User talk:Serols/Archive 21
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Serols. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
#jsjjsjdhshydhshshdhhsjsjsnjd
Hey why you have deleted my edit I just added schools and colleges name Jayantamitra980 (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Jayantamitra980, please send me the link. --Serols (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted link. --Serols (talk) 08:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC) Jayantamitra980 (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
You just wasted my time and nothing else dude. I just sent the link and yet if u won't believe then u can google it. U are smart enough to do it Jayantamitra980 (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kindly undo my edit Jayantamitra980 (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Jayantamitra980, please send me the Wikipedia link. --Serols (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Jayantamitra980, do you have two accounts? This accounnt deleted the whole infobox without reason. --Serols (talk) 17:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Time traveler!
[Humor]Hello! This is a non-automated notification to say that one of your edits [1] has revealed that you are a time traveler. If you think this was a mistake, please let me know! Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor strange, my pc clock is ok. Thanks for the hint. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- No problem lol. I was just like "Wait that's not right" but wanted to make a bit of a joke out of it so I sent you this. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Revision Editor?
Hi there, I just wanted to check in. Please don’t add warnings to a user unless you are the person who made the revision. Maybe the computer flubbed and we both made the revision on Paris Métro Line 1 and I assume no harm was meant. Yungli0n (talk) 17:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)yungli0n
- Hello Yungli0n, I would like to ask you to look carefully, I have withdrawn the processing of the vandalism, see here. The deletion of my warning was not ok. --Serols (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, I’m glad you responded again. I couldn’t remember your user name and I made a mistake. I realized a bit later that I was not actually reverting when I thought I was when the same thing happened on another edit. I’ve been careful to actually check if I was responsible for the revert since this incident. Again, my mistake. I was online too long that day and was feeling frantic. - Yungli0n (talk) 16:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)yungli0n
- Hello Yungli0n, you only have 400 edits, please take it slow. Get your first with the rules of Wikipedia familiar. With such actions you can quickly get into trouble. This is just well-intentioned advice from me. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
REmoval of a warning
Hello Serols! I just wanted to let you know that I replaced a warning you gave a user with a welcome as from what I saw, the user was literally just testing, so a welcome test would've been more fitting. Just thought I'd let you know what my intentions were. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:18, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor, thanks for the information, it's okay. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi - regarding the above revert, I just wanted to say that while my edit may have been somewhat heavy-handed (I tend to be when it comes to controversial claims in Wikipedia's own words), I wouldn't go so far as to call it vandalism. I won't change it back, because I generally avoid disputes here, but I want to put it on record that I disagree with you. A S U K I T E 15:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello A S U K I T E , you misunderstood something . We both wanted to restore the edit of the IPs. While I was trying to restore the version, your change came. I didn't want to change your edit. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, I should have figured before I jumped to conclusions! Sorry for that, and thanks for explaining. Happy editing! A S U K I T E 19:53, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Don't edit me
Allow my opinion and opinions from the fandom on the various pages Mylittledogpockets (talk) 18:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Mylittledogpockets: Opinions don't belong on Wikipedia, as this site is written from a neutral point of view. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 19:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Will continue to edit the Tony Khan page
Keeping changing it back I will just change it back again Mylittledogpockets (talk) 18:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Mylittledogpockets: That'd be an edit war, which likely won't turn out good for either of you and could easily result in a block to protect the site. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 19:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Pf tek is unverified sources and needs to be removed
The pf tek has no certified verified sources and except self promotion of his personal website and post on the shroomery promoting him and fungi fun also which is a personal website for selling spores and needs to be removed Innoculatethewest (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Innoculatethewest, please use the article's talk page. --Serols (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Great job on the reverts
You're doing an impressive job reverting vandalism! Thank you! Stickymatch 18:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for defeating that Kiev Guy... You'd probably agree Kyiv is the most popular spelling? Kyiv Guy (talk) 06:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| thanks for keeping wiki factual and vandal-free! Alibino (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC) |
A Barnstar for you!
|
The Recent Changes Barnstar | |
| Thank you for your very quick reverts from vandalism. Without you Wikipedia would not be what it is supposed to be. Your fight against vandalism is very important and your work is really wonderful. Thanks again! RacoonyRE Message meContributions 19:08, 21 April 2021 (UTC) |
Petroccelli
Is your wrong intepretation that are no constructive, is very important, the real name is Vincenzo Pasquale Angelo Petroccell (with doubble "c"), next in a wrong way he was called Petrocelli. Check it and correct please. https://www.google.it/books/edition/L_Accademia_di_belle_arti_di_Napoli_1752/HrVtAAAAIAAJ?hl=it&gbpv=1&bsq=%22Vincenzo+Petroccelli%22&dq=%22Vincenzo+Petroccelli%22&printsec=frontcover} correct these, all the other version are wrong. --151.36.215.167 (talk) 08:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, please note the article name, it is binding. --Serols (talk) 11:38, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Stop it
Whenever you are at Special:RecentChanges there is no no spam left for me :(. Great job mate! Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 12:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- I've wanted to say the same thing before now!!! Tommi1986 let's talk! 12:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Echinopsis pachanoi
This is the source: http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:88444-2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.68.130.122 (talk) 15:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, not on my talk page, but in the article. --Serols (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Brunei page must be protected
The Brunei National Football team page is constantly being vandalised I would appreciate if you or a colleague could protect it or semi-protect it Thank you here is a link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunei_national_football_team.
- Hello, I will take care. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello
I'm new, why is that a vandalism? I was just saying hello.
- Hello, please stop with your vandalism. --Serols (talk) 14:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
B SAD
Please verify the talk page of this article to check the information about this process.Jafdfm (talk) 22:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
MALAT1 Removal
Hi Serol. Would it be okay if you returned my link on the MALAT1 gene page? This gene frequently occurs during analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data and thought it might be a useful for bioinformaticians who are interested in this gene, hence searching it on Wikipedia, to be connected to the link I shared pertaining to it's relevancy. Thanks!
- Hello, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
A goat for you!
.jpg)
You are awesome
I keep seeing you beat me to it
Keep it up mate
Skelly, a real skeleton 🦴 (talk to me!) 18:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Why was my edit reverted
Hi, I wonder why my contribution was reverted: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UEFA_Euro_2020&oldid=prev&diff=1026471851 The source is an official website of the Dutch Football Association. thanks for your answer in advance.
- Hello Mworkel, please use upper and lower case. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:42, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Confused
Please could you let me know how talking about an important invention in 3d printing is promotional? No mention of a company has been stated, a relevant citation has been added, what is the issue? Why can't LCD printing be discussed in 3d? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tharliarmy (talk • contribs) 15:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Tharliarmy, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:22, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Serols, I linked to a leading publication source in 3d printing, not the actual inventors of the machine?? Not sure how this is promotional, but hey...
- Hello Tharliarmy, no links in the flow text. What you have done is link spam. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
TNARS/Log College and Seminary
You reverted all my edits on The North American Reformed Seminary page, claiming they were vandalism. Every link on the page currently brings up a 404 error and the college changed their name, which you can easily find on their website.
- Hello, please note Use commonly recognizable names, and without a relevant source it is vandalism. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Tonton Bernardo. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Carposina bullata —because it destructive and may be considered as vandalism. Thanks. I'm so tired (talk) 07:41, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello I'm so tired, can you read -> use upper and lower case? --Serols (talk) 07:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, I copy & paste, if you consider necessary or are unable to read it: do it yourself !
Stop spamming now, it's not constructive" ! I'm so tired (talk) 08:17, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello I'm so tired, is it still possible? You start an edit war, although I pointed out to you, that you have to use upper and lower case and the spelling is not ok? And your excuse is I copy & paste? Your behavior is not acceptable, likewise your choice of words. Since you are not able, I change your mistake. --Serols (talk) 10:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Chernobyl
Greetings Serlos, Writing about recent changes to Chernobyl page, that you descrided as "did not appear constructive", willing to say that I wanted to correct wrong name of town, which seems to constructive. BR, MortyHQ — Preceding unsigned comment added by MortyHQ (talk • contribs) 17:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello MortyHQ, my revert was ok -> Chernobyl and not Chornobyl. --Serols (talk) 17:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Serols According to what you can say that it is ok? Try looking at google maps to check the correct name. Later you can check the official Romanization of Ukrainian. BR, MortyHQ (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello MortyHQ, please note, this is Wikipedia.en -> Chernobyl, discussion is over. --Serols (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Serols According to what you can say that it is ok? Try looking at google maps to check the correct name. Later you can check the official Romanization of Ukrainian. BR, MortyHQ (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Apologies
Sorry about the warning. I thought you were part of the edit war. I see you were not. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello CambridgeBayWeather, no problem, can happen and you noticed it yourself. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking that so well. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Barnstar!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Wonderful work on anonymous IP vandals. Way to go! Benevolent human (talk) 18:50, 16 June 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Serols. Thanks for letting me know about your reversion of my recent edits to Vani Jairam. Could you be more specific as to which parts of the edits you found not constructive? I based each of the edits on the Wikipedia policies, the Manual of Style and the guidance for the corresponding templates used, although I did change the infobox type from {{infobox musical artist}} with an embedded {{infobox person}} to just to {{infobox person}} because none of the parameters used were unique to {{infobox musical artist}}. If some of the parameters that are unique to {{infobox musical artist}} were being used (e.g., |genre=, |instrument=, |associated_acts=, |label=, etc.), I would have left it as it was. I think it is cleaner without the dual/infobox types, but I recognize that not everyone may agree with that; although I'm not sure calling it not constructive is entirely fair (AGF). Anyway, I invite you to let me better understand your concerns. If I made a mistake, I want to learn from it and correct for the future. Thank you. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 16:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello 108.56.139.120, see here -> born 19045. You can revert my edit, but you must change the date. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ah. I see. A typo. I'll fix it. Thanks for letting me know. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 16:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Quadratic reciprocity
What's wrong with adding a link to arXiv pdf of the proof in the quadratic reciprocity article? (Making it more accessible for a general reader?)
- Hello, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks. --Serols (talk) 12:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Would this be acceptable: "...(for the text of the proof, see[1])."? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.33.2.160 (talk) 14:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, this the text of the proof, see is considered spam. --Serols (talk) 14:31, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
I’m sorry about the inadvertent rollback on this entry! Larry Hockett (Talk) 15:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Larry Hockett, no problem, can happen. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Curious question
This certainly isn't a critique or anything like that, but just out of curiosity, why did you decide to skip the user page? Benevolent human (talk) 16:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Benevolent human, why should I have one? The vandalism on my talk page is enough for me, at least I notice it. --Serols (talk) 16:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Good point, makes sense! I think you're right, there's really no need. Benevolent human (talk) 16:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Reverting my edit
Hello i am gokul from mutharasanallur. I was edit temple name in mutharsanallur article but you reverted it. That temple is also in the mutharasanallur village and that temple where also 200+ years old temple. So edit our temple name in that articleKaikudi sgr (talk) 10:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Kaikudi sgr, please use reliable sources. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Yes I will show the source for that temple. Kaikudi sgr (talk) 12:24, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Reverting my edit
Hello. Why have you reverted my edit here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three_grand_soups&diff=1026474435&oldid=1026474122?
- Hello, you can read it here -> A CONSENSUS IS BEING MADE ON THE TALK PAGE ON THE SUBJECT OF ORIGIN; PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THIS. --Serols (talk) 14:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Please pay more attention to the history when reverting changes! Here is a reversion from 10 of April which changed the original consensus - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three_grand_soups&diff=1016965445&oldid=1009612556 What I did - just reverted to the consensus version.
- Hello, please see the whole history, there has long been a dispute about the origin. Please use the talk page until consensus is found. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:32, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Need a help
Hi Serols , hope you doing well. Please I need a help to report a person which starts really to bother me with its vandalism and reverting all my edittings with some misrespect in comments, just because the first time I added some information on his tribe. Can you please help me how to report a user ?
Thanks in advance
Qazi Muhammad Isa
If an individual uses uncommon spelling for their name, and is commonly regocnised as such, then it is ok to use such spelling.Monatowfik (talk) 12:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Monatowfik, please note the rules Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names, that is binding. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
What do you mean binding? Why do you want to disrespect a deceased person by imposing your version of how you feel his name is spelled?
Look at the postage stamp issued in his honour.
https://www.thedesignwork.com/pencil-sketches-postage-stamps-by-saeed-akhtar/
- Hello Monatowfik, please accept the rules of Wikipedia. --Serols (talk) 12:19, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello User talk:Serols, what rules of Wikipedia say that you get to decide how a person's name is spelled? Instead of threatening with revoking my editing privileges, kindly stop vandalising the page unless you have a solid reason for imposing why a particular name should be spelled differently from its official spelling. Monatowfik (talk) 12:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Monatowfik, the article name is binding, see the link. --Serols (talk) 12:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Sorry which link are you asking me to see? I do not see any link you have shared. I have shared with you a link to the commemorative stamp issued for the gentleman in question. I can fix the article name if that is OK with you. If it means so much to you to spell this person's name incorrectly that you are willing to threaten me, then I will just back off. Spelling a dead person's name properly is not so important to me that I would want to be threatened by strangers Monatowfik (talk) 12:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)