User talk:SP1CF

Welcome!

Hi SP1CF! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 22:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hi SP1CF! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Guntur Kaaram that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. — Archer (t·c) 06:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop doing vandalism. The source which you added for Guntur Kaaram are from makers and cannot be considered as reliable. Please stop adding this source again. Thanks. SonaMani1 (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. SonaMani1 (talk) 15:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Guntur Kaaram, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SonaMani1 (talk) 14:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Guntur Kaaram, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SonaMani1 (talk) 16:56, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid further edit warring

You appear to have recently engaged in an edit war. This means that you have been repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.

If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SilverLocust 💬 19:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would also note that your edits may not be intended as vandalism as suggested above, but they are nonetheless disruptive. SilverLocust 💬 19:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Indian films of 2024. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Thewikizoomer (talk) 06:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of Indian films of 2024 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thewikizoomer (talk) 06:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding unreliable sources

Please stop adding unreliable source to the articles. The source which you are adding for Guntur Kaaram is not considered reliable. Please stop Fan edits. Thanks. SonaMani1 (talk) 17:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:SP1CF reported by User:Thewikizoomer (Result: ). Thank you. Thewikizoomer (talk) 06:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at List of Indian films of 2024.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 07:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given the extensive edit warring on multiple articles you have been blocked indefinitely until you can convince an administrator that you understand what edit warring is and that it will not continue. You have gone well past WP:3RR on multiple articles in the past few days without using the talk page of any of them, and continued edit warring on each of the three articles after receiving this notice. At List of Indian films of 2024 you made 6 reverts on January 18 and 5 on January 17. At List of Telugu films of 2024 you made 7 reverts on January 18, and 3 on January 17. At Guntur Kaaram you made 8 reverts on January 18 and 4 on January 17. - Aoidh (talk) 07:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]