User talk:Robschnell

This is my talk page to discuss any comment you would like me to go through please don't forget to sign your name after posting by adding --Robschnell (talk) 21:56, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robschnell, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Robschnell! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for protecting the account of the Arab Fashion Council, The Arab Fashion Council is needed to be protected as an entity the fosters the growth of creative talents in the GCC/MENA region and we are proud of it's presence. M7md44071 (talk) 05:06, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please familarisize yourself with WP:NOTVAND. Vandalism means to intentionally damage Wikipedia articles. I come here after this Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 07:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also please use the edit summary. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 06:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Aqra moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mohammed Aqra, is not suitable as written to remain published. Most of the references in the article are passing mentions and do not provide the in-depth coverage Wikipedia requires. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mccapra, the article has been improved, more reference is added to one on one interviews with the subject and reviewed by a few Wikipedia editors, could you kindly publish it to the mainspace?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Aqra (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability requires significant coverage of the subject in multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources. Interviews, close sources and passing mentions are insufficient. As currently written, this article would almost certainly fail at AfD.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammed Aqra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohammed Aqra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Aqra (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails general notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammed Aqra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohammed Aqra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheBirdsShedTears, the article has been improved, more reference has been added included one on one interviews with very credible media, kindly review the reference as in my opinion the article qualifies to be published and the reason for rejection is not valid. Thanks for your effort. Robschnell (talk) 14:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Aqra (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I am reviewing this draft second time because the author has posted a message on my talk page asking to re-review this draft. Please note, the first 4 references are not sufficient to establish notability. They are interviews and primary sources, while other added sources are just passing mentions. You must provide three best sources with in-depth coverage about the subject. Each source should discuss the subject in detail with 150 to 200 words.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammed Aqra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohammed Aqra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hi. I see you have articles refused for not enough references, even though you have 20 references! How is this possible, when many articles exist on wikipedia, with NO references at all? I am also having this problem. Thanks. 188.172.109.22 (talk) 23:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mohammed Aqra

Hello, Robschnell. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohammed Aqra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mohammed Aqra

Hello, Robschnell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mohammed Aqra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]