User talk:Seaman4516
Walk-forward optimization
[edit] | This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, post a new help me template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Recently I made some changes to the "Walk-forward optimization" page (first 2 paragraphs). I am new to the Wikipedia, but on this particular page, I would delete almost everything below the first 2 paragraphs. It is a talkative, manual style text. On the other hand, I would probably add the picture from Bob Pardo's book (page 252), and maybe add some views on problems of methodology. I was afraid to make huge deletions and therefore writing... Seaman4516 (talk) 22:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Seaman4516 - welcome to Wikipedia! I suggest you start by sharing your ideas on Talk:Walk forward optimization to ensure you have consensus before making massive changes to the article. Good luck! GoingBatty (talk) 22:26, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hi GoingBatty: How does the "Talk" page work?: (1) Does it depend on some user randomly entering the space, or does it proactively engage others into discussion; (2) Is it fine to clear the old outdated discussions on the "talk" page, or should they be kept for eternity? Thank you.
- See WP:Talk page guidelines. Briefly: to start a new section, click "New section" at the top and enter a heading: that will place your new section at the bottom of the page, where it should be. It is likely that other interested users have the page on their watchlists and so will be aware of your addition: if there is no response in a day or so, you can add a {{helpme}} there, just as you did here. Talk pages are preserved for the record: it is possible to "archive" older sections if the page gets too long, but that one doesn't look too long yet.
- Hi GoingBatty: How does the "Talk" page work?: (1) Does it depend on some user randomly entering the space, or does it proactively engage others into discussion; (2) Is it fine to clear the old outdated discussions on the "talk" page, or should they be kept for eternity? Thank you.
- I should add that the way Wikipedia works is described at WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. If there is no reply to your suggestion, and you think it would improve the encyclopedia, you should be WP:BOLD and make it. If someone disagrees, they can revert it and/or start a discussion; if no-one disagrees, there you are! Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)