User talk:SheldonCohen
Sheldon Cohen article
[edit]The problem you will face is that your username is the same as the subject of the article. So, the factual question is, are you *that* Sheldon Cohen? If you are writing an article about yourself, it's not that it can't technically be done, but it will raise eyebrows among the reviewer set. So, assuming you *are* the subject. What should you do? (The article is otherwise in my opinion ready to be moved to mainspace.) The challenge will be that you have a conflict of interest. See WP:COI. The defense is disclosure. You could make it in the article's talk page, but that would be awkward. You can also say so on your USER page. You don't need to go into great detail, just that you are SC, and a psych prof. If you are *not* Sheldon Cohen then you should create a new user account, where you do not use a name, just one of those cutesy account names, and repost the article from such page. "Article name"=="User name" seems to be a problem. Any questions? Respond on my talk page. Need help moving the article? Ask. It's likely you can do this yourself. Look towards the top right of the page for "New section". To the right of that is a star. Click on the star. Select "move". Examine the prompts. At that point, give the article the name you want. Tkotc (talk) 06:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Armbrust WrestleMania XXVII Undertaker 19–0 20:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant talk 22:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Ideas for improvement
[edit]Hi Sheldon. Sorry about the delay here, real life got in the way. I'm reviewing now, and will come up with a bullet point list for you in a couple of moments re: PPS WormTT 19:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- First things first. Under external links policy, external links should not be linked within the article, but only in the External Link area. Which means I'd suggest removing all the external links there.
- There is no need for a title, if it gets to the main space, there will be one there automatically.
- The article should be verifable, which means that should find some sources that are not self-published and not affiliated with the product, which discusses the subject. See more at identifying reliable sources.
- Why is the scale notable? Is it very widely used? Can you source that?
Hope that helps as a start. WormTT 19:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 01:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]Pol430 talk to me 22:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 22:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Talkback re: Sheldon A. Cohen and Perceived Stress Scale
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 18:55, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant talk 21:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
- Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Thank you for helping Wikipedia!
My76Strat (talk) 13:13, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
A thing about references
[edit]This line names a reference.<ref name=Choosename>This is the reference information.</ref>
This line uses the named reference.<ref name=Choosename/>
This line names a footnote.<ref name=nameit group=Note>This is the actual footnote.</ref>
This line uses the named footnote.<ref name=nameit group=Note/>
And this line uses both the named reference and the named footnote.<ref name=Choosename/><ref name=nameit group=Note/>
This line names a reference.[1]
This line uses the named reference.[1]
This line names a footnote.[Note 1]
This line uses a named footnote.[Note 1]
And this line uses both the named reference and the named footnote.[1][Note 1]
References
[edit]Footnotes
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
- Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Thank you for helping Wikipedia!