User talk:Rogerjchristian

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Roger Christian (filmmaker), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 22:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cinema Alchemist

A tag has been placed on Cinema Alchemist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. elektrik SHOOS 03:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Cinema Alchemist, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. elektrik SHOOS 03:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roger Christian (filmmaker). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 06:41, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Roger Christian (filmmaker), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 05:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Roger Christian (filmmaker). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Teapotgeorge^Talk 19:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

You may want to look at the guidelines for identifying and citing reliable sources in a neutral manner, which means avoiding peacock phrases. You're welcome to edit here, and you can even edit the article about you, but Wikipedia is not going to host your resume. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:38, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Roger Christian (filmmaker). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:13, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some more advice

If something has a reference, you probably shouldn't delete it. There's nothing in the guidelines saying the articles should flatter their subjects, only summarize sources about them and report what they are know for. You are known for directing Battlefield Earth. Battlefield Earth is known for the criticism against it. Those two facts are not being removed, and attempts to remove them (especially by you) will be treated as censorship. If you don't like it, that's tough, but trying to hide your connection to Battlefield Earth on this site will accomplish nothing, because more people will come along and restore that information. Wikipedia is not your resume. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:19, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Roger Christian (filmmaker), as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. OlYeller21^Talktome 05:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]