User talk:Sai Raghavendra Puranam/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Sai Raghavendra Puranam. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
Sarocharu
Re your reverts. Dates in the body may usually be in dmy and mdy formats. However, MOS requires consistency. MOS:DATEUNIFY states: "Dates in article body text should all have the same format ... Publication dates in article references should all have the same format... Access and archive dates in references should all have the same format. You will notice that there are a mix if dates, meaning that the article is not MOSNUM compliant after your revert, and your objection does not seem to be founded on policy grounds. But because it is an Indian subject, the date adopted by convention here on WP is dmy. I will revert you once again. -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 12:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Sorucharu
Hi Raghusri, and thanks for your work on that article. I see there's friction with a very experienced editor, Ohconfucius, concerning ... date formatting, is it? I believe the guidelines for en.WP say that these formats should be harmonised where they are inconsistently used within a single article. It looks as though that is what he has done.
Could you raise the matter with me if you have further questions, and I'll be pleased to help if I'm able to. Thanks. Tony (talk) 17:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Raghusri image.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Raghusri image.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
- state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
- add the relevant copyright tag.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
