User talk:Saa19952

You have introduced images and various errors into the article which I have simply reverted .

It is your job to ensure images do not violate Wikipedia image policies and also that any changes you make do not introduce errors .If they do it is not my responsibility to fix any problems that you have introduced Garda40 (talk) 06:05, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

A merge has been proposed for 25/8, you are welcome add your position here • S • C • A • R • C • E • 00:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

I do not understand what exactly you are saying .

The only type of pictures that are allowed (free ) are already in the article .

Unless you have a picture you took yourself you can't judt put it in the article .Garda40 (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent reverts

Since you're new here, I'm going to assume that you aren't aware of updated filmography style changes, which I implemented on Sarah Michelle Gellar and you reverted. My edits to that page were completely accurate and valid. I added a maintenance tag noting the article needs to be copy-edited to clean up the prose, removed editor ascribed role descriptions such as "supporting role" and "main role" (which are mostly POV classifications, reduced repeated entries of appearances on shows into combined listings, cleaned up some language and removed unsourced content. On Drew Barrymore, which is designated a good article, I returned the 2 television show appearances and the tv movie role to the main filmography because there is not sufficient separate television work to warrant a separate table for what amounts to 3 roles. Please so not revert these changes. Also please be aware that spinning out article content from the main article should never be undertaken without first bringing it up on the talk page of the main article to see if there is editor consensus to do so. There was no need to spin out awards for either Charlize Theron or Reese Witherspoon out of context from the main article into only a stark listing of awards. In neither case was it first discussed on the article talk page and when you moved awards for Charlize Theron, they were completely removed from the main article. This removes pertinent content from that article and renders it incomplete. It might help you to review WP:HELP which has many links teaching you how to edit and the rationales for the policies and guidelines here. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk)

August 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Charlize Theron. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Do not remove article content, which I just returned, without valid rationale and discussion on the talk page. This can be considered vandalism and will be reported as such if you remove it again. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charlize Theron, you will be blocked from editing. Stop removing the awards from the filmography. You are removing a large amount of article content with absolutely no rationale. Since you've been approached twice about this with no success, it is now considered vandalism and will result in your being blocked if you do not stop. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:04, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sarah Michelle Gellar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Garda40 (talk) 21:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sarah Michelle Gellar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Garda40 (talk) 05:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sarah Michelle Gellar, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You appear to be duplicating edits that were made by another editor giving rise to the suspicion that you are that editor .It is against wikipedia policy to use 2 different accounts except for clearly defined purposes which do not apply here . Garda40 (talk) 21:03, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with 2 accounts without good cause

I notice you have completely ignored the point I have made about likely operating 2 accounts without good cause in your reply to me .07:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Angelina Jolie

Since you had to move the internal note that said "NOTE TO EDITORS - Please do not add unreleased work here without first discussing it on the article's talk page", you could not possibly have not seen it. So why, then, would you go ahead and add an unreleased work without dicussing it? Just for the fun of it? Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Garda 40

Hello,

I completely agree with you on the attitude of Garda 40. He was deleted some of the contributions that I have made, which are 100% true and backed up by solid references. He terms this vandalism and gets upset far too easily.

You are not alone and have a friend in me!

Skreen (talk) 18:19, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since pages I edit automatically get added to my watchlist I noticed Skreen's edit here .

The only edits I deleted of Skreen were edits where he inserted generic pictures of objects into articles where mention was made of such object and I wasn't the only one to object to such generic images [1].

I edited other contributions of Skreen for inserting POV language and again was not the only one with such concerns .[2] . Garda40 (talk) 18:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Salt filmposter.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Salt filmposter.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.johnshoward.com/2009/08/my-angelina-jolie-salt-movie-poster.html. As a copyright violation, File:Salt filmposter.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Salt filmposter.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Salt filmposter.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Salt filmposter.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Salt filmposter.jpg. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by MuZemike 04:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Orphaned non-free image File:Cloudy with a chance of meatballs film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cloudy with a chance of meatballs film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Did you hear about the morgans filposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Did you hear about the morgans filposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:It's complicated filmposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:It's complicated filmposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Valentine's day filmposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valentine's day filmposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:18, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Streets of blood filmposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Streets of blood filmposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of awards and nominations received by Reese Witherspoon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of awards and nominations received by Reese Witherspoon. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Reese Witherspoon. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Reese Witherspoon – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. FunkyCanute (talk) 12:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]