User talk:Rogerreborn

Welcome!

Hello, Rogerreborn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Joy Of Creation: Reborn, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Joy Of Creation: Reborn

The article The Joy Of Creation: Reborn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks to be a non-notable fan game based on FNAF. I can find nothing to show that this game would pass WP:NVG, as it doesn't seem to have gained any coverage in any place that would be considered a reliable source per WP:VG/RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Joy Of Creation: Reborn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Joy Of Creation: Reborn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Joy Of Creation: Reborn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fyddlestix (talk) 19:46, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with BlastphamousHD. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CMP Article Notice

The article BlastphamousHD is Wikipedia worthy and it is clearly notable and does not need deleting. Please remove your deletion notices or they will be removed by Cosmo Millan Pictures Wikipedia editors.

It is not Wikipedia worthy, both on the basis of intrinsic non-notability and because it has no valid references; youtube references are by definition not admissible.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As to your threat contained in your above posting, note that vandalism as threatened will result in vandalising editors being blocked from editing here. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at BlastphamousHD, you may be blocked from editing. If you want the article to be kept, instead of removing the CSD template and notability template, please provide reliable sources which establish the subject's notability. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Police are currently tracking down the following users Narutolovehinata5, NgYShung if you do not cease destroying company property. you will be arrested and jailed.

CMP

Speedy deletion nomination of Cosmo Millan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cosmo Millan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dps04 (talk) 16:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 16:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This is a warming from Cosmo Millan Pictures. Police have been called about the following users Narutolovehinata5, NgYShung. The authorities are currently tracking down their locations. You have this warning to stop destroying Wikipedia worthy articles or risk arrest and imprisonment for a maximum of 10 years for the following charges: Hacking and Destroying company property. If this continues police will not hesitate to take action. This is just a warning but the next time this happens police will be dispatched to your homes and this will be settled in the United States Court Of Law as Cosmo Millan Pictures is an American company.

File:Teaser Poster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Teaser Poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeffrey Ridgway Sr

A tag has been placed on Jeffrey Ridgway Sr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7: Unremarkable person from an unremarkable webseries

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Darth Mike^(talk) 18:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rogerreborn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17055 was submitted on Dec 05, 2016 19:49:31. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand

Jeffrey Ridgway Sr is a very notable person please help me improve it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogerreborn (talk • contribs) 20:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are blocked, this page has one use and that is to resolve that block. Do not use it for any purpose other than to resolve your block. - GB fan 20:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Titanic II

Hello, Rogerreborn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Titanic II".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 21:33, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Angry Grandpa The Movie: Angry Grandpa vs IMustDestroyAll

Hello, Rogerreborn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Angry Grandpa The Movie: Angry Grandpa vs IMustDestroyAll".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 13:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Angry Grandpa V Psycho Dad World At War

Hello, Rogerreborn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Angry Grandpa V Psycho Dad World At War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]