User talk:Samuelhinchliffe1991

Welcome!

Hello, Samuelhinchliffe1991, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Will Best (presenter), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Mr X 11:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Will Best (presenter)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Will Best (presenter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Mr X 11:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Hilary Duff, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Chase (talk | contributions) 04:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Height

Stop adding the height of subjects to articles. It's unsourced and irrelevant trivia.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at West Wittering, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Austin Dickinson (vocalist)

The article Austin Dickinson (vocalist) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julie Walters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plaistow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sean Ward (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sean Ward and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Samuelhinchliffe1991, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 2 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Nico Mirallegro page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ewan McGregor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Natalie Portman.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Information was potentially outdated, and see talk page discussion for Israel. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Iain De Caestecker, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Fassbender, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Fassbender, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christian Bale. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at PJ Harvey, you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 14:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tilda Swinton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Björk. Rob van vee 10:42, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at George Clooney. Stop using unreliable sources such as the Daily Mail. Binksternet (talk) 16:36, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Is This Desire?. If you are hell bent on getting blocked again, you're on the right path... Rob van vee 16:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shane Meadows, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dead Man's Shoes (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Aerial (album). Binksternet (talk) 16:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Nightwish talk page

Please see Nightwish talk page about genres. Delain123 (talk) 22:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Residence

Hello Samuelhinchliffe1991. An edit of yours was referred to recently here. The information has been removed, but I'd like to advise you to exercise extreme caution when mentioning other people's private information - perhaps avoid the topic entirely; WP:BLPPRIVACY is the relevant policy. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ben Affleck, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 21:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Samuelhinchliffe1991. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please refrain from doing unconstructive, unnecesary changes to the Samantha Morton article; the edits you've done recently are redudant as the lead crearly expresses her career trajectory through the highlights and not her whole filmography. You can look down in the article to read about her role in Code 46. Thank you. 190.249.179.87 (talk) 22:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sam Keeley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sam Keeley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 00:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

famousbirthdays.com is not a reliable source

Hi Samuelhinchliffe1991 . I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 18:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Davis

Do you have a reference for "Judith Davis"? Your edit added 'Judith' and just now someone decided to remove 'Judy', which is entirely undesirable. Small changes added to small changes can result in wrong changes. Shenme (talk) 01:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cate Blanchett, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Gene Wilder does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Strawberry4Ever (talk) 12:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Unloved Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Unloved Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Cate Blanchett, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tori Amos

With this edit you added a new infobox image but you may not have noticed that it is a flopped image which is not recommended per WP:IDD and MOS:IMAGES#Editing images. I intend to unflop it so you may not want to continue using it like that or choose a different image. ww2censor (talk) 23:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Within Temptation. Victão Lopes ^Fala! 16:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for adding poorly sourced material to BLPs (using the Daily Mail as a source after warnings), as you did at Liv Tyler. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Using your own writings

Regarding edits of this sort, please read the section WP:REFSPAM which discusses how editors should not use their own writings as references as it also serves to inflate their online presence. Binksternet (talk) 00:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing

Your persistent disruptive editing including genre warring and addition of unsourced claims needs to stop, now. You are very close to being blocked (again). And the next block is likely going to be a long one. This should be regarded as a Final Warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

Hinchliffe is evading his block by using Special:Contributions/86.132.100.49. Note the name in the reference here. Still spamming... Binksternet (talk) 01:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IP blocked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And again as Special:Contributions/86.152.253.157. See the name in this reference. Binksternet (talk) 18:50, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again as Special:Contributions/86.174.102.113. See the name in this reference. Binksternet (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]