User talk:SanctuaryX

Your submission at Articles for creation: CollXtion I has been accepted

CollXtion I, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

BenLinus 1214^talk 02:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AllieCoverArtCollXtionICover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AllieCoverArtCollXtionICover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Allie X. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zpeopleheart (talk) 01:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Allie X page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Zpeopleheart. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Catch (Allie X song) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zpeopleheart (talk) 23:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Allie X:"You had no standing to do this. Many of the references you have been removing are WP:ABOUTSELF. So get over yourself; if you want to make any such drastic edits, propose it, because this is insane)". Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. 23:33, November 17, 2015‎ SanctuaryX (talk Zpeopleheart (talk) 01:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Admin noticeboard. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. he does not care Zpeopleheart (talk) 02:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at admin nb. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. he can't follow simple guidelines and policies Zpeopleheart (talk) 03:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Allie X Catch EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Allie X Catch EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at arbitration board, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. quote It seems like they are colluding to be so crudely disruptive.endquote I am being accused of collusion with editor Wordseventeen in the serious venue of the arbitration board. There is no proof of collusion. no diffs, no nothing You need to cut this junk out! You are guilty of repeated personal attacks against me with absolutely no proof and no diffs just attacks. You are guilty of severe disruption and repeated personal attacks against a specific editor! I have been personally attacked for the fifth time now! You need to be blocked by an admin ASAP to prevent any further disruption to wikipedia. Zpeopleheart (talk) 01:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Arbitration page venue, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You accused me of collusion with another party without any proof. You are guilty of making a personal attack against me! Stop! You are being disruptive and are defaming me with accusations that are not supported by any proof whatever. WordSeventeen (talk) 03:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AllieXCatchGif.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AllieXCatchGif.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Allie X - Catch (Audio).ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Allie X - Catch (Audio).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The reference by whathisface

Was probably not intended to call you anything mean, just an expression that he had little to worry about (which is incorrect). The song 99 problems is famous to the point that I've seen it analyzed in solid law journals, and has the recurring chorus "I got 99 problems but a bitch ain't one" - and both Jay-Z and most analyses of the song concur that 'bitch' doesn't reference a human woman at any point. You may find this piece about it an interesting read, although it's totally tangential to the issues at hand. I'll be making more relevant post on the article talkpages shortly. Kevin Gorman (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kevin Gorman:I am familiar with the song; I said potentially because he did adapt the lyrics to reference this specific situation, talking about the ANI's and "arbbie". Though, I've been called much worse; it doesn't really offend me. Anyway, interesting read. Never knew it wasn't. SanctuaryX (talk) 00:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Annie is likely just a play on WP:ANI and arbbie on arbitrator - the fact that he didn't have a pending arbitration case lingering over his head. He may have overlooked the fact that the reason the arb case was rejected is because admins have block buttons. As a further tangent there have actually been some major changes in New York law regarding the search of a vehicle since the incident occurred, the song was published, the article were published, and now so any meaningful review of the accuracy of that verse depends on if you're analyzing it at the time the suppose real event occured, when the song was charged, when the article was published, and now :). Of course, Jay-Z should probably not be taken as a figure to look to for legal guidance, since he famously opined "You see me with a bodyguard that means police is watchin', And I only use his Waist to keep my Glock in" in 2001 only a matter of months before he was facing legal charges for, before, well, keeping his unregistered Glock in his bodyguard's waistband. Kevin Gorman (talk) 01:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your arbitration request

Hi, SanctuaryX. In response to your request for arbitration of this issue, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

Disputes among editors regarding the content of an article should use structured discussion on the talk page between the disputing editors. However, requests for comment, third opinions and other venues are available if discussion alone does not yield a consensus. The dispute resolution noticeboard exists as a first point of call for disputes that are not resolved by discussion, and the Mediation Committee provides formal mediation for advanced content disputes.

In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact a member of the community if you have more questions. Miniapolis 00:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Allie X. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zpeopleheart (talk) 22:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. Zpeopleheart (talk) 22:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moving discographies

Please don't move discographies to namespaces with a capital D, as you did with Florrie discography. This is incorrect per discography naming standards; see literally any discography on Wikipedia, and especially featured discographies. Ss 112 11:09, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SanctuaryX. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SanctuaryX. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SanctuaryX. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]