User talk:Ryan Pikachu

Hey there

William S. Harley death details

Could you please provide a reliable source for the details you added to William S. Harley? - Brianhe (talk) 05:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan_Pikachu: You need Search to WilliamS Harley cause of Death and see in Google Thank you.

Talkback

Hello, Ryan Pikachu. You have new messages at Talk:Samuel Goldwyn.
Message added 01:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 01:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Donald Voorhees (conductor). I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not use thumbnails inside of infoboxes as you did to Robert Weede. Note that this is your second warning regarding this issue. Continuing to add thumbnails will be seen as disruptive editing. For more information please see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE. When adding an image, instead of doing:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daisy Keith

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daisy Keith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Daisy Keith. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 01:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Cooper Jr.

The article George Cooper Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No source except imdb. No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 07:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cissy Wellman

Hello, Ryan Pikachu. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Cissy Wellman, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Cissy Wellman to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Nerd1a4i (talk) 21:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Don Hanmer

Hi, I'm Atlantic306. Ryan Pikachu, thanks for creating Don Hanmer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, imdb and findagrave are unreliable usergenerated sources and need to be replaced, thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen A. Hope

Do you plan to add more content/references to the article? As it stands (with only obituaries as references), the page will almost certainly be deleted. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0394044/

A page you started (Stephen A. Hope) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Stephen A. Hope, Ryan Pikachu!

Wikipedia editor Ajpolino just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add more info from the refs in the article. If you have questions about how to do that or what info is appropriate feel free to ask me or to ask at WP:TEAHOUSE. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment on Ajpolino's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ajpolino (talk) 07:50, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Tale

The article Paul Tale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Article doesn't state what he is notable for.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ryan Pikachu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen A. Hope

The article Stephen A. Hope has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen A. Hope for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen A. Hope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen A. Hope until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:46, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improving Sam Polo

I worked a bit on your article Sam Polo adding categories. Please improve the article adding more information. Good luck with your edits! -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Josef von Stroheim

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Josef von Stroheim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 08:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cause of death

Could you please have a read through the documentation for Template:Infobox person? It explains when it is and isn't appropriate to include cause of death in the template, as well as other details like what to link. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, could you please read the documentation before making edits like this? As it notes, routine illnesses should generally not be included there. You can include them and the sources in the article body. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:33, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again: when the person dies of a routine illness such as cancer or a heart attack, particularly when the person is middle-aged or older, this detail should not be added in the template. If it is reliably sourced, add it elsewhere in the article if you like. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What about circumstances though? Take Bing Crosby for example. Granted, a man in his mid-70s dying of a heart attack isn't exactly unheard of. However, the fact it occurred so suddenly (literally without any prior warning) while he was playing golf does lend it a fair degree of notability IMO. Hamptonian92 (talk) 07:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most heart attacks happen without warning, when people are doing things. That doesn't make it significant that someone in his 70s died of a heart attack. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people buried at sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Please discuss and get consensus before switching infobox musician to infobox person, especially with a blank edit summary which is deceptive. There are legitimate reasons to use the musician infobox. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 20:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please stop, and reveert any that you have already done. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:25, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use thumbnails inside of infoboxes, as you did at Jane Wilde, you may be blocked from editing. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use thumbnails inside of infoboxes, as you did at Fernando Poe Jr., you may be blocked from editing. You have been repeatedly warned about this issue... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cissy Wellman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cissy Wellman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ryan Pikachu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! – The Grid (talk) 19:57, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – The Grid (talk) 20:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cause of death

Hello again. As I've mentioned to you before, please don't add |death_cause= to articles using {{infobox person}} or similar where the cause of death is routine. The template documentation indicates that that parameter should not be included in those cases. If you would like to propose changing that documentation, the place to do that would be Template talk:Infobox person. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Richard Feynman, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 19:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

his father born in Belarus by mistake. Ryan Pikachu (talk) 19:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kazimierz Sabbat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bieliny. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jung Bahadur Rana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balkot.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]