User talk:Shan 052705

Karna Shilahara moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Karna Shilahara, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —teb728 t c 10:55, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My new page. Shan 052705 07:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shilahara, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 15:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Kapardin I, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:V, and go through WP:TUTORIAL if you haven't already. Merely claiming that you're providing the "true" information and removing "wrong" information is not sufficient: you need to provide reliable sources for the changes you're making. utcursch | talk 13:57, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Dridhaprahara. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 18:00, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Seuna (Yadava) dynasty. utcursch | talk 13:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content and removal of sourced content. Please use this period to go through WP:TUTORIAL, if you haven't already. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. utcursch | talk 14:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive edits: the content you are removing is sourced in the article body. Wikipedia is not a place for your language politics. utcursch | talk 14:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits that involve removal of sourced content and linguistic chauvinism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. utcursch | talk 15:10, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Shilahara, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Next time you remove reliably-sourced content to suit your linguistic agenda, you will be blocked indefinitely. utcursch | talk 18:59, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please stop making unsourced changes, especially when the article already has sourced content. Also, please have a look at Help:Edit summary - an edit summary should explain the changes you are making, not "Please edit this page". utcursch | talk 15:32, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vijaya (Satavahana)

Hello, Shan 052705,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Vijaya (Satavahana), for deletion, because it's impossible to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yajna Sri Satakarni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vijaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vijaya (Satavahana) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vijaya (Satavahana), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 09:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Babaji Raje Bhosale

Hello Shan 052705,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Babaji Raje Bhosale for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 17:06, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sambhaji Bhosale

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sambhaji Bhosale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mcampany (talk) 04:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Karnoji

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karnoji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kheloji

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Kheloji, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:35, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Maratha Empire, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 14:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Baji I Nimbalkar

Hello, Shan 052705

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Baji I Nimbalkar, for deletion because it seems to be incoherent gibberish. If you want to practice editing-skills, please use the sandbox.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|AaqibAnjum}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 12:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baji I Nimbalkar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Baji I Nimbalkar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to add unsourced information, including material to an infox that directly contradicts an article and another which said a king reigned for 3 centuries - competence issues.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 15:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vijaya (Satavahana)

Hello, Shan 052705. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vijaya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]