User talk:Shivam Kumar 766

Welcome!

Hi Shivam Kumar 766! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 03:50, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please don't use the Administrators noticeboard for such questions. In brief, the answer is that we're not LinkedIn. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Republic TV seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 06:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at NDTV, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 06:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Republic TV, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 06:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shivam Kumar 766! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Republic TV several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Republic TV, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 07:05, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shivam Kumar 766! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:57, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Venkat TL (talk) 06:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Venkat TL,

Don't hurt anyone sentiment on belief, religion and never spread hate-news against Hindu and India. I warn you to not stop me from editing and removing content that violates otherwise I may hack your whole website .That is ultimatum.

For you adding Republic -TV as Hindu-nationalist is neutral point of view. For me adding NDTV as Muslim-nationalist is not neutral point of view. Even my citation and sources are correct. Shivam Kumar 766 (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Republic TV. Adakiko (talk) 07:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adakiko,

I am Shivam and I am really sorry to violate wikipedia policies but let me give permission to create my profile page better. So I can create more neutral article pages for users. I swear that I will not create any violating content or anything like that.

Thanks

Shivam Shivam Kumar 766 (talk) 05:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Republic TV, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Bajrang Dal. — Newslinger talk 20:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Swastika. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me clear you.I had added best reference from my sources.It is called Hakenkreuz and it originated from Germany.So stop it calling swastika rather than Hakekreuz. Shivam Kumar 766 (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You all are build from left wing idelogies. You don't have power to make Islamic ideologies people accused but calling Indian nationalist militant.This double standard will kill you.God will never accept you as a good human being. Shivam Kumar 766 (talk) 14:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 00:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I need to clear you. "Your" sources, that's a newspaper article. It's a lousy source and won't let you overthrow a longstanding consensus, established worldwide, about the usage of these words, but that's a matter you could have taken up on the talk page. You didn't--you chose to invoke some deity to throw down some wrath on me (and, apparently, other Wikipedia editors) for an unspecified and profoundly ungrammatical offense. You can't do that on a collaborative project. Drmies (talk) 00:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alakh Pandey (December 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

S0091 (talk) 17:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shivam Kumar 766! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Naula Village

Hello, Shivam Kumar 766. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naula Village, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Naula Village

Hello, Shivam Kumar 766. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Naula Village".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]