User talk:SamuilKrasavtsev

Welcome!

Hello, SamuilKrasavtsev! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! !dea4u 05:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of Alexander Raskin

The article Alexander Raskin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject is not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 04:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dylan Smith (student)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dylan Smith (student) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ivan Uzlov concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ivan Uzlov, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zot Nekrasov

Hello, SamuilKrasavtsev. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Zot Nekrasov".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Zot Nekrasov}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:27, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Yuri Sotnik concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Yuri Sotnik, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yuri Sotnik

Hello, SamuilKrasavtsev. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Yuri Sotnik".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Yuri Sotnik}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ivan Uzlov

Hello, SamuilKrasavtsev. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ivan Uzlov".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Ivan Uzlov}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:38, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SamuilKrasavtsev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didnt abuse any accounts at all. I am never a sockpuppeter and never have been one. I thought that I was making pages that are relevant. That block must have been a mistake. I apologise for any inconvenience. If I done sockpuppetry or violated rules, I am sorry and didnt understand the rules, these actions havent been committed on purpose

Decline reason:

So let me understand what's going on here... three accounts, found to be operated by the same person, post substantially similar block appeals within ten minutes of each other. Totally legit. MER-C 10:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SamuilKrasavtsev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was hacked is the reason why the bad stuff happened and didnt notice, I didnt do anything thats bad at all, I didnt do sockpuppetry or anything else thats bad, I have absolutely nothing to do with the bad stuff, I am serious and I swear to god. I really think that the block must be removed because of these reasons above

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know. As per WP:COMPROMISED, this account is no longer eligible for unblock consideration. Yamla (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

This user has engaged in pretty consistent block evasion and sockpuppetry stretching from before this account was blocked, all the way through February 2019 (at least). Additionally, they have engaged in edit warring and general vandalism, such as via 110.175.251.234. --Yamla (talk) 13:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user has lied about sockpuppet accounts being hacked, and has attempted to continue evading their block in March, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 10:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SamuilKrasavtsev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me and my sock puppets because we understood what we did wrong, won't do it again and agree not to. We were blocked due to sock puppetry. I didn't know that using multiple accounts in the same IP address is sock puppetry and abuse. We agree not to do sock. I will tell what is sock puppetry: It's reviving old (unused) accounts and presenting them as different users and contributing to the same page and/or discussion with multiple accounts. I was a bad idea not to read the Wikipedia Sockpuppetry page. If unblocked, I would edit articles about aviation and biographies. We were abusive and we are sorry for this. I will abide all rules and agree to. I am sorry for socking.

Decline reason:

If you go six months without sock puppetry or block evasion, you can request the standard offer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Who is "we"? Jannik Schwaß (talk) 05:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have continued to evade your block by use of IPs as recently as a few days ago. The edits you have made have constituted harassment of another user. I have revoked access to this page. You can pretty much forget the standard offer.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Grigori Grigoryevich Nelyubov.jpg

The file File:Grigori Grigoryevich Nelyubov.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]