User talk:Sergacy

Welcome!

Hello, Sergacy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Carbon monoxide antidote «Acyzol®», may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Whispering^(t) 22:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Carbon monoxide antidote «Acyzol®»

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Carbon monoxide antidote «Acyzol®» requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://acyzol.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whispering^(t) 22:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:37, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Carbon monoxide antidote «Acyzol®» concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Carbon monoxide antidote «Acyzol®», a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Carbon monoxide antidote «Acyzol®»

Hello, Sergacy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carbon monoxide antidote «Acyzol®»".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:04, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello Sergacy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sergacy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sergacy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Hug^syrup 10:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hugsyrup, you are completely right that I don't get any penny either directly or indirectly. Everything is transparent I can provide any information required. The only question is how should I prove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergacy (talk • contribs)

@Sergacy: Ok, but I guess the questions people are going to have in mind is a) what is your connection to Acyzol and b) if you are not being paid, why are you the webmaster of the website from which you had copied all of the information? Has anybody asked you to create this page? Hug^syrup 11:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hugsyrup, I just help my friend, The initiation of eng version of web site is mine, creation of Wiki article in Eng is also mine. So, I dont know what to do. And asking for help. BTW The page in Russian exists long ago. Sergacy (talk) 11:19, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well, if you insist that you are not being paid then I am not going to press the point. Other editors may or may not be convinced. Either way, you have a conflict of interest so please ensure you have read WP:COI before editing. And, as other editors have explained, you cannot use content that you have first posted elsewhere on the web unless you explicitly release that content under an irrevocable creative commons license. You would need to edit your website to make it clear the content is released under such a license. Otherwise, just write new content for Wikipedia. Hug^syrup 11:25, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Paid-contribution disclosure says: "Users who are compensated for any publicity efforts related to the subject of their Wikipedia contributions are deemed to be paid editors, regardless of whether they were compensated specifically to edit Wikipedia." Your claim of "I just help my friend" doesn't seem consistent with your previous statement (in this edit) of "site belongs to our company". --David Biddulph (talk) 11:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To David Biddulph, Do I understand correcty? If I put on website a file to make it clear the content is released under such a an irrevocable creative commons license it will be ok??? And regarding WP:COI - how can I myself violate my rights?? Or I put WP:Paid-contribution disclosure - that will be Total lie???Sergacy (talk) 11:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think what Hug and David B are asking is that as you deny paid or otherwise compensated, you still need to declare COI on your user page because you are personally involved ("I just help my friend."). Each language has its rules - English is strong about declaring COI. David notMD (talk) 13:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David notMD, Can you imagime a situation, for example, that you are going along the street and a person falles down in front of you and you I suppose will help that person by calling to emergency service or if needed make an artificial respiration. What would you do if you are claimed that you got paid for that??Sergacy (talk) 14:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sergacy. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 10:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Draft

Draft:Carbon monoxide antidote «Acyzol®» was edited in July 2019 to remove copyright content. Copyright content cannot be re-added to the article. That content can be linked to in External links (what you had listed as References). Drafts that are not resubmitted or being worked on are subject to being deleted. You can resume editing, or submit by clicking on the blue rectangle. David notMD (talk) 10:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Acyzol website has a list of publications that can be considered as references for the article. The guidelines in WP:MEDRS require that references be review articles, i.e., not clinical trials or pre-clinical work. David notMD (talk) 12:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sergacy. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your user page

Hi - that declaration on your user page makes no sense. All you have been asked to do is explain your connection to the company. Why are you creating a website for them, if they don't pay you? Are you friends with somebody in the company? Have they asked you to do it on a voluntary basis? Do they even know that you are doing it? Just explain truthfully what your connection is so we can move on. GirthSummit _(blether) 18:18, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GirthSummit _(blether)

Yes, without any tiny doubt, I also help with the website and have full total administrator's rights about that, how could I get those rights if they did not know? My former colleague and two of the original scientists are the company owners. Ask me to help them to translate website to english with any text amendments I wish. after I ask them should I make an article on Wiki (actually translate to English) and they said do if you can. And I did while I had time. I can provide a copy from register of the company in you can easily check who they are if needed. Also all Patents and clinical trials if required. How else can provide proofs? An official paper with stamp - no problem.Sergacy (talk) 18:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sergacy, OK, so the conflict of interest you need to declare is that you have a connection to one of the company owners (you are former colleagues, and presumably friends), and that you are writing this on their behalf but not for recompense. No need for sarcastic messages - just a factual description of you connection to the subject. GirthSummit _(blether) 18:57, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Girth Summit Thank you very muchǃ That actually what I was asking for, but probably in different words. I'll do...Sergacy (talk) 19:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Just FYI, if you want to ping another user, you just need to copy their username - not all the code that goes along with the signature. I've refactored your comment above so you can see how it should look. Alternatively, you can use curly brackets, followed by u|username, and that will achieve the same effect - like this {{u|GirthSummit}}.

So, where to go from here. Have you read through NCORP and MEDRS yet? To establish the notability of this product, you will need sourcing about it that meets the requirements outlined at NCORP - that will allow you to create the article, and have it reviewed and published. For any biomedical assertions however, you will need sourcing of the quality described at MEDRS. Please read them carefully, and consider whether you have the sourcing necessary. Remember that it doesn't matter what the company's website says, or what the owners of the company have written - we need independent sources discussing the product. If you've got that, you should be good to go with the article. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 19:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Sergacy! You created a thread called Draft:Carbon monoxide antidote «Acyzol®» at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Acyzol concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Acyzol, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Acyzol

Hello, Sergacy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Acyzol".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:51, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]