User talk:Saforrest

Talk archives: 1 – 2 – 3

My User Name

Hi, Saforrest. Thanks for your message. I love Wikipedia and attempting to make it better. My name actually happens to be "Gerard Kennedy" so that's why I chose my name. Nevertheless, if you think it's confusing, changing it would be fine by me. "GerryK" would be my preference. GerardKennedy

Removing empty sections

Hi, you removed empty sections from the David Currie article. As you may have noticed, the article is quite new. The section headings are like "scaffolding" or framework, to encourage other editors to add material. Instead of removing framework, perhaps we could put "To be added". Is there a Wikipedia policy on this? Of course, the "ignore all rules if it helps you to write a better Wiki article" rule would suggest that having "framework" cues in the early months of an article's existence would be a good idea. Just some ideasNazamo 01:41, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Johnathan Madden: Spelling

The name is actually spelled Johnathan, and I wrote a stub article called Johnathan Madden yesterday. Maybe the thing to do is to add the content from Johnathon Madden to Johnathan Madden and then propose Johnathon Madden for deletion. --Rrburke 22:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Quite right -- Johnathon. Odd. So why were they identifying him as "Johnathan" prior to the adult sentencing and the end of the publication ban? I think what I'll do is see if there's anything worth migrating from the stub and then convert it to a redirect. --Rrburke 23:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I briefly thought the spelling Johnathon might've been judged sufficiently distinctive that it would've made him identifiable and so was included in the publication ban. Seemed like a good theory. Not true: I googled the name with that spelling and got 1,000,000 hits. Who knew? And like you, I had never even encountered the spelling Johnathan.

It seems likely to me there's more to it than a misspelling: whoever wrote the CBC.ca piece you linked to had obviously picked up on it, and the reporters who sat in the courtroom day after day must have seen the boy's name written any number of times, and it's hard to imagine that none of them would've picked up on the unusual spelling -- unless it was consistently misspelled in court documents.

Creepy side note: when I went to look at my copy of today's Globe after I read your message, I also had a look at the pictures and realized I recognized the mother -- from minor league hockey or baseball, I think, though I can't quite place her. Dawes Road is a little east of me.

So you're in Hamilton? I was born at St. Joe's. --Rrburke 00:51, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"On coincidences..." Gets weirder: I used to live on Old Ancaster Rd in Dundas. --Rrburke 03:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

shiny buttons?

Hi Saforrest, I ran across your name going through some of the old Rwanda pages and wandered by. I saw your statement that you're less article centered these days and wonder if you think getting the admin tools would be useful. If so, I'd be happy to nominate. Cheers, Banyan Tree 01:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One Dead Indian

Hi, Saforrest. I was able to track down information concerning the original Stoddart edition (including ISBN) through Abebooks [1], a site for used and out of print books. The Stoddart edition was a hardcover, while the M&S edition, which appeared two years later, was a paperback. I'm not familar with the latter, so don't know whether there were any revisions. Stoddart was part of General Publishing, a large coimpany that went belly-up about four years ago. I'm afraid I am guilty of having removed the mention of the book under "Reference" - but only because I wasn't aware of any article on a book that cites the same book as a reference. I've taken the liberty of changing the section head to "Editions" - something I've seen in other articles on books. Regards, Victoriagirl 06:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CUPE

Hi Saforrest. I read your comments on the CUPE talk page - an additional view/edit is a very good idea. I like you Category:CUPE, but do think it should be Category:Canadian Union of Public Employees? The acronym isn't very self-evident if you're outside of Canada. Cheers.--Bookandcoffee 17:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The cat's only a couple hours old. I'm just going to create Category:Canadian Union of Public Employees and

{{db|created in error - expanded acronym with {{cat|Canadian Union of Public Employees}}}}

the old cat myself! :) No one's really concerned, and it'll save wandering through the WP:CFD.--Bookandcoffee 18:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boomer - Athena

It may get confusing but any early mention here of Sharon Valarii - (aka Boomer - aka Athena - aka Number Eight) - prior to third season when she took yet another name - should remain as Boomer since that's what she was called in earlier developments of the show. Please leave them as such, thanks. Cyberia23 03:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'll just change it to Sharon since Caprica-Boomer went by that name because thats what Helo called her. It's really confusing to write about her because she has so many aliases. Cyberia23 03:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, why did you use such a complex link [[Sharon_Valerii#Sharon_.22Athena.22_Agathon_.28n.C3.A9e_Valerii.29|Number Eight]] when [[Number Eight (Battlestar Galactica)]] would have sufficed? Cyberia23 03:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, never mind about the later part - I see what you did there. It just looked weird. Cyberia23 03:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Priscilla de Villiers

I noticed your name in the history, this article could really use some help. Alan.ca 06:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your question on my talk page. I prefer to have the discussion there. Alan.ca 08:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucien Quelet

It doesnt have to have Charles Darwin anywhere - the mention of evolution infers Charles Darwin because evolution refers to his theory. So I can say that and be right, even if it doesnt say that in the text. But I see your point. We hsall leave it out for the moment, and try to find a more stable interpretation. Thanks, —ÅñôñÿMôús _{Dîššíd3nt} 01:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Howard_pawley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Howard_pawley.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 15:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Paulmartinsr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Paulmartinsr.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Kerr

Please check out my comment at Talk:John_Kerr. Cheers Bjenks 03:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saforrest, I do research as an archivist often political nature, and changed a number of important factual errors on Payne's entry, after checking my own facts. May I suggest you retain the corrected version inserted by me after research, since the original contains important errors. Potentially libelous errors. curious that you reverted all the corrections. Archiviste

Fair use disputed for Image:Blackwater Scahill.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blackwater Scahill.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TTC token image

I'm glad to see an image of the current TTC token in Wikipedia, but the one you've supplied is puzzling: it looks as though the whole thing is brass, when of course the center is actually aluminum or some similar-colored metal. Would it be possible for you to photograph it again while avoiding the reflection or color distortion or whatever it was that made that happen?

(If you're going to reply, please do it here on your page; I am not the only person who has contributed to Wikipedia from this IP address. If you can't improve the image, so be it.) --207.176.159.90 00:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 207.176.159.90: I agree with your comments about the misleading colours in the photo. have uploaded a new image taken under different lighting conditions to commons:Image:Toronto_Transit_Commission_Token-2007.jpg, which I believe fixes the problem. Cheers, --Saforrest 19:37, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, much better. --207.176.159.90 00:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

What is it and how do I upload all of my Hamilton images to it? Nhl4hamilton 21:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your response regarding Commons. I wish someone had explained that to me cause then I would have had all of my images uploaded to Commons a long time ago and also when I had more free time at my disposal. One more question though. Someone has already uploaded one of my images to Commons, the one of the Copps Coliseum on York Boulevard and they didn't need me to upload it to Commons. Some of the images I no longer have saved on my hard drive so would I be able to upload the images straight from my Gallery page here on wikipedia to Commons? Hamilton Photo Gallery, My Contributions Nhl4hamilton 08:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - No problem. I still have a few more Hamilton photos to upload to wikicommons. I'm about halfway through. Plus there are some new ones as well that I will be uploading there that I haven't yet uploaded to wikipedia. Nhl4hamilton 00:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Peter Mansbridge.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Peter Mansbridge.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 18:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

There is a relatively new contributor, working his of her way through all the GWOT articles, (1) suggesting a lot of it isn't "notable", (2) removing links, removing material he or she thinks isn't referenced, (3) insisting on a burdensome amount of references. (He or she has demanded references to prove Omar Khadr wasn't housed in Camp Iguana, for instance.)

You started the Zaynab Khadr article, so you might be interested in this challenge to its notability.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 04:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zaynab Khadr Article

Hi - thanks for your thoughts on the Zaynab Khadr article. I should have been more specific when I placed that notability tag on the article, but I made the points that led to me placing that tag on the article on the talk page. Please let me know what you think! BWH76 (talk) 23:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		I'm honoured to present Saforrest with this Photographer's Barnstar for his amazing photo contributions with the Hamilton, Ontario-related articles! Nhl4hamilton \| Chit-Chat 12:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

McMaster Engineering Article

Hi Saforrest

I put the picture you took of the engineering building on the McMaster University Engineering article. Hope you don't mind. If not, I can remove it. Thanks 219.77.172.234 (talk) 07:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Kanman Wong

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kanman Wong, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kanman Wong seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kanman Wong, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hostages-Kember-Sooden.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hostages-Kember-Sooden.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 10:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Count Pavel Ignatiev

Hello! Emperors, empresses, kings and queens do not have regnal titles in their article titles, but those below the rank of king do (Albert II, Prince of Monaco, Henri, Grand Duke of Luxembourg, etc). As for Isaac Newton, titles of knighthood are not included in the article title. You are right, however - the conventions do not address Russian nobility directly. Yet, titles of most (if not all) articles about European nobility are consistent with the conventions: e.g. Landgravine Amalie of Hesse-Darmstadt (nobility, not royalty, and minor member of the house of Hesse-Darmstadt); Louis VI, Landgrave of Hesse-Darmstadt (nobility, but head of the house of Hesse-Darmstadt); Count Ingolf of Rosenborg (former royalty); Baroness Mary Vetsera, etc.

My goal was to make articles about Russian nobility consistent with other articles about other European nobility. If you object to the moves, I won't insist. Surtsicna (talk) 11:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Uwilingiyimana.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Uwilingiyimana.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jerry Bergman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jerry Bergman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Bergman. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Steve Dufour (talk) 06:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption Categories

I am not sure whether I discussed this with you or someone else, howeever, the explanation is very simple: there is more in common between adoption issues across countries than there is within them. Thus, creating country-specific categories - while compelling for patriots uneducated in the issues - does nothing for the value of an encyclopedia. Moreover, over categorization makes the job harder for those of us who are trying to maintain articles. Sorry about the half-populated categories. It talks a lot of time to put things in order and we are almost done. Hope this explanation helps.Tobit2 (talk) 17:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Seven Daughters of Eve - failed reference

Reference 4 in this article links to a 404 notice (the article doesn't exist) Would the following link suit your purpose? http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20060609f3.html Apuldram (talk) 14:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Saforrest! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Princess Margarita of Baden - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Wayne Marston - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Edward Greenspan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
France Chrétien Desmarais - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A problem with the term "uterine ancestry"

Hi Saforrest, Can we go back more than 5 years to 4Sep04 to try to get to the bottom of a problem that has recently arisen concerning the WP article Matrilineality, as follows?

First, the problem is that when one enters the word uterine in the Wikipedia search box, one obtains a very erroneous result, namely the following Disambiguation page:

The word uterine can refer to different meanings:

   * relating to or near the uterus or womb
   * having the same mother, but different fathers, see matrilineality

Disambig gray.svg

In this Matrilineality article's History page, I learned that you inserted the following sentence in the article, on 4Sep04:

"The uterine ancestry of an individual is a person's pure female ancestry, i.e. a matriline leading from a female ancestor to that individual."

Your inserted sentence now appears as my sentence below:

"One's matriline is thus one's pure female ancestry, and is also sometimes called one's uterine ancestry."

You and I can agree, I assume, that the above Disambiguation page is seriously in error. Can we also agree to simply drop all mention of "uterine ancestry" from this Matrilineality article? Or can you provide some evidence to support either my sentence or your sentence? I myself have not been able to find any other use of the term "uterine ancestry" or any other support for either sentence.

If you agree, I'll remove the last half of my sentence above from this article ––(and then I should cause the erroneous Disambiguation page to be removed from WP too, right?) Please reply on my talk page, rather than on yours. Thank you very much for whatever time and trouble this costs you –– to help WP readers... For7thGen (talk) 19:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saforrest: It was (and is) a pleasure to receive and read your reply, on my own Talk page. From your reply I've learned more about uterine and agnatic pedigrees, and from your two sources. I've changed Matrilineality to reflect what I learned. Please feel free to redo it, you certainly have my blessing. I do feel that it is now better than it was, for the WP reader. You can see that I gave "uterine ancestry" its own short paragraph, relocated toward the bottom of the Intro.

This interaction with you also stimulated me to straighten out my inaccurate use of the word Matriline, in the Matriname section of the article (my improved wording does not need Matriline). So I wish others would make more contributions in this new section of mine, not less.

Finally, you made it very easy for me to rectify the WP page Uterine. Except for your suggestion above, I would not have thought to look at the History of the page, from which I learned that I really could just edit it back to a Redirect page. Obviously I could write a message on JoannaB's Talk page but I don't think it's needed.

My heartfelt thanks to you, For7thGen (talk) 21:23, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:HIV/AIDS in Canada

CfD nomination of Category:HIV/AIDS in South Africa

CfD nomination of Category:HIV/AIDS in Uganda

CfD nomination of Category:HIV/AIDS in the United States

Fair use rationale for File:Bob Edmonds.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bob Edmonds.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:25, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oligarhy listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oligarhy. Since you had some involvement with the Oligarhy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:42, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original research on Elie Wiesel

You contributed recently to the discussion about Mr. Wiesel's tattoo and subjective edits. A single user continues to add his original research about the tattoo. Could you return to the article on Elie Wiesel and also the discussion? The person has only ever edited the Elie Wiesel article here at Wikipedia, specifically on the tattoo, and keeps making his original research claims and uses a heavily doctored and biased edit from a video on YouTube as his sole evidence. It would help if you re-expressed your opinion. Thanks. 71.175.4.207 (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The meaning of "province"

Hi. Sorry I haven't replied earlier, I was kind of busy on fr:, with one of my creations becoming a WP milestone. Anyway, Thanks for the latin lesson :) I patrol Quebec politicians pages once in a while and articles like Gilles Duceppe and Pauline Marois regularly get this kind of "fly by night" editing, I rv'ed last night. As it stands, René Lévesque is not so bad, as far as neutrality is concerned, and I hope it will stay that way. Have a nice weekend. Bouchecl (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Queen Street East for deletion

The article Queen Street East is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Street East until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 23:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khadr family for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khadr family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khadr family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 09:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i nominated Khadr family by mistake. TW is helpful but dangerous. :) That is the related article i was nominating Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maha el-Samnah. IQinn (talk) 09:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mathieu Ravignat

On 13 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mathieu Ravignat, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mathieu Ravignat defeated Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon for a seat in the Canadian House of Commons despite Cannon's party making a net gain of seats in the 2011 federal election? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you, for your comments regarding the quality of my work improving the article Santorum (sexual neologism). Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 18:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GiNaC

The article GiNaC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable software. no independent references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Bettelheim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited Donnelly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Donnelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:31, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saforrest. You have new messages at Talk:Rod Zimmer.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I see that you disagree ~~and don't really feel like discussing~~. I have my doubts now that the story has progressed so I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Rod Zimmer. Please don't restore the material again until the discussion concludes. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 10:12, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto

Do you come from Toronto ? Fête (talk) 18:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quebec accent

Do you pronounced "fight" for the word fête ? Fête (talk) 10:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quebecers pronounce "fight". Fête (talk) 18:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te69JK28DDo please. Fête (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In standard Quebec French, it's pronounced "fet" and in informal Quebec French, it's pronounced "fight". Fête (talk) 22:49, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

audio

Can you record the pronunciation of the word "garage" in the audio please ? Fête (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

tête

Quebecers pronounce "tight" for the word tête. Fête (talk) 21:04, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Elwood

The article James Elwood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This BLP article is basically entirely negative.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Morefoolhim 19:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you can help?

You came up on a user search for a farsi language userspace article..I'm hoping that means you read Farsi, need a bit of help I have a newer editor that has written an article, Rebecca Masterton, right now it doesn't appear like she's relaly notable but she may have sources in Farsi that we can't find. If you do speak Farsi can you contribute to the AFD discussion as to whether this person does indeed pass WP:GNG? Thanks in advance. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:41, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

fête

If you don't believe that Quebeckers pronounce "fight" for the word fête. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30B8WkAEsi8 Fête (talk) 18:41, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Svend Borberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Jutland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kilfian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballycastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gadla Henry Mphakanyiswa

The article Gadla Henry Mphakanyiswa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not independently notable - WP:NOTINHERITED, fails WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ukexpat (talk) 13:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harmeet Singh Sooden

The article Harmeet Singh Sooden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:ONEEVENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brad Dyer (talk) 21:42, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ossetic language

Category:Ossetic language, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:32, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:KPWilhelm.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KPWilhelm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Weiler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Democratic Union. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David B. Harris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David B. Harris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David B. Harris until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:User ta-0

Template:User ta-0, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User ta-0 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User ta-0 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heinrich Troeger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Centre for International Governance Innovation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centre for International Governance Innovation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for International Governance Innovation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 11:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation error

Hello.

Please note that I've corrected the following punctuation error in several things you wrote:

right: Robertson–Wegner graph

wrong: Robertson-Wegner graph

This is codififed in WP:MOS. Similarly, the en-dash rather than the hyphen is used in ranges of years, pages, etc. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People associated with adoption has been nominated for discussion

Category:People associated with adoption, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matthias Domaschk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prag. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ernst Berliner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Saforrest. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Saforrest. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

a favor: de:Lara-Isabelle Rentinck into english

Good morning from Calabria, I'm writing to say hello and know how you are. In addition to this because I have seen that you do little traditions from German, I was wondering if you would go to work with me every now and then I will come to you to ask if you can translate something for me from German into English and vice versa. In return I will translate what you want in Italian. For now I ask you the courtesy, always if you want to translate into English, the article on this Attice and German model, a famous television series. Just and no more than 10 minutes of your precious time. I hope you can help me. thank you very much.--Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino (talk) 05:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zeca Schall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zeca Schall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeca Schall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zaynab Khadr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zaynab Khadr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaynab Khadr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐁT₳LKᐃ 14:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mayors of Jena has been nominated for discussion

Category:Mayors of Jena, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 05:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian writers in French has been nominated for discussion

Category:Canadian writers in French, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 02:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Saforrest. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pahri language for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pahri language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pahri language until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PRehse (talk) 15:41, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Seagram Museum Building.jpg

Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,

However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, Fully completeing the {{information}} block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the {{information}} accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.

If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is present, please update it to {{img-claimed}} if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Avetik Chalabyan article up for deletion

Hi Saforrest! About 2 years ago I wrote a biography of a living person article [Chalabyan]. The article has been recently marked as up for deletion. Any advice on why this might be happening, how to address it or what to improve would really be appreciated. Obviously, your vote as an experienced editor on Wiki would really go a long way to make sure it's not deleted.

Thanks in advance for your attention to the matter.

Alice Ananian (talk) 14:00, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Saforrest. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ostthüringer Zeitung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eisenberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Onnig Cavoukian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onnig Cavoukian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onnig Cavoukian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Princess Margarita of Baden

The article Princess Margarita of Baden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, only born after abolition of nobility in Germany.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 18:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Middle English language has been nominated for renaming

Category:Middle English language has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 11:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clara van Sparwoude, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oude Kerk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Briere

The article Michael Briere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fail to meet notability guideline for biographies. A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article per WP:CRIME

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Renat 13:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rico Gebhardt

The article Rico Gebhardt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 20:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Germanic history has been nominated for merging

Category:Germanic history has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 23:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jean Lafleur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean Lafleur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Lafleur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bremps... 00:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maple Photo

The photo of the maple with tar spot is a Norway Maple. 2001:1970:57D8:9400:BC82:217B:166C:DD6C (talk) 01:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of You're Gonna Miss Me (film)

The article You're Gonna Miss Me (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 03:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Franco Pillarella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franco Pillarella, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franco Pillarella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]