User talk:Shmuliko

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Shmuliko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! IZAK 12:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC) Greetings. I'm a journalist trying to reach Shmuliko for a magazine story that involves Ashdod -- a place on which you seem to be something of an expert! Can you reply soonest? Many thanks, Karl —Preceding unsigned comment added by KV1957 (talk • contribs) 09:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your writing

is excellent. I wish you also wrote about sports clubs in Hebrew. ⌠Yellow up⌡ 08:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'd like to organize my user page. What is relevant. Can recommend some page to follow? Shmuliko 10:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? If you want to create your user page just click on the red "Shmuliko" link. You can add almost (besides curses, illegal material etc) whatever you want to that page. ⌠Yellow up⌡ 22:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Kharkiv vokzal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kharkiv vokzal.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:Israeli Premier League

Please do not add club logos to this (or any) template. Wikipedia's fair use policy explicitly disallows the use of fair use images in templates. Thanks. Oldelpaso 20:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Modiin_view.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Modiin_view.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ariel Upper campus.jpg

Hi, can you explain why you tagged this photo as "CopyrightedFreeUse" when you uploaded this photo to WikiCommons but when you uploaded it to English Wikipedia you claim it is "fair use"?

Can you explain why you claim that the copyright owner of Image:Kishon.jpg has released all rights to it when in fact you took it from ru:Изображение:Kishon.jpg who has neither a source or any such claim?

And why do you claim that the copyright owner has released all rights to Image:Suvorov portrait.jpg when you took it from ru:Изображение:P001.jpg who has no such claim?

Isn't it a fact that you will upload any photo and tag them with a phony license? Thuresson 13:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. First, please don't attack me, I'm not a criminal. I'm not such experienced user and may make mistakes. As I understand all files copyrighted from ru.wikipedia is GFDL if there is no other license. If so it is my mistake & I will fix it. As for Image:Ariel Upper campus.jpg: it is "CopyrightedFreeUse" I'm sure, I've studied there. What kind of licence should I use when I'm loading it from wikipedia? GFDL? Shmuliko 15:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. If a photo is licensed under GFDL, you should use the same license, GFDL. Also, the GFDL license requires you to give credit to the photographer, eg. write out his/her name: "Photograph by Jeff" or something similar. Also, please always include a source where you got the photo so that others can check for themselves. Thanks, Thuresson 15:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really find your tone a bit exaggerated, as if Shmuliko were on an FBI investigation. I don't see any reason to say sentences like "Isn't that a fact ... and tag them with a phony license", which sounds like a sentence a prosecutor would say to a witness. ⌠Yellow up⌡ 18:22, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page removing

How can I remove page with incorrect name? In category some how exists incorrect name Amos (satllite) instead of Amos (satellite). Thank you in advance. Shmuliko 16:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the author then you can tag the page with {{db-author}} and it will be deleted. I have deleted it for you. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmouud Ahmadinjiad

See development, might interest you [1] Amoruso 02:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Lahishpark 3.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lahishpark 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I want "JBZ_elephant.jpg" - can you load it to Commons pls?

שלום. I came across your profile because I wanted to learn who uploaded this picture:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:JBZ_elephant.jpg

Well, the thing is that I need to use this picture on the Arabic version of the Jerusalem Biblical Zoo, since Gabi was once featured on a Lebanese television station (and my interest on this particular elephant). If you could upload it to commons.wikimedia.org, I would find it easier to use it, plus anyone else. Hope you'll have the time to register at commons.wikimedia.org asap.

.תודה -Qasamaan 22:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. By the way, you live in a beautiful area. I just saw Ashdod's article. :)

Done.

P.S. I glad that you like the area. In hope you'll visit it. :) Shmuliko 11:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FIFA Club World Cup 2006 logo.gif

The image was deleted because it does not have any source information. The image needs a source from where it was originally uploaded according to image use policy. Shyam ^(T/C) 17:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Category:Port cities in the Middle East

Those were giving me the most trouble as to where to put them. Some countries may have multiple, but others may not. I'll try to redistribute them by country (Israel has quite a few), others can be put into more well-defined regions (Arabian peninsula) and the rest will just go in Asia. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 16:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Ariel_Upper_campus.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ariel_Upper_campus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The issue have been discussed previously. Please find content policy in link below (Unfortunately, in hebrew only). http://www2.yosh.ac.il/Disclaimer.aspx According to this (paragraph 3), as student, I can use the content without CJS responsibility. Shmuliko 05:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno. Not that it's written clearly, but I understand from paragraph 1 that all rights are reserved, and in paragraph 3 that the college is referring to personal pages or something else. I don't think that the college would mind having the image on wp, though I assume that they would want to still keep some sort of copyright on it. I would suggest contacting the legal dept as requested and have Fritz give you some time to do so since the next week or so are holidays in Israel. --Shuki 20:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is pretty clear. According to paragraph 1 the content belongs to college, student and employees. Nobody can use the content as college official statement, till this approved by judicial office. According to paragraph 3 the students are free to use content in their web sites. I think it more than enough. Shmuliko 08:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shmuliko, I reinstated the PUI tag and dispute the licensing. I asked a couple of questions at WP:PUI. Would you be willing to continue conversation? Regards, Iamunknown 03:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely Yes. I've provided all needed information and can't understand whats wrong with it. Shmuliko 04:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I detailed my concerns at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#April 3. I unfortunately cannot read Hebrew but, based upon a machine translation, I think that, though you may use the images as a student, your use does not extend to Wikipedia. Anyways, feel free to follow up at WP:PUI. --Iamunknown 04:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I may disagree. That means that all information is Free for use by students and employees, however this will not be referred as official CJS state. Shmuliko 04:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As well as I could interpret the machine translation, it did not say that material from the website is licensed under a license that permits unrestricted commercial reuse and derivative works. Does it explicitly state that it permits those two things? --Iamunknown 04:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC) --Iamunknown 04:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. But it doesn't limit reuse of information for any purpose. As well as faculties list there taken from the site, the immage can be used in the same manner. I'm free to use this content on my own web page for any reason -> I'm free to use it in Wiki. Shmuliko 05:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless a license states explicitly that the content can be used for unrestricted commercial reuse and derivative works, we don't assume we have those rights. If you use the content on the wiki, then we assume that everyone else can use it as well. --Iamunknown 05:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

O'k. I'll put it on my web page and license it GFDL. Use it however you want :). I can also talk to officials, but to achieve written permission can be complicative. Shmuliko 06:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry but there is reason to keep this image deleted. According to the university site you are free to use the image. Like Iamunknown stated, this does not mean they give permission for commercial use and derivative works. It also definitely does NOT mean that the university gives you the right to license the image under the GFDL when you put it on your webpage. Garion96 (talk) 10:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Karaites as sect discussion

Hello. I was wondering about a change you made to Karaite Judaism (denomination instead of sect). Can you help me find the discussion to which you refer there? nadav 01:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I've mean then "Semantic in Heaer" topic, but I saw now that you continued the discussion. As for me I think that denominationis correct definition, however I'll not interfer anymore, because I think my knowlege in this issue is weak. May be I'll add some info about Ashdod community, since I meet some of them. Shmuliko 05:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sect is not correct at all. It sounds as a bad thing. --Neria 20:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AshdodLogo.png

Hello, Shmuliko. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:AshdodLogo.png) was found at the following location: User:Shmuliko. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed Image:Dynamo Kyiv.png from your user page today for the same reason. ~ Bigr Tex 21:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AshdodLogo.png

Hello Shmuliko, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:AshdodLogo.png) was found at the following location: User:Shmuliko. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 10:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ashdod article

Hi. Great work on the article. I removed the bullets because I dont think that the article is far off of GA status - with a little improving of citations it should be getting there. I know that it wont pass through if it has the bullets so I put it into prose. -- Flymeoutofhere 13:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW - love your userpage - just used some of it for the basis of mine if you dont mind. --Flymeoutofhere 13:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:K1K logo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:K1K logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Dprk nampo dam.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dprk nampo dam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 09:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

.

That's a downside of just telling one admin. Another user might go and tag the image again, which happened now. The best thing is to e-mail the permission to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org. After which the image will be tagged and a permission tag will be placed so a listing like this won't happen again. However, he gives permission to use his images on wikipedia. For wikipedia this is not clear enough. Can the image be modified or used commercially? Could you ask him to release the image under a free license? Like the GFDL or CC-BY/CC-BY-SA?

The images you uploaded

Hi Shmuliko. I believe we've met before, when I listed an image of the upper campus of Ariel University at WP:PUI. I came across some of your other images, and I am concerned about them. I'd like to deal directly with you, if possible, rather than at WP:PUI. Please respond here rather than at my talk page.

There are multiple images, but for starters, I am concerned about Image:Ashdod picargo.jpg, Image:Ashdod picgencargo.jpg and Image:Ashdod picbulk.jpg. You wrote that these three images were, "Donated by Port Official site http://www.ashdodport.org.il/". Could you forward the e-mails (that is, your request, their reply and any further correspondence) to permission-en AT wikimedia DOT org? Thanks, Iamunknown 23:49, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those images I got more than a year before. Do you realy expect me to keep the e-mail? Here above somebody delete the immage with attached e-mail under non-understandable reason. I'm tired of defending my work and embittered. Shmuliko 05:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ashdod

Thanks. I think the one thing currently holding it back from A class, and even FA for that matter is the number of citations. Add to these, and I think it really is getting there. By the way the article is looking great - great work. --Flymeoutofhere 08:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks as well. I agree with Fly - we are very close. I'll be around to help out when I get a chance, and hopefully we can get the star soon. Tewfik^Talk 05:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for your great efforts on improving Ashdod to GA status. Wear it with pride! Tewfik^Talk 05:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FIFA_Club_World_Cup_2006_logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:FIFA_Club_World_Cup_2006_logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 21:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Macher.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Macher.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 10:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationales

If your going to copy fair use rationales at least don't make it so obvious [2] It's signed as I think it falls under the fair use requirements. — Moe ε 04:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry & Thanks. Shmuliko 05:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OFC Beach Soccer Championship

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of OFC Beach Soccer Championship, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.oceaniafootball.com/index.cgi?det=1&intArticleID=1900&sID=12. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 11:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Image:EilatLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Image:EilatLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Maccabi-Petah-Tikva.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Maccabi-Petah-Tikva.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Ariel College logo.PNG

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Ariel College logo.PNG. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 14:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GanYavne Seal.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:GanYavne Seal.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ashdod lead

Hi. Had a quick look at the lead, and copyedited it. Consider droping a line at the reviewer's talk page, and see if the changes satisfy the GA requirements. My editing will be be irregular in the next 2-3 days, but I hope to find some time to have a 2nd look if needed. -- Derwig 22:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. The article is close or at FA quality. We should think of FAC or Peer review as a next step. Derwig 21:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I would recommend a Peer review first. Feedback from reviewers can be valuable, and help with preparation of the article for FAC. Let me know if you nominate. Derwig 23:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Some good advice in the auto-review (and some irrelevant), but lets wait for actual reviewers. In the meantime, if you know editors that can improve the style of the article, it would be a good idea to leave a message and ask for help. Derwig 17:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ashdod - peer review

Some good advice in the peer review. Can you add information on local media (local newspapers etc.), and on education (number of schools, high schools, kindergartens, and higher education institutions if any exists)? I will continue to copyedit, and format references. -- Derwig 11:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EilatLogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EilatLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Kharkiv square.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Kharkiv square.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. butko (talk) 08:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AshkelonLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AshkelonLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fc ashdod.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Fc ashdod.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hapoel Tel-Aviv.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Hapoel Tel-Aviv.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hapoel-Petah-Tikva.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Hapoel-Petah-Tikva.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maccabi-Petah-Tikva.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Maccabi-Petah-Tikva.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:FEL.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:FEL.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JBZ_logo.JPG

I have tagged Image:JBZ_logo.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:EilatLogo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:EilatLogo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Giv'ati (moshav)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming articles is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Jon513 (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've created the "Redirect". The reason was :

1. To fit it to list of settlments in Be'er Tuvia Regional Council topic.

2. Giv'ati is usualy means Giv'ati Brigade

Shmuliko (talk) 15:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chords Bridge

Hi Shmuliko, Could you add to the discussion on the proper name for this article on the talk page? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AshdodPortLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:AshdodPortLogo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Association Football variants

I saw you edited and contributed many beach soccer related articles, and I'll be happy if you'll support this Wikiproject. RaLo18 08:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks to your support, Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Taskforce on Association Football variants has been created! 2o-DeMoN-o8_t*c*a*wp 17:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC) (We couldn't create a WikiProject)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shavit 2

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shavit 2, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Zack Holly Venturi (talk) 23:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hapoel Tel-Aviv.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Hapoel Tel-Aviv.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Hammersoft (talk) 16:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Beitar Jerusalem

A tag has been placed on Template:Beitar Jerusalem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still there?

Hi Shmuliko! I noticed that you asked for a peer review on Ashdod, but have not been active that much recently. Are you still editing? I'll be glad to help with specifics on the Ashdod article, but don't have the patience or time to make all the minor tweaks to make it featured, nor do I have knowledge on local Ashdod topics like media. Do you plan to return to the article? Cheers, Ynhockey ^(Talk) 20:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i'm here. Unfortunately I haveno time to make major edits. I believ I'll be able to collect some info and to place it in the topic. It will take me some month or two. Thank you a lot for your support. Shmuliko (talk) 21:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HolonLogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:HolonLogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Communication satellites of Israel

Category:Communication satellites of Israel, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 02:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Navon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Navon.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Budivelnik logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Budivelnik logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BeerTuvia Seal.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BeerTuvia Seal.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Thanks for contributing new article Rutenberg Power Station. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Veriss (talk) 06:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Kharkiv park.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kharkiv park.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Kharkiv cathedral.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kharkiv cathedral.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Kharkiv muni.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kharkiv muni.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Kharkiv vokzal.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kharkiv vokzal.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Macher.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Macher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ligat Al Map 2011-12

Thats how I see your new version - http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/526/ipl1112wiki.png

Thats how I see the old version which I made - http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/4015/ipl1112wikiold.png

You see now why I revert your version, I have checked the template map in three browsers and had the same affect.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 16:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bnei-Yehuda.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bnei-Yehuda.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 08:21, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maccabia1.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Maccabia1.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Shmuliko}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:27, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BeerTuvia35.JPG needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:BeerTuvia35.JPG appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Shmuliko}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ariel College logo.PNG)

Thanks for uploading File:Ariel College logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:BeerTuvia35.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:BeerTuvia35.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:BeerTuvia35.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:BeerTuvia35.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Channel One Cup (football)

The article Channel One Cup (football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable friendly competition, not significantly covered in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 21:26, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Channel One Cup (football) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Channel One Cup (football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channel One Cup (football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 13:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:HakoahVisitPalestine24.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HakoahVisitPalestine24.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:12, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Israeli Space Agency (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Israeli Space Agency (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shmuliko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Assuta Ashdod Medical Center

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Assuta Ashdod Medical Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WWGB (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ramat HaSharon Hammers

Hello Shmuliko,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ramat HaSharon Hammers for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Arthistorian1977: I have removed the speedy delete, this has been an established page for an established team in a league for many years. The page in question was created by blanking the original page Herzliya Hammers and copy and pasting to the new page. I have undone this move as well. If you wish to move it please follow the WP:MOR protocol. - Galatz ^Talk 14:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Galatz: I don't understand why did you revert the "REDIRECT'. The team is based in Ramat HaSharon for several Years and officially named Ramat HaSharon Hammers by IFL.

User:Shmuliko

File:AQflag.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AQflag.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2016–2017 Israeli Football League season

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Shmuliko, thanks for creating 2016–2017 Israeli Football League season!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bank of Israel logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Bank of Israel logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shmuliko. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2017–2018 Israel Football League season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hiatus

Israel Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hiatus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maccabi-Petah-Tikva.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maccabi-Petah-Tikva.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shmuliko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Israeli Football League (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Israeli Football League (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ligat Al Map

Template:Ligat Al Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 17:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Basketball in Israel

Template:Basketball in Israel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Blue marina.jpg

The file File:Blue marina.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:AshdodPortCargoTraf.gif

Thanks for uploading File:AshdodPortCargoTraf.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Merom haGalil Seal.JPG

The file File:Merom haGalil Seal.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:AdHalomObelisk.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AdHalomObelisk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GAR notice

Ashdod has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ashdod picbulk.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ashdod picbulk.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ashdod picgencargo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ashdod picgencargo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 14:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Kharkiv center.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kharkiv center.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 14:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ashdod Marina.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ashdod Marina.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 14:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ParkHolotShikma.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ParkHolotShikma.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 14:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:RomanticHolot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RomanticHolot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 14:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maccabi-Petah-Tikva.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maccabi-Petah-Tikva.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting merge arbitaration

Hello, the discussion on merging Jewish Fascism into Revisionist Maximalism has not yet reached a consensus, so I am seeking a neutral party to mediate and/or make a decision. A. Rosenberg (talk) 03:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Tag900.png

Thanks for uploading File:Tag900.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kys5g^talk! 13:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Jerusalem

Hi, I'm trying to start "Wikiproject Jerusalem" now, I'm looking for editors who would like to join the effort. I saw that you (long ago) created Chords Bridge so I thought you might be interested. If so, write to me. Good Day. PeleYoetz (talk) 08:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]