User talk:EleoTager

This is a prior sockpuppet account for User:MatthewCenance. To contact this user, see User talk:MatthewCenance.

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Klibc, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. —Half Price 19:02, 1 December 2010 (UTC) I was merging the page--EleoMod (talk) 19:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

There's no consensus on a merge, that I can see... -- Jon Dowland (talk) 16:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Yt golden logo-vfldYTvNP.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yt golden logo-vfldYTvNP.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - X201 (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Goggle.com1

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Goggle.com1, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Goggle.com1

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Goggle.com1, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Windows 2000 builds

The article Windows 2000 builds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

utterly unencyclopedic

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Armor, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 20:54, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Armour a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 20:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sponge ‎ . It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 23:30, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oi

How the hell is this [1] vandalism? Darkness Shines (talk) 20:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why the hell have you templated my talk page for creating hoax articles? A response had best be given or a report to ANI over your abuse of twinkle will be made. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:48, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you here if you are retired from editing?

I still edit when I feel like it, now respond to my question Darkness Shines (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:05, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:White Terror (Russia), is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Slow down immediately, please. Several of your recent actions are extremely questionable. For instance, reverting the user who blanked their own talk page (User talk:Mew2arceus). They are perfectly entitled to do so. Favonian (talk) 20:54, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was reverting that user becuse he blanked a diffrent page.

No, this is what you did. Favonian (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's weird. I did not notice that the page blanked was a talk page. --EleoTager (talk) 21:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which only goes to show that you have to slow down and pay more attention to what you're doing. Favonian (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck is this supposed to mean? Are you trying to commit Wiki-suicide-by-admin? Favonian (talk) 21:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked your account. Your recent edits aren't consistent with Twinkle somehow malfunctioning, but with you deliberately misusing them to disrupt Wikipedia. -- Finlay McWalterჷTalk 21:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock. Your Twinkle will break if you don't. --EleoTager (talk) 21:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I sense a troll. You will not be unblocked if you continue this inappropriate behavior, I'm afraid. --Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad 21:40, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. I think we are done here. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 21:45, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TlscE

Template:TlscE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]