks.Malke 2010 15:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New York Draft Riot and Irish Americans

Just to be clear, I stated my reasons on the talk page. Simply put, most of what has been added has little to do with the Irish. The part about Tammany is relevant, but the other part, with the number of Blacks killed, is not germane specifically to the Irish, since they were not the only participants in the riot. As currently written, it seems intended to portray the Irish as racists. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 19:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your position. Nevertheless, you did not discuss the proposed change prior to editing, merely explained your position. No consensus was reached in advance. Shoreranger (talk) 19:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Granted. But, I would prefer that discussion continue before the information is readded. Either way, I am not going to revert again. I do hope that some discussion commences on the matter. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 23:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

American Revolution

I've been watching this page for a very long time and I like your edits. But a recent edit there by Rjensen seemed to change the meaning. [2] I almost reverted it, but since we are in mediation on Irish American I thought the better of it. But I wanted to say I think your edits on AR are good.Malke 2010 22:57, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catholics on the Frontier

Hello. I wish we were still able to edit in Irish American, but our hands are tied while the mediation goes on. Your comments on the religion of the Scotch-Irish got me to thinking about Catholicism and Anglicanism on the American Frontier. I found a couple of interesting articles.

I C. Walker Gollar, "Frontiers of Faith: Bringing Catholicism to the West in the Early Republic (review)" The Catholic Historical Review - Volume 95, Number 3, July 2009, pp. 636-637. Relying on documents from Catholic priests and bishops, John Dichtl argues that in the backwoods of Pennsylvania and Maryland to the far edge of Indiana, and especially in Kentucky from the 1780s through the 1820s, Catholics initially lived in harmony with their non-Catholic neighbors.
Thomas W. Spalding, "The Catholic Frontiers", U.S. Catholic Historian, Vol. 12, No. 4, Frontier Catholicism (Fall, 1994), pp. 1-15. The Maryland Anglo-Americans of the backwoods frontier, the French Canadians of the fur-trapping frontier, the Irish of the mining frontier, and the Germans of the Great Plains.

Hopefully when this mediation is done we can get on with more amicable debate. Those of us involved in this have all disagreed with one another sometime in the past, but never on the scale that we are encountering now with the many changes that have taken place in the article. Eastcote (talk) 19:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Irish American Mediation

Sorry for the delay. I have made the edit for the Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-02-27/Irish American concensus, can I get a preposal for the other page, or is this good to close? -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 01:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rights of Englishmen

Members of the WP:EAR team have commented on this article and/or the pattern of editiing of its contributors. Please see: Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests#Rights of Englishmen. --Kudpung (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bronx/The Bronx

Because you participated in a previous discussion on the subject, I'm letting you know that a discussion has started about opneing a Request for Comments concerning "Bronx" versus "The Bronx" as the article title. You can find it here Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:22, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team wants You!

Hi Shoreranger,

I saw some of your contributions on articles related to Wikiproject: United States Public Policy, you seem to know a lot about history, and I was hoping you would be interested in assessing articles with the Public Policy Initiative. There is more info about assessment on the 9/13/2010 Signpost. If you're interested or just curious you can sign up on the project page or just contact me. Thanks! ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 23:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture caption on Science page

Hey Shoreranger, I thought I would explain myself a little more fully here. First of all, I have reworded that "awful" figure caption. My initial intent was to back up the ideas mentioned in that section of the text; my point was that, even though scientists practice a sort of skepticism, this should not be taken to mean that scientists are not probably correct about a lot of things. For example, I had might as well have said "Though scientists who believe [that the sun revolves around the earth] admit they can never be certain, they are still very probably correct". I wonder, would you have objected to that?-Tesseract2 (talk) 03:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I would. My objection has nothing to do with the truth of the statement, only that a caption on an image is the wrong place to convey the idea which, if addressed at all, should be addressed in the body of the article and sourced with citations. Otherwise, it comes off as awkward agenda-pushing. Shoreranger (talk) 02:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shoreranger. You have new messages at DiverDave's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Generation X

Please stop changing the wording in the introduction on the Generation X page. The sources I added (and those not added yet) all use the the phrase high school graduating class, etc. That is also the terminology used when referring to Generation Y, and is thus included in the respective articles. Recent journalists refer to the Millennials and the high school Class of 2000. I am keeping the terminology in line with what is used in media as well as other generation pages. Thank you. CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 19:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up: Sorry, I didn't mean to jump on you. I don't have any issues with the term secondary, except for the fact that it is not used in the sources provided. Also, the Generation Y article page uses the term high school as well in reference to the graduating Class of 2000. Secondary school can refer to any school after primary school - including middle school and junior high. Some students in public school go to separate junior high and high schools. Also, the phrase 'finish their secondary education' can refer to someone graduating from the eighth grade (mini-graduation before junior high). However, high school refers to grades 9-12; it is more specific. The last graduating high school class, 1999, is the last of Generation X. We are trying to be consistent in the use of terminology on these pages. CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 00:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're a good writer

I like your improvements to History of New York City. Just noticing.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Time of year to Give Thanks

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		To Shoreranger for the amazing amount of high-quality content you contribute. Malke 2010 (talk) 19:11, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ANPR live the adventure cover08-09.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ANPR live the adventure cover08-09.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Association of National Park Rangers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Association of National Park Rangers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fluffernutter, previously known as Chaoticfluffy (talk) 01:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AD

Good morning...I see that you reverted an edit that I made on the American AD article. Would it be possible to include an edit summary when you do that? It was a pretty minor point, but the word that you re-added seems a bit unnecessary. The robe either follows the ICC or it doesn't, right? Thanks!--dave-- 13:15, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United States Bill of Rights has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for June 2011

As one of the editors who has made improvements to the United States Bill of Rights article recently this notice has been left to inform you that it has been selected as the United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month for June 2011. The goal this month is to get this article to Good Article standards or better by July 4th, 2011. You can also vote for next months article of the Month or submit a candidate for article of the month here. --Kumioko (talk) 02:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Academic regalia in the United States

Hello, Shoreranger! I'd like to rectify the grammar on that caption that's attracted so much attention lately, but I'd like to confer with you first to understand, exactly and clearly, the meaning that is supposed to be conveyed. I've written up a short message for the article's talk page so any interested user can contribute ideas. I just wanted to send you this message since you seem to understand the topic well! Armadillopteryx (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rights of Englishmen

---but look now! RolandR (talk) 19:33, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gentry

Nikkimaria has drastically forced on the article Gentry an solitary, unparalleled and uncompromising destruction of an article in the name of summarizing. Under the disguise of summarizing she exchanges material for other material. Yes, reducing was needed and it has been done. The galleries and images in the Gentry article have already been over 50% reduced in the spirit of cooperation. Still the reduction continues. Please help in the discussion. The changes have been major and constructive discussion would bee needed on the Gentry talk page. Thank you. Major Torp (talk) 12:26, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Hamilton on slavery

Before I attempt to get you permanently banned for deliberately misrepresenting a source, care to explain why you falsified the the one about the scholarly consensus on him, the other Founders, and slavery? http://www.jstor.org/stable/1408953 ColaXtra (talk) 23:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you to an admin here. ColaXtra (talk) 00:16, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I should have assumed good faith, perhaps you just misread it. Apologies. ColaXtra (talk) 01:33, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The statement that currently leads the section, and the citation that is used to try and support it, are confusing in relation to each other. The paper you cite gives ample eveidence that Hamilton was not, in fact, at all ambivalent about slavery in the United States, and the opening statement of the paragraph was misleading, and set a disingenuous tone for the rest of the section. I have done a significant amount of reading on Hamilton, and there is ample evidence that - in fact - a significant amount of recent scholorship, at least, and even contemporary documentation on Hamilton (especially considering his work the the NY Manumission Society) indicates that he was not typical among his cohort because of his opposition to slavery. I will use the same citation, rephrase the statement, and put in in place in the section that does not give a false impression. Shoreranger (talk) 16:11, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fordham University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heiress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For you

This editor is a Veteran Editor and is entitled
to display this Iron Editor Star.

Btw, Thanks for your recent edit on the Thomas Jefferson page.
-- Gwillhickers (talk) 04:07, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Thanks! I'm honored!! Shoreranger (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Long Island may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

outflanked by the British who attacked from the rear while the Hessians attacked up Battle Pass. ([[Lithograph]] c.1866]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tags on Protestant Ascendancy

It would have been polite to open a discussion at Talk:Protestant Ascendancy before leaving a raft of {{Morerefs}}, {{Who}}, {{Ww}}, {{Cn}}, {{When}}, {{Dubious}}, {{Or}} and {{What}}s, as you did here. I'm not saying that any of the tags were wrong, but throwing them around like confetti does nothing to improve an article. Why, for instance, should one short sentence need five tags in two clumps? Please remove at least the excess tags and open a discussion. Scolaire (talk) 16:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't consider them excessive. I'll open a discussion at your request, though. Shoreranger (talk) 17:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paxton Boys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scots-Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irish American, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scotch-Irish and Ulster Scots (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Generation X, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hughes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fordham seal.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fordham seal.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American Civil War edit

I have opened a discussion on the introduction terms at Talk:American Civil War#List of introduction ACW names., a) supporting your edit and b) suggesting an alternative inline note. Please join the discussion. I wonder if it would be best to construct a Request for Comment after a little commentary. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of National Memorials of the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:46, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fordham seal.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fordham seal.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 🍀 Corkythehornetfan 🍀 03:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shoreranger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Hearts of Oak (New York militia). I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shoreranger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Punk rock into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Generation X If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shoreranger. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Roosevelt Island wiki-picnic on Sunday

If you're in the city, I'd like to invite you to join us at the NYC Wiknic on Sunday. There should be a bunch of other people there also working on NYC topics. Plus, the picnic site affords excellent opportunities to see my very first article subject, U Thant Island!--Pharos (talk) 16:55, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Statue of Alexander Hamilton in front of the Hamilton Club, Brooklyn, NY c. 1935.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Statue of Alexander Hamilton in front of the Hamilton Club, Brooklyn, NY c. 1935.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kings College Erected in 1756.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kings College Erected in 1756.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Province of New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pettifog.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FCLS coat of arms.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FCLS coat of arms.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton infobox photo

Are you okay with this image as a compromise? It's an official portrait of him as Secretary of the Treasury in 1792 and looks fairly close to your 1802 portrait. Most importantly, it looks official (and doesn't depict Hamilton in a depressed state after the death of his son in 1801). Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 08:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Moxy- 23:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

USA is off my watch list now.....but to let you know that at Wiki chat there is talk about your editwaring and perhaps a block on the article for a few months. Best step back! Moxy-

19:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up.

All in all most of the discussions up till just now have been pretty civil.

As far as "edit warring", it is not clear to me how it is decided who is the party in the wrong when it takes two editors to engage. I err on the side of the person who adds the original text, but it seems what really matters is who puts up the warning notice first.

Sorry to see you go. Shoreranger (talk) 19:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work!

Hi there, what good work you are doing to help to inform people about a few elementary facts that they were not taught in school. You might enjoy reading our Yodeling article when I managed to get a lot of history about an African American contribution that few people, including me until I began my work on that article, are aware of. Also read the Gandy dancer article and see the suggestion that a Black man is likely responsible for military Jody calls. Sectionworker (talk) 20:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Shoreranger (talk) 20:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a comment in the appropriate Talk section of the article! Shoreranger (talk) 13:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look, when what the Smithsonian had to say drew no response whatsoever, I am not going to put a lot of effort into trying to convince any of those editors of anything. What the African Americans have done for this American culture is deserving of more article space, not less. The problem that you and I are facing is the problem of a one-sided opinion since we have next to no Black editors here. It's like what women face here, only worse. You've sure done a great job but it looks like you've been throwing your pearls to swine.

Sectionworker (talk) 13:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - and I see you've already commented, I hadn't realized. Best regards. Shoreranger (talk) 13:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Countering systemic bias within the United States article

Hi! I notice and appreciate the work that you have been doing at the United States article to diversify the article with more coverage of underrepresented groups. Given that the article is too long, I think that you might be more successful if you first try to cut down the existing material, starting with the content that is puffery or uncited. Your argument for including material will be stronger if the rest of the article is shorter. You might also be interested in WikiProject Countering systemic bias. — Freoh 20:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will look into your suggestions. Shoreranger (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I have tried but don't know how to delete the comment in the first para of the Culture section. Here it is: Historically, after two World Wars, which delegitimated aggressive nation-statehood and which saw the rise of a culturally liberal United States as a dominant global power, the nascent world society was built on a universalistic cultural frame rooted in the natural laws of science and human rights.}}</ref> This is far from a RS. He is almost unknown and it is one study, not even peer reviewed as far as I saw, and no links to it by anyone that may have used it.

Also, that entire section is so bad it is sickening. It begins with how freedom loving we are and the source is so biased it could be called bigoted. We have the source book in WP and you can read our article for yourself. BTW, if you happen to be Catholic, please improve yourself and your country by becoming a Protestant, or so he says... Maybe we need a little bit of Howard Zinn in the article... Sectionworker (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sectionworker, what do you mean that you don't know how? I agree with you that the sentence is problematic, so I removed it. Feel free to be bold and cut out especially biased material; this article needs some major trimming. — Freoh 23:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. Next I'm going to do something about Huntington. Sectionworker (talk) 02:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fordham University commencement 2010.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fordham University commencement 2010.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:11, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Howard's Tavern (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://stampaday.wordpress.com/2018/08/27/the-battle-of-brooklyn-new-york/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Howard's Tavern may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 21:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have never seen that article before in my life. The content I provided is original, and any similarity to other work is coincidental. Shoreranger (talk) 14:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shoreranger! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 21:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Irish immigration to Bermuda

Hi, I noticed your splitting proposal on the Irish diaspora talkpage. I agree that Irish immigration to Bermuda should be split into it's own page as the section is quite long and not entirely related to the article's main topic. As it does not appear to be a controversial idea, to my understanding it can be split without issue. King HB

Staten Island Cricket Club

The statement is that the Staten Island Cricket Club is the oldest continuously operated cricket club in the US. Yes, the Philadelphia Cricket Club is older, but like many cricket clubs they suspended the playing of cricket around 1920 for other sports such as golf and tennis. According to the Philadelphia Cricket Club’s website cricket play started again about 20 years ago, that means cricket play hasn’t been continuous. The statement about the Staten Island Cricket Club is correct, not dubious. Cusack301 (talk) 01:46, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

Congrats for entering Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits/5001–10000! Keep up the good work! Timothytyy (talk) 12:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Howard's Tavern

Hello, Shoreranger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Howard's Tavern, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]