User talk:SOURAVSHETTIGAR

Welcome!

Hello, SOURAVSHETTIGAR! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 17:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Notable people

Should have their own article meeting the criteria at WP:NOTABILITY and related pages. Doug Weller talk 17:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, I'm Venkat TL. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2022 Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly election without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Venkat TL (talk) 12:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Membership

Any membership figures that you add to an infobox need to be supported by a source that reports it in authorial voice, and not just as a claim by the organization. In other words, the source needs to say, for instance, that the VHP has 6.8 million members, and not that it claims 6.8 million members. That latter fact may still be worth including, but not in the infobox, without attribution. This is a serious issue of neutrality and verifiability; please make sure to keep it in mind going forward. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non constructive edits

Please explain why you made this edit? Venkat TL (talk) 09:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Patiala_Assembly_Constituency does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Venkat TL (talk) 09:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Abohar Assembly Constituency, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 14:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Karnataka Pragnyavantha Janatha Party, you may be blocked from editing. Le Marteau (talk) 08:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Next Karnataka Legislative Assembly election, you may be blocked from editing. SOURAVSHETTIGAR You have been making unsourced edits. These will be removed if no sources added to prove the existence of these alliance. Venkat TL (talk) 10:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bharatiya Janata Party, you may be blocked from editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 03:56, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Soory by mistakely i edited that sorry SOURAVSHETTIGAR (talk) 08:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JDS+BSP moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, JDS+BSP, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 10:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JDS+BSP (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JDS+BSP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JDS+BSP, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:47, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SOURAVSHETTIGAR! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 13:47, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Tashkent Files, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:56, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DaxServer blocked, has this editor ever added a source? User:Vanamonde93, have I been too generous. They don't even seem to respond to their talk page. Doug Weller talk 09:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chal hatt Leftist bot SOURAVSHETTIGAR (talk) 11:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 09:16, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leftist bot blocked me from editing. SOURAVSHETTIGAR (talk) 11:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Bishonen | tålk 12:45, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gurcharan Singh Gill

Hello, SOURAVSHETTIGAR. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gurcharan Singh Gill, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 06:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2023 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:JDS+BSP

Hello, SOURAVSHETTIGAR. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:JDS+BSP, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced sentence

This was removed, so you may want to start a Request for Comments if it should be added back. I don't have the time. Thanks. 2405:204:5702:811F:0:0:1420:28A1 (talk) 07:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Astraverse

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Astraverse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astraverse. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ab207 (talk) 06:40, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of sourced information.

I noticed your recent activity on "Khalistan Movement" where you removed sourced information without any explanation? You should know that the deletion of sourced data is prohibited on wikipedia, further if you delete sourced information definitely you will blocked from Wikipedia, so be careful and also remember that wikipedia is a neutral platform, don't delete anything which is not according to your personal beliefs, further if you want to delete something from an article first you can discuss about it on talk page. Shubhdeep Sandhu (talk) 13:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bharatiya Janata Party, Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bharatiya Janata Party, Nagaland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BRANCH (creating articles about non-notable branches of national parties)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again; next block will be indefinite

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:06, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parties and alliances

Hi @SOURAVSHETTIGAR. Parties and alliances section in election articles is not an exhaustive list of all political parties contesting the election. Only parties with coverage from independent sources regarding candidates lists and campaigns should be added. There could be hundreds of parties contesting an election, all cannot be added. See WP:NOTEVERYTHING and MOS:INDELECT. Dhruv edits (talk) 03:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Please also add article on BJP's Jammu & Kashmir unit. Qzgjeth (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added SOURAVSHETTIGAR (talk) 06:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

At Rosguill

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SOURAVSHETTIGAR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will stop wrong editing SOURAVSHETTIGAR (talk) 07:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a start, but to know that you will indeed stop, please describe what was wrong with your edits and behavior, and tell what you will do differently. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me

At Rosguill Please try to unblock me I will stop disruptive editing.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SOURAVSHETTIGAR (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will stop disruptive editing

Decline reason:

I see no attempt to answer 331dot's questions, above. You seem to be deliberately wasting our time with these unblocks. If you continue wasting our time, you'll lose talk page access again. Yamla (talk) 10:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.