Jump to content

User talk:Sarr Cat/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

I don't remember editing or changing the data in this page but I may have just clicked the edit link to see what happens, Sorry ;-) ... The recent edit I made to the Myalgia page is correct as I have this condition Mixed connective tissue disease and I have noticed it is quite often left out of autoimmune lists or discussions in wikipedia. If you read the Mixed connective tissue disease page and do a bit of external research you will find I am correct. I do not know how, but if there was a way to link the text "MCTD" to that page it would be handy ... any help would be great ;-)

No worries, if the edit you made on that page was accidental, then I sure wont hold it against you. I'm a recent changes patroller, so I sometimes comb through the list of the most recent edits made to Wikipedia, and revert any vandalism, pranks, and other nonsense that people will sometimes insert into articles. The edit you made looked suspicious because it was marked as having deleted a lot of data from the page. When I took a closer look, I reverted your change because I saw it had broken the infobox template. But like I said, no worries, since it was just an accident apparently. Anyways, as for the other edits you say you made, on Myalgia, I wasn't monitoring your edits, so I wasn't immediately aware of them. First off, thanks for taking time to add more information to Wikipedia! Second, might I ask what you mean by "link the text "MCTD" to that page"? I might be able to help, but I'm confused by what you mean by that. Could you elaborate a little bit? Oh, and by the way, it's customary o leave new messages at the bottom of another user's talk page, just FYI. I'll leave this here for now though. SarrCat ∑;3 06:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sarracenia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sarracenia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Delldot -- Delldot (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sarracenia

The article Sarracenia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sarracenia for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Delldot -- Delldot (talk) 07:00, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there. Any interest in working on this any time this week? Or would it be better for me to turn this down for now and possibly review it later if you have enough time to work on it? Thanks! delldot ∇. 06:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Busy with school atm, haven't been on in a while. Yeah, I would like to, but probably more on the weekends! SarrCat ∑;3 17:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sarracenia

The article Sarracenia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sarracenia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Delldot -- Delldot (talk) 04:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mr. Trash Wheel, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Enphase Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enphase Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Voldemort in movie 1 (2).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Voldemort in movie 1 (2).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 19:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of "Temmie"

Temmie, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 (talk) 02:13, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of North Carolina sewer monster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Carolina sewer monster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Carolina sewer monster (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --User:WoodElf 14:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Furry Weekend Atlanta logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Furry Weekend Atlanta logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Scott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gainesville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tod Sirod Reef, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angelfish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Venus flytrap

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Venus flytrap you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ashorocetus -- Ashorocetus (talk) 22:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Venus flytrap

The article Venus flytrap you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Venus flytrap for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ashorocetus -- Ashorocetus (talk) 22:20, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Venus flytrap

The article Venus flytrap you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Venus flytrap for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ashorocetus -- Ashorocetus (talk) 18:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

When you neglect to log in, the quality of your edits plummets, such that all of your edits since blanking your IP talk page have been vandalism. Please be sure to log in when editing, so that we may assist you in improving the quality of your edits. Thanks. - SummerPhDv2.0 16:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Sarr Cat, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Her garden in Dublin will close for ever this September. Last chance to take pictures. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sarr Cat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tanglu

Hello, Sarr Cat. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Tanglu".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 14:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion notification

I am proposing an article that you created for delection, see Mr. Trash Wheel. EMsmile (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Mr. Trash Wheel

On 26 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mr. Trash Wheel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mr. Trash Wheel removed 19 tons of garbage from Baltimore's Inner Harbor in one day? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mr. Trash Wheel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mr. Trash Wheel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Sarr Cat. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Beaver Creek State Wildlife Area".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TopCipher (talk) 07:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beaver Creek State Wildlife Area has been accepted

Beaver Creek State Wildlife Area, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 01:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Sarr Cat. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Pratt Sandhills State Wildlife Management Area".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 06:15, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Millennium Logo 1990.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Millennium Logo 1990.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Sarr Cat. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Particle Mace, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Winged Blades Godric 16:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

The article Arizona Fur Con has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article relies heavily on primary sources and not enough secondary sources to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 16:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)