User talk:Samira819

Khormans moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Khormans, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 14:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://theodora.com/encyclopedia/f/fezzan.html Samira819 (talk) 15:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.chiefacoins.com/Database/Countries/Libya.htm Samira819 (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Khormans moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Khormans. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it needs footnotes instead of an external links list (see WP:YFA and WP:TEAHOUSE for advice). Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 18:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I noticed I re-draftified this despite it having been moved once, which is technically against the rules, but I would still suggest improving the article before moving it back. If you object, I will move it back, but I just wanted to give enough time to improve it so it does not get listed for deletion. ASUKITE 18:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Khormans moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Khormans, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Siege of Tlemcen (1335–1337), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 13:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Algerian War. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton i mean there is alot of different

sources that said so ? Samira819 (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a single one of them describes Libya as a belligerent. I suggest you read Template:Infobox military conflict for more info. M.Bitton (talk) 21:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton belligerent because it supported with weapon and provided all out support Samira819 (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I also suggest you check out the definition of "belligerent". M.Bitton (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton i literally wrote "'Supported by"' Samira819 (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read Template:Infobox military conflict again. Please stop pinging me. M.Bitton (talk) 21:47, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of cabaon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kingdom of cabaon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kingdom of cabaon

The article Kingdom of cabaon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced article, prematurely moved out of Draft space.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Khormans moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Khormans, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khormans for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khormans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khormans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of cabaon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tripoli. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Tlemcen 1330 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Tlemcen 1330. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Tlemcen 1330 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Tlemcen 1330 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Tlemcen 1330 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eagleash (talk) 22:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagleash i don't think so because sources suggest it happens but doesn't give us any clear numbers Samira819 (talk) 11:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment at the deletion discussion rather than here so that comments are readily available to all. If you have sources then please add them. As the article stands, at present, it unfortunately cannot remain in mainspace. Eagleash (talk) 12:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Banu thabit moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Banu thabit, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Samira819. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Courcelles (talk) 18:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Djerba war

The article Djerba war has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is unsourced, likely WP:OR, and no evidence of Notability. Contains only one citation to a website with no details about where to find the information. No information about this "war" found in a general search of published sources. Article created by blocked editor confirmed as sockpuppeteer, who repeatedly resorted to pushing a POV with WP:OR and misleading citations in other articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FastilyBot im blocked from editing so can you wait Samira819 (talk) 12:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tripolitania-Egyptian War

Hello, Samira819. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tripolitania-Egyptian War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tripolitania-Egyptian War

Hello, Samira819. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tripolitania-Egyptian War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]