User talk:Shark2433086

Welcome to Wikipedia, Shark2433086! Thank you for your contributions. This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rasnaboy (talk) 14:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mir Osman Ali Khan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — DaxServer (talk to me) 09:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of largest empires, you may be blocked from editing. The sources you cited for the Chola dynasty entry do not even remotely verify the information you added. Misrepresenting sources like this is completely unacceptable. TompaDompa (talk) 22:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dum Dum metro station, you may be blocked from editing. Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe 11:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mughal Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William Francis Frederick Waller, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kakatiya dynasty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:45, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Kerala. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sumanuil 22:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at H. D. Deve Gowda, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 19:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ilamchetchenni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puhar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Your recent editing history at British Empire shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. W C M_email 16:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The text is not very well-written, unfortunately, and on Wikipedia we try to avoid citing encyclopedias. Drmies (talk) 17:25, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of countries by GDP (nominal), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with the policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake in regard to your edits, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on Talk:List of countries by GDP (nominal). Thank you. LVTW2 (talk) 02:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Old Tamil into Tamil language. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:35, 26 January 2022 (UTC) hello, I actually wrote it Old Tamil and copied it into Tamil.[reply]

February 2022

Per the Manual of Style page on India-related articles, avoid the use of Indic scripts in the lead sections or infoboxes. Instead, use International Phonetic Alphabet pronunciation guides, which are more international. Exceptions are articles on the script itself, articles on a language that uses the script, and articles on texts originally written in a particular script. This does not apply to articles that are not predominantly within the scope of WikiProject India.

Consensus and common practice among WikiProject Pakistan editors is that the lead sentence of an article may contain Urdu or other transliterations in regional script(s) such as Shahmukhi, Perso-Arabic, Naskh etc., where applicable or relevant. IPA may be used additionally to aid pronunciation. Articles under the scope of WikiProject Pakistan are not covered under WP:INDICSCRIPT. Note that this consensus only applies to Pakistan-related articles. The use of Urdu and other non-Indic scripts on articles outside the scope of Pakistan-related articles, such as India-related articles, may be subsumed under WP:INDICSCRIPT.

Gotitbro (talk) 11:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The scripts you have added will be reverted if they haven't been already. Please do not add non-English scripts et all to India related articles. Gotitbro (talk) 11:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Itcouldbepossible. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tamil Nadu have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please don't do things without reaching a consensus. MOSPI no longer publishes data, and it a dead link. The current data is published by Government of India Economic Survey of India. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 06:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gujarat, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. You gave no explanation for the removal of sources. David Biddulph (talk) 15:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Old Tamil. Doug Weller talk 20:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been warned about adding WP:INDICSCRIPTS to articles, yet you continue. Furthermore, you have added unsourced, unattested birth/death places and other WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH to multiple articles.

You have been warned about this multiple editors. Unless you are looking for a ban, please stop. Gotitbro (talk) 05:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited M. A. Chidambaram Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IPL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khmer Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khmer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shark2433086. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shark2433086 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use SGSGSG1123445 to upload images and miner edits when edit.I sue different accounts on different devices. Using multiple accounts for technical purposes is allowed. I did originally make some unsourced edits when I originally started to edit, I apologize. I did stop once other users told me the other users told me the edit was not well sourced.I have made several well sourced edits and other contributors to Wikipedia.]

Decline reason:

Your use was in violation of WP:SOCK and you don't seem to understand this yet. Yamla (talk) 21:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you please tell me exactly what rule I violated? I won’t violate that rule again Shark2433086 (talk) 03:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Can you please tell me exactly what rule I violated? I won’t violate that rule again