User talk:Seanhearne001

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Seanhearne001. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Sean Hearne, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seanhearne001, please could you respond to this? Thank you. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I note the declaration on User:Seanhearne001, thank you for that. Do you have links to the other biographical articles you've edited recently? -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few of the other bio pages that I have edited recently:

Julia Phillips (physicist)

C. Barry Carter

Katherine Jungjohann Seanhearne001 (talk) 15:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have also been working on a page for the following center. I am still working to get it approved: Draft:Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies Seanhearne001 (talk) 15:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note. I did not perform and edits for purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting. My edits were largely to take information from the main portion of the document and place that same information in a text box. I tried very carefully not to add any new content to the page due to my COI. Seanhearne001 (talk) 15:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your reply. I've not reviewed those other articles carefully, but for the sake of transparency I've added a banner to their talk pages. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you for the assistance. I appreciate your guidance as am clearly a newbie, but trying to add where I can. Seanhearne001 (talk) 16:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seanhearne001! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Voorts were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For a Wikipedia article about an organization to be published, the company must be notable. An organization is notable if it is has significant coverage in several independent, reliable sources. Under Wikipedia's guidelines: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable." Coverage of a company is significant if the subject is covered in depth in the source; passing mentions and routine news stories are generally not significant.

Under Wikipedia's guidelines, sources that discuss only a part, product, or person associated with an organization is not significant with regard to the organization itself. "Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization."

The sources cited here do not significantly discuss the Center.

Please remove external links from the body of the article. Also, LinkedIn is generally not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

voorts (talk/contributions) 21:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hi Seanhearne001! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Sean Hearne that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. I tried to make sure that none of the edits I made were of any substitutive impact due to the COI I have with this page. Seanhearne001 (talk) 16:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies

Hello, Seanhearne001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]