User talk:ScienceWick2011

Welcome!

Hello, ScienceWick2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 23:14, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. EleoTager (talk) 21:18, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 17:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Can you please cite why you believe the citations provided are not supported? The science has in fact changed and you've made this reversion without consideration. Upon review of the talk page, it is evident there is significant amplification of the viewpoint that was in the majority and remains so, it was merely supressed. ScienceWick2011 (talk) 17:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you reviewed the article's talk page, you have seen that this has been discussed many times before, and you know that you will need to secure agreement from others before making such changes. MrOllie (talk) 19:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]