User talk:Schmeater

Welcome!

Hello, Schmeater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Blackest Night Edit War

Some quick points

I've reverted a number of edits because:

We don't add plot when the issues haven't been published - solicitations don't count as sources
We use the cover dates, which run two months ahead of the date the issue is released

Hope that helps explain my edits.

I also suspect that the "People who I know that are annoying" section on your user page violates WP:USER, specifically WP:UP#NOT #5 and 10. (Emperor (talk) 23:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can a human tell me next time Sine.--Schmeater (talk) 23:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: the Blackest Night: Batman AfD

Read up on how AfDs work.

Just because you believe you've gotten the last word in does not mean you "win".

Generally they stay open for about a week at which point an admin, generally an uninvolved one, looks at what the editors who've commented have said. Evaluates it. And determines one of three results:

Keep either by virtue strong arguments based on policy/guidelines or consensus;
Delete/rename either by virtue strong arguments based on policy/guidelines or consensus; or
No consensus either way.

Since the AfD went up on the 2nd, it likely won't close before the 9th or 10th.

Now, some of how you've gone about things deserve comment on the AfD page.

- J Greb (talk) 20:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Red Robin

Done. The main problem I'm noticing in your edits isn't the content for the most part, it's basically just formatting. In most cases you don't need to add extraneous details like what story a particular title is tying into, usually you just add a link to the story itself and let the reader figure it out. As a pointer you might want to look over some WikiProject Comics policies in your spare time and just look at the formatting of some good articles to see how it's done.

Any other advice, let me know. --CmdrClow (talk) 04:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck You J Greb

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Schmeater (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

174.1.80.86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hate J Greb". The reason given for Hate J Greb's block is: "Personal attacks or harassment".

Blocking administrator: J Greb (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Looks like you were too closely involved. Toddst1 (talk) 16:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blackest Night: Crossovers

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Blackest Night: Crossovers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

lacks references, no indication of how this is notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 03:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blackest Night: Batman

The problem is they have a point - this largely spins off from Batman RIP and the tie-in with BftC is pretty minimal.

Please take this to the talk page at Talk:Batman: Battle for the Cowl#Blackest Night tie-in as you are edit warring with the other editor and are bordering on WP:3RR. If you both continue this warnings can be issued and/or the article locked until this is resolved. (Emperor (talk) 13:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Edit-warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Enigma^msg 05:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please re-write that?

In the article discussion, I asked - rather specifically asked:

"Without commenting on the merits of the others' positions, could folk verify that I am understanding their positions accurately?"

It is important to limit the content of your response to further clarifying your position, not your position in relation to others, so as to avoid further tangential discussion. I would like to suggest that you edit yourself to remove any reference to any position other than your own. Believe that I will enforce the same amongst the other two users, so the quicker you act on this, the better. I can almost guarantee that if you do not, choose to do so, you are only hurting your own position. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 17:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you wish to remove the first attempts? The past post was what we were looking for. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 19:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I would like it to be removed. --Schmeater (talk) 19:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, Now, we wait for the other folk to weigh in, and we can proceed. :). - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 20:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary break

I think that, while your intentions for improving the article are good and commendable, you are still kinda new at editing articles in Wikipedia. We aren't allowed to make some of the connections you think we should be making. I don't want to discourage you, and I suspect that pointing you to a bunch of links might do that. I am going to put a template here on your talk page that will help you decide for yourself what you want to learn about; it will help you to understand the policies and guidelines that are getting tossed around in discussions. Feel free to delete it if you don't want it. My door is always open if you have a question or need help in understanding something. If I don't know the answer,I will help you find the answer.
Just keep a cool head and focus on the edits, avoiding entirely comments about an editor, especially negative comments. Good luck to you. :) - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 16:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Belated welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Schmeater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

AfD nomination of Batman: Reborn

An article that you have been involved in editing, Batman: Reborn, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batman: Reborn. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. J Greb (talk) 22:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmation

You see I wan't to confirm one thing did you wan't Blackest Night: Batman in Battle for the Cowl because of it's articles deletion, and what relation does it have to Battle for the Cowl.--Stinkysoxmon (talk) 15:41, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you look at the Afd of Blackest Night: Batman Emperor suggested added a say into R.I.P or Battle for the Cowl.--Schmeater (talk) 21:09, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COMICS

Summarization should never be on a per-issue basis and should only outline the plot rather than describe minor details. Additionally, plot descriptions must include cited reference to critical analysis published in secondary sources. Editors should approach the discussion of fictional concepts within a "real world context"; this means editors should describe fictional elements in terms of how they relate to the real world, as fictional characters or topics. --Cameron Scott (talk) 20:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what is difficult to understand, we do not write issue by issue plot summaries and we write about comics as fictional items not as if they are real. Now you could edit war over this but it is likely to end with you blocked. in addition, you are now removing relevent referenced material and that can be considered vandalism. So how would you like to do this? --Cameron Scott (talk) 21:07, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

also is it okay if I make a page called Blackest Night Tie-in's for a series of plot summaries? It's been discussed and rejected on the Blackest Night page so would likely just be merged back into that article. --Cameron Scott (talk) 06:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Batgirl

I think you should add the info on Stephanie Brown to the Batgirl article. I also think you should provide a reliable source for the information pertaining to its relationship to other series, and the info in the second paragraph. If it's out already, you could find an image of its cover to add to the Infobox. I also copyedited it to add some formatting and wikilinks. Aside from that, what help do you need with it? Nightscream (talk) 22:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How would you like to handle this

If I reported a certain account as being a sock of yours and they checked the IPs, I'm guessing they would come back as the same? Now we could get into a "I have no idea what you are talking about" and I could get a IP check down or you could log into that other account and put up a 'retired' notice and we will leave it at that? So how would you like to handle this? --Cameron Scott (talk) 12:45, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hard way it is then. --Cameron Scott (talk) 06:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time this has happened (see also). You are going to have to do something because if this happens a third time then assuming good faith is going to be tricky. You can add password protection to your screensaver, for example. (Emperor (talk) 03:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Ok tell me how to delete Stinkysoxmon. --Schmeater (talk) 18:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spell checker

Can you at least put in some minimum effort and spell-check your efforts? You added in (AGAIN) the same spelling mistakes.

They include but are not limited to:

Disctrict Attorney

question's

go's

implant's

Comic Book Rescource

and on and on and on..

--Cameron Scott (talk) 07:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask you once again - please ensure that if you try and re-add the material that you have read it and removed the errors. If you are unable to do this, I will have to ask that you are banned from the article because your actions (even after you have been told about them) degrade the quality of the article. --Cameron Scott (talk) 06:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppeting again

174.1.80.86 is clearly you, the edit history gives it away - last time you were blocked for a short period of time, next time it's likely to be a month. So are you going to pack in the sockpuppeting or are we going to get you banned? --Cameron Scott (talk) 08:04, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Ray Joseph Cormier

Thank you for registering your opinion on the subject. You might want to look at this, [1]

Proposed deletion of The War of Light

The article The War of Light has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not the place to post your fan fiction.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mblumber (talk) 03:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should be flushed straight down the toilet. --Cameron Scott (talk) 12:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I don't specialize in those types of articles. Did you try going to that WikiProject that has the assessments? You can find people there that might be interested. Zoo Fari 00:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BftC

In general, I like to help where I can, but unfortunately I just started a new job and I don't have a lot of time to lend out to Wikipedia for sizeable edits (I'm typically on clean-up duty for the most part). In addition, I don't really work on comic book articles, because I don't know where to find good information about them. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 04:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle for the Cowl

I could help, but what is "B Class"? TH43 (talk) 23:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did some minor edits, does that count? TH43 (talk) 01:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've lost me. :P TH43 (talk) 10:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll take a look on the weekend, see if I can make heads or tails of the information. ;-) TH43 (talk) 01:37, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please try to avoid edit summaries like this 7 03:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bone: Quest for the Spark

The article Bone: Quest for the Spark has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BioShock template

Hi Schmeater,

I had to undo your edits to the BioShock template. Assuming good faith, I think you'll probably thought that it was for the better, but I honestly don't think so. I put a link to System Shock 2 in the 'See also' section of the template, but claiming it's part of one big franchise is more than a bit farfetched. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans | drop me a line | what I'd do now? 16:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Hi Schmeater, please refrain from adding original research to Wikipedia articles, like you've done twice now to the article on BioShock Your undoing has been reverted. Claiming that BioShock and SystemShock are part of one universe, isn't mentioned in any source; BioShock is considered the spiritual succesor and that's it. As you seem to be unfamiliar with the term canon, please take a look at canon (fiction). --Soetermans | drop me a line | what I'd do now? 11:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Windstorm Studios

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Windstorm Studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Windstorm Studios and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 19:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the articles Crash Bandicoot (series) and High Impact Games , please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ETLamborghini (talk) 23:19, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article High Impact Games, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ETLamborghini (talk) 02:25, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Jonathan Nolan. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-5- (talk) 23:08, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Conduit (Mythology)

A tag has been placed on Conduit (Mythology) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I42 (talk) 18:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Windstorm Studios

A tag has been placed on Windstorm Studios requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I42 (talk) 18:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Adams (Conduit)

A tag has been placed on John Adams (Conduit) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I42 (talk) 18:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prometheus (The Conduit)

The article Prometheus (The Conduit) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I42 (talk) 18:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Ford (Conduit)

The article Michael Ford (Conduit) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable fictional character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I42 (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Drudge

The article The Drudge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I42 (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Conduit (Mythology). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. I42 (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Drudge

I have nominated The Drudge, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Drudge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 19:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Conduit (Mythology)

I have nominated Conduit (Mythology), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conduit (Mythology). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 21:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Conduit (Mythology)

I have nominated Conduit (Mythology), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conduit (Mythology). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Conduit (Series)

I have nominated Conduit (Series), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conduit (Series). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is an active wiki for The Conduit with over a hundred articles thus far

You might want to check out http://conduit.wikia.com/wiki/The_Conduit since you are interested in contributing to information about the series. Originally the Wikipedia was a totally different community, people filling it with everything imaginable, and many people did come here to read things they were interested in. Then the deletionists came, and have been mercilessly doing everything they can to destroy what they consider "fancruft", despite the fact that it is what most people who visit the Wikipedia actually read. When people Google for something, they find a link to the Wikipedia article, and then one to the Wiki at wikia.com appearing, and increasingly are going to the wikia. "According to Quantcast.com, over 33 million people around the globe now visit Wikia every month!" [2] Dream Focus 22:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Batman Incorporated

Proposed deletion of Batman Incorporated

The article Batman Incorporated has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL Comic book hasn't been published yet. Also fails WP:N as a result. No prejudice against recreation once the comics are out.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 17:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this has been redirected to Batman, Inc.

Please, look for existing articles under the correct title before starting new ones.

- J Greb (talk) 19:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Superman (film series). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.-5- (talk) 16:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Schmeater

Hi Schmeater. I noticed you created a Requests for Adminship page some time ago; I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. If you want other users to !vote on your RfA, you will have to transclude it at WP:RFA. However, I would advise you not to run at this time. Your edit count is fairly low (only about 900 edits), and !voters will see this as lack of experience. The standards for RfA have gone dramatically up recently, and now successful candidates tend to have at least 4,000 edits. Of course, this is your decision whether to run or not, but please take my words into consideration. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have replied at User talk:Eagles247#Schmeater RFA sometime ago. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I would advise that you don't run, but if you are still intent on running, you will need to transclude your RfA at WP:RFA by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nominate#To nominate yourself (#9 and 10, specifically). Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:01, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will delete it now. I look forward to supporting in a future RfA of yours if you gain some more experience editing here. Regards, Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Conduit Series

Template:Conduit Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 15:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Conduit series

Template:Conduit series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 15:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crash Bandicoot/CTR

Hello. It seems that there is a problem in the article Crash_Bandicoot_(series). The section Crash Team Racing contains the same text than the previous section. I just wanted to inform you about this little issue because you are the author of the games summaries in this article. Regards. Maimai009 23:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hemiogenic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hemiogenic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zakhalesh (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions concerning Indian Subcontinent

An ip user Special:Contributions/76.67.18.192 is trying to bring up discussions about this at South Asia and Indian Subcontinent. They are also trying to rename a section from "Definition by South Asian Studies programs" to "Definition by tertiary studies programs"

Since you were active on this subject in the past, I thought I should warn you. (you are being informed of this because I saw you participated in discussions in the Talk:South Asia archives) Thegreyanomaly (talk) 01:03, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Atari

I just want to let you know ahead of time, I respect your viewpoint and am not looking for an edit war or flame fest. I understand you're looking to improve the article and related ones, but please understand others are as well and there was already an established consensus for the format and a non-merger. We can re-establish consensus if you like, which I am happy to do, but please give time for such a discussion. You started a discussion at the video game project page, please give time for other regulars to weigh in before any further edits from the original consensus version. Normally in such consensus generating discussions the original version stands while a consensus for the desired changes is formed, since the change is what has to be discussed for consensus or no consensus. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Centipede: Infestation

The article Centipede: Infestation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While the PROD was contested, please remember not to copypaste copyrighted material from websites onto articles; I removed the Gameplay and Plot section from the article because of that. While you can use other sites as a source of information, you cannot use them as a source of sentences. Regards, –MuZemike 03:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Atari merge discussion

The discussion is already taking place at the original discussion you started at the main video game project talk page. Please keep discussions at a single location (the video game project talk page) for completion sake. What you are proposing is against the previuosly established consensus and where the article came from originally (a single unified page) years ago. So far, the current consensus is again against this. It appears you're under the misconception that there's a single entity called "Atari" when there is not, "Atari" is currently used as an abbreviation for Atari SA and it's brand. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 18:00, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a video game project matter at this point, as you had already started the discussion there. Please go to the link I gave you to join back in to the discussion. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 18:10, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Daggerdale sequel

Hey. I don't know much about the game, but Gamma World doesn't actually seem to be a sequel to Daggerdale, rather is just uses the same engine. If so it shouldn't be on the Daggerdale page, but as you probably know more I thought I'd ask you before doing anything. Muskeato 01:18, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Alliance Engine

Please note that your edits to X-Men Legends and X-Men Legends II: Rise of Apocalypse are incorrect. They don't use the Dark Alliance Engine, they use Vicarious Visions Alchemy as their engine. This is both well documented on the web and shown on the in-game introductions. Please stop adding it. --Teancum (talk) 10:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MW3's Engine

Regarding your edits to the engine section of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, it has been CONFIRMED by Robert Bowling on reddit quite a while ago that MW3 will run on the MW3 Engine a.k.a. IW 5.0. Read the ref link about it if you must, but please don't change it again. The ref your going off of was before Robert Bowling had said that MW3 would have a new engine. It's a very old one, and shouldn't be used. Thank you. Saru786 (talk) 11:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips to help you out!

Hi Schmeater, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Schmeater/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky (talk …stalk!) 07:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How references work

Simple references

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Schmeater/reftest and try it out.

Named references

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Something to make your life easier!

Hi there Schmeater! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you might appreciate some help with references.

You might want to consider using this tool - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well. Happy editing! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 07:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit in Religion in Thailand

It is unclear to me what is meant with this edit of yours. Regards, - Takeaway (talk) 04:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear what the sentence "and is the the religion's population comprises of the majority of the South Asian population" means. - Takeaway (talk) 19:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would also be very careful "assuming" things. If I were to assume what would be the 4th most practised religion in Thailand, it would be animism, practised by many of the hill tribes in Thailand. - Takeaway (talk) 19:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sikhism in Canada. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 18:42, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Sikhism

Could you explain why you've decided to move Sikhism in Canada to Canadian Sikhism? Also, why have you added Jagmeet Singh Dhaliwal to the list of prominent Sikhs, he is not an MP but an Member of Provincial Parliament. Gsingh (talk) 22:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Night of Owls, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Batman and Robin and Batwing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Batman: Streets of Gotham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Huntress

Batman Incorporated (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Stephanie Brown

Night of Owls (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Starfire

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Conduit 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andromeda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Batman Incorporated (organization), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Batwing and Nightrunner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Batman: The Dark Knight, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paul Jenkins and Joe Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. When you recently edited Baldur's Gate: Enhanced Edition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ultima (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fluency, Grammar, and Other Writing Conventions

Since I am new to editing/commenting on Wikipedia, let me preface this by saying that I hope this is the place for this comment. If it is not, I am sorry, and obviously, delete it.

First, let me say that I appreciate you starting and constantly updating the Baldur's Gate Enhanced Edition page. It is people like you who make wikipedia such a tremendous resource. Second, your articles would be much more effective if you focused on a few aspects of your writing.

1) Fluency: In your articles, you tend to write very short and choppy simple sentences. Although there is nothing inherently wrong with this, your writing will be much more effective and readable if you vary your sentence structure and add transitions in your writing. You can do the former by constructing meaningful complex sentences (i.e. sentences that contain a dependent clause), and you can do the latter by using a variety of words that help transition from sentence to sentence. By doing this, your reader will be more engaged, and as a result, more people will reap the benefits of your hard word and know more about the topics that you are writing about.

2) Tense: use correct tense and avoid verb construction that is unnecessarily wordy and indirect.

3) Comma Splices: In the two articles that I have read of yours, you often use a comma to join two independent clauses that are not joined by a coordinating conjunction (i.e. a comma splice). For example, the first line on your user page, "I am Schmeater, I believe that becoming...," is a comma splice. You should either replace the comma with a semi-colon or a period. If you want to keep the comma, you need to add a conjunction between the two independent clauses (e.g. I am Schmeater, and I believe...). Although this may not seem like a big deal, it does weaken your credibility as a writing because some may be turned off by poor punctuation, and it distorts the meaning of the writing.

4) FANBOYS: Another comma usage issue. Basically, if you have two independent clauses that are joined by "for, and, nor, but, or, yet, or so," you need to have a comma before one of the conjunctions (e.g. The dog ran in the park, and it ate a bone). Again, although this does not seem like a huge issue, it helps create clarity in your writing. A skilled reader will see the comma and realize that the author is starting on another thought that can stand on its own. Without the comma, the reader could think that you are making a list or something else, which will reduce the clarity of the work.

5) More Comma Usage: When you start a sentence with a prepositional phrase, you need to separate it with a comma (e.g. Without a comma, the reader...). Additionally, when you start a phrase with a dependent clause, you need to separate it by a comma (e.g. this sentence). Again, using the commas in this instance achieves two effects: 1) your writing will be clearer and 2) it will help you write more effectively by forcing you to understand when you are writing a dependent clause.

6) Fragments: Make sure that every sentence is complete and is not disconnected from the main clause. For example, in your profile, you write, "Which is now, because I find that people who are admins use their powers incorrectly and pick on us and only put in what they think is right and only a few are exceptions." In this fragment, you have no main clause. Your sentence starts with a prepositional phrase and ends with a dependent clause; you do not have a independent (main) clause to make the sentence complete.

With all of this in mind, this is how I would re-write introduction to your user page:

"I am Schmeater, and initially, I thought that becoming an administrator would cause people to distrust me on this wiki. With that in mind, I decided to become an administrator only when I thought the time was right. That time is now because I find that most people who are admins. use their powers incorrectly by picking on other wiki users and by only allowing content that they think is right to be posted. By becoming an administrator, I will take Wikipedia back to its joyous age of 2006 by being the right type of administrator and by including and allowing the right information/data in the wiki of Wikipedia."

By no means do I believe that my revision is "best," but I do believe that is is clearer and more effective at conveying your message.

If you work on these basic principles, your already phenomenal contribution to wikipedia will be significantly better. Please do not take offense to anything that I wrote, as I admire what you do and I am only attempting to improve your articles.

Md00150028 (talk) 23:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Batman Beyond characters and Joe Chill

Hi, can you help me proofread what I wrote on List of Batman Beyond characters#Comic books and Joe Chill about the new character Jake Chill? Thank you very much.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 05:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the copy edit. Although Jake Chill's story isn't over yet, as we have to wait for the next issue, after he alter the details of his Wayne-Power uniform as his new costume and built some gadgets (he's also a genius in his own right, and obviously they are going to be lethal). You can imagine him as a Batman Beyond-version of Lock-Up, just as Inque was to Clayface. I'm guessing that you've watched the show yourself as well. How do you feel that about writer Adam Beechen retconning what had established from Batman Beyond of Mr. Fixx as Warren McGinnis's killer to Jake Chill anyway? Even in the comics books, it is established that Jake Chill was one of the guards that Terry had fought in the second part of "Rebirth."--NeoBatfreak (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm JCRules. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to WWE '13, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JC ^{Talk to me} _{My contributions} 01:56, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to User talk:XxBosSCatxX. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. David1217 ^{What I've done} 23:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. When you recently edited MDK2 HD, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jinder Mahal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crazy Cars: Hit the Road, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PC and Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dwayne Johnson

Hi. I'm confused by your edit to Dwayne Johnson. What is this "non-timelinic format" you speak of, and what does it have to do with re-adding 4,000 bytes of wordiness? As far as I can tell, it's in chronological order, either way. I've reverted you, but I'm willing to hear you out. You may have a point, but it's not apparent from your edit summary.

I've also reverted your paragraph break between WrestleMania XXVIII and the next Raw. This isn't as big a deal, but I think the match with Cena and Rock's reaction to it belong together. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:23, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had to revert you again. You restored a lot of poor writing. I'm not doing this to be rude, but Wikipedia has standards for English. I'll look through your edit history and redo any changes that actually benefit the article. Your one summary about the "RKO finisher" makes sense, for example. That was mainly for the benefit of readers who don't watch wrestling, but a Wikilink would probably suffice. If there's anything else, please bring it up on the Talk Page first. What you see as an error could just be something you don't understand. This may help explain how paragraphs work. You seem to have a problem with those. InedibleHulk (talk) 09:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you can see the problem with a sentence like "The Rock would vow to leave the WWE for good, but would be attacked by Bill Goldberg, who he would go on to lose to at Backlash, which Goldberg won." Why all the "would"? What's wrong with "vowed", "was attacked" or "lost to"? Is it necessary to say Goldberg won the match Rock lost? InedibleHulk (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interplay Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seth Rollins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dusty Rhodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sterling James Keenan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dusty Rhodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm STATicVerseatide. I noticed that you made a comment on the page CM Punk that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 01:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Detective Comics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Tieri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WWE 2K14, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

N52 Futures End plot

Hi Schmeater. Thank you for adding the plot info. If you can, can you try to cite it using {{cite comic}}? That would be very helpful in the long run of the page. Even if it is bare info, that's fine. The page is on my list of things to eventually get to expand, and I can do the citation expansions if needed. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mesozoica

The article Mesozoica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not likely a notable game at this time, especially given that it hasn't been distributed yet and isn't by a standing game producer. See WP:CRYSTAL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 24 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Mesozoica page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Supernatural with characters dean and Sam Winchester

Are dean and Sam Winchester real? Are they alive? Mariah543 (talk) 07:18, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aluna Games

The article Aluna Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable and fails WP:NCORP. There is no significant secondary source that covers the company in great details besides a press release from Gameindustry.biz

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AdrianGamer (talk) 05:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Schmeater. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Schmeater. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Schmeater. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bound (2015 film)

The article Bound (2015 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, no significant coverage by independent sources, per WP:NF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 14:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Interplay Discovery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interplay Discovery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interplay Discovery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Free Media Kid$ 15:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]