User talk:Arthur Warrington Thomas/Archive1

Emptiness

Please don't create an article until you're ready to have actual content: empty articles look bad. What would happen if someone found it through the Random Page button?

I've deleted it, but if you like, I can copy the deleted material to a subpage in your userspace (User:FK0071a/whatever) for you to work on until it's ready. Okay? DS 15:18, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the right tag...

The right tag is {{PD-old}}. I marked the photo for you. ---J.S (t|c) 15:52, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bowling Books

Hi,

Your bot? has changed the bowling books pages - said it may delete them for being "nn book" - fair enough but what does that mean so I am able to expand?

Many thanks.

(Added to User:Pearle on 11:17, 9 April 2006 by User:FK0071a)

Pearle is a computer program that does not tag articles for deletion. Which page(s) in particular are you referring to? Perhaps I can help figure out what happened if the problem has not already been resolved. -- Beland 21:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Nickhalling.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nickhalling.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 08:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source for Image:TELogoN10N.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:TELogoN10N.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 13:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post copyrighted text

We appreciate your creation of the articles:

...but we cannot accept copyrighted text borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information on this topic, or generally, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Please do not remove the copyright violation notice placed in the article or repost the suspected infringing text. However, if you would like to rewrite the article in your own words, follow the link in the posted notice to create a temporary subpage. If your new article is appropriate, and not a further copyright violation, the reviewing administrator will move that new article into place once the copyright status of the original has been resolved. Happy editing! ~Matticus ^T_C 14:40, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Animal Liberation

Please do not add red names and external links in a template. You might as well add Islamist terrorists in the Islam template. The template is not about terrorism. Best wishes, --A Sunshade Lust 19:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries, a good thing in general but more important on something like this template, used on lots of pages. It mainly makes it easier for others to look at your changes. Thanks, |→ Spaully°τ 22:40, 12 August 2006 (GMT)

Image tagging for Image:PETAPoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PETAPoster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Content policies

Hi FK, there are a few problems with the way you're writing and editing, and I think it would help if you'd take time to read our content policies: WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:BLP. In particular, material must be written from a neutral point of view, and in a disinterested tone, and must be carefully sourced. Your writing displays a strong pro-animal rights POV, which means that a lot of your edits will be reverted, whereas if you edit within our content policies, you'll find they'll be more likely to stick. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 03:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

link to British

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to British, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as United Kingdom or Great Britain by writing out [[United Kingdom|British]] or [[Great Britain|British]]. Regards, Jeff3000 17:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion procedure

See AfD in 3 steps. I think you missed steps 2 and 3. Let me know if I can help. Tom Harrison ^Talk 22:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replace "Reason the page should be deleted" with your reason. Replace my name with four tildes (~~~~). This will appear as your user name with a time stamp. Tom Harrison ^Talk 23:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then we'll move on to step three. Tom Harrison ^Talk 23:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The whole thing was a mess, and probably violated WP:POINT anyway. If you want to list it for deletion, try again, and this time follow the directions carefully. Let me know if you have any questions. Tom Harrison ^Talk 23:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Roccosutherland.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Roccosutherland.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

credit given as TV Screen shot: Screenshot from "I Trust You To Kill Me". I want to learn how to fix my mistakes about images but am unsure. FK0071a 15:57, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:739551245 l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:739551245 l.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

credit given as Promotional image: Promotional image from Rocco DeLuca official MySpace site [1] FK0071a 20:36, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:BritishDruids.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:BritishDruids.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:55, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

article

Wellcome to your first contact with the anti-truth movement:

Your article Paul Joseph Watson is risking to be deleted. --Striver 14:34, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the invitation. I have tried to creat similar projects earlier, so expect at least an atemt to delet it very soon. --Striver 11:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its more or less a rule of thumb, most of the things i creat are afd'd, and most of them are keept. But people want them to go away, and you need to be well informed and stuborn to not get scared away. I even have my own team of editors that follow me to whadever i do, i cant even do something in a totaly unrelated article for them to show up and start hassling me. Just as well to get used to it, Big Brother, or the "Big Brother wannabee team" are watching me :D --Striver 15:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rocco De Luca

Hiya, I got your message about Rocco DeLuca and the Burden. I edited the Rocco article after watching Sky 1's I Trust you to kill me documentary . To be honest I'm a massive Kiefer Sutherland fan, so I don't know much about the band other than his involvement, and I don't know if I can help you. Sorry that I can't be much help. I am from England too. It was sad that the band didn't get a warmer (and more punctual) welcome in London. Jilly 14:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS Your Rocco article says that citations are needed for when Kiefer said he was sacked by the band. I don't know how to cite, but if you go to the Kiefer Rocks website, under 'news' you can view a clip from the The Tonight Show With Jay Leno (from 19 April) that shows Kiefer saying the quote that appears in your article (that mucisians are 'nuts'). Hope this helps. Jilly 14:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd let you know that since you said their music was good I looked on their website and listened to a few tracks. I actually got really into it, particularly liking Colorful and Mystified, so I've asked for the (CD) album for my birthday. You aren't sad for getting a Bauer bag - I'm in the 24 fanclub! Love the article - wow it must've taken you ages!! Jilly 17:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JH Brennan

Hi there, saw your recently created page. Is this the same J.H. Brennan who used to write gamebooks? Nehwyn 17:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not to my knowledge but please update me as much as you can! FK0071a 18:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Odin Brotherhood

Excellent work on the Odin Brotherhood material! --Cpoirot 00:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

article namespace and Wikiprojects

please stop adding {{Germanic Mysticism, Revivalism and Nazism}} to article namespace (apparently a Wikiproject template, as opposed to a template on an article series). We want to avoid self-reference and not refer to Wikiprojects in articles. Alternatively, you could change the template to link to articles, not Wikipedia: namespace. dab (ᛏ) 19:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Katja Lane

Hello. I deleted the article because someone else had tagged it {{db-bio}}. All the article contained was that she was the wife of an imprisoned Wotanist and a co-founder of his organisation (together with lots of "see also" wikilinks). I didn't think this lends her notability per WP:BIO. The closest WP:BIO criterion I could find was, "Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events, such as by being assassinated," and I don't think she qualifies there. If you have more information about her, please resubmit an article that explains more clearly why joint-foundation of this organisation makes her notable. Best wishes, --RobertG ♬ talk 12:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism / Copyright violations

Do not add text copied from other websites to Wikipedia articles as you did at Freya Aswynn, Níð and The Secret of the Runes (book). If you do this again you will be blocked from editing. Haukur 15:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ron McVan

Only sysops can view deleted revisions but I'll send you the text if you specify an e-mail address in your preferences (or elsewhere). Haukur 16:43, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still getting "This user has not specified a valid e-mail address, or has chosen not to receive e-mail from other users." Haukur 17:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Animal rights

Could you explain what you meant by this edit, please? [2] SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fair enough. No worries. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:46, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NigelCPennickPromo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NigelCPennickPromo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:23, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Please block

I've reverted the IP, will keep watch further. Looks like some minor infractions from a school, so I won't block just yet (if anything urgent comes up, WP:AIV has several sysops on standby). - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 15:37, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Kand02.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kand02.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Britt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Britt.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 11:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nidstangpolepennick.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Nidstangpolepennick.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Saxifrage ✎ 08:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Internal links to a subheading

Ah, I just saw the little external link symbol. Take a look at how I resolved it. The external link format should not be used for internal links.

Also, the references need to be reformatted. Should be alpha by author's last name. For example:

Last, First (year). Title. Publisher. ISBN xxxxxxxxxx.

Sorry for the confusion. -999 (Talk) 16:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Magic vs Magick

But, I agree with 999 on this question, at least. How does that help you? —Hanuman Das 14:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK

I am also going to fix the category for you. Should be "Magical terms in Germanic mysticism" —Hanuman Das 14:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem

No problem. I am trying to help, not hinder. Since a couple of the articles like Odin Brotherhood and the one on its author have been deleted once via AfD, they could be speedily deleted at any time. Therefore it is important to see that these articles conform to Wikipedia standards. If there is a lot of unverified material, links to personal websites as "references", etc. it will be hard to keep the articles from being deleted... -999 (Talk) 15:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Teachings of the Odin Brotherhood

I left a message on the Odin Brotherhood talk page. The work exists and I have a copy. It was given to me about ten years ago.

Mirabello or his book are nowhere mentioned in it.

--Jkelley 23:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Jkelley 21:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC) I left this on the talk page of Odin Orotherhood:[reply]

I regret I do not know how to photograph and post a picture.

On occasion, I have seen copies for sale on ebay, however. How weird is that?

If you have a postal address, I could probably xerox it and send it to you. Again, it seems to have been distributed without charge. --Jkelley 04:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More information on "Teachings of the Odin Brotherhood." It was "printed" by Thule Publications, PO Box 4542, Portland, Oregon 97208, USA. There is no ISBN. Athough nicely done, it appears to have been an underground publication--one "off the radar."

If I remember correctly, the leader of a "Thule" group was assaulted with a baseball bat some years ago in Portland. That may explain why the web site no longer exists for this Thule group.--Jkelley 21:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It occurs to me I could probably find someone to "scan" the work for you. Interested?

--Jkelley 21:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide an e-mail for the scanned copy? --Jkelley 02:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ostara

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ostara. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Disinclination 23:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove AfD notices from articles

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Peter Carroll. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 18:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing the AfD tag

I got sidetracked before I finshed closing the AfD.--Isotope23 15:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Stop with the vandlising notices on my talk page. I made a mistake and I removed it. Please see WP:AGF and perhaps you need to read WP:OWN as well. Thank you. Whisp e ring 16:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I note that it was a mistake on your part and respect that. But, don't say I vandalise notices on your talk page when I only edit my own comments to make them better and give references. FK0071a 16:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GD link

Apparently it had a / at the end when it shouldn't. When you restored it you took the / off. Still, the anon who has been repeatedly adding it should have tested it!! Perhaps some browsers retry without the trailing slash and others don't? I use Firefox and the original link gave a 404 error. -999 (Talk) 17:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Illuminates of Thanateros

Has been nominated for deletion. Thought you'd want to know. —Hanuman Das 00:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:VOLKSigil1awhite.JPG listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:VOLKSigil1awhite.JPG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. thunderboltz ^(Deepu) 19:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, a hostile fellow ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mikkalai ) has systematically purged everything about the Odin Brotherhood. To make matters worse, he has administrative powers!

There are plenty of places to play these pagan games. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a junkyard of wild fantasies. There are well-known cults and sectret societies and sects and whats not. Mirabello's stuff is just nonnotable. `'mikkanarxi 02:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested, I have saved most of the material at this alternative site.

http://tinwiki.org/wiki/Odin_Brotherhood

On another matter, I will send the scan of the “Teachings of the Odin Brotherhood.” Do you have an e-mail I may use? --Jkelley 22:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! For the record, I only put the link on your page. The "hostile fellow" copied the text here and altered it. Sorry about that. Be sure to delte what he copied, as it is adulturated.

--Jkelley 02:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the correct version. His adulturated version follows:--Jkelley 02:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Odin Brotherhood is a secret society for men and women who value “knowledge, freedom, and power.”

The Brotherhood practices the ancient warrior religion called Odinism. Consecrated to the pagan gods of the Norse pantheon --gods viewed as "older, better, and truer"- members of the Brotherhood use the so-called Eddaic Verses–also called the Poetic Edda–as a kind of scripture.

Members claim their pagan order was established in 1421 to protect the ancient religion during the "Burning Times," and they insist it has existed in unbroken lineage to the present. If the claim is accurate, the Odin Brotherhood resembles the Tariquat, the secret brotherhoods in Islam that sustain the traditions underground in times of intense persecution.

Who Established the Odin Brotherhood?

Their myth of foundation –albeit interesting– is fantastic. Like the story of Hiram Abif in Freemasonry, the foundation myth of the Brotherhood involves a crime against innocence.

In the legend of the Brotherhood, the story begins when a young pagan widow was caught honoring her ancient gods and goddesses in a remote grotto. For her action, an angry mob burned her on a pyre composed of green wood.

After the murder, the woman’s three children used an ancient and forbidden rite from paganism (a rite called necromancy) and summoned her from beyond the grave.

Answering the summons, the slain woman instructed her children to save the ancient religion of Odinism by taking the movement underground. They were instructed to form a secret society–a "conspiracy of equals"--dedicated to the old gods.

According to the Odin Brotherhood, all of these events occurred somewhere in Eurasia–somewhere north of the Black Sea--in the fifteenth century of the current era.

They also insist that buried artifacts exist which will some day confirm their tale.

How Does One Join the Odin Brotherhood?

Traditionally, the teachings are spread from person to person. Only by word of mouth, from mind to mind, could the secrets pass.

Today, however, with more written information appearing in manuscript and in published form, solitary practitioners (“lone wolves” who initiate themselves)–are becoming more common.

In its current form, membership in the Odin Brotherhood is secret–as in the so-called Illuminati conspiracy. The objectives of the Odin Brotherhood are stated publicly, as in the legendary Rosicrucians.

Secret Societies are still illegal in some countries. As Nick Harding points out in Secret Societies, for example, they are forbidden by the constitution of Poland.

The Rite of Blood

Joining the Odin Brotherhood involves a kind of vision quest cemented by a ceremony of blood.

In ancient religion, without blood there is no power. That is the reason that animals were cut in half when the biblical Jehovah made his covenant with Abraham.

Also, because of the power of blood Jewish boys are circumcised on the eighth day.

The initiation rite of the Odin Brotherhood--which is based on the “marking with the spear” rite described by the medieval author Snorri Sturluson, involves solitude, a diet of bread and ice, a dagger, and a fire.

The initiate –after proper purification– makes three incisions on his body. He then devotes, hallows, and sanctifies his soul to the “gods who live” by penetrating a fire three times with a dagger stained with his own blood.

From the beginning, the movement--in spite of its name--has included women.

Theology, Devotion, and Ethics

The Odin Brotherhood embraces polytheism. The gods, which include Odin, Thor, Frigga, Heimdall, Vidar, Tyr, Freya, and the other beings in the Norse pantheon, are viewed as powerful entities that are finite in nature. The gods are not omnipotent—they are not omniscient—but they accomplish their wills through struggle, not fiats. Humanoid in shape, the gods are physical beings that inhabit hidden corridors in the universe. Often appearing on earth in disguise, they are known by many names in many languages. Odin, for example, appears also as Hermes and Rudra. Believing in direct contact with the gods, the Odin Brotherhood teaches that deities typically communicate with humanity through a system of "messengers and spies."

Devotionally, members of the Odin Brotherhood do not worship the gods on their knees. Refusing to be slaves, Odinists admire the gods but do not grovel before them.

Ethically, the Odin Brotherhood creates no laws, only virtues. The Odin Brotherhood glorifies "thought, courage, honor, light, and beauty."

A tradition for warriors, the Odin Brotherhood teaches that "when the gods made man, they made a weapon." The Odin Brotherhood represents strength over weakness, pride over humility, and knowledge over faith.

Death and Afterlife

The Odin Brotherhood teaches that all beings ultimately experience death. In poetic terms, death is personified as beautiful females--called the valkyries--who exist "in an endless variety of exquisite forms."

Since death is not annihilation, the "transfigured life form" will go to one of three Other-Worlds. The most famous of these "Other-Worlds" is Valhalla.

In cosmic terms, death is described as Ragnarok, the final battle which destroys every universe. According to the Odin Brotherhood, Ragnarok is an "orgy of purification" from which a new cosmos is born. The cycle of destruction and rebirth--which will go on forever--is called the Law-of-the-Endless-Circle."

Also called the "eternal return," the "Law-of-the-Endless-Circle" teaches that existence never ends with destruction. "Nothing dies forever," and all beings--and all things--will return.

Discovery and Exposure of the Brotherhood Today

The Odin Brotherhood's was first exposed to the general public in 1992 with the publication of the book The Odin Brotherhood by Dr. Mark L. Mirabello, who is a professor of European history at Shawnee State University.

First contact was made when Mirabello encountered a silver-haired man in a bookshop in Leith, in the United Kingdom. At the time, Mirabello was conducting historical reseach as a doctoral student in Scotland's University of Glasgow.

The gentleman, who called himself Lodur's Friend (in honor of the mysterious god in the Eddaic Verses), was holding a peculiar cane adorned with the images of the serpent and the ass, the two animals that speak in the bible.

"Blind loyalty is a virtue in a dog, but it is an offense in a human being," declared the stranger, when he noticed Mirabello studying an obscure essay on faith.

The two men became friends, and "Lodur's Friend" introduced Mirabello to a "circle of fascinating individuals." The group met for unusual feasts, normally in Edinburgh or London, always at night, and always during the time of the new moon.

The feasts were referred to as "conventicles," and they were by invitation only. Those who "feared" or "hated" authority were excluded, but those who "laughed at" authority were welcome.

Some years after the publication of Mirabello's book, the anonymous and privately printed Teachings of the Odin Brotherhood began to circulate. Copies of the latter are rare.

Bibliography

Hollander, Lee M. The Poetic Edda. Austin, 1986.

Mirabello, Mark. The Odin Brotherhood. 5th edition. Oxford, England, 2003.

Storyteller, Ragnar. Odin's Return. Payson,Arizona, 1995.

Sturluson, Snorri. Ynglinga Saga.

Sturluson, Snorri. Prose Edda. Mineola, New York, 2006.

Teachings of the Odin Brotherhood. Portland, no date.

Wodanson, Edred. Asatru-The Hidden Fortress. Parksville, BC, Canada, 2005.

External links

Odin Brotherhood (North America and Europe)
Odin Brotherhood (South America)
Radio interview on the Odin Brotherhood for Odin Lives, now Nine Worlds Radio
Odin Brotherhood Discussion Group.

HERE FOLLOWS HIS COMMENTS:

Odin Brotherhood

Why don't you buy the book of this Mirabello guy, to enjoy his fantasies in origin? I don't see any problem to put this text here. I am only against free promo of Mirabello the fantasy writer. `'mikkanarxi 02:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Odin Brotherhood is a secret society claiming to practices an ancient Germanic "warrior religion" called Odinism.^{[citation needed]} Members of the Brotherhood use the Eddaic Verses, also called the Poetic Edda, as a kind of scripture. The existence of the society was claimed in 1992 by Mark L. Mirabello.

Members claim^{[citation needed]} their pagan order was established in 1421 to protect the ancient religion during the persecution of the "Burning Times", and they insist it has existed in unbroken lineage to the present. In its current form, membership in the Odin Brotherhood is clandestine–as in the so-called Illuminati. The objectives of the Odin Brotherhood are stated publically, as in the legendary Rosicrucians.

Mirabello's alleged discovery of the Brotherhood

The Odin Brotherhood's first expose into the general public came to light in 1992 with the publication of the book 'The Odin Brotherhood' by Mark L. Mirabello, who is the professor of European History at Shawnee State University.

First contact was made when Mirabello encountered a silver-haired gentleman in a bookshop in Leith in Scotland while conducting doctoral research in history at Scotland's University of Glasgow.

The gentleman, whom called himself Lodur's Friend (in honour of the enigmatic god of the Eddaic Verses), was of eastern European ethnicity and was holding, according to Mirabello, a peculiar cane adorned with the images of the serpent and the ass, the two animals that speak in the bible. Both were examining occult books. The gentleman noticed that Mirabello was studying a book called the 'The Brotherhood of the Rosy Cross' by Arthur Edward Waite. During this encounter the gentleman pointed out that "The rose symbolizes secrecy" while pointing to an engraving in Mirabello's book on the Rosy Cross. The gentleman went on to say that "Since we speak sub rosa or 'under the rose', our discussion must remain forever secret." Several months passed before Mirabello saw the old man again, which occurred at the Atlantis Bookshop , an occult emporium near the British Museum in London, England. "Blind loyalty is a virtue in a dog, but it is an offense in a human being" declared the stranger, when he noticed Mirabello studying an obscure essay on faith.

Mirabello has stated that since he was interested in the stranger's knowledge they became friends and that they began to meet for dinner, usually in Edinburgh or London, at which time the stranger introduced him to a "circle of fascinating individuals". This gathering of friends for a meal (which only dined at night, during the time of the new moon), referred to itself as a conventicle, was by invitation only, and those that 'feared' or 'hated' authority were excluded. Mirabello states that those that 'laughed at' authority were welcome. The meals always adjourned before dawn.

Some years after the publication of Mirabello's book, the anonymous and privately printed Teachings of the Odin Brotherhood began to circulate. Copies of the latter are rare.

References

Mirabello, Mark. The Odin Brotherhood. 5th edition. Oxford, England, 2003. ISBN 1-869928-71-7
Storyteller, Ragnar. Odin's Return. Payson,Arizona, 1995.
Teachings of the Odin Brotherhood. Portland, no date.
Wodanson, Edred. Asatru-The Hidden Fortress. Parksville, BC, Canada, 2005.

External links

The Odin Brotherhood
Another 'Odin Brotherhood' website (South America)
Book review by Tyler Ferguson in Dagobert's Revenge
A radio interview on the Odin Brotherhood from the formerly Odin Lives! Radio station (now Nine Worlds Radio)
TinWiki article on the Odin Brotherhood

re: Chaos Magic term first used?

I'm afraid I can't help you. My involvement with the Peter J. Carroll page was limited to the removal of some obvious gibberish and non-encyclopedic content. From the look of the discussion page, the assertion that he coined the term remains unsourced. If someone doesn't come forward in a reasonable period of time, I'd pull the comment from that article. Good luck. Rossami (talk) 00:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RunicArmanenFutharkCirclecopyrightVictorOrdellLKasen.JPG listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:RunicArmanenFutharkCirclecopyrightVictorOrdellLKasen.JPG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. _JD^talk 22:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

Given your interests, you may want to join this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Neopaganism

There is a discussion on the Odin Brotherhood on their talk page.

--Tsmollet 03:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prod notice

I've placed a proposed deletion tag on the article Temple of Wotan (book), which you created. While contributions are appreciated, this article gives no indication why the book would pass the notability guidelines for books. If you do not agree with the proposed deletion, you may remove the proposed deletion tag and the article will not be deleted under the proposed deletion process. However, the article may subsequently be submitted to the articles for deletion process for a community decision on deletion. If you do not wish to contest the deletion, simply do nothing and the article will be deleted in five days. Seraphimblade 04:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandals Attack Again

Note they are now going after your article on McVan's book. Try saving your material at

http://www.paganwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page

They welcome new work! --Jkelley 23:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwig Straniak

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ludwig Straniak, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Ludwig Straniak. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess 23:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wendehorn

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! --Vox Causa 23:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Einstein plaigiarist?

The only people who believe Einstein is a plaigiarist are a small group of white supremacists and outspoken anti-Semites (most of which also happen to be Holocaust deniars). It is not a theory which has any standing in the non-crackpot community at all. It is not a notable POV to represent; the number of people who seriously advocate it can be counted on one hand. Their voice gets magnified with something like the internet, of course, but it is a small, fringe blip. To even discuss it at all on the Einstein page would give it undue weight under our NPOV policy. In any case we already have an article (Relativity priority dispute) which covers most of the bases and keeps it out of the main article. In any case, at least one of the links you listed doesn't even have anything to do with that — read the post-script on this one. --Fastfission 02:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:WewelsburgMosaic.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:WewelsburgMosaic.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Wewelsburg1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wewelsburg1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ahnenerbe class.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ahnenerbe class.gif. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wiligut1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wiligut1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SchwarzeSonneArtifacts.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:SchwarzeSonneArtifacts.JPG. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. Elembis 06:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Black Sun Rising (Odinist)

It's restored. No problem. I'd just recommend adding some assertion of notability or it's likely to get deleted again. Merry Christmas (if you don't do Christmas, then have a happy day). :) --Fang Aili ^talk 01:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you might be rather new to Wikipedia, so here's link to notability guidelines for companies: Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations). Cheers, Fang Aili ^talk 01:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've prod'd this article. Please add a notability assertion. Thanks! --Fang Aili ^talk 17:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Mead Hall

The Mead Hall has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Bowl store has also been proposed for deletion. You'll want to check out WP:WINAD for the relevant policy. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Höllental

Since you were the only author I'll write to you here, first there are some obvius mistakes, like the Schwarzwald being some totally unrelated hills in SW Germany, but it looks like the whole article is written on top of a mistake. The Höllental via ferrata is not known for List, I guess his "Großes Höllental" is somewhere else entirely. --Hurax 09:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my message to you on my talk page. We could try to improve the Höllental and v. List articles, Großes Höllental should probably be deleted since everything is wrong.--Hurax 07:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:BillHoffman.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:BillHoffman.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the wikipedia-article "Black sun"

Hello, I am not from Darmstadt but Salzgitter, Germany. Don`t bother to correct my English in the Wikipedia, when it`s not ok. It`s not my native language. I have stopped changing the german article about the Schwarze Sonne. It`s not possible to create a good article there. Greetings

Rename

As requested, I have renamed you. You can now log in using your new username. Warofdreams talk 23:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DIEsCHWARZEsONNEwEWELSBURG.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DIEsCHWARZEsONNEwEWELSBURG.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Bajuwarian (an ancient tribe) row graves (?), with weapons as burial objects, have been discovered near Freimehring, and in a big grave field called "Bachkramer" between St. Christoph and Steinhöring. From the last one came three decorative disks made of bronze, which are displayed together with other discoveries from the Haag region. Research and collection is not complete yet. For details call Robert Münch at +49-8027-8489. P.S. You should correct the new message link to your talk page, to link to your new username. --Hurax 16:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swastika

I removed your links on Swastika because the shape is almost definitely accidental; you haven't proved otherwise. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 21:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stara Basn

Hallo, ich denke mal dass du deutsch sprichst? Ich bin durch den Artikel über den Film Stara Basn auf deine Seite gekommen. Bin nicht bei Wikipedia registriert. Falls es dich interessiert, mit mir Kontakt aufzunehmen schreibe an skjoldsmoey@yahoo.no lg Kathi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.189.17.55 (talk) 17:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Sent you an email. Robert C Prenic 19:01, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guido von List Translation

The Großes Höllental (English: greater valley of Hell) is an area of the Höllental ("valley of Hell") of the Zugspitze.

Hurax, here are the pages. 19 (highlighted with a red box, I also think this mentinos the Rax?) (German wikipedia article) - this is page 19 of the book Der Wiederentdecker Uralter Arischer Weisheit and this page 523 is page 523 of the book Deutsch-Mythologische Landschaftsbilder. Please can you translate these for me please? I GREATLY appreciate your help on this. Also, in the second book, their is a chapter called 'Das Höllental' which is referred to I think in the second link above (523)? (Siehe Seite 469 ?) A few weeks ago you kindly "found the solution to your riddle here: [3] Ask if you need a translation. To put it short, the Großes Höllental is a small valley leading to the Rax, in Lower Austria in the easternmost end of the Alps, and has nothing to do with the Höllental which leads up to the Zugspitze. - so, if the second link does mention the Rax then this is what it is? I would like to get this perfect. If this is correct then it should be added to the list on the German article section called Einige Wanderungen und Steige Robert C Prenic 18:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red Box: "Once, the alpine majesties nearly kept the brave wanderer with them. During the descent from the Gaisloch (Rax) Guido v. List fell on the 8. May 1871. A mass of ice loosened beneath his feet and threw him into the depths. He was only saved because a cone of fresh snow harbored him. In rememberance of his rescue from mortal danger Guido v. List made a chain path (not sure how to translate that) be constucted, which was called "Guido-List-Steig" after him. "

2: Picture 73. Cf. page 469. Panorama of the Großes Höllental. On the place marked with "X", the author fell on may 8, 1871 and let a chain path be constructed out of his own expense, which was opened on June 21, 1871, under the name "Guido-List-Steig".

That's all.--Hurax 18:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes, suf.at. translation coming soon, sorry but i had no time in the last days. --Hurax 10:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gaislochsteig (Loswand): At first the Gaislochsteig was only secured by a steel rope erected by the ÖTK (donated by Mr. Türcke). The construction of the Steig (path/via ferrata) we owe to Mr. Guido List, who, on 8. May 1876 fell during a definitely perilous ascent attempt, past the rocks by a vertical altitude of more than 20m, without being hurt seriously. In thankful rememberance of that lucky fall he let the most dangerous places be secured with brackets and chains, out of his own expense. On the 28. 29. and 30. November 1870 [sic] 8 lumberjacks erected 300kg of chains across a length of 48 meters. Even earlier the Gaislochsteig was allegedly equipped with chains on the order of Archduke Johann. The wall, netted with water, is however subject to a constand process of destruction which repeatedly makes fortifies paths inaccessible by tearing out single strands of rock. A commemorative plaque remembers Franz Podgorski and Rudolf Stölzle who fell out of the walls of the Wilder Gaislochsteig in 1892. --Hurax 11:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freya Aswynn

Robert, Since you seem to have the most invested in the Freya Aswynn entry I'm writing to appeal to you to shape up the entry. As it stands it really should be nominated for deletion. It looks like all the information is coming directly from her site, which whether true or not is self promotion and not acceptable. Also, it seems that her real name is something like "Elizabeth Hooy-schuur", or at least so it is stated in the following article [4]. See also in the responses to this piece, below the article, that supposedly Freya uses a different spelling of this same name. Anyway, my point with all of that is that if she has a legal name then both should be mentioned. You could follow the protocol used for Edred Thorsson/Stephen Flowers. That is to say, Edred links to Flowers where the actual entry is. Either way, you need to specify that Freya Aswynn is a pseudonym if it is one. That's at least a start. If no materials other than those provided by her are available, the entry should be very specific about this as well. Freya claims ... etc. I hope that helps and I hope you can salvage the entry. Best.PelleSmith 23:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have no interest in this even though you created the page. I intend on nominating it for deletion. Have a good one.PelleSmith 02:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Freya Aswynn, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.

You were the only user that I could imagine may want to improve the entry, but you did not even respond to my message of over a week ago so perhaps you are not interested in improving the entry perhaps it cannot be improved. Thanks.PelleSmith 02:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have saved the Aswynn article at wiki pagan [[5]]

I now have sysop privileges at wiki pagan.--Tsmollet 23:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, but you missed the bit about child-porn. Link - WeniWidiWiki 23:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need Your Articles

Hello. I am an Odinist (in the Odin Brotherhood, Asatru Folk Assembly, and some other groups), I am re-starting the pagan.wiki. Wikipedia has become rather petrified, and I would like to make this branch wiki as comprehensive as possible.

I am interested in all your pagan articles--in particular the ones that have been deleted by vandals. Thanks!--Tsmollet 22:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Weaveworld"

Google has zero relevant hits for either of the searches "Weaveworld Porton Down" [6] or "Weaveworld UFO" [7]. If you want to assert that Porton Down is known as "Weaveworld", please cite reliable sources for this assertion, as is required by Wikipedia's verifiability policy. -- The Anome 07:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Onechectomy

I saw you are in the Animal Rights WP and was wondering if you are against Declawing animals or Onychectomy? The userbox is located at {{User:PatPeter/User nocatdeclaw}}

User:PatPeter/User nocatdeclaw

So just copy the title as you are viewing and put it with the {{ }} and w/o the [[ ]] to your userpage. -PatPeter 18:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced material in Germanic mysticism

Hello. As far as I can trace it back, it appears that the following passage was originally authored by yourself:

Ariosophy has been termed a theoretical precursor of the Nazi genocide.^{[citation needed]} However, the foremost expert on Guido von List in the English-speaking world, Stephen E. Flowers, refuses to connect the theories of List and other early 20th century rune magicians directly to the excesses of Auschwitz.^{[citation needed]} One German academic, Stefanie von Schnurbein (1992: 136), in commenting on Flowers' introduction to The Secret of the Runes, states:

Dabei erwähnt [Flowers] an keiner Stelle, daß List und die anderen Ariosophen Vordenker des Rassenwahns des Nationalsozialismus waren... (In this work [Flowers] nowhere mentions that List and the other Ariosophists were intellectual predecessors of the racial madness of National Socialism...)

Although it is now considered conventional wisdom that the ideas of List, Lanz and others were directly implemented in the Nazi genocide, Flowers states that this is “with little to no actual critical investigation”.^{[citation needed]} Because the very term “Ariosophy” was analogous to its predecessor, “Theosophy”, it has also been argued that the racial ideas in Ariosophy can be traced to Theosophy.^{[citation needed]} Flowers states that “no one has ever shown that racial policies of the NSDAP are based on so-called 'Ariosophical' ideas.”^{[citation needed]}

It has further been argued that even the writings of the most "extreme" of the Ariosophists, Lanz von Liebenfels, cannot be definitively linked to the applied anti-semitism of the Nazis. Apologists for Lanz state that he did not write unfavorably about the Jewish race,^{[citation needed]} that he cooperated with Jewish scholars in many of his publications,^{[citation needed]} and while it can be argued that individual Nazis became familiar with the mystical racism of Theosophy through the works of List and Lanz,^{[citation needed]} it does not necessarily follow that List and Lanz were culpable in the crimes of the Nazis.

This entire block was recently deleted from Germanic mysticism. I intend to put it back, suitably rewritten, and wondered if you could possibly fill in some of the missing citations, especially for Flowers? Please post it on my user talk page afterwards.

Thanking you in advance, Gnostrat 14:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:609px-Schwarze-sonne--black-sun--sonnenradsFYLFOTS.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:609px-Schwarze-sonne--black-sun--sonnenradsFYLFOTS.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. But|seriously|folks 22:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:SchwarzeSonneArtifacts.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:SchwarzeSonneArtifacts.JPG. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. But|seriously|folks 23:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Zierscheiben.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Zierscheiben.JPG. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. But|seriously|folks 00:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interested in Esotericism in Germany and Austria and Wikipedia:WikiProject Occult?

Hello Robert C Prenic,

I had noticed that you did not write anything on the talk page of Germanic mysticism, when we discussed the move to Ariosophy. I would have been interested in your opinion (and I hope that you would not have disagreed too strongly).

Anyway, I acknowledge that you have an interest in Esotericism in Germany. Whereas I will admit that my interest in Ariosophy is based on its connection to Nazism (whatever that may be), I also acknowledge that an interest in this field for esoteric reasons is legitimate. To deal with this topic, I have created the article Esotericism in Germany and Austria, with material from Nazi occultism. I wonder if you would be interested in expanding it, and if you like I would also invite you to join the WikiProject Occult.

Kind regards, Zara1709 14:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What Zara said. Your contributions would be really appreciated on Ariosophy too; the material we are now working with has largely grown from articles which you created or contributed to. As you can see, I've merged some of them but generally kept your material and expanded it. I am still hoping that you can supply some references for the Ariosophy-and-Nazism stuff that I posted here some weeks ago. Please feel free to add any sources which you may have on the Ariosophy talk page. Best, Gnostrat 22:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A short, important additional notice. Working on Ariosophy, I just read the article Guido-List-Bücherei. Some of the phrasing seemed weird, so I checked it out. One section of that article is actually copied from here or here. Before I flag that article I would like to give you the time for a comment. Zara1709 15:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Khalid Kelly

I've emailed you the latest edit using the email this user link. If you want the whole history, or want the article undeleted, I can do that because proposed deletions can be undone at any time. Graham87 11:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dodgy quote

Hi Rob - Sharon was a very nasty piece of work, and it's a great shame he'll never face justice for it. But the statement "Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it." ^[1] is disputed by CAMERA. However, we'd only trust a source that speaks of "Palestinian duplicity" when we trust one that spoke of "Jewish duplicity", so I don't really know whether to believe them! PR^talk 16:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFC: Speciesism on discrimination template

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Discrimination#RFC:_deciding_if_specieism_should_be_in_the_template

Hi I thought you might be interested in commenting on this request for comment. -- Librarianofages 03:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Catch

Hi, I came across The Catch (American football movie), and I wanted to let you know that the notability guidelines for films says that articles on future films can only be created when filming commences. This is due to the various factors that can halt a project before it enters production, such as the recent writers' strike that has affected a lot of projects. I am going to prod the article for deletion. If you wish, you can userfy the article and recreate it if filming on this project begins. Let me know if you have any questions! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 05:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thors Hammer Vodka

A tag has been placed on Thors Hammer Vodka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Awotter (talk) 00:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Milk

The edits you've made use non-credible sources, and the manner in which your edits were made are weasly. I'm removing them.Halogenated (talk) 17:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non credible sources? References to these statements are as follows:

MDC, 2004. Dairy facts and figures 2003. Compiled and published by the Milk Development Council, Cirencester, UK. Available from: http://www.dairyuk.org/pdf/MDC_DFactsFig_1612.pdf [Accessed July 26 2005].
Berry, E. Middleton, N., Gravenor, M. and Hillerton, E. 2003. Science (or art) of cell counting. Proceedings of the British Mastisis Conference (2003) Garstang. 73-83.
Dairy Products (Hygiene) Regulations 1995. Statutory Instrument 1995 No. 1086, London, HMSO.
Blowey, R. and Edmondson, P. 2000. Mastitis control in dairy herds. UK: Farming Press Books.
Grosvenor, C.E., Picciano, M.F. and Baumrucker C.R. 1992. Hormones and growth factors in milk. Endocrine Reviews. 14 (6) 710-28.
White Lies: The health consequences of consuming cow’s milk. by Dr Justine Butler, Professor T. Colin Campbell, PhD

(Jacob Gould Schurman Professor Emeritus of Nutritional Biochemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY), Professor Jane Plant CBE (DSc, CEng) Life Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine, Professor of Applied Geochemistry, Imperial College, London. Edited by: Juliet Gellatley BSc DipDM

Robert C Prenic (talk) 08:52, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Israel lobby in the United Kingdom

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Israel lobby in the United Kingdom, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 11:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello, Arthur Warrington Thomas. Concerning your contribution, Andy Chung, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.andychung.co.uk/biography.html. As a copyright violation, Andy Chung appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Andy Chung has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Andy Chung and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Andy Chung with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Andy Chung.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Sbowers3 (talk) 00:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Andy Chung

I am not the one who deleted Andy Chung - I merely marked it for someone else to delete it - so I cannot retrieve the text for you. You could ask User:Coredesat to retrieve the text for you but he might decline because the text was a copyright violation. The simplest thing for you would be to go to http://www.andychung.co.uk/biography.html which was the source of the text and use that as a source for writing a new article that does not copy word for word the other web site. Sbowers3 (talk) 15:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Gabriel

Hi Robert, I have restored the article into your user space, at:

User:Robert C Prenic/Mark Gabriel

If you think the article can be improved to the point where it is a viable Wikipedia article, you can do so in your userspace then move it to Mark Gabriel. Otherwise let me know when you are finished with it and I will delete it for you. Best, Gwernol 15:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, I intend to delete this page in the next 24 hours unless you are planning to make further use of it. Thanks, Gwernol 13:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guido-List-Bücherei Candidate for speedy deletion

Well, you have removed my previous comment on you talk page, and apparently you don't care about the topic any more, but I still want to inform you about this:

Hello, Arthur Warrington Thomas. Concerning your contribution, Guido-List-Bücherei, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://geocities.com/fjornpim/List/lifeoflist.htm or url=http://geocities.com/fnrswulf/lifeoflist.htm. As a copyright violation, Guido-List-Bücherei appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Guido-List-Bücherei has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Guido-List-Bücherei and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Guido-List-Bücherei with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Guido-List-Bücherei.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Zara1709 (talk) 13:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your name

I saw your quite long name, and wonder how it comes to this? Are you just doing it for fun? ;)

Btw: You should correct the typo in "all aDademic degrees". It looks a bit ironically when a person who claims to have all academic degrees does typos :D

Greetings, Tobenvontoben (talk) 11:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The X-Files peer review

As you're a top contributor to the X-Files article, I'd like to inform you that the article is currently undergoing a peer review. This is an effort to get the article up to featured article standards for an eventual FA nomination, in the hopes that it can be featured on Wikipedia's main page on or around the release date for the new X-Files movie entitled The X-Files: I Want to Believe. If you can, please take a look and offer input on improving the article. Thank you. Equazcion •✗/C • 18:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Myatt

Regarding your question to me about Myatt, please e-mail me via Wikipedia. Coolmoon (talk) 16:54, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Myatt

Re your question to me about Myatt - please e-mail me via Wikipedia. Coolmoon (talk) 16:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Khalid Kelly

Done - it's at User:Arthur Warrington Thomas/Khalid Kelly and you can freely edit it there. I've disabled the categories so they don't appear in the article namespace - remember to re-enable them when you move the article back. Graham87 08:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh by the way I fixed your new messages link that pointed to your old user talk page, and transferred the messages from your old talk page to here. Don't worry, I did the same thing as well. Graham87 08:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, I am just curious. Are you a Muslim? Why have you got the pictures of the Black & White Islamic flag and David Myatt.122.167.15.42 (talk)

to remind me to work on them

Notability of Andrea Minichiello Williams

A tag has been placed on Andrea Minichiello Williams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 13:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Lawyers’ Christian Fellowship

A tag has been placed on Lawyers’ Christian Fellowship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:JulietGellatley.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:JulietGellatley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Unicursalhex1.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Unicursalhex1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:RunicArmanenFutharkCirclecopyrightVictorOrdellLKasen.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:RunicArmanenFutharkCirclecopyrightVictorOrdellLKasen.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of apartheid deletion notification

Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning Allegations of Israeli apartheid. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, Allegations of apartheid, was recently nominated for deletion. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether Allegations of apartheid should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination). -- ChrisO (talk) 18:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^ Ariel Sharon on Israeli radio to Shimon Peres, as reported on the Kol Yisrael station (October 3, 2001) - PIA (2001) From a monitored news broadcast of Yid Israel radio. Oct. 3. and also reported in Pravda.

[1] Ariel Sharon on Israeli radio to Shimon Peres, as reported on the Kol Yisrael station (October 3, 2001) - PIA (2001) From a monitored news broadcast of Yid Israel radio. Oct. 3. and also reported in Pravda.

[1]