User talk:Murrallli

High Blood Pressure Murrallli (talk) 19:38, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Apologies for warning you for something you did not do see here. By the way, could you please refrain from removing posts from users to your talk page (And other talk pages as well)? Is rather difficult to discuss anything this way. Sitethief~_{talk to me}~ 20:12, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SVSC

Please don't add Disambiguation link(s) such as the one you added to SVSC article. For reference see this Old ID : SVSC old ID. Thank you. Raghusri (talk) 13:58, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eega

Both of you seem to disagree in many issues.May I please request you to stop editing the article for a week so that this dispute can be settled? I would like to act as the middleman if you both don't mind.This message is for both Murali and Raghusri. Sincerely TheStrike Σagle 13:14, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Murrallli. You have new messages at Strike Eagle's talk page.
Message added 15:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TheStrike Σagle 15:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for providing sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thank you for this edit! :) Strike Σagle 06:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ishan Arya

Thanks so much for writing Ishan Arya! It's a lovely article :). Ironholds (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you so much for writing the article of Bandla Ganesh..I was planning to start the article before you made it! Strike Σagle 03:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure

Hii. I'm very sorry for the poster i uploaded but i confess i dint do it intentionally with any intention of showing any woman in a bad light. That was the only non-watermarked available till now but i found one and will upload it. Thanks for the info.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 13:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ghattamaneni family

The article Ghattamaneni family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article has no significant content about the topic except listing out all the members and relatives of that family.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. krZna (talk) 22:48, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Satya 2

Hello Murrallli,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Satya 2 for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Op47 (talk) 20:21, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jagadguru Adi Shankara

The article Jagadguru Adi Shankara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]