User talk:Nhl4hamilton

Proposed deletion of Upper Wentworth Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Upper Wentworth Street (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been in CAT:NN since 2009. After comparing this street to WP:GEOROAD, I'm not seeing notability. It's a local street in a medium-sized city, and it doesn't seem to get much coverage as a street, most of the coverage is for buildings on the street. Not even this book about streets in the city contains any significant coverage of this road. I'm just finding instances of this road being where something is located or being the boundary of something. Nothing here to pass WP:GNG or GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm _Bacon 15:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rick Cordeiro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rick Cordeiro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Cordeiro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mind matrix 21:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nash Road (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Nash Road (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One can list crossroads, parallel roads, and nearby parks for any arbitrary street, but notability about the road itself not established with substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 14:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Upper Kenilworth Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Upper Kenilworth Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Generic street, notability not established with substantive sources about the road itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 14:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Woodward Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Woodward Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Generic street, notability not established with substantive sources about the road itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 14:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Parkdale Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Parkdale Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One can easily look at the map and see local businesses like Springer's Meats Inc. and Ford Eastgate dealership on the avenue, but what makes it notable or encyclopedic? No sources showing notability about the avenue itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 14:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Upper Ottawa Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Upper Ottawa Street (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Generic street, notability not established with substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

Upper Sherman Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario)

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cochrane Road (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Cochrane Road (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources about the road as a whole. The map shows that King's Forest Park is on the other side of Greenhill Ave, which intersects with NINE streets including this one. So why are all these waterfalls pictures here, when they're literally over a mile away from the end of the road????

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 01:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charlton Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Charlton Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources about the street as a whole. A listing of generic places along the length of it does not an encyclopedia article make.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

Cannon Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charlton Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlton Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlton Avenue (Hamilton, Ontario) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cochrane Road (Hamilton, Ontario) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cochrane Road (Hamilton, Ontario), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cochrane Road (Hamilton, Ontario) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nebo Road (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Nebo Road (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources about generic road

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 16:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Limeridge Road (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Limeridge Road (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources about generic road

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of West 5th Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article West 5th Street (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Generic street, notability not established with substantive sources about the road itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 17:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Garth Street (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Garth Street (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Generic street, notability not established with substantive sources about the road itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Service awards proposal

Hello, Nhl4hamilton! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 00:51, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A request for Hamilton "streets"

I've renamed the article List of streets in Hamilton, Ontario to List of roads in Hamilton, Ontario, as is used with Toronto and Ottawa. All the roads with articles have a hatnote saying to see the list, but this should be in the See also section instead. I'm doing a LOT to try and get these articles up to snuff, so I was just wondering if you still watch those articles if you could take a look if you have a chance. Cheers, ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 00:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi

I'm from wp.fr and working on Cleveland Barons. Do you think you can upload File:Cleveland Barons.JPG on Commons?

Thanks for your help.

--TaraO (talk) 10:32, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Babe Dye.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Babe Dye.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 21:57, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Babe Dye.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Babe Dye.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WilliamSherringPlaqueHamilton.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WilliamSherringPlaqueHamilton.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Service award level

There has been a major revision of the the Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.

Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.

Herostratus (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hamilton, Ontario

Just wanted to alert you to some controversy brewing. Are you any good with CSS? Ng.j (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CSS? Nhl4hamilton | Chit-Chat 16:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently we need Cascading style sheets for the template. I thought you might like to give it a go? The template looks really boring now. You can start here: Help:Cascading style sheets Ng.j (talk) 22:09, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beverly Golf & Country Club

The article Beverly Golf & Country Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 16:59, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamilton Steelhawks.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hamilton Steelhawks.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:18, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamilton Project.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hamilton Project.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamilton.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hamilton.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Member assessment at the Canadian Roads Wikiproject

Hello,
In order to better assess the activity at the Canadian Roads WikiProject, all members that had an Active status have been changed to Pending. If you are still interested in assisting the project, fielding inquiries by fellow editors, and participating in group discussions, please visit WP:WikiProject Canada Roads/Participants and change the {{Partial|Pending}} beside your username to {{Yes|Active}}.

On February 28, the remaining users that are listed as pending will be switched to inactive.

-- ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 23:41, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Congratulations Nhl4hamilton, your image Image:HamiltonOntarioSkylineC.JPG was the Random Picture of the Day! It looked like this:

Random picture of the day

Skyline of Hamilton, Ontario

Image credit: Nhl4hamilton (talk · contribs)

Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Nhl4hamilton | Chit-Chat 01:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 02:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Queenston Road (Hamilton, Ontario)

The article Queenston Road (Hamilton, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable road, no suitable redirect target

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Floydian ^τ _¢ 09:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Cordeiro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City of Hamilton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pat Quinn Exhibit.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pat Quinn Exhibit.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:31, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quebec Incline 13.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Quebec Incline 13.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nhl4hamilton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Inch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Inch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Inch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 20:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Nhl4hamilton, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Quinto Martini (politician) have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nhl4hamilton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Nhl4hamilton/Sportspage

User:Nhl4hamilton/Sportspage, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nhl4hamilton/Sportspage and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Nhl4hamilton/Sportspage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hamilton Doublerink Arena

The article Hamilton Doublerink Arena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication or evidence of WP:Notability. Article has been tagged since 2009 for being unreferenced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 15:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]