User talk:Scott Illini

Welcome to my talk page! Click the button below for an easy form for adding to this page. Please sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page.

Feel free to visit my user page!

300

Well, that's interesting. I didn't know it was so similar. I'm not sure how "close" things should be in the "See also" section. Let me get back to you, I'm going to ask around on the WikiProject Film area. Ok? BIGNOLE (Contact me) 00:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dymytrii Sydor

A tag has been placed on Dymytrii Sydor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Well, instead of writing "Article needed," please write what you want the article to say, and voilà. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But first, read WP:Your first article. If you do not want to write an article yourself, the place to ask for one is WP:Requested articles. JohnCD (talk) 16:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia's secession declaration

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Georgia's secession declaration (my note: Declaration_of_independence, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_geosec.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Georgia's secession declaration

A tag has been placed on Georgia's secession declaration requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lakota

The actual text of the Republic of Lakotah declaration of independence (my note: s:Republic of Lakotah declaration of independence is source material and should be published in Wikisource or your own website. A short article explaining the significance of the declaration would probably be accepted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 06:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		Metzler Bank (talk)						Add sources
		Electrical network (talk)						Add sources
		Double degree (talk)						Add sources
		Mocatta (talk)						Add sources
		Federal government of the United States (talk)						Add sources
		Philippines (talk)						Add sources
		Mateship (talk)						Cleanup
		Human capital flight (talk)						Cleanup
		Physical impacts of climate change (talk)						Cleanup
		Columbia University (talk)						Expand
		Houston (talk)						Expand
		Twitter (talk)						Expand
		Gene-for-gene relationship (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		William P. Leahy (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Crowdsourcing architecture (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Effects of global warming on humans (talk)						Merge
		Sales (accounting) (talk)						Merge
		Liberal arts education (talk)						Merge
		David Cameron (talk)						Wikify
		Rothschild banking family of England (talk)						Wikify
		Effects of global warming on marine mammals (talk)						Wikify
		Della Hardman (talk)						Orphan
		Angelica Burevik (talk)						Orphan
		Air (painting) (talk)						Orphan
		Charles Evans Hughes III (talk)						Stub
		Gross value added (talk)						Stub
		Louis-Raphaël Bischoffsheim (talk)						Stub
		Net income (talk)						Stub
		Solaro (family) (talk)						Stub
		Naches Valley High School (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Hinckley

Please do not recreate Barry Hinckley again. There was a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Hinckley about the article and the result was redirect to United States Senate election in Rhode Island, 2012. Toddst1 (talk) 12:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Scott Illini. You have new messages at Toddst1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

October 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Barry Hinckley, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 04:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly a fun experience for me either.

WP:BRD

Ever heard of WP:BRD? William M. Connolley (talk) 11:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please be aware of WP:3RR which you're in danger of breaking at global warming. Please note also Even without a 3RR violation, an administrator may still act if they believe a user's behavior constitutes edit warring, and any user may report edit-warring with or without 3RR being breached. The rule is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times. William M. Connolley (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Vsmith (talk) 21:38, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All's well that end's well.

Founders Fund

I noticed that your addition of investments to the Founders Fund article was reverted as unsourced. I know it's hecka work but it's a fair request to find a citation for all of these investments to verify that there are no errors and to make it easier to source and edit the section going forward. Notability probably isn't the issue as all these are wikilinks to notable companies, really just WP:V. I'll see if I can find a few,I've found one source that verified most of them, perhaps you can supply the rest. Thanks, - Wikidemon (talk) 00:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. When you recently edited Gary Ackerman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, Scott Illini (talk) 22:47, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transjordan

The response to your changes has been quite strong because a lot of work has been done to properly source the article around this topic. If you read the article thoroughly and look at the quotes in the footnotes and the underlying linked sources, it should become clearer. Appreciate your contribution here, but to keep emotions down it would be better to keep it to the talk page after your bold edits were reverted. The wording in both article could be clearer, so it would be good to agree some redrafting. Scott Illini (talk) 22:47, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Druker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Druker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Druker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hahc21 ^{[TALK][CONTRIBS]} 06:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Working class, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Enlightenment and Profit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pearl High School shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page .45 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hollingsworth v. Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eleventh Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Career politician

Scott, this is a copy of a message I just sent to User:GeoffreyVS

Hi Geoff, I reverted your removal of User:Scott_Illini's addition of "career politician" to the Max Baucus lede. I stumbled onto this issue because Illini reverted a similar addition that I had made to the article for Tom McClintock, with a comment identical to the one you made about Baucus. The fact that "career politician" has a negative connotation does not change the fact that Baucus and McClintock are both career politicians by any reasonable meaning of the phrase. One could hardly object to describing a member of the National Socialist Movement (United States) as a neo-Nazi just because "Nazi" is an epithet. Cheers, Lahaun (talk) 04:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Angus Davis

Hello, Scott Illini, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Angus Davis, appears to be directly copied from http://www.crunchbase.com/person/angus-davis. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Angus Davis if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 21:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Angus Davis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Angus Davis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Ignatzmice ^talk _contribs 21:50, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would simply recreate your article without any images as an {{Userspace draft}} or using the Article creation wizard and once it is done, you can request it be reviewed and moved into content space. Technical 13 (talk) 23:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It never had any images. If he/she would restore it we could have a rational discussion on the article Talk page. But I'm not going to start over for no reason. This admin behavior is a great way to scare away good faith Wikipedia volunteers. Scott Illini (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EL

Please stop spamming twits. Per WPEL only links that are shown to provide valuable information for an encyclopedia reader should be included. We are not here to provide social media walls. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject", which these are. For instance, Naomi Wolf is an author and commentator and her Twitter is obviously relevant if you took the time to look. I'm happy to stop doing this work since you asked and I have other things to do, but I do want to restore the work I already did. And BTW, Twitter has no "wall".Scott Illini (talk) 22:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you obviously did a blanket revert of all my edits without really considering them, including here and here. Clearly this is not neighborly. Yes, you later reverted yourself on the non-Twitter ones, but I think it is clear that you did not consider these edits individually before blanking them. Scott Illini (talk) 22:58, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please familiarise yourself with the relevant policy (I would suggest WP:ELOFFICIAL for starters), rather than merely blanking content on your usual whim. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:30, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help requested

Given this how was Angus Davis an "unambiguous copyright violation"? Scott Illini (talk) 04:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That site states directly that it is made up of user contributed material. At the bottom you'll see this:

"Like all of the content in CrunchBase, Media Files can be uploaded and edited by anyone with an Internet connection and are not subject to monitoring by the CrunchBase staff.

This means that any of the material or media may very well not be the property of the contributor, but could be taken from anywhere and placed on the site. This means that the CC-BY license isn't backed by a sufficient copyright claim and isn't trustworthy. INeverCry 06:52, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"By uploading data and media files to CrunchBase, you grant permission to CrunchBase and other sites to access under the conditions of Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) and that third parties will provide attribution by linking to CrunchBase. You should not upload media files that cannot be offered under CC-BY or another compatible license." That addresses copyright. As to trustworthiness, please put the article back and I'll add some citations. Thanks. Scott Illini (talk) 19:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't address copyright. These uploaders and contributors may not have the right to release their contributions under a free license, considering that they may not be the actual copyright holders of the material. "You should not" doesn't mean people won't or don't contribute and upload material that is copyrighted by others without their knowledge or permission. I'm not going to restore the article. INeverCry 19:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing can be said for Wikipedia contributors and Wikipedia content. Please restore, let me edit for 24 hours and add cites, and then let someone else weigh in on this. Scott Illini (talk) 22:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing can't be said about Wikipedia, because here we have to directly source content, or that content can be removed.

I offered to add citations.Scott Illini (talk) 23:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here we have oversight, which CrunchBase directly states they don't have. I'm not going to restore it. If you want to ask someone else, feel free. INeverCry23:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we have oversight, we can request citations, we can flag content, etc. You are actively pre-empting that oversight process. You are penalizing authors for having first authored content on CrunchBase, and declaring that content poisonous because it was first posted elsewhere. That makes no sense. If I first posted something on WikipediaPrime, and then migrated it here, you would delete it because WikipediaPrime lacks "oversight"? But if I first posted it here, that would be okay? Your demand that content be exclusively posted to Wikipedia first negates the collaborative value of creative commons licensing. Scott Illini (talk) 23:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're not understanding me. I'm saying that the contributors of CrunchBase can steal the work of others and post it on CrunchBase as their own under a free license if they want to. In any event, I'm not going to restore the article. Period. INeverCry 00:02, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That work is a valid Creative Commons work. It is no different than a Creative Commons image, and such images are added to Wikipedia all the time. Your personal theory that CrunchBase is a den of nefarious activity is unwarranted and unsourced. Scott Illini (talk) 00:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Means of Production

The correct phrase is, "the means of production," not "means of production". I notice that you've been changing all pages with "the MOP", to "MOP" without the "the". This is just plain wrong and I've undone your edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigiheri (talk • contribs) 20:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Resource. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. This notice will be posted on Sigiheri's talkpage as well. – S. Rich (talk) 23:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And since the article wasn't deleted, I'm just reiterating this point. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:23, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalist state AfD

WP:GD says it is good practice to notify creators of articles of AfD nominations. I hope you will do so. Here is the talkpage: User talk:Zloyvolsheb. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 23:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I C the notice. Thank you, Scott. – S. Rich (talk) 23:36, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Association (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miguel Hernández Souquett

The article Miguel Hernández Souquett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A violation of WP:BLP1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lenticel ^(talk) 03:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information about Edit warring

Hi Scott Illini I just wanted to caution you that you were engaged in an Edit War with Fat&Happy. Remember if you violate the 3RR you can be blocked from editing. If you seem to disagree with an editor please discuss the edit on the article Talk page or that users Talk page. I'm just giving you a friendly reminder. Etineskid (talk) 02:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jews in the Hellenistic and Roman Cities

I don’t think I am miss reading Jews in the Hellenistic and Roman Cities. Maybe my wording was bad but here is what the source says. Both sources mention the census but only Jews in the Hellenistic and Roman Cities is clear about why.

Top of page 105 Bar-Hebraeus’ figure is a mangling of Eusebius’ report of a census of Roman citizens and does not refer to the number of Jews;

Bottom of page 106 and Lo Cascio now makes a strong case that Beloch was wrong about the Augustan census figures. This is an extremely fragile chain of argument. I do not believe we have the first notion of how many Jews there were in the ancient world, Jonney2000 (talk) 04:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Democracy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Freedom

Unemployment benefits (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tenth Amendment

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Scott Illini/David Madden (Jeopardy! contestant)

User:Scott Illini/David Madden (Jeopardy! contestant), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Scott Illini/David Madden (Jeopardy! contestant) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Scott Illini/David Madden (Jeopardy! contestant) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Madden (Jeopardy! contestant) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Madden (Jeopardy! contestant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Madden (Jeopardy! contestant) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AldezD (talk) 17:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bitcoin

fyi, since you were bitten with your first edit on Bitcoin: I filed a 3 RR report re Fleethams edit wars over the last month here--Wuerzele (talk) 10:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Scott Illini. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RfC at Bitcoin, re: mentioning its use in online black markets. Thank you. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 09:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Left–right politics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Equality and Inequality. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Corporations funding politicians

HI, i had a lok at this page and cant see how it meets the criteria for Speedy deletion as an attack page, the page in question is a redirect to another page which itself doesnt appear to be an attack page either. Was this tagged in error, if not let let me know and we can try to figure out what needs doing with it. Amortias (T)(C) 09:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lower class. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

August Capital

added a link pointing to Seagate

Streak (company)

added a link pointing to Michael Birch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Civil forfeiture in the United States

Your removal of this photo here -- well the reason that photo was included was to try to keep the article balanced. Right now almost all of the diagrams and photos and charts are pushing the agenda of the critics. If you wish to delete this photo, please replace it with another one which makes the pro-law enforcement case.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RFAR evidence

Hi, Scott. You probably noticed I reverted your edit at the Lightbreather case evidence page? There are strict rules for those pages, and you can't edit another person's section. I'm not a clerk, but I saw it so I spontaneously reverted it; if I hadn't, an arbitration clerk would have done it a little later. (And in fact I probably should have left it to the clerks.) Anyway, I'm sorry, because you obviously added evidence in good faith. Perhaps you thought you didn't have enough material to create your own section? That's what you have to do, though. The individual sections can be small, that's not a problem. An alternative might be to contact Faceless Enemy and ask them to take ownership of your example, and add it to the section themselves. Regards, Bishonen | talk 08:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Ammophilinae

Scott, I turned your redirect into an article. The subfamily contains six other genera, so is not identical to its best known genus. Thus, a stub article is better. Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:28, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

article names

Please stop tweaking the names of climate change articles. Instead, how about starting a thread at the most-watched of all the climate articles, i.e., Talk:Global warming to see if there is consensus for an article title name standardization? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 08:23, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speak freely

A tag has been placed on Speak freely, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Compassionate727 (talk) 17:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Believe freely

A tag has been placed on Believe freely, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Compassionate727 (talk) 17:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carrying arms

A tag has been placed on Carrying arms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Compassionate727 (talk) 19:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bearing of arms

A tag has been placed on Bearing of arms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Compassionate727 (talk) 19:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have arms

A tag has been placed on Have arms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Compassionate727 (talk) 19:23, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hi Scott. Could you please stop adding external links in the body of Collegiate Network, per our guideline on external links? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 04:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Abortion, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--slakr^\ talk / 03:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redstate

Is that a joke? It's hard to imagine a more obviously unsuitable source. If this only covered in one ideological corner of the blogosphere, it shouldn't be in WP. (To say nothing of matters of weight, location, etc.) --JBL (talk) 20:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would reinforce Joel's comment about the unsuitability of the sources you're inserting. I see that you've been notified, above, about the discretionary sanctions covering abortion-related material on Wikipedia. I couldn't tell if you've been notified that these pages are also subject to 1RR (a one-revert rule), meaning that no editor should revert more than once in a 24-hour period. I don't think you've breached this standard, but wanted to make sure you were aware of its existence. MastCell ^Talk 20:42, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What an utter embarrassment. --JBL (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks, you are more than welcome to lend a voice! Springee (talk) 02:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who has edited the Southern Strategy page I would appreciate your input on the question I just posted in the talk section.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Strategy edits

Scott, I've been having some issues editing the Southern Strategy article. I would be interested in your take on some of the material I've been trying to get added to the article.[[1]] Thanks Springee (talk) 03:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PP

There's only the one Colorado Springs clinic, and it was protested. The source used there confirms that. It's not synthesis to say that the videos and reactions to them are related to the shooting, especially since reliable sources say so for us. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi

just a quick note to say thanks for taking the time to add edits to the Ven page on wikipedia. if you need more information or want to add anything, let us know and happy to help - Hub Culture

Inferno (1973 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inferno (1973 film). Since you had some involvement with the Inferno (1973 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Also Inferno (1995 film), Inferno (1998 film), and Inferno (2002 film). Nick Number (talk) 23:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of California drought

The article California drought has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is not an article. Just a few statements, some of which are opinion and synthesis.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 07:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social justice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Barack Obama

Hello! I am here to know why you reverted my edit on Barack Obama. It does not reject WP:MOS, rather it supports the criteria. Even so, feel free to sustain the issue in your side. Thanks, and I will appreciate your response. Ikhtiar H (talk) 04:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Political positions of Hillary Clinton

Sorry I didn't see the one tiny sentence about immigration for Indians. Still, the rest of it seems to be only about Hispanics. Has she made any statements about immigration from other countries/continents? Right now, it sounds like she would discriminate against her own ancestors, or against Asian start-up founders in the Silicon Valley, etc. Let's look at our initial misunderstanding as an opportunity to expand the section, shall we? Can you find anything? To be honest, I have not found anything. Please ping me! Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Bad edit"

Thank you for a straight-forward and descriptive edit summary that tells it like it is. I am going to try to keep it in mind for the future. Best, BMK (talk) 01:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FiOS from Frontier

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of FiOS from Frontier, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://everything.explained.today/Verizon_Fios/.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:14, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dougla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exploitation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Your recent editing history at Number of guns per capita by country‎‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You deletion is not according a consensus and only disruptive. ZH8000 (talk) 00:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Scott_Illini reported by User:ZH8000 (Result: ). Thank you. ZH8000 (talk) 03:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have no business undoing the facts, sir

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Value added, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Profit. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

African-American upper class

added a link pointing to Doctors

Agriculture in Israel

added a link pointing to Arable

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your input requested on Washington state cannabis article

Please see here: Talk:Washington_Initiative_502#Rename_to_Cannabis_in_Washington_.28state.29_or_split_off.2C_or_what.3F

Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 23:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback requested re major changes to Cannabis in the United States

Please see: Talk:Cannabis_in_the_United_States#Proposing_bold_changes_at_Cannabis_in_the_United_States

Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 21:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Scott Illini. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ramu Yalamanchi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramu Yalamanchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramu Yalamanchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Scott Illini. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Article the Third" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Article the Third. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 16#Article the Third until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 02:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Gun politics in Indonesia" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gun politics in Indonesia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Gun politics in Indonesia until a consensus is reached. Paul_012 (talk) 08:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TogetherAI moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to TogetherAI. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. MarioGom (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TogetherAI for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TogetherAI is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TogetherAI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarioGom (talk) 15:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]