User talk:Rrthakur22

This is Rrthakur22's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rrthakur22/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DoubleGrazing, I have copied the contents of your sandbox into Human_rights_in_Cambodia#Freedom_of_expression_and_assembly.--Quisqualis (talk) 04:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rrthakur22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Rrthakur22!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Venkat TL (talk) 07:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Corruption in India. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I will try to do it, although I could not understand the use of attribution template. Is it enough to write in the References section that "This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain?" Alternatively, can we put the text taken from the source in quotes while writing the article, as we do in editorial articles for newspapers? Rrthakur22 (talk) 11:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you add material copied from another Wikipedia article, you need to cite the source used by the copied article to support the claim, as well as making mention of the copying in the edit summary, indicating which Wikipedia article is being copied. Note that a Wikipedia article is never a reliable source. This is because Wikipedia is user-generated, like IMdB, fandom and the like.--Quisqualis (talk) 04:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Aam Aadmi Party. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 09:49, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twitter in India (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Twitter in India and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 09:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twitter in India (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also duplicates information on the Twitter page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Twitter in India and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 08:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twitter in India (August 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia depicts what is considered to be established knowledge. There doesn't seem to be any exclusive coverage of the subject "Twitter in India" in secondary, independent reliable sources. The approach that has been chosen for this draft works with virtually any object in any place which immediately indicates that the draft is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Money laundering

At Money laundering there is a section Notable cases. Referenced content about cases that occured in India should go there. Content should be limited to cases which are the topics of existing Wikipedia articles. P.S. All of your reverted content is available to be recovered and move to a more appropriate place. David notMD (talk) 19:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Venkat TL (talk) 08:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I could not understand why my edits to the page Aam Aadmi Party removed. I had added information from reliable sources and that pertains to the topic, although it was critical information. Please restore the information under the Funding section. Rrthakur22 (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sanctions alert and an editor's decision to revert your referenced contributions are not connected. David notMD (talk) 09:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD is right. This was an alert. Please read Discretionary sanctions#Guidance_for_editors to understand what it means. Venkat TL (talk) 14:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source

Please see WP:PSTS, WP:TOI.

WP:HISTRS is needed. Venkat TL (talk) 15:13, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rrthakur22! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Editing semi-protected article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rrthakur22! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Content Removal, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cullen328 (talk) 05:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added my comments on Teahouse so that other editors could also react. Rrthakur22 (talk) 06:00, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicion of conflict of interest

Your concern appears to be about people who have a conflict of interest (paid or not paid) with a topic, your examples being political parties and politicians. Such editors can be asked to declare the situation (see WP:PAID and WO:COI. Either means that those editors should not edit the article directly, but instead make a request on the Talk page for a change. Requests are dealt with by non-involved editors. David notMD (talk) 13:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning PAID and COI in your edit summary to MS was wrong place. Make a (more polite) statement on the Talk page of the article, as that is where it will be seen by other editors. Goal is consensus. David notMD (talk) 14:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD Okay, thanks. Rrthakur22 (talk) 15:16, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BLP violations

Please reply if you have read and understood the full page WP:BLP. Especially the sections on WP:SUSPECT and WP:CRIME. Venkat TL (talk) 17:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have maintained NPOV with verifiable facts and no original research as all the media sources that I have cited are highly reliable. By removing such information from Wikipedia will amount to deliberate suppression of facts. Thank you. Rrthakur22 (talk) 04:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rrthakur22 Please read my question once again. You did not answer it. Venkat TL (talk) 09:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rrthakur22! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Dishonest Removal of Content, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rrthakur22! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Suspect Editors, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indian National Congress presidential election (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Indian National Congress presidential election and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @KylieTastic But announced today this is a developing event which has a lot of interest in India. And a similar sketchy page about this event was earlier allowed on the

the Indian National Congress presidential election, 2017. So, this is not a single-news event. Rather, it will develop very fast, as the election process proceeds. Please publish this page which cannot have more information at this stage. Rrthakur22 (talk) 13:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your correct that is a very sketchy page that really should have had more sources at least but their was less control of articles in 2017. If that is typical of the level of information on a Indian National Congress presidential election it would maybe more appropriate to have one article about all of them and the dated ones just as redirects. 2001 Indian National Congress presidential election is another trivial stub. It at least needs more than one source. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 13:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed 2022 Indian National Congress Presidential Election has already been created. KylieTastic (talk) 13:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This new page also does not have enough information but approved. So, you should have also approved my article. I have observed that there are plenty of inconsistencies and ad hoc approval process on Wikipedia. The approval depends on the whims of an editor rather than on clearly defined guidelines. This needs to be streamlined. If possible, please raise this issue among your fellow editors who reject articles instantly. Thanks. Rrthakur22 (talk) 13:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Department of Registrar Cooperative Society Delhi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Department of Registrar Cooperative Society Delhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ^Complex/_Rational 13:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Your edit on Russian war crimes is arguably outside the scope of the article. If I may suggest, it may probably fit better in the International sanctions during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Would you agree to move said data there?--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 18:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks. You can move the content to the page you have suggested. Rrthakur22 (talk) 05:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Rrthakur22/sandbox

Hello, Rrthakur22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Rrthakur22/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Twitter in India

Hello, Rrthakur22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Twitter in India, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:00, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Rrthakur22/sandbox

Hello, Rrthakur22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Twitter in India

Hello, Rrthakur22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Twitter in India".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Department of Registrar Cooperative Society, Delhi

Hello, Rrthakur22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Department of Registrar Cooperative Society, Delhi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need help n Gautam Adani page

The article page Gautam Adani looks more like a Fanpage..WP:FANPOV. Your inclusion will be of much effect on it.Strandofhair (talk) 09:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Rrthakur22. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. Maduant (talk) 12:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat what I just posted on the Copyright page. You can click here and click here to find the motivation behind this frivolous copyright request. I have followed all the Wikipedia rules for my contributions. And I won't be able to waste more of my time in disputing these dishonest complaints. Please do not remove or change any of my contributions and take action against this user @Maduant who has filed this ridiculous request. Rrthakur22 (talk) 13:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have examined this request. You copied content from [1] in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy and your response to the complaint indicates you do not understand that this is problematic. Therefore:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 11:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is an arbitrarily imposed censorship without considering the argument (including a couple of links) that I had given above on 3 March 2023 to show the purpose behind the fake copyright complaint. This decision is arbitrary because I have never been communicated about the complaint, if any, from the sources that I have cited.

I have experienced attacks on my contributions to Wikipedia multiple times in the past because a few people with commercial interests do not want me to contribute to Wikipedia.

It is okay if I stop contributing to Wikipedia pages, but I strongly urge Wikipedia to normalize its working which is mostly driven by naive editors who may have hidden objectives to censor critical content.

Although it is a totally wrong decision to block me from editing Wikipedia pages, I do not have time to argue it further. However, if some honest Wikipedia editors are reading my statement(s) and response, they should intervene to study this whole case in order to save Wikipedia from nefarious elements. Thank you. Rrthakur22 (talk) 12:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As an uninvolved and AFAIK honest Wikipedian, I see no evidence that this block or copyright complaint has anything nefarious about it, or anything whatsoever to do with the events you linked to above. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Indian National Congress presidential election

Hello, Rrthakur22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indian National Congress presidential election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Department of Registrar Cooperative Society, Delhi

Hello, Rrthakur22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Department of Registrar Cooperative Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 17:42, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Indian National Congress presidential election

Hello, Rrthakur22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indian National Congress presidential election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]