User talk:Sávy

Sávy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sávy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Meher Aali

Hi, have moved this article to draftspace because it has no references. When you have added references to WP:Reliable sources as per WP:Referencing for beginners please move it back to mainspace or ask me to do so. (there may be a delay if am offline). This action has been taken in accordance with New Page Patrol guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Majnu (Bengali Movie)

Hi, have moved this article to draftspace because it has no references. When you have added references to WP:Reliable sources as per WP:Referencing for beginners please move it back to mainspace or ask me to do so. (there may be a delay if am offline). This action has been taken in accordance with New Page Patrol guidelines. thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 00:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Sávy, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Majnu (Bengali Movie) have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:10, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pataas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] The content about a Bengali remake of this film is unsourced and I can't find any reliable news sources describing the release of "ACP Rudra On Duty". And going forward, if content you add is removed for being unsourced, the burden is yours to provide a reference if you restore it. And please also note that blogs and other random websites are insufficient as references. Please stick to major mainstream news sources. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:25, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jio Pagla (Movie)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jio Pagla (Movie), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ittefaq (2017 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [2] The financial changes you made are unsourced. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of scandals in India, you may be blocked from editing. Samf4u (talk) 03:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of scandals in India. Samf4u (talk) 03:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Coderzombie (talk) 13:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You have been adding unsourced and false information to a lot of pages. If you continue this behaviour, you can be blocked. Coderzombie (talk) 13:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mayors of Kolkata

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Sávy, thanks for creating Mayors of Kolkata!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 11:12, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning!

You are fairly new to the Wikipedia editing. If your changes are reverted, at least consult other editors before making changes unilaterally. Please don't keep making some changes and again. Raise the doubts on the talk page. This is your final warning, if you continue to exhibit this behaviour, you'll be blocked. Coderzombie (talk) 15:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Telugu films of 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sabang (Vidhan Sabha constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sabang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joy Kumar Mukherjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Value (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited News Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Value (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been blocked once for disruptive editing. I will report you to mod once again if you continue your disruptive behaviour. Coderzombie (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2017–18 I-League 2nd Division. Coderzombie (talk) 16:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Super Cup (India). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please add sources for everything you add. This is an encyclopedia. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 19:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Super Cup (India). Why are you adding unsourced information? Coderzombie (talk) 04:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Sávy reported by User:Coderzombie (Result: ). Thank you. Coderzombie (talk) 12:07, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amrita Puri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Say something

You were already blocked, actually say what you are editing first especially when it was already reverted. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 16:30, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let me remind you that if you continue your behaviour, you will be blocked indefinitely Coderzombie (talk) 07:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joy Kumar Mukherjee, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Value and Hooghly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Xherdan Shaqiri, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:37, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alisson (footballer, born 1992). Nzd (talk) 12:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hiran Chatterjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kasba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Calcutta Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Calcutta First Division moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2018 Calcutta First Division, does not have enough sources and information as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Natureium (talk) 14:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Calcutta Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khadim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Calcutta Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khadim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I league page Vandalism by you

Savy stop vandalizing I league page last warning to you.

LordJoki (talk)

Idiot read this https://www.goal.com/en-in/news/i-league-2018-19-unimpressive-brazilian-duo-shown-the-door/161zfqo8rewca1tgywaijex9cz — Preceding unsigned comment added by LordJoki (talk • contribs) 06:22, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philip Adjah

The article Philip Adjah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails WP:NFOOTY and GNG. Same for duplicate article Phillip Adjah.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 07:39, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sávy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2018 Calcutta First Division

Hello, Sávy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018 Calcutta First Division".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CoolSkittle (talk) 18:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Mohun Bagan A.C.; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Usage of non-free images is prohibited in Wikipedia. I appreciate your will to help but can check the pages of other European football clubs if they have logos in place of sponsors' names. These images (like football club logos or company logos) are generally available in commons only for educational purposes. It is expected you'll refrain replacing sponsors' names with their logos from the future. REALMMB ^(talk) 13:04, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mohun Bagan A.C., you may be blocked from editing. You had already been cautioned, please refrain from adding company logos henceforth. REALMMB ^(talk) 05:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mohun Bagan A.C.. REALMMB ^(talk) 12:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Sávy reported by User:Realmmb (Result: ). Thank you. REALMMB ^(talk) 21:10, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violating the 3 revert rule and generally failing to communicate. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 17:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Amra Remidies Logo.jpg

The file File:Amra Remidies Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:EB old logo.jpeg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mitsubishi Pajero Sport.jpeg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Mitsubishi Pajero Sport.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.autocarindia.com/car-news/mitsubishi-pajero-sport-price-drops-by-rs-1-lakh-405454. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kouassi Arthur.jpeg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Kouassi Arthur.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://newsjizz.in/33223-mohammedan-sporting-dropped-by-fci-3-1-in-pre-season-draw.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gate of Mohammedan.jpeg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Gate of Mohammedan.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://indianexpress.com/photos/sports-gallery/mohammedan-sporting-club-stadium-in-tatters-for-years/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:43, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Actor Om photo.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Actor Om photo.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:02, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced and unconfirmed materials

Hello, I'm Dey subrata. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

For recent addition of Players name and Stadium name at 2019–20 Indian Super League season article. Be careful, don't add such unless and untill any official confirmation, if official then add official citation at the talk page of the article for every editors conveniences. Dey subrata (talk) 15:41, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ELEGANT SPS.jpg

The file File:ELEGANT SPS.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copyright violation, the editor is not the copyright holder, did not mention how he is the owner of the work.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dey subrata (talk) 22:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Reebok 2006 logo.png

The file File:Reebok 2006 logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copyright violation, the editor cannot be the owner of the work as its the logo of a famous brand

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dey subrata (talk) 22:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Angel company logo.jpeg

The file File:Angel company logo.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copyright violation, did not produce any reason how the editor is the owner of the work, seems to have uploaded many such logo without any knowledge of copyright laws.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dey subrata (talk) 22:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:EMTA Group logo.jpg

The file File:EMTA Group logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copyright violation by same editor who uploaded multiple logos without having any prior knowledge to copyright laws. Did not give any reason how he is theowner of the work

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dey subrata (talk) 22:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kaizen Sports logo.jpg

The file File:Kaizen Sports logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem the copyright owner of the logo of a company, multiple violation of copyright laws, seems don't have prior and proper knowledge of copyright laws.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dey subrata (talk) 22:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Orion Impression.jpg

The file File:Orion Impression.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Is a comapny logo, does not seem the editor have any copyright to grant right to any other party for using the logo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dey subrata (talk) 22:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:IRIS hospital logo.png

The file File:IRIS hospital logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Is a hospital logo, does not seem that the editor have any copyright to the logo, uploaded without any prior knowledge of copyright laws

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dey subrata (talk) 22:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2019 Sikkim Gold Cup

Hello, Sávy

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SportingFlyer and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, 2019 Sikkim Gold Cup, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SportingFlyer}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SportingFlyer T·C 15:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chencho Gyeltshen, you may be blocked from editing. Coderzombie (talk) 14:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:24 Ghanta old logo.jpeg

The file File:24 Ghanta old logo.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angel company logo.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Angel company logo.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:IRIS hospital logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IRIS hospital logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't update anything untill the match is over and with unsourced and wrong info

You recent edits showing you are updating the I-League article before the match has concluded. Don't do such kind of edits any further. Plus you have added attendance, which is yet to be published by the websites. Why and How? Dey subrata (talk) 13:45, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

You updated the player name when the game was in play and I-League did not announced the Hero of the league.
You updated the attendace improperly, including a wrong figure and not update the number of matches.

Refrain from any further such edits, otherwise, trust me, this is the last warning, after that I can't help you. Dey subrata (talk) 15:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What are doing man, again and again doing disruptive edits. How many times I have to tell you, don't add factually incorrect materials in the article and poorly sourced materials too along with disruptive edits. Dey subrata (talk) 17:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia.

Please explain these edits [3] [4], you are warned enough times. You are deliberately adding materials without any source and citation and editing improperly. Such of these edits any further will lead you to get blocked. So refrain from such edits and if you want to update, then update properly and with dates. Dey subrata (talk) 21:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2019–20 I-League, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

The warning is for this 1 which was previously brought to your notice for this one before 2, when I warned you last time (level 4 warning), I clearly asked you to explain your edits and said this could be your last warning. You haven't left choice for me, this warnig is final for you (level 5). If you do any more such vandalism in the article or anywhere in wikipedia you will be blocked. Dey subrata (talk) 00:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to see you get blocked for foolish edits, as you are asked again and again. You are doing good work with football articles specially leagues, keep doing that, rather than such disruptive edits. Dey subrata (talk) 00:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its really pathetic, I have given you enough chances to get yourself changed, but it seems you want to ignore everytime. You've vandalised several times with continuous addition of wrong, unsourced materials in the article 2019–20 I-League, latest through this 1 has tested my patience enough where you did the same and violated the WP:4RR, I thought you would care to address the matter at the article talk page when I have opened a discussion. But it seems you care nothing. You will be blocked now for sure. Dey subrata (talk) 21:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Sávy reported by User:Dey subrata (Result: ). Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further disruptive editing and edit warring. Your complete lack of communication despite repeated concerns and three blocks led to this decision. You have never edited a talk page nor your user talk page here. You have not used edit summaries to explain your changes either. Wikipedia is a community project; it does not work this way. When others complain about your edits, you can respond to their concerns or stop editing; continuing as before and ignoring repeated warnings is not an option.
The discussion that ultimately ended your disruption can be found at the bottom of Special:PermanentLink/936935652.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Meher Aali

Hello, Sávy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Meher Aali".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 11:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

please update name and logo of east bengal fc https://www.facebook.com/EastBengalOfficial/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.1.23.241 (talk) 16:43, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

help

please protect my last contributions and links from one asian monster — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.152.166 (talk) 12:13, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Shiv Naresh logo.jpg

The file File:Shiv Naresh logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:OC Blue logo.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OC Blue logo.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unblock accont

Admin please unblock my account Sávy (talk) 15:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ETV News logo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:ETV News logo.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:I-League third logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:I-League third logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:I-League second logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:I-League second logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ripley company logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ripley company logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CFL Old logo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:CFL Old logo.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sadhana News Arya logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sadhana News Arya logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:I-League first logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:I-League first logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:McDowell's No.1 logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:McDowell's No.1 logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hiran new photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hiran new photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaizen Sports logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kaizen Sports logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:53, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Star Ananda logo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Star Ananda logo.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:I-Core Group.jpg

The file File:I-Core Group.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rice Education old logo.jpg

The file File:Rice Education old logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:TUM New Logo.jpeg

The file File:TUM New Logo.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:EMTA Group logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EMTA Group logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]