Jump to content

User talk:SD0001/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, SD0001, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Masssly —Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 14:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

—Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 14:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SD0001, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi SD0001! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
Hello, new guy! Newcomers are rarely as good a team workers as you are.

Welcome to the team.

In case you are wondering what is this, well, this is called a "barnstar". In Wikipedia, we use it to show our appreciation towards each other. And no, it is not a pre-written template message that is used over and over again.

  Codename Lisa (talk) 01:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Outline of Google, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blogger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]k. . . . . a ] • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed - SD0001 (talk) 09:09, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Google Currents, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fast Company. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Google products, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plugin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed - SD0001 (talk) 09:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Google Fit, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nike and Polar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed - SD0001 (talk) 09:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 6 November

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed - SD0001 (talk) 09:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Google Play, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed - SD0001 (talk) 09:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Secrets to App Success on Google Play

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Secrets to App Success on Google Play requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 16:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Google Camera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited How Google Works, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hachette and Jonathan Rosenberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed - SD0001 (talk) 09:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Google Play Books, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PDB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google Play page

[edit]

Hello, I removed the Play Newsstand content, simply because I added it to the Main Google Play Newsstand page, there's no need to make Google Play page duplicate with separate articles. And what is this Google Play branded applictions. Google Play Store has music and movies and etc and there is simply Play Games, which actually has nothing to do with Google Play Store. I strongly believe that what you added about Newsstand is not needed in the Google Play page, but only in Google Play Newsstand page. Sincerely Naskox (talk) 10:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google Play-branded applications refers to the applications with 'Google Play' in their name. Yes, Play Games has nothing to do with the Play Store. But Play Newsstand also has only a little to do with the Play Store because you can follow topics, subscribe to RSS feeds, and subscribe to free news sources all without going to the Play Store. So, in a way, they are similar. Please note that the information about Play Newsstand is a condensed (shortened) version of the text in the main article. If you think that it still contains excessive details, you are free to further shorten it. SD0001 (talk) 12:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google Library Project

[edit]

Hi there, just read your comments re: my additions to this article.

I was not aware that the critiques I included had already been made in the Google Books article; thank you for bringing that to my attention. That being the case, I have no objection to having my comments deleted from the Google Library Project article and replaced by a link to the comments in the other article.

As regarding comments like "gibberish" not being objective, there I have to disagree.

An uncorrected OCR error in an equation completely destroys it's meaning -- the definition of "gibberish" is "unintelligible, meaningless language" (Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, 9th edition). Google's uncorrected Library Project scan of Einstein's original papers on Relativity Theory is 136 pages of meaningless quasi-random characters between two imperfectly reproduced e-covers. If that's not "gibberish", I don't know what is. :)

ETA: You say: "Google has often replied to the criticisms raised against the project, and you need to include them." Would you mind telling me where Google has replied to these criticisms? I have spent some time studying the issue, and I've not seen any specific replies from Google. Indeed, I've not even seen any specific place where one would make these criticisms known directly to the Google Books Library Project. Any pointers you might be able to share in this regard would be appreciated. 74.95.43.249 (talk) 00:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have now copyedited your text. "Gibberish" has been replaced with more formal wording. The line containing that word appeared as if they are your opinions. Remember, Wikipedia has no place for the opinions of individual editors. You can only add facts or the opinions of experts. Sometimes, it is useful to quote the source directly. Also, please note that blogs and discussion forums are not WP:Reliable sources and should not used as references, especially for criticisms. These have been flagged with a {{Unreliable source}} tag. P.S. Why do you put two spaces after almost every sentence?
And of course, Google will not make any specific replies to criticisms unless too many people are complaining about the same thing, or if the complainant is someone famous, like Geoffrey Nunberg. Google's Jon Orwant made a very lengthy and open response to Nunberg's post regarding the metadata errors on Google Books. SD0001 (talk) 07:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prosper Masquelier

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to delete this article because it has nothing to do on Wikipedia, this guy is not notable, even in his own country (France). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.2.53.215 (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Password

[edit]

Why did you request a reset of my user password? - Ahunt (talk) 00:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

[edit]

Hello there, im not about deleting it, rather to rearrange the section regarding the pre-invasion during Military campaigns under Caliph Uthman in the background section, it is deleted for while sorry its just my habit to editing by sectionAhendra (talk) 09:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I undid my own revert. SD0001 (talk) 09:53, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bryan Henderson for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryan Henderson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Henderson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Go Phightins! 21:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, SD0001. You have new messages at AKS.9955's talk page.
Message added 13:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, SD0001. You have new messages at AKS.9955's talk page.
Message added 16:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The user Sameer Paudwal

[edit]

He is also a very likely sockpuppet (actually basically confirmed) as well-check: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sadman_Sakibzz Wgolf (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks for the note here. SD0001 (talk) 14:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AINTBROKE

[edit]

Before you try merging the page again, gain community consensus. It makes no sense for you to merge this page on your own whim, especially since you're redirecting a history-old Wikipedia page to a page you created on 7 March 2015. The old page was better, and there was nothing wrong with it - it was short, succinct, and to the point. The shortness of the page with its one-liner brought the message home very effectively. Your new page does not have the same feeling or effect, due to its verbosity. --benlisquareT•C•E 07:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Benlisquare: The fact that WP:BROKE is short is in itself its biggest fault. If you take a look around the WP:Village pump, you will come across so many proposals that are opposed on the basis of them being "solutions looking for a problem." The term "solution looking for a problem" is used as well as misused too commonly. We need to properly define it to prevent misuse. WP:BROKE is so short and unexplanatory that different users come up with their own interpretations of the arguement. That essay does not tell us the cases in which the arguement should not be used as an oppose rationale for proposals. Thus, it does not at all "bring home the message effectively", as you say. The new essay, on the other hand, makes everything clear. There is a paragraph that explicitly describes the cases where the arguement should not be used. Your concern that the new essay is too verbose is genuine. But some verbosity is often required to explain something properly; however you may shorten it if you wish.
I was just being WP:BOLD in making the merge as WP:Avoid writing redundant essays tells us that redundant essays should be merged, and because "solution looking for a problem" is the very commonly used term. SD0001 (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay to be WP:BOLD, and I understand where you're coming from. My point is that your unilateral change may not be viewed to be an improvement by many editors, and hence it's in everyone's best interests if consensus is gauged beforehand. Feel free to start a discussion somewhere: If you strongly feel that WP:AINTBROKE is flawed in its current state, then surely other people would feel the same if a discussion was brought up? --benlisquareT•C•E 14:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Benlisquare: And what I am to mean by "I understand where you're coming from"? Please keep in mind that it is not WP:SOCIAL to take a dig at others on the basis of nationality and other such trivial matters. SD0001 (talk) 18:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I see that WP:AINTBROKE has a greater scope than WP:SLOP. It can be used not only for proposals but also for other smaller issues. So, no merge is required. SD0001 (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure you've misunderstood what I've said, which had nothing to do with nationality. "I can see where you're coming from" is an English idiom, a figure of speech. It's meaning is, roughly, "I can understand what your point of view is". C.f. here and here. --benlisquareT•C•E 00:14, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Wikipedia:Sandbox links?

[edit]

What's going on?

Are you connected with (or even a sock of) {[u| Rider ranger47 }} Andy Dingley (talk) 20:24, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. I'm not. That was a really bad test edit. I have requested a mass rollback at WP:ANI. SD0001 (talk) 20:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm DawnDusk. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Preceding undated comment added 02:43, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
You have been sentenced to the Village Stocks
For mass unlinking of the Sandbox.

KonveyorBelt 16:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:48:05, 27 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 91.36.124.158

[edit]

Hello, first I want to thank you for reviewing the article about Vox Maris. I regret that it has been declined again, this time due to the reason that there are not enough reliable sources mentioned. Well, I can provide the required information first hand as I am the one who has built the instrument. I have a lot of plans measurements, etc... Please let me know, how I can prove the information provided in the article about my instrument. Thank you and best regards 91.36.124.158 (talk) 10:48, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The contents of the articles on Wikipedia must be verifiable through reliable sources. If there are no reliable sources about your instrument, then that means your instrument is not notable and thus is not eligible to be on WIkipedia. It can have be an article if and only if your instrument becomes popular and is commented upon by newspapers or magazines or written about in books. For detailed information on what sources are reliable, see WP:IRS. SD0001 (talk) 11:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see the point. But there were a lot of articles, radio reports and tv reports during the Expo-time, I will include more sources to the article. Of course the instrument is popular, too - actually it is one of most popular pipe organs as more than eight million visitors saw and heard it as one of the top four attractions of Yeosu Expo, it was played every half hour and opened and closed every Expo-day with a Fanfare in full volume. Vox Maris (talk) 11:40, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:21m.260pigpigpig

[edit]

Hi SD0001
Re User:21m.260pigpigpig ‎ your Wikipedia:CSD#G1 on this user page appears to be invalid as G1 says "This excludes the sandbox and pages in the user namespace." 220 of Borg 11:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note her. Didn't know that. SD0001 (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frederic Woodman Root, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Mason and James Flint. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (7th nomination)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (7th nomination), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (7th nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (7th nomination) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

Be sure to also check out the deletion discussion of that page, then the deletion discussion of that page, and so on until you reach the end of the tunnel. Thank you. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 12:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Comment

[edit]

Hello, I've commented there. I wasn't really sure what to say before ... Graham87 14:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Asiff Hussein

[edit]

Hi, SD0001. I saw your note on this draft. I checked out the two drafts. They couldn't be history merged, because the newer one was not really a copy of the old draft; it just had some overlapping content. I had already been working on the older draft, so I decided to finish it up. It's at Asiff Hussein. I added in a couple of book titles that were mentioned in the new draft, but didn't use any of the editor's words. Instead of the extensive list of offline citations, I found online sources to back up the information, so I decided that the "Citations" section was unnecessary. Since I didn't use any of the new text from Draft:Asiff Hussein, I don't think it needs to be kept for attribution purposes. If you agree, please revert your edits and then I will delete the draft under db-g13. If you disagree, and feel it needs to be kept, it can be redirected to the mainspace article and moved to Asiff Hussein (writer).

Thanks for helping out with these old drafts.—Anne Delong (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

[edit]

Per your request, I have hard blocked your account for the next two years. Enjoy your break. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfonso Bernal del Riesgo has been accepted

[edit]
Alfonso Bernal del Riesgo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Aerospeed (Talk) 01:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frederic Woodman Root

[edit]

The article Frederic Woodman Root has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find anything indicating his notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jerod Lycett (talk) 17:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frederic Woodman Root for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederic Woodman Root is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederic Woodman Root until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jerod Lycett (talk) 18:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate accounts

[edit]

Please note that User:DL9C and User:103.6.156.167 are alternate accounts of this editor. BMK (talk) 22:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's just stupid. Self-requested blocks are not toys for your game playing. I have unblocked you and noted in your block log tht you evaded a block that you repeatedly asked for. Please don't waste admin's time with this sort of nonsense in the future. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Google eBooks logo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Google eBooks logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mac OS X 10.10 listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mac OS X 10.10. Since you had some involvement with the Mac OS X 10.10 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 21:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SD0001/Archive_1&oldid=1078503557"