User talk:Shapeyness/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Shapeyness. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
January 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to J. Cole. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. General Ization Talk 21:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- One citation alone cannot serve as a reliable source for the claim that anyone is "widely regarded" as the best of anything. Please stop adding this or similar non-neutral content at this or any biographical article. General Ization Talk 21:04, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- You can always bring this issue to the article's Talk page and seek consensus for the content. General Ization Talk 21:07, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
@General Ization: sorry about that, I don't have strong feelings about that. I was just on the page and saw sourced content being removed without explanation (should've thought more about it). Alduin2000 (talk) 01:27, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Why did you revert my Jean Grae edit?
I literally linked to her verified twitter where she corrected the incorrect article? She publicly thanked me for doing it. Why would you revert that??? Jonceramic (talk) 04:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Jonceramic: sorry but Wikipedia is written based upon the secondary sources not primary sources. In hindsight though it would probably be best to put it back as crediting Jean Grae and put a citation needed tag. Alduin2000 (talk) 18:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
G Fuel
I saw that you added the "this article is written like an ad" banner to my G Fuel article. I am changed some things around and I am inviting you to check it to see if it's better now. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 20:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- @AdrianWikiEditor: I think it's ok now but it needs a lot of work having more information added/sourced.
- @Alduin2000: Thank you for checking it out. I am working on getting much more information. Plus once Google starts putting the article in the search in a few weeks more people will come and edit it. Still, I want to make sure it's pretty complete before that happens.
Please comment on Talk:Appeal to nature
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Appeal to nature. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
I want to reach consensus on this issue about which I and others have edit warred, i.e. how we present the rape comments . Let's try to see if we can do so without personal attacks. I am new here and recognize that I got a little too heated in the previous debate; I am willing to start over and AGF. I have reached out to the other editors on the page, and I hope you too are willing and able to help me develop the lede on Benjamin. GergisBaki (talk) 06:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, User:Alduin2000. I want you to consider your recent removal of a source in the article Carl Benjamin. Despite the source being effectively a local tabloid, it contains relevant information about the person and his statement of opinions, which are needed in the article. Ajñavidya (talk) 23:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Edit request
There is a minor correction in this edit. "... behind Premam and Lucifer" should be changed to "... behind Lucifer and Premam" as Lucifer is the highest-grossing Malayalam film in Tamil Nadu per the source. 2405:204:D20B:BB55:5C9B:4C3:4495:6BB7 (talk) 13:47, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Done Thanks, 2405:204:D20B:BB55:5C9B:4C3:4495:6BB7. Alduin2000 (talk) 14:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for doing this. I'm really glad that the apparent lack of topicality of the concern didn't preclude a medically-relevant fix in keeping with WP policies/guidelines. Cheers! 86.172.7.184 (talk) 16:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- No problem, 86.172.7.184, seemed like a nice and easy fix for me to do. A thanks is nice so thanks for the thanks I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . Alduin2000 (talk) 22:30, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Providing a standard alert for information per the discussion at Talk:Stephanie Hirst --Fæ (talk) 11:16, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Fæ: I already knew about this ruling but thanks for the notification anyway Alduin2000 (talk) 12:39, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Shapeyness/Archive 2,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:History of Christianity
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:History of Christianity. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Please comment on Talk:Ole Nydahl
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ole Nydahl. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)