User talk:Sevak Zeinali

Oriental Dreamworks moved to draftspace

This is improperly formatted, and looks like it has been copy/pasted from somewhere. GirthSummit _(blether) 09:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hi - you created the draft I mentioned above about Oriental Dreamworks, and have edited multiple articles to add assertions about that company. Please read COI and PAID - there are certain steps you have to take to declare any connection you have with that company, and you should put draft articles through AfC. The content you put in the draft isn't ready for publication as an article - take a look at WP:FIRST to learn more about creating articles, and see V for why content should be supported by reliable sources. Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 09:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at How to Train Your Dragon 2, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:33, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Home (2015 film), you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Oriental Dreamworks

A tag has been placed on Draft:Oriental Dreamworks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Page already exists in mainspace as Pearl Studio

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Puss in Boots (2011 film) into List of unproduced DreamWorks Animation projects. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaurs in Jurassic Park

Hello. I've reverted your additions at Dinosaurs in Jurassic Park again. The article's focus is on notable animals that have been covered in reliable sources. I've seen no evidence that any of the Camp Cretaceous animals are noteworthy (please see here). I see no point in listing these dinosaurs in the table of appearances if there's nothing else to say about the animals. Real-world info would be ideal, but that doesn't seem to exist for these dinosaurs. AJFU (talk) 21:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Camp Cretaceous is part of the Jurassic Park storyline. That doesn't automatically make its dinosaurs notable. Can you provide any reliable sources to prove that they are? Simply appearing in something is not noteworthy. Like I said, the article's focus is on real-world info, and there doesn't seem to be any for the Camp Cretaceous animals. Furthermore, Smilodon is not a dinosaur and is not commonly mistaken for one. It clearly shouldn't be here.

The entire Allosaurus section is unnecessary. There's nothing of substance, no real-world info. Just a few sentences describing its brief role in the films. We don't need a separate section for this.

I suggest you read this, and if you disagree, please feel free to discuss. In the meantime, the longstanding version of the article should be restored while contested changes are being discussed. AJFU (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's unfortunate that you spent so much time working on this, but that's not a good reason to keep it. We don't allow a disputed edit to remain in an article just because someone spent a lot of time working on it.

The article doesn't take canonicity into consideration. It's primarily about how the dinosaurs were created for the films. Story details are unimportant and largely absent from the article.

Yes, Camp Cretaceous does introduce a few new dinosaurs. That doesn't mean they're notable, and you have yet to provide any sources to prove me wrong. Simply appearing is not enough. The "Other creatures" section does contain some mere appearances, but I think there's potential to expand that. I don't think the same can be said for the Camp Cretaceous dinosaurs.

Disputes are settled through talk pages. If you still disagree, then please explain why, either here or at the article's talk page. AJFU (talk) 16:11, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In case you weren't aware, I have responded to your comments at my talk page. AJFU (talk) 21:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb

The user generated ratings from IMDb are not reliable so please do not include them like you did at List of DreamWorks Animation productions Indagate (talk) 09:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of DreamWorks Animation productions, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Additionally, please take a look at WP:COLOR before making tables with a lot of colors ★Ama ^TALK ^CONTRIBS 14:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ★Ama ^TALK ^CONTRIBS 15:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]