User talk:ShadowBee

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, ShadowBee! Thank you for your contributions. I am Beeblebrox and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Beeblebrox (talk) 18:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diphenylcarbazide has been accepted

Diphenylcarbazide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diphenylcarbazone has been accepted

Diphenylcarbazone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp ✉ 18:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mish-mash (food) (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mish-mash (food) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mish-mash (food), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShadowBee! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mish-mash (food) has been accepted

Mish-mash (food), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dragons breath pepper.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Dragons breath pepper.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.alamy.com/mike-smith-owner-of-tom-smith-plants-in-st-asaph-has-grown-the-worlds-hottest-chilli-named-dragons-breath-it-measures-248-million-on-the-scoville-heat-scale-mike-will-also-be-exhibiting-plants-in-this-years-chelsea-flower-show-pictured-mike-claims-you-can-see-the-face-of-the-welsh-dragon-in-the-chilli-tuesday-16th-may-2017-the-worlds-hottest-chilli-pepper-so-fiery-it-could-kill-someone-who-eats-it-has-been-created-in-north-wales-but-hobby-grower-mike-smiths-record-breaker-was-developed-to-be-used-as-an-anaesthetic-because-its-oils-are-so-potent-they-can-numb-the-skin-it-measu-image235123015.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 22:57, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dragons breath chili pepper.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Dragons breath chili pepper.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.alamy.com/mike-smith-owner-of-tom-smith-plants-in-st-asaph-has-grown-the-worlds-hottest-chilli-named-dragons-breath-it-measures-248-million-on-the-scoville-heat-scale-mike-will-also-be-exhibiting-plants-in-this-years-chelsea-flower-show-tuesday-16th-may-2017-the-worlds-hottest-chilli-pepper-so-fiery-it-could-kill-someone-who-eats-it-has-been-created-in-north-wales-but-hobby-grower-mike-smiths-record-breaker-was-developed-to-be-used-as-an-anaesthetic-because-its-oils-are-so-potent-they-can-numb-the-skin-it-measures-more-than-248-million-on-the-heat-measuring-scoville-scale-and-it-could-image235122962.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 22:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Panagyurishte-style eggs.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Panagyurishte-style eggs.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Panagyurishte-style eggs.jpg

Hello, ShadowBee. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Panagyurishte-style eggs.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teleshko vareno moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Teleshko vareno, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, ShadowBee

Thank you for creating Princess (food).

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nicely done article. Literally made my mouth water. One thing, the last assertion in the article really should have a citation.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969:

Thank you for your kind words, although I think there are quite a few phrases that are somewhat poorly worded in the article, that I'm thinking of rephrasing at a later time. Anyway, on topic - I don't have a citation explaining the reason behind the name becoming shortened, but it is extremely unlikely to be something else. It was the thing that happened during the communism - the party officials came up with overly-complex words about everyday stuff, and people hated it and half-assed the name. This is why we have the "veal, boiled" dish - the original name should be something like "veal, boiled in vegetable broth". How about "Eggs by Panagyurian" - should be "Eggs by Panagyurian style", but no, the former is how the dish is known. And there are many such examples.

So, do you think it is OK if, instead of "Apparently the pretentious name wasn't popular ..." I change the sentence to "It is likely that the pretentious name wasn't popular ...", or something like "Possibly the pretentious name wasn't popular ..."? I think that this is a peculiar insight into the food culture of the period, and I'd rather have that sentence in the article, or at least have this discussion in the page's talk page...

ShadowBee (talk) 17:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think if you can't find a source to support the assertion it should be removed. WP:VERIFY and WP:OR would be the two policies which come into play. Hope that helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teleshko vareno (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teleshko vareno and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Teleshko vareno, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 18:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Teleshko vareno

Hello, ShadowBee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teleshko vareno, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Teleshko vareno

Hello, ShadowBee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Teleshko vareno".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Teleshko vareno

Hello, ShadowBee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Teleshko vareno".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]