User talk:Rupturestriker

Accuracy in your edit summaries

Instead of putting "fixed typo" in your edit summaries, it would be better to say "updated label", "added sales", "updated sales", "added reference" etc. You do have accurate summaries on ocassion, but I've noticed that a lot of what you call typos aren't grammatical mistakes, spelling errors, or erroneously copied numbers, which is what "typo" generally refers to on here. Otherwise almost every single update on WP would be considered a typo. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 09:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hlists

Please see Template:Infobox song before making further changes to song articles. For short lists of two or three items in the |genre= or |label=, we don't generally use {{hlist}}. Bulleted lists are preferred. Also, the |album= or |EP= should be the name of the first record from which the song was first released. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 19:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Total_length

Just because the total_length parameter indicates the sum of the track lengths, does not mean we need to or even should put it at the end. In fact, if you check Template:Track listing, the parameter is placed at the top. Using Template:Nobold was additionally unnecessary—too much or even the use of nobold at all is inappropriate with some editors. Ss112 04:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you would take care next time. Rupturestriker (talk) 04:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rupturestriker/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Rupturestriker/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://searchenterpriseai.techtarget.com/definition/agent-intelligent-agent. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:18, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:YG Entertainemnt logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:YG Entertainemnt logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article icon

Hello! I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions has been undone because it added the Good Article template to Still Dreaming (TXT album), an article that has not been promoted by the Good Article Nomination process. If you believe that this article meets the Good Article Criteria, then you are encouraged to nominate it for review by following the Good Article nominating instructions. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Good Article Nominations talk page. Thank you. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Fixed typo"

Hi. I notice you've been asked this before but have largely ignored that request, so I'll make another attempt. Please do not use edit summaries stating "fixed typo" unless you are correcting an actual typing error. Adding an unsourced address to an infobox with the edit summary "fixed typo" borders on disruptive. Rob van vee 10:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aquaman (film). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source has some flaws, DC Entertainment has not produced, it’s DC Films.Rupturestriker (talk) Rupturestriker (talk) 04:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Toho Cinmas logo.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Toho Cinmas logo.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information.

You are not an admin to keep reverting or deleting edits from other editors who collaborate on wikipedia. Next time I'll report you to one of the administrators! MISTER PAULO FERRARI (talk) 12:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As per the templete:infobox company" the CEO is above the chairman. Rupturestriker (talk) 12:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information 2

Wrong. The chairman of the board of directors is above the CEO; because the chairman of the board of directors receives the order from the shareholders of the company and the CEO has to obey what the chairman of the board of directors and the shareholders have decided. MISTER PAULO FERRARI (talk) 12:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What about the page Apple Inc. ? Rupturestriker (talk) 13:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apple inc.

On the Apple inc page, the company hierarchy (Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer) is also in the wrong order, me, you, other editors or admins need to correct that too. MISTER PAULO FERRARI (talk) 11:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The instruction from Template:Infobox company:

Up to four key individuals closely associated with the company. If there is more than one entry, use to format the entries. List the figures in order of organizational role importance. Give job title(s) in parentheses (round brackets); these job titles use standard English casing. If a founder is already listed in the founder parameter, do not list them again here as a founder; if the founder still holds an executive job with the company, you may, however, list them along with their job title (chairman, president, etc.).

Generally list prominent, current executives within the company holding key positions such as chairman, chief executive officer, president, VP of design, etc., but do not list roles below chief officer level if they are not notable. Do include top executives even not individually notable, but do not wiki-link them.

Use popular names rather than formal names if the key figure has an existing Wikipedia article.

For defunct companies, list the most prominent former executives.

Example:

Tim Cook (CEO)
Arthur D. Levinson (chairman)
Jonathan Ive (SVP of industrial design)
Steve Jobs (chairman, 1976–1985, 2011; CEO, 1997–2011)

Rupturestriker (talk) 12:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Kilar hasn't left

Kilar only made an announcement he is leaving. Hw hasn't actually stepped down. He is expected to leave on 8 April. Please read this [1] and don't add he is no longer WarnerMedia CEO again. Announcement doesn't necessarily mean something has already happened. AbsolutelyFiring (talk) 16:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks will take care in future. Rupturestriker (talk) 16:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read edit summaries when you find yiur edit has been removed. I had already mentioned this when I reverted you but you ignored it. AbsolutelyFiring (talk) 16:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BFI

I have no idea why you're removing citations to the British Film Institute, but please stop doing this. Also, please don't change the production companies when they're sourced. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:The Flash (film) poster.jpg

The file File:The Flash (film) poster.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

File is not an actual poster of the subject film The Flash (film), and has since been re-uploaded to the file that has been used on that article, File:The Flash (film) logo.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Galobtter (pingó mió) 01:45, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, your comment at Special:Diff/1087954498 is not ok at all. Personal attacks are completely unacceptable on Wikipedia. Galobtter (pingó mió) 01:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Flash (film) poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Flash (film) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I've asked for your account to be indefinitely blocked this time, so you should probably respond there. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked 3 months from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Oz\^InterAct 09:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rupturestriker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’ve used disruptive behavior in the past and I will no longer useRupturestriker (talk) 11:20, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not convincing. What were you doing? Why? And why can we trust you won't do it again? Yamla (talk) 12:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rupturestriker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now that I know the consequences, I will not resort to disruption. And reduce the frequency of my edits. Also if I am here not to build wikipedia, why have i created a wikipedia page Rupturestriker (talk) 11:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't tell us what your disruption was. We know, but to unblock you we need to know that you know. Many people create pages that do not add to the encyclopedia(Wikipedia has articles, not pages). I'm also a bit concerned that you needed to first know the consequences; most inappropriate behavior is common sense even without knowing the consequences. 331dot (talk) 13:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rupturestriker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here to build wikipedia, and I want to correct things that I see wrong, I want to source information and link it. Thats all I was doing here. Whenever someone reverted my edit I began to undo that acton, and repeated my edit. I don't want misinformation on Wikipedia and that's the the reason I created this account. Whoever found my way of editing going against the way of making wikipedia, didn't really highlight my proper mistake. If I get to know that I would not repeat that.Rupturestriker (talk) 05:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; user decided to engage in sockpuppetry so this unblock request no longer applies. Yamla (talk) 10:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You should read WP:VG/OFFICIAL and WP:TRUTH. The first link goes to the video game wikiproject and talks about video games, but it can be generalized to include most pop culture. Wikipedia is written according to what reliable sources say, not what you think is true. Pop culture today leaves behind a long trail of primary sources, including press releases, advertisements, posters, and other promotional material. The internet makes it easy to find even more primary sources, such as copyright statements and even government records. And once it's released, the work itself becomes a primary source. Many of these sources would be considered "official" elsewhere on the internet and thus of the highest quality and reliability. However, Wikipedia policy does not really care much about whether something is official, and it instead prioritizes what third-party, reliable sources say. If a reliable source says a company produced a film, that's what Wikipedia says. It doesn't matter whether that company's logo is on some official-looking promotional material, or the company is on the copyright statement, or whatever. You seem to be going through film articles and removing citations whenever you disagree with what the source says. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have read this previously but there is this flaw in it: what should be done when multiple secondary source contradict each other? Rupturestriker (talk) 15:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rupturestriker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have realized my mistake and now would not repeat it. Rupturestriker (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You already have an open unblock request. Please don't post multiple open unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 00:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rupturestriker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I didn’t know the importance of secondary source on Wikipedia, and I was either removing them or replacing them with other non reliable source. I will not repeat this, and will discuss on article talk pages before major edits. Rupturestriker (talk) 03:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You already have an open unblock request. STOP MAKING NEW ONES. All you are doing is showing you lack sufficient competence to edit here and this is a real problem, see WP:CIR. If you are unable to understand or follow simple directions, Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Yamla (talk) 10:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blanking

You are not permitted to remove (or edit) declined unblock requests for your currently active block, even those that were abusive. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Rupturestriker (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No response unblock plea

@Yamla: Why have my plea for unblock on June 4 not received any response (acceptance or decline)?

It doesn't come close to addressing the concerns that lead to your block. Additionally, you have had four (!!!) unblock requests declined. You've essentially exhausted the pool of unblock reviewers. --Yamla (talk) 17:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've decided to engage in sock puppetry, you're now indefinitely blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So is there a way to delete both the accounts and never come back? Rupturestriker (talk) 05:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. However, you can simply stop using Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 10:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: Do indefinitely blocked user ever gets unblocked?

Orphaned non-free image File:Toho Cinmas logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toho Cinmas logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]