User talk:SCP-053

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Tagging redirects

If you create redirects from Japanese to English titles then please tag them with {{R from alternative language|ja|en}}. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cyumen

A tag has been placed on Cyumen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

SCP-053 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "GraemeHartOfficle". The reason given for GraemeHartOfficle's block is: "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia".

Accept reason:

Probably not related - unblocking. SQL ^{Query me!} 21:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi 053pvr! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Jorm (talk) 00:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Jorm (talk) 00:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Double redirects do not work

I see you have created 2015 Garowe, Puntland attack as a redirect to 2015 Garowe attack, which is also a redirect. Please note that double redirects do not work, and you should redirect to the article directly instead. Thanks. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 06:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ase1este: I created the redirect, then moved "2015 Garowe attack" to Garowe attack. 053pvr (talk) 06:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, bots should fix it automatically. (Alternatively, you could check Special:WhatLinksHere and fix them manually, but that is usually unneeded if the page is unprotected.)

I thought you created the redirect after moving the page. In any case, happy editing. :) ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 06:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to 2015 Garowe attack, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Antan O 01:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hainault Loop

Hi, I moved Hainault Loop for you, please could you tidy up the article for consistentcy with this new title. Polyamorph (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Polyamorph: Thanks. 053pvr (talk) 20:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"99.999999999999999999999..." listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 99.999999999999999999999.... The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 12#99.999999999999999999999... until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Mohamed Kunp" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mohamed Kunp. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 12#Mohamed Kunp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:STEPHENKING" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:STEPHENKING. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 14#Wikipedia:STEPHENKING until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia Cookbook" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia Cookbook. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 14#Wikipedia Cookbook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Station infoboxes

The infoboxes your recently added all have errors. Please do not add more until you fix the existing errors with the services. Thanks. MB 14:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed them. 053pvr (talk) 20:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks [[User:MB]]. 053pvr (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you MB. 053pvr (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Mockobckar O6nactb" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mockobckar O6nactb. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 19#Mockobckar O6nactb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Victoire pisa owner

turkey jockey club Ozgur0609 (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you may be responsible for any damage that may occur Ozgur0609 (talk) 22:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ozgur0609: Stop posting nonsense. 053pvr (talk) 00:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"A (internet meme)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect A (internet meme). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 31#A (internet meme) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Azeotropes

Dear 053pvr:

Thank you for your comments regarding my addition to the article on azeotropes.

First my back ground. I graduated from U.C. Berkeley with a B.S.Chemistry in 1974. I retired from medicine in 2015 and wanted to catch up on biochemistry which has made amazing advances since I took it in 1972. After finishing Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, my interest in chemistry was re-kindled. I was always fascinated by azeotropes but they were only mentioned in organic chemistry. I went into this topic fairly extensively. I always start with Wikipedia to find out what is the latest information.

While reading the section on minimum boiling azeotropes, it occurred to me that the graph showed one mole fraction for the condensate at a specific liquid mole fraction. It occurred to me that this could only be true if the volume of liquid was much larger than the volume of condensate. During an actual distillation, the substance that is enriched in the condensate relative to the liquid, will have to be subtracted from the moles in the liquid. I did the calculations for 3 rounds of distillation. I used 1000 ml of the chloroform - methanol azeotrope. First I started to the left of the azeotrope point with a 30% chloroform, 70% methanol mixture. I collected 100 ml of condensate and assumed it was all 47% chloroform and 53% methanol. I subtracted the moles of each from the original mixture. I did this twice again. The starting point moves to the left. I then did a mixture to the right of the azeotrope point. The starting point moves to the right.

This is what I wrote in the article: The above description presumes that the volume of the starting mixture is infinite, such that the concentrations of X and Y do not change during the distillation. For real distillations, as the concentration of X decreases in the boiling flask, the temperature will rise, and cause a shift to the left along the bottom curve. This will cause the condensate to become less rich in X. For real distillations one will have to limit the temperature rise to a few degrees in order to get an enriched condensate.

The only change I would make is the last sentence. It is not clear what the distillation is trying to accomplish. I would change it to: For real distillations, if one is trying to get a high mole fraction of X in the condensate, one will have to limit the collection such that the boiling temperature rises only a few degrees.

I do not have a citation for this change in the article because I could not find anyone who has done the calculations. If you doubt what I am saying, please do the calculations yourself.

The reason I am adding this is that the graph can lead the reader to believe that all one has to do is keep boiling away and collect a condensate that is rich in X. Obviously if one boils away all the liquid, one gets the same liquid in the condensate!

Actually I am glad you responded and deleted my comments. I was beginning to worry that it was too easy for someone to add things to articles and no one was monitoring the material. I use Wikipedia a lot and depend on accurate information. My trust is Wikipedia is renewed! Now I hope you add my addition to the article, or should I re-submit it?

Sincerely Yours:

224238scott (talk) 21:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of West Taiwan

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at West Taiwan. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Millimetre of rain

A tag has been placed on Millimetre of rain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ GB fan 18:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Holostars

A tag has been placed on Holostars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ GB fan 18:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Station names in Australia

Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Australian_and_New_Zealand_stations) for Australian station names - I will revert the two Hamilton renames.Fleet Lists (talk) 22:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I have been unable to revert.Fleet Lists (talk) 22:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fleet Lists: I followed the guidelines at WP:USSTATION and WP:UKSTATION. I think that stations in Australia and New Zealand should be disambiguated the same way as stations in the UK and US, so I moved the pages. The guideline that you cited is still a proposal, so there's no obligation for me to follow it. We can discuss this issue on the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Naming_conventions_(Australian_and_New_Zealand_stations). 053pvr (talk) 02:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines you followed apply to the US and the UK - they are not worldwide guidelines and do not apply to Australia and New Zealand. While the Australia and New Zealand guidelines have not been formalised, they are the best we have here and should be followed until they are formalised or something different is approved. Many templates used throughout the the system such as RWSA used the proposed guidelines and things should NOT be changed until discussed and a consensus reached.Fleet Lists (talk) 03:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fleet Lists: Let’s try make this guideline official. There’s no reason not to. 053pvr (talk) 07:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Russian-language redirects

Hello, I've noticed you recently created a batch of redirects from Russian-language names. Often, such as in Сыктывка́р or Чебокса́ры, you used a diacriticised version, which was probably used in the lead. Please note that the acute accent is almost never used in Russian outside phonology, showing the stress of a word in works like dictionaries. In normal writing, it only appears in case of ambiguity that could arise from a different pronunciation. Thus, I am quite sceptical about the usefulness of such redirects, as it is very unlikely that anyone will enter or paste these terms with the accent mark. As redirects are cheap, I do not think it is necessary to delete these (especially as they are technically correct), but even if you are going to continue creating redirects like this, I strongly suggest you create the non-diacriticised versions as well. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've created the missing non-diacriticised redirects corresponding to those you recently created. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@1234qwer1234qwer4: I don't know how I can create the non-diacriticised redirects when my computer can't type Cyrillic. SCP-053 (talk) 01:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it has been months since I created those. SCP-053 (talk) 02:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As you are still active, you might well decide to create more. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 05:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your computer probably can type Cyrillic; I'm not sure which devices don't have a Cyrillic keyboard setting. You could look for Cyrillic A or similar, but the infobox also uses the version used in regular writing. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 05:44, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@1234qwer1234qwer4: I have found a computer that can input Cyrillic. SCP-053 (talk) 06:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Millimetre of rain" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Millimetre of rain. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 30#Millimetre of rain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sandstein 09:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts at gender-related articles

Since you've received a Discretionary sanctions alert about this before, you should already be aware of the stricter rules about reverting edits on gender-related articles. I call to your attention your recent edits at Jazz Jennings (diff) ‎and Sex reassignment surgery (diff). Per WP:BRD, you should have opened or joined a discussion on the Talk page if an edit of yours was reverted by another editor rather than re-revert, but you didn't do so. That applies to articles on any topic. In these two cases, not only does BRD apply, but so do possible sanctions, so you also taking a risk by making reverts such as these. If you didn't read the Ds/alert on gender when it was posted earlier, please do so now, and follow the links. This is for your own benefit. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't know that. SCP-053 (talk) 01:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Btw, thanks for opening the discussion at Jazz Jennings#Gender confirmation surgery. Regarding this comment of yours, nobody is threatening you. Ds/alerts are standard notices, that may be delivered to anyone editing articles in topics subject to sanctions, by any other editor; they are not a threat. You already received such a notice back in March, and after noticing your edits at the two articles mentioned above, I thought that you might have either overlooked the original Ds/alert when it was issued, or not understood it because you are new, or forgot it. Hence, the reminder. So, when you get one of the notices, you shouldn't think of it as a threat, but as good advice that might help keep you out of trouble. In any case, I couldn't threaten you even if I wanted to; I have no ability to enforce a sanction. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 06:15, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dunedin supermarket stabbing moved to draftspace per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:DELAY + WP:SENSATIONAL

An article you recently created, Dunedin supermarket stabbing, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dunedin supermarket stabbing (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As said before per WP:DELAY and WP:NOTNEWS, Wikipedia is not a newspaper

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dunedin supermarket stabbing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dunedin supermarket stabbing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SCP-053! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcoming users

You are welcoming users who haven't edited in years. Stop.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Woah. SCP-053 (talk) 21:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding AN

I see that that was your first AN report, so I don't want to go too hard on you. Pretty sure my first AN report sucked.

But I do think it's important that you understand how important it is to not repeat this mistake. The encyclopedia is always in need of more editors, especially more content creators. When you report a new user to AN or another noticeboard, you absolutely have an obligation to make sure that they've really done something report-worthy. The same is true of an editor returning after 12 years' inactivity. We never know who's going to be our next legendary content creator; and we'll never know how many people could have been that, but were scared off by a noticeboard report early in their career.

"I didn't read the draft" is not a good excuse. Rather, it shows that you rolled the dice on scaring away an inexperienced editor without even familiarizing yourself with the situation. You should be absolutely sure of the facts before filing a noticeboard report against anyone, but especially someone who isn't sufficiently familiar with WP procedures to understand what's going on.

I'm not an admin, so I can't compel you to do anything here, but it disappoints me that I've twice said you should apologize, and you've twice indicated that you saw my message, and yet you still haven't apologized. If I were Asingleton-green and saw that, it definitely would make me think twice about continuing to contribute to the encyclopedia. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 22:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will stop reporting users to WP:AN in the future. SCP-053 (talk) 05:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tamzin: SCP-053 (talk) 05:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:14, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since my warning yesterday, you Welcomed 7 IPs who each have not edited in over 10 years. You have also created a redirect twice for User:Taiwan Junior pointing to the user's Talk page. That user has not edited since 2007. I deleted the redirect twice. These are just examples of some very unusual and disruptive editing generally that are atypical of a relatively new user.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You, the editor behind the keyboard, are locally banned and globally locked from editing Wikimedia projects. The mere creation of an account or edit via IP is a violation of that ban unless you make a successful unblock appeal via your original account. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:XPROTECT" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wikipedia:XPROTECT has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 29 § Wikipedia:XPROTECT until a consensus is reached. Q 𝟤 𝟪 07:09, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buses in 2015

A tag has been placed on Category:Buses in 2015 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]