User talk:Shivaguru krish

Petta Movie already gross 300cr worldwide

October 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kabali (film). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

As you've been told twice now - "Figures are disputed. So you can't add figures from one source in the infobox" Begoon 14:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kabali (film), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Begoon 14:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Kabali (film). Begoon 15:07, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About quarries

As per source only I tried to update the page, I can submit you the source atleast you please do corections. Shivaguru krish (talk) 15:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do corrections

Im ready to submit you the source for kabali(film), please do corrections. Shivaguru krish (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask on article talk pages for changes to be made, and they will be discussed. So far all you've been doing is edit-warring, ignoring requests for discussion/explanation, and trying to force your own version by revert wars. If you now want to start discussing on article talk pages instead then that would be a good thing - but please stop edit-warring and removing referenced content without discussion or explanation - that will get you blocked.

In this case you would need to open a new section at Talk:Kabali (film), be patient, and wait for responses and consensus to be reached. -- Begoon 16:02, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm A-NEUN. I noticed that in this edit to Darbar (film), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A-NEUN ⦾TALK⦾ 10:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I attempt to update the 'Actual box office collection' of the movie 'Darbar'. I request you to update the box office collections,for your reference I can give you the source.

Actual box office figure is 267c. For your reference I can give the URL source. Kindly request you to update the real box office figure Shivaguru krish (talk) 10:42, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that you make a WP:EDITREQ on the talk page of the article in question. A-NEUN ⦾TALK⦾ 10:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Darbar (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] You apparently don't understand the difference between a prediction and a figure that has been estimated to have been achieved. Please note that competency is required, so I hope your decision-making is a bit stronger moving forward. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I'm giving actual reliable source you are not considering that. Those sites you blacklisted and not considering reliable source.

Please consider reliable source to update. Shivaguru krish (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't understand the difference between a prediction and a source saying that the film is confirmed to have grossed a certain amount, I don't know how to help you. Further, the source says "It is estimated that Darbar was made on a budget of close to Rs 200 crore. Therefore, Darbar should gross about Rs 280 - 285 crore globally to be a profitable outing as far as its theatrical run is concerned." This means that the writer is doing a projection on what the film has to gross before it is considered successful. If you don't understand that distinction, then you are editing far beyond your capabilities. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:31, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Thalaivar168_poster.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Thalaivar168_poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 06:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thalaivar 168

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Thalaivar 168 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 07:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thalaivar168 (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Thalaivar168 (film), does not have enough content to remain published as is. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources and information from said sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:55, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thalaivar168 (film)

Hello, Shivaguru krish. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thalaivar168".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]