User talk:Scaufape

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome! —Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs

Empty articles

Please do not create articles with no content other than an infobox. These are candidates for speedy deletion since there are basically empty. Angela . 15:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:1951UE Lleida.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1951UE Lleida.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

put Category in your articles

RaySe. 15:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Hernán Falco

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Daniel Hernán Falco, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. King of the North East 19:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Manuel Buzzi

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Juan Manuel Buzzi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. King of the North East 19:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ULEB Cup 2002-03 and ULEB Cup 2003 issues

They look like the same article to me. Which is the correct one?
Nowhere in the articles does it say what sport is played -- you probably really want to add that in.

Thanks!!! -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 00:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aleix Serra

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Aleix Serra, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Aleix Serra

An editor has nominated Aleix Serra, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleix Serra and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of UE Lleida head to head

An editor has nominated List of UE Lleida head to head, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of UE Lleida head to head and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flagging Ermengol Graus for further review

Hello, Scaufape … I recently encountered the article about Ermengol Graus and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that Some Other Editors (including at least one administrator) may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. — triwbe (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Football biography

{{Football player infobox}} was renamed {{Infobox Football biography}} in August 2006. The old template is not identical to the current version. Please see the edits I have made to Daniel Marín to give yourself an idea. Thanks. slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 14:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2008-2009 ACB season

An article that you have been involved in editing, 2008-2009 ACB season, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008-2009 ACB season. Thank you. MrZaius^talk 15:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juan Luis Ruiz Ledesma

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Juan Luis Ruiz Ledesma, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced athlete, does not play in top tier league.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MBisanz ^talk 05:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Lázaro Alonso

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Lázaro Alonso, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:N and WP:ATHLETE because it is about a footballer who has not yet played in a fully-pro league

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jogurney (talk) 21:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Player statistics

Please do not use 0 (0) in player infoboxes in cases where the stats are unknown, it is misleading. It would be preferable if you could leave the line blank or use something like ? (?) or - (-). Regards King of the North East 23:50, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Hi, I noticed that you have been linking some dates at 2009 ACB Playoffs recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an temporary Arbcom injunction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Ohconfucius (talk) 05:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Urrea

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Albert Urrea. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Andoni García Aranbillet

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jon Andoni García Aranbillet. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Segunda División

Why change the names of the clubs of Segunda División seasons?

They are the real names they had in that season, do not change them into the current ones. ZZ86 (talk) 23:32, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel Pérez Rodríguez listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Manuel Pérez Rodríguez. Since you had some involvement with the Manuel Pérez Rodríguez redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Geregen2 (talk) 15:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Torices Bravo

The article David Torices Bravo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 19:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Scaufape! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 31 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 318 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Gonzalo Eraso - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Pablo Sierra Madrazo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Giovanni Pérez Rodríguez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Manuel Lanzarote Bruno - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Luis Miguel Gracia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Joan Tomás Campasol - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alfredo Juan Mayordomo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nuno Carvalho - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Xavier Vallmajó Tercero - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
José Javier Zubillaga Martínez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

11. Daniel Guerrero Gómez 12. Borja Sánchez Luque 13. Alberto González Pérez 14. José Javier Etxarri Sanz 15. Miguel Ángel Rubio Buedo 16. Fernando Esparza Aizkorbe 17. Antonio Domingo Rojas Melero 18. Víctor Marco Soler 19. Daniel Fernández Cañueto 20. Juan José Blanco 21. Manuel Pérez Rodrigo 22. Emili Vicente 23. Óscar Reche 24. Iban Parra 25. Roger Fornas 26. Salva Arco 27. Miquel Martínez 28. Adrià Fernández 29. Gerard Roca 30. Oriol Jorge 31. Albert Urrea

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Óscar Reche

The article Óscar Reche has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of FC Barcelona managers

Hi Scaufape! I'm writing to you because you've done a lot on the List of FC Barcelona managers article. I'm trying to get all the references right, do you know where I can find the references for matches won, drawn and lost? Best regards Sandman888 (talk) 13:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Fernández Cañueto

The article Daniel Fernández Cañueto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 01:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adrià Fernández

The article Adrià Fernández has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 01:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alfredo Juan Mayordomo

The article Alfredo Juan Mayordomo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 01:31, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gerard Roca

The article Gerard Roca has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 19:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UE LLEIDA

Hola SCAUFAPE, VASCO desde Portugal al habla,

Perdona por mis maneras en mis cambios en "HONOURS" en UE Lleida, ya he hecho algunos otros cambios. Sin embargo, todavía creo que en los títulos no hace falta poner "WINNERS", se da por hecho, solo poner "RUNNER-UP" en caso de segundo lugar (y solo en copas, nunca en liga, eso no se contabiiza).

Un saludo cordial, buen fin de semana - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:33, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lleida Bàsquet

Hi, Scaufape. I was working this last month in a project of Liga Española de Baloncesto and the 2010-11 season of the league. You are welcome to make any contribution to the page.

Gonzaka (talk) 09:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Óscar García (basketball)

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Óscar García (basketball). The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Óscar García (basketball)

The article Óscar García (basketball) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pequeño Gran Favor

Gracias, Scaufape. El otro usuario, sin embargo, me ha dicho que solo estaría dispuesto a editar dos grupos porque tiene poco tiempo. La única forma de hacerlo entonces sería haciendo tú 8 grupos y yo 8 grupos (es decir, 2 grupos más de los que dije). Si no te importa, contéstame y vamos al lío (Puede que sea bastante pero tampoco se tarda demasiado en editar 8 grupos. Una media hora o 40 minutos a la semana como muchísimo. Yo solía actualizar los 18 grupos la temporada pasada y me llevaba una hora y pico más o menos). Las formas que tienen las tablas no deberían ser un problema y no son complicadas de editar. Son parecidas a las de Segunda División B solo que no hay diferencia de goles (+1 ó -3). No hacen falta.

Utilizaríamos esta página aunque creo que puede que ya la conozcas: www.futbolme.com

Si estás dispuesto a hacerlo contéstame y empezamos. Mil gracias. Qampunen (talk) 08:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

¿Te parece bien desde el 11 hasta el 18? Yo haré del 1 al 4 y del 7 al 10. El otro usuario hará los grupos 5 y 6. Es preferible que los actualicemos el mismo día si podemos, y si no pues cuando podamos preferiblemente antes de que pasen demasiados días. No es necesario que pongamos la diferencia de goles (bastante tenemos con tener actualizada la tercera división). Mil gracias por tu colaboración. Allá vamos... Qampunen (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Si tienes algún problema con las tablas no dudes en consultarme. Por cierto, ya no tienes por qué actualizar el grupo XI. Tus grupos son desde el 12 hasta el 18 (7 grupos). Saludos.Qampunen (talk) 22:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fantástico, crack! Creo que con el trabajo colectivo seremos muy eficientes. Buen trabajo! Qampunen (talk) 22:05, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cuando termines de actualizar las tablas (si eres el último en hacerlo) cambias la fecha de "last updated" en el artículo. Qampunen (talk) 21:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Te he editado el grupo XV de hoy por si estabas ocupado. Muchas gracias por el gran trabajo que estás haciendo. Qampunen (talk) 21:06, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mira, la página www.futbolme.com está sin actualizar así que te he puesto los resultados del grupo XII por si no lo actualizan hoy:

Corralejo 2-1 Tirajafe
Realejos 2-0 Vera
Mensajero 0-3 Villa Sta. Brígida
Atl. Granadilla 4-0 Orientación Marítima
Victoria 2-1 Pájara Playas de Jandía Qampunen (talk) 17:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Como ha pasado un día y seguro que estás ocupado porque es Navidad (fechas ocupadas) te he actualizado el grupo 12 y 15 de ayer, pues no eran demasiados partidos. Por cierto, ¿vas a poder editar el grupo XV el día 30 ó 31? Si no puedes, puedes contar conmigo ese día ya que es raro editar un 31. Gracias por tu trabajo, Scaufape! Qampunen (talk) 10:44, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tranquilo, no hay problema. Un saludo y enhorabuena por la goleada del Lleida :) Qampunen (talk) 21:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No tengo Internet en mi ordenador personal, por lo que ahora mismo no podré editar. Espero arreglarlo lo antes posible. ¿Podrías ayudarme a actualizar la Segunda B esta jornada? (La Tercera es demasiado y ya tienes bastante con tus grupos, así que mis grupos de Tercera los actualizaré cuando me sea posible). Un saludo, amigo! Qampunen (talk) 11:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muchísimas gracias por ayudarme con la Segunda División B y la Copa Federación y por tu trabajo en Tercera División. ¿Vas a editar el partido de Tercera de mañana viernes? No he podido casi editar nada esta semana y sin embargo alguien ha actualizado los grupos míos y algunos tuyos (algo muy poco común). Nos ha ahorrado trabajo. Un saludo y suerte al Lleida :) Qampunen (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De acuerdo :) Es que es una tarea ardua. Suerte al Lleida. Qampunen (talk) 22:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Te echado una mano esta mañana porque seguro que tienes mucho trabajo. Un saludo, amigo. Qampunen (talk) 11:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, se metió el usuario Jolley algo, y empezó a actualizar la Tercera División. No sé si va a ser regular o no, pero te ha quitado trabajo :) Como sueles actualizar la Tercera los domingos por la noche, pues compruebas si tus grupos necesitan ser actualizados o no. Gracias, compañero! Qampunen (talk) 15:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gonzalo Eraso

The article Gonzalo Eraso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer who fails WP:ATHLETE.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1943–44 Tercera División

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 1943–44 Tercera División requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola!

Hola, amigo. Cuánto tiempo. ¿Cómo te va? Pues mira, yo seguiría con el mismo artículo pero le cambiaría el nombre solamente (move the page) porque sólo le han cambiado el nombre ¿no? Yo hubiera hecho un artículo nuevo si el Lleida hubiese desaparecido y hubieran creado el nuevo equipo en Regional, pero como siguen en Segunda B sólo cambiaría el nombre. Aún así voy a consultarlo con otro usuario a ver qué piensa. Saludos y suerte para el Lleida la próxima temporada :) Qampunen (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He consultado con otro usuario y lo mejor es redirigir el articulo UE Lleida a Lleida 1939, así también como todos las categorias que tengan en el titulo UE Lleida, como por ejemplo, de UE Lleida footballers a Lleida 1939 footballers. Lo que ha sucedido es exactamente igual a lo de la SD Compostela. Hay que poner como fecha de fundación 1939 y al lado como reformado en 2011. Un saludo! Qampunen (talk) 17:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, al final el nombre de Lleida 1939 ha sido desestimado y el club se llamará Club Lleida Esportiu. Cámbialo tú mismo porque no veo donde puedo hacerlo, o me lo enseñas. Gracias crack!!! Scaufape (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! Tengo una duda para los puestos de Segunda B para acceder a la Copa del Rey. Casi siempre ha sido los cuatro mejores restantes (aparte de los cinco primeros de cada grupo). El año pasado dijeron que dos y sin embargo se clasificaron !5!. ¿Este año son dos o cuatro? Gracias! Qampunen (talk) 06:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Lleida esportiu.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lleida esportiu.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Scaufape for helping to promote Andorra national football team to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. Sp33dyphil © • © 08:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips to help you out!

Hi Scaufape, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Scaufape/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky (talk …stalk!) 08:57, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How references work

Simple references

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Scaufape/reftest and try it out.

Named references

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Something to make your life easier!

Hi there Scaufape! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you had to create titles for your url links manually, or were using bare urls as references.

You might want to consider using this tool - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well. Happy editing! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 08:57, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award

You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this month! 66.87.2.193 (talk) 16:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of José Javier Etxarri Sanz

The article José Javier Etxarri Sanz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 09:14, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fernando Esparza Aizkorbe

The article Fernando Esparza Aizkorbe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 09:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PC updates

Hola SCAUFAPE, qué tal?

ya sé que no me vas a contestar (o me lo temo, y no sé que he hecho, yo creo que nada), pero ahí va: te pediría por favor mucho cuidado y ayuda con los "PC updates", las datas que aparecen en las cajas de los jugadores abajo (y "NT update" para los equipos nacionales). Se debe de cambiar el día quando hay partido (partido y gol por supuesto) no quando uno edita.

Los días del final de las temporadas pasadas en España fueron: 13 MAYO para La Liga, 3 JUNIO (antes del playoff) para las otras, no se deben poner datas después porque no hay partidos. Veo que lo has hecho en todos los nuevos jugadores del Lleida Esportiu, lo he tenido que cambiar todo otra vez.

Gracias, buen rollo y buena semana - --AL (talk) 00:31, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nada? OK. Pero una última cosa, has vuelto a poner el nombre del jugador de tu equipo como MOLO CASAS, y eso es incorrecto, así es mitad apodo y mitad nombre de pila. Con MOLO tenemos suficiente creo yo. --AL (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, perdona, no sabia estas normas. Scaufape (talk) 18:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No hace pedir perdón hombre, faltaría más. Pero sí, esa norma ayuda a saber en que altura de la temporada vamos en cuanto a estadísticas se refiere (mucha gente, al ver 28 JULIO en una caja puede pensar que se está jugando ya cuando no es así), aunque no hay que quedarse muy preocupado si uno se equivoca, no es una norma así tan esencial que digamos.

Gracias y buen trabajo, a seguir así y suerte al Lleida E. (buena temporada la de su estreno, aunque a lo mejor muchos jugadores transitaron del "muerto" UE Lleida, eso ayuda en la transición). --AL (talk) 16:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toni Seligrat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toni Seligrat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toni Seligrat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 21:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan Carlos Ortiz Padilla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Córdoba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francisco Solar

The article Francisco Solar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer, has not played first team football in a fully professional league. Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 13:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rivas Ecópolis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laura Nicholls (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 UEFA Regions' Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Divisiones Regionales de Fútbol in Cantabria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polanco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Germán Beltrán - y otros supongo

Hola SCAUFAPE, AL de Portugal "al habla",

por favor, en la caja se pone REAL MADRID B, el nombre al completo es en la historia OK? Ah, y así todos los equipos reserva por favor (ejemplo, SEVILLA ATLÉTICO en la historia, SEVILLA B en caja).

Gracias, que tengas una buena semana - --AL (talk) 16:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Más (lo acabo de descubrir, en Utebo FC): en los títulos se ponen los segundos lugares SÓLO en copas (de equipos u selecciones nacionales) en las ligas sólo se admiten los PRIMEROS puestos. Por favor, si los has hecho en otros clubes quítalo por favor. Gracias --AL (talk) 16:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1966–67 UE Lleida season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Castellón

2012–13 Lleida Esportiu season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jaén

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Copa Catalunya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solsona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013–14 Tercera División

You are too early to start 2013–14 Tercera División because there is still a vacancy to fill in the 2013–14 Segunda División B. Some of the groups are wrong because you assumed that the groups must contain no more than 20 teams. Group 7 will have 22 teams (if none of the teams receive an administrative promotion). The each Tercera División group is allowed to have a maxium of 22 teams; adding two more relegation spots for the coming season. Raul17 (talk) 19:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting the 22-team Group 7. Raul17 (talk) 23:36, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since Group 7 has 20+2 or 22 teams then the relegation is 4+2 slots. Even if four teams are promoted, 6 teams will relegated and 8 will be promoted from the Catergoría Preferente.Raul17 (talk) 00:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Jorge Giménez) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Jorge Giménez, Scaufape!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Jorge Giménez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jorge Giménez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Giménez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:53, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Thanks for contributing the new article 2013–14 Copa Federación de España. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Giant Snowman 13:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liga Española de Baloncesto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 UEFA Futsal Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lokomotiv Kharkov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Modderman‎

The article Joe Modderman‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rikster2 (talk) 01:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Javier Mandaluniz

The article Javier Mandaluniz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 09:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2012–13 Copa Catalunya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012–13 Copa Catalunya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Copa Catalunya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2013–14 Tercera División for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013–14 Tercera División is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Tercera División until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C 679 15:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Tercera División and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Copa Catalunya

I noted that you recommended delete Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Tercera División. I don't agree with you, but I'm not sure of the basis of your opinion . Do you feel that it's not notable? Also, I'd appreciate your opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Copa Catalunya which you appear to have put a lot of work into, but no opined on it's contentious deletion. Nfitz (talk) 21:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tercera División seasons

I am very surprised that there appear to be loads of tables that have not been completed for Template:Tercera División seasons. I am quite happy to tidy-up etc but would appreciate help in preparing the basic tables. The source material can be accessed at http://www.league321.com/spain-football-historic-league-tables.html . Kind regards. League Octopus 20:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013–14 División de Honor Juvenil de Fútbol

I like your playoff format since there is no longer a group format anymore. Will update the previous seasons. Thanks! Raul17 (talk) 15:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Guerrero Gómez

The article Daniel Guerrero Gómez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Albert García

The article Albert García has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 10:49, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lleida players who reached Segunda División level.

Hi, MYS77 "here".

Please, don't create any former Lleida player who doesn't played a match in Segunda División or La Liga. Only signing with a Segunda club is not enough. I saw your creations of Jaime Mata and Jesús Imaz, but both of them aren't fully pro until the day of his debut, according to WP guidelines.

Thanks, MYS 77 ^✉ 18:12, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alejandro Sánchez López, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Copa del Rey Juvenil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page REF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enrique Martín

Thanks for pointing it out. He also played for Tudelano, on loan as well.

I'm adding it to the article right now.

Cheers, happy weekend. MYS 77 ^✉ 02:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited European Junior and U23 Canoe Slalom Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hohenlimburg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Spain national football team hat-tricks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ireland national football team. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Spain national football team hat-tricks

The article List of Spain national football team hat-tricks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable WP:NOTSTATS violation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 19:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spain national under-17 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletic Club. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Scaufape. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caufapé

The article Caufapé has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to be a particularly notable surname, especially if less than 100 people have it. No notable ppl with the name to disambiguate to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2017–18 División de Honor Juvenil de Fútbol

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Scaufape, thanks for creating 2017–18 División de Honor Juvenil de Fútbol!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add clear sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sebastián Gómez, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 12:59, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Scaufape. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1967–68 Liga Femenina de Baloncesto) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1967–68 Liga Femenina de Baloncesto, Scaufape!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for sourcing issues.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tablas de resultados

Buenas, te escribo porque me ha sorprendido ver que en el artículo de la LEB Oro has cambiado el módulo de los resultados por las plantillas Bs, las cuales están en desuso. Me entra la curiosidad del porqué, si la otra opción es más modificable en caso de cambio de nombres, orden y esas cosas. Un saludo y felices fiestas. Asturkian (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, no conseguía visualizarla al completo. Si crees que es mejor la anterior, no hay problema, la cambio. Felices fiestas! 20:23, 24 December 2107 (UTC)

Hola de nuevo. ¿A qué te refieres con no visualizarla al completo? Me extraña, porque estas plantillas son las mismas que se usan en las ligas de fútbol y, al menos a mí en cualquiera de los navegadores, no me está suponiendo ningún problema. Asturkian (talk) 14:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas, los nombres no me salían en la misma línea... debe ser el navegador. Un saludo 20:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Adri Rodrígues. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 11:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ffmadrid.es/pnfg/NFG_CmpPartido?cod_primaria=1000120&CodActa=919696&cod_acta=919696

http://www.futmadrid.com/noticia/el-c-dot-p-parla-escuela-inicia-2018-con-varios-cambios-en-la-plantilla.html

Atlético Madrileño (juvenil)

Hi, this is not anything relating to Wikipedia editing, but I know you have an interest in Spanish youth football and would have more local knowldge than me, so I wanted to ask about Atlético Madrileño. I'm a bit confused about why the team exists? I have tried looking it up on Google etc but as you will know, that was also the name of Atlético B for many years so a lot of the results come back to them. From what I could gather, Atlético Madrileño was an unofficial youth team that represented the club when Jesús Gil stopped the official cantera, and then when the system was restarted, the Atlético Madrileño setup was allowed to continue alongside the official teams? Not sure if I have got that right. Also seems that the Madrileño Juv A team are officially connected to Atlético de Madrid (as per official website) but no other age groups, so do they operate as a separate club below that?

Seems a bit weird to me that Atlético are the only club which can have two teams in the Division de Honor and that they are allowed to operate in two different leagues with the possibility of winning them both, as has happened this season. What will happen if Atléti Juv A is drawn against Atlético Madrileño in the end of year competitions? Or will they be kept apart to try and make sure it doesn't happen?

Thanks for any info you can tell me regarding this. If you are aware of any references (Spanish would be fine, very unlilely to be any in English) which explain the situation, please either point me to it or add it to the Atlético Madrid (youth) article to explain to anyone else who may be wondering about this unusual sitation – at present, Atlético Madrileño linnks back there but there is no team list or other info for them, I'm not saying that is incorrect but it would be good to add something about them on the article if we can. As I stated above, I tried to look myself but most of it just had recent results etc without explaining about the origins of the team, or related to old stuff about Atlético B.

All the best and thanks for keeping the tables etc updated all the time! Crowsus (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Crowsus! Such a good question. Both of them are Atlético de Madrid U-19 teams due the number of players in their academy. Is not a very rare situation on the Spanish youth football. For instance, Antiguoko is a feeder club of Real Sociedad, San Félix of Málaga or Roda of Villarreal. As you see, it's a strange situation, but nothing in Spain is normal ;)

http://www.atleticodemadrid.com/equipos/atletico-madrileno-juvenil-a-2017-2018

Also you're right about the old name of Atlético B-team, as Castilla for Real Madrid B or Atlético Malagueño for Málaga B nowadays.

Thank you for your interest Scaufape (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. It seems strange to me that it is allowed officially, I mean those other teams you mention have very close links to the professional clubs but they are separate, and also play in the same regional division against the 'parent' canteras. It would probably be fairer if Madrileño was separated from Atlético and playing in the same division, although of course they would still get the financial support and share players.

I see they have been drawn against one another in the Copa de Campeones. So Atlético are guaranteed to have a semi finalist. But maybe better than the possibility of them having two! 21:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve 1966 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Scaufape, thanks for creating 1966 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:47, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to the above? Please stop creating unreferenced articles - you've received many messages about this. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and communication

Please respond to my messages. WP:Communication is required as part of the policies WP:DISPUTE and WP:CONDUCT. Please also see WP:V and WP:BURDEN. You've been contacted many times on this issue - please stop adding unverified content to articles. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand it. Best wishes, Scaufape (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, can you please add your sources to 1966 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scaufape, please respond. Other editors have repeatedly spent time contacting you about adding unverified content; please add references to content you add. Boleyn (talk) 07:43, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How can i do it?. Best wishes, Scaufape (talk) 09:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Scaufape, thanks for responding. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners. If you find it unclear, please let me know. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't addressed the issue. WHat was your source for this article? Please see Help:Referencing for beginners or ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. I'm happy to add it for you if you tell me what your source was. Boleyn (talk) 09:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you nine messages on this over the last nine months, and yet you have just created another unreferenced article, 2018–19 Lleida Esportiu season. This is not acceptable. Please add your sources for these or if you are struggling, ask for help. Boleyn (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me showing an example? Thank you for your help and sorry for doing thing bad :( (talk) 11:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a problem not to know how to do something, Scaufape, there's always help if you ask for it at the WP:TEAHOUSE, just please don't ignore concerns raised. UEFA Youth League is an example - you add a piece of information, then at the end of the sentence put where you got it from. Please let me know if you're still unsure after looking at that and Help:Referencing for beginners. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:44, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scaufape, do you now understand? Are you able to add your sources to the articles? Boleyn (talk) 17:03, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, now i understand (talk) 14:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. Will you now add references to the articles you've created: 1966 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil, 1965 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil, 2018 Supercopa de Catalunya, 1902–03 Copa Barcelona, 1902–03 Copa Macaya, 1901–02 Copa Macaya, 1965 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil and many others at [1]? Boleyn (talk) 21:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've continued to edit, can you please respond? Boleyn (talk) 21:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i will (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After 14 messagess from me, you have continued to edit but ignored this issue. They are all now moved to draftspace, you can work on them there. Boleyn (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018–19 Liga EBA season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2018–19 Liga EBA season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Scaufape. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Federico Bessone

Please remember to include sources when you make changes! Giant Snowman 13:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks

Andorra national football team

Andorra national football team, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 21:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pardinyes

Muy buenas, amigo. Aprovechando que eres lleidatà y los ascensos a LEB Plata es algo que me interesa (por si hay vacantes para el Círculo) te pregunto, ¿este club tiene previsto consumar el ascenso o renunciará al mismo? Gracias y un saludo. Asturkian (talk) 12:39, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas! Teniendo en cuenta que es un club humilde, de un barrio de Lleida, es posible que no se pueda hacer frente al ascenso sin el apoyo institucional. De todas formas, la próxima semana tienen reuniones para hablar del tema. Ahora mismo no sabría decirte porque están en plena euforia. Scaufape (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1901–02 Copa Macaya

Hello, Scaufape. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1901–02 Copa Macaya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 06:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1929–30 Campionat de Catalunya) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1929–30 Campionat de Catalunya.

User:Boleyn while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add clear references section.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1932–33 Campionat de Catalunya) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1932–33 Campionat de Catalunya.

User:Boleyn while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add clear references sections to the articles you create - it may be clear to you but won't be to all readers.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1936–37 Campionat de Catalunya) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1936–37 Campionat de Catalunya.

User:Boleyn while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

All your creations come up in a special list of new pages with major concerns. If you add a clear references section, this would be simpler for readers and save New Page Patrol a lot of time. Could you please do this in future?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:20, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1933–34 Campionat de Catalunya) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1933–34 Campionat de Catalunya.

User:Boleyn while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add clear references section.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1966 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil

Hello, Scaufape. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1966 Copa del Generalísimo Juvenil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2018 Supercopa de Catalunya

Hello, Scaufape. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018 Supercopa de Catalunya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 12:41, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CB Pardinyes

Bon dia! Ahora que ya se ha confirmado el ascenso de este club, he creado su artículo por si quieres mejorarlo o modificarlo por completo. El artículo de la liga lo tiene User:Vasconia en su banco de pruebas. Un saludo.

PD: La próxima vez, respóndeme haciendo uso de {{ping|Asturkian}}, así me doy por enterado. Muchas gracias. Asturkian (talk) 07:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2006 FIBA Europe Under-16 Championship Division C moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2006 FIBA Europe Under-16 Championship Division C, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019–20 Lleida Esportiu season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019–20 Lleida Esportiu season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Lleida Esportiu season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BDFútbol

Buenas. Sólo por curiosidad, ¿eres tú el que está creando las ligas andorranas en BDFútbol? Un saludo. Asturkian (talk) 21:47, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sí señor!. Scaufape (talk) 10:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ahí estoy también metido yo, haciendo el fútbol femenino y ahora metido con la Copa RFEF. Te había invitado un par de solicitudes de lectura/edición, aunque sea simplemente para curiosear. Asturkian (talk) 07:24, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Por otra parte, te he guardado tus cosas en uno de mis cajones. Asturkian (talk) 16:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas de nuevo. Aquí tienes los artículos del Lleida Esportiu que salvé antes de su borrado. Te faltaría por actualizar el partido de ayer contra el Villarreal B. Por otra parte, ¿no vas a publicar en BDF la temporada 2018–19? Un saludo. Asturkian (talk) 10:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias! Estoy acabando de retocar algunas cosillas. Scaufape (talk) 10:11, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UE Lleida en BDFútbol

Muy buenas, Sergi. He estado recopilando aquí los datos de los jugadores de la UE Lleida que aparecen en las plantillas que juegan Copa estando en Tercera, que ahora se pueden rellenar. A ver si podías ayudar a completar lo que falta más las temporadas en las que ni siquiera se tienen alineaciones de los partidos, como son la 1972–73 y 1971–72. Gracias por tu ayuda, un saludo. Asturkian (talk) 11:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas Gonzalo. Creo que sí puedo ayudarte. Dime cómo lo prefieres. (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Si puedes registrarte y aportar lo que tengas a la comunidad, para completar las temporadas, bienvenido sea. Si no, ya como prefieras. De momento voy a poner ahí los datos que encuentre de las temporadas que te dije. Asturkian (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Tengo unos problemas terribles para registrarme en la comunidad! No hay manera de conseguir contestarte con los datos que encontré Scaufape (talk) 19:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Buenas, ya te he visto contestar. Supongo que ya no te hará falta ayuda, aunque si necesitas que publique algo por ti, lo haré. ¿Qué tienes? ¿Algún libro del club o es hemeroteca del Segre o diarios de allí? Asturkian (talk) 16:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - Es una base de datos del ayuntamiento con diarios antiguos. Si quieres echar una ojeada, a lo mejor te son de utilidad: http://premsadigital.paeria.es/cgi-bin/Pandora.exe. Scaufape (talk) 18:05, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to talk

Hi

You are invited in Andorra national football team talk about section "International goals". As a recurrent editor, your contribution will be highly appreciated.

thank you Riktetta (talk) 14:16, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2002–03 UE Lleida season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2002–03 UE Lleida season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002–03 UE Lleida season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2006–07 UE Lleida season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2006–07 UE Lleida season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006–07 UE Lleida season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2007–08 UE Lleida season

The article 2007–08 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced squad list; no indication of meeting WP:GNG and violates WP:NOTSTATS; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate football stats database.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1981–82 UE Lleida season

The article 1981–82 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced squad list; no indication of meeting WP:GNG and violates WP:NOTSTATS; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate football stats database.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:08, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1982–83 UE Lleida season

The article 1982–83 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced squad list; no indication of meeting WP:GNG and violates WP:NOTSTATS; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate football stats database.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1970–71 UE Lleida season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1970–71 UE Lleida season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1970–71 UE Lleida season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1972–73 UE Lleida season and other articles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1970–71 UE Lleida season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1983–84 UE Lleida season

The article 1983–84 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; no evidence that this particular season ever received significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1984–85 UE Lleida season

The article 1984–85 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; no evidence that this season ever received significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1985–86 UE Lleida season

The article 1985–86 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS as well as other elements of WP:NOT. More to the point, there is no evidence that this meets WP:GNG at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2001–02 UE Lleida season

The article 2001–02 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS as well as other elements of WP:NOT. More to the point, there is no evidence that this meets WP:GNG at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1978–79 UE Lleida season

The article 1978–79 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS as well as other elements of WP:NOT. More to the point, there is no evidence that this meets WP:GNG at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1974–75 UE Lleida season

The article 1974–75 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS as well as other elements of WP:NOT. More to the point, there is no evidence that this meets WP:GNG at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1975–76 UE Lleida season

The article 1975–76 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this season actually passes WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1977–78 UE Lleida season

The article 1977–78 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1979–80 UE Lleida season

The article 1979–80 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet our inclusion criteria for football seasons nor WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1980–81 UE Lleida season

The article 1980–81 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this season meets WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1976–77 UE Lleida season

The article 1976–77 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; no evidence of notability for this season.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:00, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1986–87 UE Lleida season

The article 1986–87 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; no evidence of notability for this particular season.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1969–70 UE Lleida season

The article 1969–70 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability; no justification for a stand-alone article on this season. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1968–69 UE Lleida season

The article 1968–69 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2008–09 UE Lleida season

The article 2008–09 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, does not meet WP:GNG. No evidence that this season received any significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010–11 UE Lleida season

The article 2010–11 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant coverage for this season, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:14, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2009–10 UE Lleida season

The article 2009–10 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of continuous WP:GNG coverage to build an article from for this season.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2000–01 UE Lleida season

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2000–01 UE Lleida season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sakiv (talk) 20:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1999–2000 UE Lleida season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1999–2000 UE Lleida season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sakiv (talk) 04:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2000–01 UE Lleida season

The article 2000–01 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; no evidence of notability for this particular season.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sakiv (talk) 00:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2000–01 UE Lleida season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2000–01 UE Lleida season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000–01 UE Lleida season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sakiv (talk) 13:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2003–04 UE Lleida season

The article 2003–04 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant coverage per WP:GNG, which would be a requirement for a stand-alone season article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sakiv (talk) 01:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2004–05 UE Lleida season

The article 2004–05 UE Lleida season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant coverage per WP:GNG, which would be a requirement for a stand-alone season article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sakiv (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Força Lleida CE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Schreiner. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]