User talk:Sfsorrow2/Archive 1

Image notices

For your convenience (and the convenience of people looking at your talkpage, I'm moving your old image notices to this archive subpage. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Constantinople-Baghdad Railway

Hi, it would be very useful if you could let me know the reference you used for this page, regards sbandrews (t) 16:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks, then it was maybe E M Earle, Turkey, the Great Powers and the Bagdad Railway (1924). I'll drop by the energy policy page later, regards sbandrews (t) 10:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Very Large Vehicles of BC

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Very Large Vehicles of BC, by WWGB (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Very Large Vehicles of BC seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Very Large Vehicles of BC, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:38, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hola!

I see from your contributions that you have been editing for some time. But, the quality of your edits are suspect. Have you read any of the tutorials? An encyclopedia needs to have some uniformity amongst its articles to make the experience cohesive and enjoyable. Coming out with you own style and format breaks this pattern, and makes it hard for the reader to grasp what you are trying to say.

I highly recommend that you read some of the tutorials and look at some of the Wikipedia:Featured articles to get an idea of what is trying to be achieved here.

Welcome!

Hello, Sfsorrow2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Also:

Make it about quality, not quantity.

Thanks,

WikiDon 04:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very Large Vehicles of BC

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Very Large Vehicles of BC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. NeilN 03:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Very Large Vehicles of BC

Very Large Vehicles of BC, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Very Large Vehicles of BC satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Very Large Vehicles of BC and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Very Large Vehicles of BC during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. NeilN 02:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of P & H Power Shovell

An editor has nominated P & H Power Shovell, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P & H Power Shovell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

.******** —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.76.183 (talk) 21:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

|}

Speedy deletion of Rhine River Steamer

A tag has been placed on Rhine River Steamer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Cocomonkilla (talk) 04:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Detroit Engine Company

A tag has been placed on Detroit Engine Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --Alinnisawest(talk) 05:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Atlantic Foundry

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Atlantic Foundry, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Atlantic Foundry is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Atlantic Foundry, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics to 2008

Electricity:

production 3.979 trillion kWh produced in 2004 [1]

Electricity - production by source:

fossil fuel: 71.4%
hydro: 5.6%
nuclear: 20.7%
other: 2.3% (2001)

Oil:

production: 7.61 million barrel/day (2005 est.)
consumption: 20.03 million barrel/day (2003 est.)

Proposed deletion of Energy future of North America

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Energy future of North America, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Vianello (talk) 01:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Energy future of North America

I have nominated Energy future of North America, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy future of North America. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Anshuk (talk) 02:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Anshuk (talk) 02:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rainbow Lodge

I have nominated Rainbow Lodge, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow Lodge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fremte (talk) 01:54, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Twelve-foot" Davis

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as "Twelve-foot" Davis, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Twelve-foot" Davis

A tag has been placed on "Twelve-foot" Davis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:33, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The beauty of the trees, the softness of the air, the fragrance of the grass, speaks to me.

The summit of the mountain the thunder of the sky, the rhythm of the sea, speaks to me

The faintness of the stars, the freshness of the morning, the dew drop of the flower, speaks to me.

The strength of fire, the taste of salmon, the trail of the sun And the life that never goes away, they speak to me.

And my heart soars. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.7.23.169 (talk) 21:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 20:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sfsorrow2. You have new messages at Acather96's talk page.
Message added 20:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Christmas Card

File:Wikisanta-no motto.png

Merry Christmas At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green and Yellow Present.gif

File:Yellow and Red present.gif

File:Blue and Red Present.gif

steamboats

Please remember to add some sources right away. DGG ( talk ) 04:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why ? that's your job !

No, it's NOT his job, SFS, not at all. I was already coming here to tell you "please sandbox this stuff before you put it in namespace", ie. make it into an article. You post t hings without proper formatting, even categories, and quite frankly they could be legitimately deleted fairly quickly. This is an article I've been meaning to get at starting for a long time, if not having ot put out fires all over the place, in Wikipedia and elsewhere - including picking up affter you. Please start respecting other editors by not expecting them to provide citations, formats, categories and proper layout as you're supposed to do. Otherwise keep stuff like Steamboats of the Lower Fraser River and Harrison Lake on User talk:Sfsorrow2/Sandbox and invite other editors to help you write/fix it and guide you to do it properly; you're wrong in various assertions in this article, e.g. teh focus on IRving and Moore, without any mention of Hugh Nelson or Frank Barnard or Wells Fargo and the situation that led to the demand for steamboat service, and why it went up to Harrison Lake; the Skuzzy shouldn't dominate the article so much, it's not really "the Lower Fraser" (i.e. above Yale isn't "the Lower Fraser"). But your attitude stinks, as much as I respect your knowledge, and it's becoming a pain...uncited, and rambling like this is, it's really WP:OR, WP:SYNTH and WP:Essay - and could rightly be deleted. I'm irked because the intro as it is now doesn't have proper historical context - about the economics, the route, the geography, the rivalries between different captains and companies and the deal between Barnard and Nelson, the details of the first vessels on Harrison Lake, the Riffles etc etc etc, various explosions etc etc etc. You've put in place something that just isn't an effective timeline, and - from my view - far too perfunctory. And no, I don't have time to fix it right now, nor do I have time for the type of smart comment you made to the other editor above, nor do I have time to give you a (big) list of rading materials you should absorb before sallying forth on an article, without even caring to place "See also" within th necessary equals marks to make it a heading.....lazy, lazy, lazy, and now rude. Look, do me a big favour and DON'T start on the Kamloops and Shuswap one, OK/ I've been picking up far too many unneeded taskss around Wikipedia, including ones you've launched (deliberatlye for others to fix), to have time to do it. And I want to do it properly. And when the time comes I'll probably rewrite this whole thing entire; uncited and unformed, it shouldn't have been published. Keep stuff in the sandbox until you've learned enough to play with others to make it work, before expecting them to clean articles up for you because you can't be bothered....Skookum1 (talk) 06:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Big Hill. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 21:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Big Hill

Hello, Sfsorrow2. You have new messages at Old Moonraker's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

06:01, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Sfsorrow2. You have new messages at Old Moonraker's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

11:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Steamboats on the Volga River for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steamboats on the Volga River is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steamboats on the Volga River until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mesoderm (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re: your message

Hi Sfsorrow2, I've replied to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 ^talk 03:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parana River steamers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parana River steamers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parana River steamers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mesoderm (talk) 03:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Volga Steamers, and other contributions

Hello Sfsorrow2 --

I understand that you are frustrated regarding my recent nomination to delete the Volga River Steamers article. Please don't take this personally. WP:NOTABLE lays out the criteria for when we decide that a topic warrants its own article. If you can explain how Volga River Steamers satisfies these criteria, then there should be no problem, and the page will be kept. Also, I've noticed that a large portion of your work does not cite any sources. Please take a look at WP:V, which states that all information added into Wikipedia needs to cite a reliable source. Let me know if you have any questions, or need help with anything. I know it's confusing, and is very different from how you might write in other places, but with an open encyclopedia, it's very important that we maintain strict limits on what type of information gets included, so that Wikipedia remains a credible resource. Again, please take a look at WP:NOTABLE and WP:V, and let me know if you have any questions about them. Best wishes. ~ Mesoderm (talk) 03:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sfsorrow2 -- It seems that you know quite a bit about steam boats, and I'm sure you have a lot to contribute to Wikipedia. Please try to calm down and understand where I am coming from. Anyone can edit Wikipedia. Most people (like yourself) are interested in including factually correct information. Some people are not. To deal with those people that are not, we require that everyone provide reliable sources for ALL of the information they include in the article. We do not accept the publication of original research here. I would love to see your wealth of knowledge on steamboats be used to improve Wikipedia, but it must be done in the right way. I would love to help you do this. But I need you to work with me, instead of getting angry at me. Please take a look at the pages I've linked to here, and then come to my page if you have any questions or comments about it. I really don't have anything against you, and can tell that you know a lot about the subject, but you just need some work on how you include the information here. Cheers. ~ Mesoderm (talk) 04:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you want to see an example of how an article on steamboats could be written that adheres to the policies I'm talking about, take a look at Steamboats of the Columbia River. Note that there are several reliable sources that talk about the subject, which shows that it satisfies WP:NOTABLE, and that the statements in the article each cite one of these sources. Do you see how this is different from your Volga River Steamers article? (If not, I don't mind explaining it to you further). ~ Mesoderm (talk) 06:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Istanbul ferries

By now you should know not to leave an article in the state you left it. Go back and add some specifics and some references. Presumably you have a source available, so use it. Perhaps you may have written the article to support the photograph, but it really does need some expansion. I advise you to fix the problem before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process.

If I can help you further, let me know on my user talk page. DGG ( talk ) 04:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Sfsorrow2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Seattle tugboats

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Seattle tugboats. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Washington State Ferries. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Washington State Ferries - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 14:17, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.68.6.12 (talk) 19:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.68.6.12 (talk) 19:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of D. June & Co. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D. June & Co. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. June & Co. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kumioko (talk) 00:12, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]