User talk:Sai Raghavendra Puranam/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

What is and is not vandalism

FYI, the removal of inappropriate non-professional reviews per Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines#Critical response is not vandalism. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:59, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Teluguone a website that is not even notable enough for its own Wikipedia article cannot be assumed to be a reliable source. On what basis do you think it meets WP:RS? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:53, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Those edits were neither editing tests nor vandalism. Dougweller (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on my suggestion

Talk:Naan Ee-- Dravidian  Hero  20:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Eega

published source says live action animation, please check the reference and the content, before accusing other editors blindly, mind ur words. learn to revert what is necessary, dont just blindly, foolishly delete the reliable source from HINDU paper. OKAY GOT IT Murrallli (talk) 13:40, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

PRODUCERS NAME - EEGA

PRODUCER'S NAME IS K. Ranganatha Sai - means Korrapati Ranganatha sai - means Sai Korrapati - CHECK THIS REFERENCE - DONT EDIT BLINDLY AND FOOLISHLY- http://pib.nic.in/archieve/others/2013/mar/d2013031801.pdf

I have not blanked anything in any article - stop messaging me

18:38, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

My dear intelligent fellow

I have not deleted any awards and nominations, coming to ur URL, some other user removed it stating it as an unreliable source, so I have added a PUBLISHED SOURCE FROM DFF - first learn things about wikipedia, whether a reference is URL OR PDF OR DOC, IT SHOULD BE PUBLISHED SOURCE - DONT WASTE MY TIME - I AM NOT INTERESTED IN EEGA. DONT MESSAGE ME - THANK YOU Murrallli (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

First kindly develop ur knowledge on wikipedi about references, who told u Pdf file and all non sense - a reference should be a published document

pdf is a reliable source, that 123 is not a reliable source, u need to develop ur wikipedia knowledge, ur very poor pdf, doc, url doesnt matter Murrallli (talk) 19:25, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

ur so ignorantly accusing me, DONT MAKE A FOOL OF UR SELF

IT IS NOT ABOUT URL - IT IS ABOUT WHAT SOURCE UR ADDING, BARE URL'S CAN BE CORRECTED WITH REFLINKS, PLEASE DONT BECOME A FOOL IN FRONT OF OTHER EDITORS Murrallli (talk) 19:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

section heading is okay, glad that u atleast know this -

BUT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS URl, PDF ETC FOR A REFERENCE, please read notes on wikipediaMurrallli (talk) 19:31, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

u show the Pdf file and the so called ur favorite 123 Url ur adding, to admin - actually bare url's are not allowed, pls u need to study a lot on wiki, and ask which is reliable and published source, for removing pdf file, people will laugh at u Murrallli (talk) 19:34, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Regards - Kindly dont message me,

until u sit and study about wikipedia and learn editing on wikipedia Murrallli (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

i have not removed any of ur edits

now again dont start ur non sense, without knowing subject of wikipediaMurrallli (talk) 19:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

in ur first message to me,

u said I blanked the page, it is not blanking the page, it is removing the template, this also u dont know, and ur accusing me??, please dont message me Murrallli (talk) 19:46, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

know what is vandalism first

happy editing, regards Murrallli (talk)

We only include professional review sites

I will continue to remove content that does not meet Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines#Critical response. We only use professional reliably published reviews, not just any old crap from any fansite on the web. It is up to you to actually establish that the content meets the reliable source criteria, a claim that a website has been up for years or has lots of hits does not suffice, even if both of those claims are true, that does not make the site a reliable source. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:49, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

my dear user

please dont put block warnings on peoples talk page, without even realizing what they are trying to say, and please kindly do notaccuse other users, that they (removed or blanked page content), removing page content means removing whole article Murrallli (talk) 19:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

relaible sources - LECTURE 1

1. any film website or fan website will not serve as reliable source.

2. A reference can be a URL OR DOC OR PDF, provided it is reliable

3. Best reference sources are any Published book, press release from (Directorate of film festivals), press relases of any National News paper, Film Magazine, Yahoo/rediff/msn etc. (all these can be A URL OR DOC OR PDF, IF IT IS A http bare URL, u need to convert them using reflinks).

HOPE U DONT BOTHER ME NOW Murrallli (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Lecture 2

misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.Murrallli (talk) 20:06, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

please know the basics of wikipedia

Murrallli (talk) 20:09, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

check my talk page

then read wikipedia introduction page and then edit Murrallli (talk) 20:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

FYI

Just letting you know... PDF files(and books) can be used as sources as long as they are reliable.Don't bite new comers TheStrike Σagle 07:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Don't expect a new user to be as civil as we are.He must have been rather frustrated.You should have made the reverts manually than Twinkle! :) BTW continue this here and please don't call me by my name in my talk due to security reasons :) Cheers TheStrike Σagle 12:56, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

It is a disambuguated link,

please please dont message me, until u know completely about wikipedia, thanku Murrallli (talk) 12:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Sai Raghavendra Puranam. You have new messages at Murrallli's talk page.
Message added 13:14, 22 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please.... :) TheStrike Σagle 13:14, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

kindly

know the basics of wikipedia, on when to issue warning and what is vandalism, and then message me, dont become a joker Murrallli (talk) 14:11, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Businessman

You have a new talk back message at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:209.147.224.225&action=edit&section=16 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.147.224.225 (talk) 18:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)