User talk:Scriptir

Scriptir, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Scriptir! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Choking, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Per MOS:NOBOLD, Wikipedia articles don't use boldface for emphasis. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lenny Marks. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Choking, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You may find it helpful to consult WP:CITE, Wikipedia's citation guideline. Lenny Marks (talk) 22:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hi Scriptir! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Choking that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please don't add new sentences to articles and mark that as minor. That is not a minor edit in Wikipedia terms. --Lord Belbury (talk) 13:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand what is being asked here? --Lord Belbury (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sorry for answering so late, I have been busy. Yes, I have understood the point aboit minor edits. I expect continuing making new editions in the right way. Regards Scriptir (talk) 05:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Fire, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Hey there, thank you for your contributions but please remember that Wikipedia is not a guide. Additionally, please do not use bold text on random text in the article, as that is only used for repeating the article name in the lede. B3251 (talk) 11:46, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the matter on the article talk page, rather than just repeatedly adding the material, as you did here. Mitch Ames (talk) 01:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Okay, I will expose the point on the article talk page as recommended. Thank you for the advices, Mitch Ames and B3251 . Let me know about any new problem. Regards. Scriptir (talk) 01:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. B3251 (talk) 00:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Active fire protection, you may be blocked from editing. This article is not intended to be a how-to guide in any event, and it is not appropriate to boldface all of these words. Julietdeltalima (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I noticed you had been editing the articles about choking and CPR recently, so I wanted to let you know about Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. It's a chat page on wiki where a group of editors hang out and talk about improving medicine-related articles. It's a great place to ask about finding appropriate sources for biomedical information or how to write about medical content. If you're interested, please put the page on your watchlist (or bookmark it on your computer, if that works better for you) and drop by to check it out whenever you feel like it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Myocardial infarction, you may be blocked from editing. You were warned last year about making careless edits and adding unconstructive content. Your edit to add a redirect for first aid to this and other articles is not useful, as the encyclopedia is not intended for advice, WP:NOTADVICE. Your writing often is careless and unsourced - observe WP:MOS. Zefr (talk) 02:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Kimen8 (talk) 16:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I hope to remember it. Thanks! Scriptir (talk) 17:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting and stylistic edits

Hi - I don't meant o be rude, but I just reviewed some of your recent contributions, and found that they introduced numerous grammatical errors into our articles. We all have different areas of expertise, and I don't want to discourage you from contributing, but if English is not your native language and your ability to form grammatically correct sentences is limited, please can I suggest that you avoid rewording other people's sentences? Best, Girth Summit _(blether) 11:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Girth. Excuse me if my sentences were not grammatically perfect. I am so busy... Please... don't erase all my editions as if they were all the same. They took time. I will try to write better sentences. But I will keep in mind your recommendations. Thanks Scriptir (talk) 12:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Drowning, you may be blocked from editing. You continue to write with careless grammar and no reliable sources. You have been warned numerous times about this in comments above. Zefr (talk) 23:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Drowning. Again, an edit like this one adds unsourced statements and incorrect use of English grammar and spelling. If as you say above you are too busy to write grammatically, please don't attempt to correct grammar on Wikipedia. Belbury (talk) 10:43, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]