Jump to content

User talk:SHLAMA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, SHLAMA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  KillerChihuahua?!? 18:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


It looks nice there

[edit]

I don't know why, but it really bugs me to talk to a redlink. I thought that would be a good way to start your Userpage. You get some deserved recognition and I get the benfit of seeing a bluelink :) --Doc Tropics 03:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This sort of move to correct a misspelled title is pretty routine. I went ahead and moved the article and fixed the links to it. Fan1967 15:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you supplement the article you created with a list of the books that she authored, awards, etc.? This would help establish the subject's notability. Thanks! Regards, Accurizer 14:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was working on the booklist as you sent this, and am doing the award next. Both lists are incredibly long. :-) --SHLAMA 14:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Regards, Accurizer 15:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Regarding Oshea Wilder

[edit]

I noticed that you wrote the the article on Oshea Wilder. I was curious on why you were interested in this man and if you knew much of his family. I am a direct relative to his sister, Mary Wilder.

contact direct if you wish maficdan @ yahoo <dot> com

Thanks!

Daniel


Thanks!

[edit]

I just stumbled across your article on Francis Adam Goodman, great stuff. I'm not sure I even realized my great-great-great-grandfather was a state representative. Please let me know if you link any other articles to my site, you've done some very nice research and I'd love to leach if you don't mind :)

--Somegeekintn 21:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aramaic Wiktionary

[edit]

Seeing your knowledge in Aramaic, I believe that you may be interested in something that has been recently proposed on Meta. If you'd like to help us get the Aramaic Wiktionary established, please add your name to the "Users interested in forming an editing community" section, and voice your support in the section labeled "Arguments in favour". Thanks! :-) אמר Steve Caruso (desk/AMA)Give Back Our Membership! 06:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Impossible but true mixture

[edit]

Except for age, it sounds like you're something like me - Jewish, believer in Jesus, Aramaic, Hebrew, and Koine Greek oriented, maybe other things, except I'm here on Wikipedia only for KAL 007 - so far!Bert Schlossberg (talk) 09:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Edward G. Dobson

[edit]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – moonty (talk) (contribs) 07:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meyer (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Meyer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 17:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! SHLAMA, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 17:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alakzi (talk) 22:40, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Board of Delegates of American Israelites, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elisheva Shomron has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Safiel (talk) 00:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LangejansLogo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LangejansLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thom Bresh for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thom Bresh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Bresh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui  09:04, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mission Network News for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mission Network News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission Network News until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPinkerton (talk) 04:34, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathleen Mitchell for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathleen Mitchell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Mitchell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

... discospinster talk 17:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Del Langejans

[edit]
Notice

The article Del Langejans has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not demonstrate notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LimonesMI (talk) 04:01, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Little Mary's Hospitality House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Main reason being no significant coverage, has been marked for notability concerns for 12 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Douglas L. Fagerstrom for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas L. Fagerstrom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas L. Fagerstrom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PierceG (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keys for Kids Ministries for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keys for Kids Ministries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keys for Kids Ministries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 14:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]